| Doc_id | Review | Left | Term | Right | Sentiment | Polarity | Rating | Contradiction-Based_MOY | Contradiction-Based_Ci |
| -4ffSHNYEeWIfhKr_WcYsQ | Has interesting ideas and approach to forming a structure way of analysing a problem. The module does feel a little thin in content, and perhaps should be combined with Exploratory Analysis. | does feel a little thin in | Content | and perhaps should be combined with | Positive | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.74 | 0.77 |
| -4ffSHNYEeWIfhKr_WcYsQ | content is not enough for one class. should be only one to two videos. | | Content | is not enough for one class. | Negative | -0.7 | 0.0 | 0.74 | 0.77 |
| -4ffSHNYEeWIfhKr_WcYsQ | Excellently designed course! I loved how the course content and assignments were designed and delivered. | course! I loved how the course | Content | and assignments were designed and delivered. | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.74 | 0.77 |
| -4ffSHNYEeWIfhKr_WcYsQ | I've already written a review but it seems to have been removed... This is an awful course, there is very little purpose to it whatsoever, it is basically a module in markdown which will in all honesty not have much application for most learners. In addition, the course is not at all balanced / laid out well, there is a peer assignment in week 1, which you need to have covered week 2's content for. Lastly, the recording quality of some of the lectures is awful, it is clear that they have simply used some recordings of an actual classroom session of a related course instead of recording for Coursera. In all honesty, this entire specialisation is of awful quality, it is not a data science course, it is a "here's a few useful things in R" course, and the instructors should be ashamed that their institution makes money from it. | need to have covered week 2's | Content | for. Lastly, the recording quality of | Negative | -0.7 | -1.0 | 0.74 | 0.77 |
| -4ffSHNYEeWIfhKr_WcYsQ | The content is good but the contents have a lot of overlap. The instructors are definitely knowledgeble about the material and clear about the presentation but a lot of the same matierial are repeated throughout the course unintentionally. Think the insturctors just thought it was enough to throw a bunch of things together and called it the day. | The | Content | is good but the contents have | Positive | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.74 | 0.77 |
| -4ffSHNYEeWIfhKr_WcYsQ | The content is good but the contents have a lot of overlap. The instructors are definitely knowledgeble about the material and clear about the presentation but a lot of the same matierial are repeated throughout the course unintentionally. Think the insturctors just thought it was enough to throw a bunch of things together and called it the day. | The content is good but the | Content | have a lot of overlap. The | Positive | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.74 | 0.77 |
| -4ffSHNYEeWIfhKr_WcYsQ | It's, for sure, a necessary content but don't feel like something that deserves to be on this specialization. Content is good. | It's, for sure, a necessary | Content | but don't feel like something that | Negative | -0.6 | 0.0 | 0.74 | 0.77 |
| -4ffSHNYEeWIfhKr_WcYsQ | It's, for sure, a necessary content but don't feel like something that deserves to be on this specialization. Content is good. | deserves to be on this specialization. | Content | is good. | Positive | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.74 | 0.77 |
| -A_ToPNPEeSAEiIAC9TCSQ | The professor has an immense amount of charisma and a concise way of breaking down concepts. The content material is short and to the point. These short lectures allow the student to even explore philosophies of economics in detail giving a big picture to what the issues at hand are with Law, Policy, and Climate Change. Great lectures, materials, discussions, and extremely effective Professor. Highly recommend. | way of breaking down concepts. The | Content | material is short and to the | Negative | -0.6 | 1.0 | 0.67 | 1.11 |
| -A_ToPNPEeSAEiIAC9TCSQ | The instructor was engaging, the content was interesting, and the structure held up very well as a self-paced course. | The instructor was engaging, the | Content | was interesting, and the structure held | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.67 | 1.11 |
| -A_ToPNPEeSAEiIAC9TCSQ | Great course. Really enjoyed this introduction to environmental law and policy. Many issues and concepts were covered and the professor delivered the content in a interesting and well structured manner. | covered and the professor delivered the | Content | in a interesting and well structured | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.67 | 1.11 |
| -A_ToPNPEeSAEiIAC9TCSQ | The contents of this lecture are profound and can review variety cases. I recommend this course to who works as lawyer and are interested in environmental dispute cases. | The | Content | of this lecture are profound and | Negative | -0.6 | 1.0 | 0.67 | 1.11 |
| -A_ToPNPEeSAEiIAC9TCSQ | I really liked this Course. Although I am not a lawyer and more environmental engineer, the professor explain different environmental law cases (Waste, Soil, Water, Air) in an easy-going manner. It was simple but very strong content! 100% recommendable!! | It was simple but very strong | Content | 100% recommendable! ! | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.67 | 1.11 |
| -A_ToPNPEeSAEiIAC9TCSQ | Excellent overview, interesting presenter (passionate about subject, knowledgeable and entertaining) and well organized in content. I would strongly recommend to anyone interested in environmental law. | and entertaining) and well organized in | Content | I would strongly recommend to anyone | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.67 | 1.11 |
| -A_ToPNPEeSAEiIAC9TCSQ | I thought the course was a fantastic introduction to environmental law and policy. I especially enjoyed the structure of each lesson (reading -> video) and the entire course. I thought the Prof did a great job of being enthusiastic and was mostly clear when explaining, analyzing and discussing each case. Perhaps, an aspect that could be improved in the future is to ask more in-video question to challenge the student to think critically while watching the videos. However, where there is most room for improvement is to have much better management of the discussion section. There was no authority answering any questions whatsoever, not content related nor operational. | authority answering any questions whatsoever, not | Content | related nor operational. | Negative | -0.6 | 0.5 | 0.67 | 1.11 |
| -Eu38u08EeSKeyIACwQXPg | I think people who have experience in studying science will take better advantage of this course but, in general, it has great content. | but, in general, it has great | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.73 | 1.09 |
| -Eu38u08EeSKeyIACwQXPg | For anyone that has lived with a dog, much of this content will be common knowledge. The value is the scientific and technical studies done to validate those assumptions. | with a dog, much of this | Content | will be common knowledge. The value | Negative | -0.6 | 0.5 | 0.73 | 1.09 |
| -Eu38u08EeSKeyIACwQXPg | Great course, just a little too much selling towards the end I felt. But top-notch videos, and interesting content for sure! | felt. But top-notch videos, and interesting | Content | for sure! | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.73 | 1.09 |
| -Eu38u08EeSKeyIACwQXPg | It was a great course for all dog lovers! The content was so interesting with types experiments and games to better understand our pet dogs. Also the scientific findings are so suprising for us to really know who our dogs are. Go through this, your dog-knowing journey will be wonderful!! | course for all dog lovers! The | Content | was so interesting with types experiments | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.73 | 1.09 |
| -Eu38u08EeSKeyIACwQXPg | What a wonderful class. I have found very few colleges that offer aclass in regards to animals, unless you're majoring as a vet. This class gives me the option to learn about my best friend (my dog) and how to apply my learned skills to better his life. The course content is easy to understand and exciting for an avid animal lover. Thank you Coursera, for changing how education is delivered. #rethinkcollege | to better his life. The course | Content | is easy to understand and exciting | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.73 | 1.09 |
| -Eu38u08EeSKeyIACwQXPg | I just do not feel a connection with this professor - he is constantly plugging his book and the website. The content is just not engaging. | his book and the website. The | Content | is just not engaging. | Negative | -0.6 | -1.0 | 0.73 | 1.09 |
| -Eu38u08EeSKeyIACwQXPg | Absolutely amazing course! Everything is explained really well and I loved the content! | really well and I loved the | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.73 | 1.09 |
| -Eu38u08EeSKeyIACwQXPg | Really interesting information about the evolution of dogs, their cognitive approach to problem solving and their relationship to humans. Just the tip of the iceberg but a great jumping off point to further understanding man's best friend. Content was presented in a way that was easy to follow and complete at your own pace. | to further understanding man's best friend. | Content | was presented in a way that | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.73 | 1.09 |
| -Eu38u08EeSKeyIACwQXPg | The content was interesting but the lectures could have been taped in a more engaging manner. | The | Content | was interesting but the lectures could | Negative | -0.6 | 0.5 | 0.73 | 1.09 |
| -Eu38u08EeSKeyIACwQXPg | I love some of the discussions in this course, and i think that students can be prompted to contribute even more. Perhaps make contributing to a discussion in each module an essential part of the course? The content is well-structured, going from a general overview of evolution to canine cognition. I would have liked to see it go even further, questioning the assumptions behind some of the recent research publications in this area instead of just including it in this course. A little more critical reasoning doesn't hurt. | essential part of the course? The | Content | is well-structured, going from a general | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.73 | 1.09 |
| -Y69EP9dEeSa0SIACyGBQw | Very well made, great contents. The only reason I removed a star is it seemed to me there was more topics in the quizes than in the course itself in the first part. It was a bit confusing and the quizes required to look up information on the internet and there was no real way to know these topics would be in the quizes. Otherwise, I enjoyed the class and learned a gread deal. | Very well made, great | Content | The only reason I removed a | Negative | -0.6 | 0.5 | 0.56 | 0.95 |
| -Y69EP9dEeSa0SIACyGBQw | Excellent course! The content is great in quality, quantity and structure!! 5 stars to that! However, I am giving 4 stars since passing the course or not depends mostly on Extension Exercises, which at the beginning seem to be optional but they in fact mandatory. | Excellent course! The | Content | is great in quality, quantity and | Positive | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.56 | 0.95 |
| -Y69EP9dEeSa0SIACyGBQw | This was truly and excellent introduction to systems engineering. The facilitators presented the course content in the simplest methodology, utilizing diagrams to aid comprehension. The exercises and extended-exercises gave an opportunity to apply the knowledge acquired to verify and validate complete understanding and application of the course materials. | engineering. The facilitators presented the course | Content | in the simplest methodology, utilizing diagrams | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.56 | 0.95 |
| -Y69EP9dEeSa0SIACyGBQw | Very good content and delivered in an effective manner. Lots of information and examples are quite valuable and not provided in the slides so I recommend everyone to have the handouts at hand when studying for the assignments and exams. | Very good | Content | and delivered in an effective manner. | Positive | 0.9 | 1.0 | 0.56 | 0.95 |
| 0aY3BdGZEeSX5iIAC4tS5g | This course is very well presented and the content has been made easy to follow through the use of simple succinct language and examples that are easy to relate to. An excellent place to start. | is very well presented and the | Content | has been made easy to follow | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 1.03 |
| 0aY3BdGZEeSX5iIAC4tS5g | Great course, easy to understand but profound in content! | easy to understand but profound in | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 1.03 |
| 0aY3BdGZEeSX5iIAC4tS5g | Great, engaging lecturer - Content was at the level described. Fantastic course! | Great, engaging lecturer - | Content | was at the level described. Fantastic | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 1.03 |
| 0aY3BdGZEeSX5iIAC4tS5g | Decent with space for improvement (a bit more content) | space for improvement (a bit more | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 1.03 |
| 0aY3BdGZEeSX5iIAC4tS5g | Very good for dummies in finance or pure techies. Can add a bit more content in IRR, ROI topics as we come across those quite often. Also these topics will help engineers with technical knowledge to understand the bigger picture of financial viability of the projects they handle. | techies. Can add a bit more | Content | in IRR, ROI topics as we | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 1.03 |
| 0aY3BdGZEeSX5iIAC4tS5g | Pretty hard to Keep track but the content was good. I probably need to be a bit more focussed next time. | hard to Keep track but the | Content | was good. I probably need to | Negative | -0.6 | -0.5 | 0.6 | 1.03 |
| 0aY3BdGZEeSX5iIAC4tS5g | It is a real good course with rich content for non-finance people. Good understanding and explanation of | a real good course with rich | Content | for non-finance people. Good understanding and | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 1.03 |
| 0aY3BdGZEeSX5iIAC4tS5g | I really liked this course beacuse of the content and who is teaching. | liked this course beacuse of the | Content | and who is teaching. | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 1.03 |
| 0aY3BdGZEeSX5iIAC4tS5g | As a nonfinancial person, I liked that it is a good clear intro finance. However, I wished there was more reading content available on the site to go more into depth on the topics. | I wished there was more reading | Content | available on the site to go | Negative | -0.6 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 1.03 |
| 1b9VUDu6EeWdUgozVKt3nw | 1- Almost no content , all just general knowledge 2- the instructor was very hard to follow, his intonation is totally off and the sentences are broken so you can't connect the thoughts together. 3- There was no forum and thus no interaction. | 1- Almost no | Content | , all just general knowledge 2- | Negative | -0.6 | -1.0 | 0.58 | 0.98 |
| 1b9VUDu6EeWdUgozVKt3nw | This course means well, but with very little critical thinking required, it ultimately communicates good intentions over solid content. | ultimately communicates good intentions over solid | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | -0.5 | 0.58 | 0.98 |
| 1b9VUDu6EeWdUgozVKt3nw | I have always loved the Coursera courses that I have taken, but this one is dramatically below the standard. It is lacking in terms of content, pedagogy, and production. I truly hope that this isn't the direction that Coursera is headed in, as this class seems more like a cheap self-help seminar than an academic course of study. | It is lacking in terms of | Content | pedagogy, and production. I truly hope | Negative | -0.6 | -1.0 | 0.58 | 0.98 |
| 1BM3lirjEeWLVg5w1LoYqQ | One thing I regret from this course is the content of the video lectures. Having watch the first week's videos, I found that the professor mostly just read the slides - and did it in a very faithful and careful manner, not to miss a subscript .... This is quite devastating for me. I can read the slides myself (although I have to download it first, since the fonts on the screen are very small). What I need is the professor to explain the logic behind the formulas, the *why* behind what is written, instead of just reading *what* is written on the slides. I find it amusing that with an expected learning of 8 hours a week, the total duration of the first week's videos add up to a mere 36 minutes. A couple of weeks ago I have just finished a course that subjectively is comparable in its difficulty level. That course is also rich in mathematical content and also requires a commitment of 4-8 hours per week. Each week, the duration of the lecture videos amount to somewhere between 120-150 minutes - and the lecturer didn't read slides; instead, he would explain the logic behind the concepts and provided papers for learners to read on our own time. That approach really helped scaffold my learning. I hope you'd consider revisiting this course's learning plan - or probably just state on the course info page that this course is more suitable for a refresher course rather than an introductory one. | regret from this course is the | Content | of the video lectures. Having watch | Negative | -0.6 | -0.5 | 0.92 | 0.94 |
| 1BM3lirjEeWLVg5w1LoYqQ | One thing I regret from this course is the content of the video lectures. Having watch the first week's videos, I found that the professor mostly just read the slides - and did it in a very faithful and careful manner, not to miss a subscript .... This is quite devastating for me. I can read the slides myself (although I have to download it first, since the fonts on the screen are very small). What I need is the professor to explain the logic behind the formulas, the *why* behind what is written, instead of just reading *what* is written on the slides. I find it amusing that with an expected learning of 8 hours a week, the total duration of the first week's videos add up to a mere 36 minutes. A couple of weeks ago I have just finished a course that subjectively is comparable in its difficulty level. That course is also rich in mathematical content and also requires a commitment of 4-8 hours per week. Each week, the duration of the lecture videos amount to somewhere between 120-150 minutes - and the lecturer didn't read slides; instead, he would explain the logic behind the concepts and provided papers for learners to read on our own time. That approach really helped scaffold my learning. I hope you'd consider revisiting this course's learning plan - or probably just state on the course info page that this course is more suitable for a refresher course rather than an introductory one. | course is also rich in mathematical | Content | and also requires a commitment of | Positive | 0.7 | -0.5 | 0.92 | 0.94 |
| 1BM3lirjEeWLVg5w1LoYqQ | solid content and dedicated teach staff! | solid | Content | and dedicated teach staff! | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.92 | 0.94 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | Terrible course compared to all others I've seen on Coursera. Content is scarce, quality is low, maybe okay for college graduates, but being in business, it's just too slim. Video quality is also terrible. Don't waste 35$ | all others I've seen on Coursera. | Content | is scarce, quality is low, maybe | Positive | 0.6 | -1.0 | 0.87 | 1.02 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | This course would be much better if there was some actual substantive content. This course was not worth 35$. | if there was some actual substantive | Content | This course was not worth 35$. | Negative | -0.6 | -1.0 | 0.87 | 1.02 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | Most of the content was already known to me, and in my opinion it scratches at most the surface. also it only contains round about a 100 minutes which is not that much. | Most of the | Content | was already known to me, and | Negative | -0.6 | -0.5 | 0.87 | 1.02 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | great content, easy to follow. good examples. hit the spot! | great | Content | easy to follow. good examples. hit | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.87 | 1.02 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | Loved it. All content was new to me. Super useful. Best teacher ever. I reccommend it 100%! | Loved it. All | Content | was new to me. Super useful. | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.87 | 1.02 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | great content. learnt about strategic reserve times, and other practical tips. if only I could see my quiz results for free | great | Content | learnt about strategic reserve times, and | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.87 | 1.02 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | I liked the content and the way it was presented. However it was a shame that I was not able to get feedback on my test since I took the free course | I liked the | Content | and the way it was presented. | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.87 | 1.02 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | A very very helpful course. It made me realizing where did I lag. Going to opt for Specialization as I am highly impressed by the content of this Course. | I am highly impressed by the | Content | of this Course. | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.87 | 1.02 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | Got some new ideas to try out. Good content | new ideas to try out. Good | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.87 | 1.02 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | This course helps me a lot in my life, however it takes discipline to apply its content on your daily life. Thank you very much for your effort, Coursera! | it takes discipline to apply its | Content | on your daily life. Thank you | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.87 | 1.02 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | It is too basic content, I can't imagine an specialization with material that basic. | It is too basic | Content | I can't imagine an specialization with | Negative | -0.7 | -0.5 | 0.87 | 1.02 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | I thoroughly enjoyed this course...the content was exceptional...well done to everyone involved | enjoyed this course. . . the | Content | was exceptional. . . well done | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.87 | 1.02 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | good and useful content but some problems in vids | good and useful | Content | but some problems in vids | Positive | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.87 | 1.02 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | I liked the content which Coursera provided in this course. Also the mentor was very impressive. Her voice and her way of delivering the lecture was amazing. The examples given in the course were very helping. | I liked the | Content | which Coursera provided in this course. | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.87 | 1.02 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | Good course!!! Need more contents!!! | Good course! ! ! Need more | Content | ! ! | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.87 | 1.02 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | The teacher seems really nice and explains things really clearly, however the content of this course is not as helpful as I believed. It gave me a few new techniques to better administrate my time, but nothing that will revolutionize the way I work. | explains things really clearly, however the | Content | of this course is not as | Negative | -0.7 | 0.0 | 0.87 | 1.02 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | I dont recommend this course to anyone. The course content is not up-to-the mark. | this course to anyone. The course | Content | is not up-to-the mark. | Negative | -0.6 | -1.0 | 0.87 | 1.02 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | An excellent presentation with concise contents | An excellent presentation with concise | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.87 | 1.02 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | Good curse. The issue is that it was way way too short, and I felt its content is the equivalent of a week, and that more could be said about it. Again, otherwise, good course. | too short, and I felt its | Content | is the equivalent of a week, | Negative | -0.6 | 0.5 | 0.87 | 1.02 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | This course offers very useful tools and topics that would lead you to improve your time management and at the same time introduce you to a more productive work environment. It is a bit short and I think that it could go deeper on its content, offering other tools in time tracking and visualization. I definitely recommend this course. | it could go deeper on its | Content | offering other tools in time tracking | Negative | -0.7 | 0.5 | 0.87 | 1.02 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | Good content, but not the best. Need to improve Vietnamese subtitles! | Good | Content | but not the best. Need to | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.87 | 1.02 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | It's a good course, very easy to understand and practical content | very easy to understand and practical | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.87 | 1.02 |
| 2dHcFsRdEeW2JxKnR3RyOw | Really good content and the teacher is one of the best in Coursera. This is for many people a difficult subject that is made easy to digest. Looking forward to more courses from the same Teacher | Really good | Content | and the teacher is one of | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.77 | 0.98 |
| 2dHcFsRdEeW2JxKnR3RyOw | Very mixed feelings about this course. Generally speaking, the course lectures are informative and well organized. Mentors are reallly of great help, they are doing a great job, honestly: they are very active, they give good insights, they know the subject matter. But in the course lectures, there are occasions where concepts are used which were not formally introduced before their actual use. One example: in the lectures on probability, the first "slide" in the lecture talks about random processes, outcomes of random process,... On the next slide, the notion of probability of an event is introduced, but the very notion of "event" was never introduced. It is introduced in the accompanying book, but if it is the case that the book chapters should be read PRIOR to watching the course videos, that fact should be made clear. Further in the course on probability, some words are used "interchangeably" without the context making it clear why they can be used interchangeably. For instance, on some occasions, the concept of independent events is used, but then, later on, the discussion talks of independent processes. Which is which??? Is there a difference? If so, what is it? When do I need to use independent events as opposed to independent processes? The graded assignments are of varying quality. The most disturbing thing about them is that, on some occasions, concepts are used in the quiz questions (either directly in the questions and answer choices, or indirectly in the "correction" for the quiz after you have submitted it) that were never touched upon in the course. I have had two occasions of concepts not introduced in the course but used in the graded assignments. The first occurrence of a gap between course content and quiz questions was on a quiz question about inference. I failed the question, and understood why I failed based on the course content litterally minutes after failing the question (and one mentor actually rightly corrected me). But the question "correction" (the explanation text you receive after submitting, as justification for what the correct answer is) referred to the concept of "two-sided hypothesis test". Where did THAT come from?? I checked and rechecked the course videos, no mention at all of it. I checked the accompanying book, and the first mention of two-sided hypothesis test is way way way further in the book, in a chapter that is entirely focusing on inference. The second occurrence was in week 4. The course lectures cover two distributions: normal and binomial. The recommended reading in the book also focus on these two distributions (the recommended reading actually skips the section on geometric distribution, if I remember well). But in one of the quiz question, there was one of the possible answers referring to the geometric distribution. If it is the case that we are supposed to know and understand about geometric distributions, then the course content should cover the subject. Or at the very least, the course lecture should mention clearly that learners are advised to read about it in the accompanying book. The guidelines for the project assignment (week 5) are not all that clear as to what is expected from the learners. Sure, there are instructions on where to find the info, what structure should be followed,... There is also a very nice "example" project (designed by one of the mentors), which provides a lot of useful info (how to filter missing values from variables,...). But there is no real hint as to the depth of analysis we are expected to complete. This is definitely a source of confusion, not only for me, but also for a few other learners, from what I gathered in the discussion forums. The result is that the projects you get to review are of very disparate levels. Some end up in calculating one figure per research question, without any attempt at deriving trends or patterns, others do not include any plots at all,... The thing is that the peer review criteria do not really provide a good basis to ensure that learners did indeed assimilate the course contents. Most of the questions in the peer review assignment have a lot more to do with following a canvas and not so much with the course substance itself. For instance, some of the peer review criteria have to do with the narratives for computed statistics and plots. The criteria are: "Is each plot/R outout followed by a narrative", "Does the narrative correctly interpret the plots, or statistics", "Does the narrative address the research question". But when the research question is a question of the type "What it the IQR for income per state", for instance, the narrative can be very short: "IQR per state shows that the state with higher variability of income is...". So, the narrative meets the 3 evaluation criteria: there is a narrative, it does address the research question, and it does correctly interpret the statistics. But it is not particularly useful. I do understand that Internet-based peer review is challenging, and that you have to settle for "neutral" criteria that are easy to assess by learners. But the peer review grading "grid" as it currently stands is not "that" helpful in assessing whether the course contents has been assimilated. To conclude, when I took the course, my initial plan was to follow the entire specialization. But after having completed the first course of the specialization, I have radically changed my mind, and will look for alternatives "elsewhere" to get the knowledge/skillset that I am after. | I failed based on the course | Content | litterally minutes after failing the question | Negative | -0.7 | 0.0 | 0.77 | 0.98 |
| 2dHcFsRdEeW2JxKnR3RyOw | Very mixed feelings about this course. Generally speaking, the course lectures are informative and well organized. Mentors are reallly of great help, they are doing a great job, honestly: they are very active, they give good insights, they know the subject matter. But in the course lectures, there are occasions where concepts are used which were not formally introduced before their actual use. One example: in the lectures on probability, the first "slide" in the lecture talks about random processes, outcomes of random process,... On the next slide, the notion of probability of an event is introduced, but the very notion of "event" was never introduced. It is introduced in the accompanying book, but if it is the case that the book chapters should be read PRIOR to watching the course videos, that fact should be made clear. Further in the course on probability, some words are used "interchangeably" without the context making it clear why they can be used interchangeably. For instance, on some occasions, the concept of independent events is used, but then, later on, the discussion talks of independent processes. Which is which??? Is there a difference? If so, what is it? When do I need to use independent events as opposed to independent processes? The graded assignments are of varying quality. The most disturbing thing about them is that, on some occasions, concepts are used in the quiz questions (either directly in the questions and answer choices, or indirectly in the "correction" for the quiz after you have submitted it) that were never touched upon in the course. I have had two occasions of concepts not introduced in the course but used in the graded assignments. The first occurrence of a gap between course content and quiz questions was on a quiz question about inference. I failed the question, and understood why I failed based on the course content litterally minutes after failing the question (and one mentor actually rightly corrected me). But the question "correction" (the explanation text you receive after submitting, as justification for what the correct answer is) referred to the concept of "two-sided hypothesis test". Where did THAT come from?? I checked and rechecked the course videos, no mention at all of it. I checked the accompanying book, and the first mention of two-sided hypothesis test is way way way further in the book, in a chapter that is entirely focusing on inference. The second occurrence was in week 4. The course lectures cover two distributions: normal and binomial. The recommended reading in the book also focus on these two distributions (the recommended reading actually skips the section on geometric distribution, if I remember well). But in one of the quiz question, there was one of the possible answers referring to the geometric distribution. If it is the case that we are supposed to know and understand about geometric distributions, then the course content should cover the subject. Or at the very least, the course lecture should mention clearly that learners are advised to read about it in the accompanying book. The guidelines for the project assignment (week 5) are not all that clear as to what is expected from the learners. Sure, there are instructions on where to find the info, what structure should be followed,... There is also a very nice "example" project (designed by one of the mentors), which provides a lot of useful info (how to filter missing values from variables,...). But there is no real hint as to the depth of analysis we are expected to complete. This is definitely a source of confusion, not only for me, but also for a few other learners, from what I gathered in the discussion forums. The result is that the projects you get to review are of very disparate levels. Some end up in calculating one figure per research question, without any attempt at deriving trends or patterns, others do not include any plots at all,... The thing is that the peer review criteria do not really provide a good basis to ensure that learners did indeed assimilate the course contents. Most of the questions in the peer review assignment have a lot more to do with following a canvas and not so much with the course substance itself. For instance, some of the peer review criteria have to do with the narratives for computed statistics and plots. The criteria are: "Is each plot/R outout followed by a narrative", "Does the narrative correctly interpret the plots, or statistics", "Does the narrative address the research question". But when the research question is a question of the type "What it the IQR for income per state", for instance, the narrative can be very short: "IQR per state shows that the state with higher variability of income is...". So, the narrative meets the 3 evaluation criteria: there is a narrative, it does address the research question, and it does correctly interpret the statistics. But it is not particularly useful. I do understand that Internet-based peer review is challenging, and that you have to settle for "neutral" criteria that are easy to assess by learners. But the peer review grading "grid" as it currently stands is not "that" helpful in assessing whether the course contents has been assimilated. To conclude, when I took the course, my initial plan was to follow the entire specialization. But after having completed the first course of the specialization, I have radically changed my mind, and will look for alternatives "elsewhere" to get the knowledge/skillset that I am after. | about geometric distributions, then the course | Content | should cover the subject. Or at | Negative | -0.6 | 0.0 | 0.77 | 0.98 |
| 2dHcFsRdEeW2JxKnR3RyOw | Very mixed feelings about this course. Generally speaking, the course lectures are informative and well organized. Mentors are reallly of great help, they are doing a great job, honestly: they are very active, they give good insights, they know the subject matter. But in the course lectures, there are occasions where concepts are used which were not formally introduced before their actual use. One example: in the lectures on probability, the first "slide" in the lecture talks about random processes, outcomes of random process,... On the next slide, the notion of probability of an event is introduced, but the very notion of "event" was never introduced. It is introduced in the accompanying book, but if it is the case that the book chapters should be read PRIOR to watching the course videos, that fact should be made clear. Further in the course on probability, some words are used "interchangeably" without the context making it clear why they can be used interchangeably. For instance, on some occasions, the concept of independent events is used, but then, later on, the discussion talks of independent processes. Which is which??? Is there a difference? If so, what is it? When do I need to use independent events as opposed to independent processes? The graded assignments are of varying quality. The most disturbing thing about them is that, on some occasions, concepts are used in the quiz questions (either directly in the questions and answer choices, or indirectly in the "correction" for the quiz after you have submitted it) that were never touched upon in the course. I have had two occasions of concepts not introduced in the course but used in the graded assignments. The first occurrence of a gap between course content and quiz questions was on a quiz question about inference. I failed the question, and understood why I failed based on the course content litterally minutes after failing the question (and one mentor actually rightly corrected me). But the question "correction" (the explanation text you receive after submitting, as justification for what the correct answer is) referred to the concept of "two-sided hypothesis test". Where did THAT come from?? I checked and rechecked the course videos, no mention at all of it. I checked the accompanying book, and the first mention of two-sided hypothesis test is way way way further in the book, in a chapter that is entirely focusing on inference. The second occurrence was in week 4. The course lectures cover two distributions: normal and binomial. The recommended reading in the book also focus on these two distributions (the recommended reading actually skips the section on geometric distribution, if I remember well). But in one of the quiz question, there was one of the possible answers referring to the geometric distribution. If it is the case that we are supposed to know and understand about geometric distributions, then the course content should cover the subject. Or at the very least, the course lecture should mention clearly that learners are advised to read about it in the accompanying book. The guidelines for the project assignment (week 5) are not all that clear as to what is expected from the learners. Sure, there are instructions on where to find the info, what structure should be followed,... There is also a very nice "example" project (designed by one of the mentors), which provides a lot of useful info (how to filter missing values from variables,...). But there is no real hint as to the depth of analysis we are expected to complete. This is definitely a source of confusion, not only for me, but also for a few other learners, from what I gathered in the discussion forums. The result is that the projects you get to review are of very disparate levels. Some end up in calculating one figure per research question, without any attempt at deriving trends or patterns, others do not include any plots at all,... The thing is that the peer review criteria do not really provide a good basis to ensure that learners did indeed assimilate the course contents. Most of the questions in the peer review assignment have a lot more to do with following a canvas and not so much with the course substance itself. For instance, some of the peer review criteria have to do with the narratives for computed statistics and plots. The criteria are: "Is each plot/R outout followed by a narrative", "Does the narrative correctly interpret the plots, or statistics", "Does the narrative address the research question". But when the research question is a question of the type "What it the IQR for income per state", for instance, the narrative can be very short: "IQR per state shows that the state with higher variability of income is...". So, the narrative meets the 3 evaluation criteria: there is a narrative, it does address the research question, and it does correctly interpret the statistics. But it is not particularly useful. I do understand that Internet-based peer review is challenging, and that you have to settle for "neutral" criteria that are easy to assess by learners. But the peer review grading "grid" as it currently stands is not "that" helpful in assessing whether the course contents has been assimilated. To conclude, when I took the course, my initial plan was to follow the entire specialization. But after having completed the first course of the specialization, I have radically changed my mind, and will look for alternatives "elsewhere" to get the knowledge/skillset that I am after. | learners did indeed assimilate the course | Content | Most of the questions in the | Positive | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.77 | 0.98 |
| 2dHcFsRdEeW2JxKnR3RyOw | Very mixed feelings about this course. Generally speaking, the course lectures are informative and well organized. Mentors are reallly of great help, they are doing a great job, honestly: they are very active, they give good insights, they know the subject matter. But in the course lectures, there are occasions where concepts are used which were not formally introduced before their actual use. One example: in the lectures on probability, the first "slide" in the lecture talks about random processes, outcomes of random process,... On the next slide, the notion of probability of an event is introduced, but the very notion of "event" was never introduced. It is introduced in the accompanying book, but if it is the case that the book chapters should be read PRIOR to watching the course videos, that fact should be made clear. Further in the course on probability, some words are used "interchangeably" without the context making it clear why they can be used interchangeably. For instance, on some occasions, the concept of independent events is used, but then, later on, the discussion talks of independent processes. Which is which??? Is there a difference? If so, what is it? When do I need to use independent events as opposed to independent processes? The graded assignments are of varying quality. The most disturbing thing about them is that, on some occasions, concepts are used in the quiz questions (either directly in the questions and answer choices, or indirectly in the "correction" for the quiz after you have submitted it) that were never touched upon in the course. I have had two occasions of concepts not introduced in the course but used in the graded assignments. The first occurrence of a gap between course content and quiz questions was on a quiz question about inference. I failed the question, and understood why I failed based on the course content litterally minutes after failing the question (and one mentor actually rightly corrected me). But the question "correction" (the explanation text you receive after submitting, as justification for what the correct answer is) referred to the concept of "two-sided hypothesis test". Where did THAT come from?? I checked and rechecked the course videos, no mention at all of it. I checked the accompanying book, and the first mention of two-sided hypothesis test is way way way further in the book, in a chapter that is entirely focusing on inference. The second occurrence was in week 4. The course lectures cover two distributions: normal and binomial. The recommended reading in the book also focus on these two distributions (the recommended reading actually skips the section on geometric distribution, if I remember well). But in one of the quiz question, there was one of the possible answers referring to the geometric distribution. If it is the case that we are supposed to know and understand about geometric distributions, then the course content should cover the subject. Or at the very least, the course lecture should mention clearly that learners are advised to read about it in the accompanying book. The guidelines for the project assignment (week 5) are not all that clear as to what is expected from the learners. Sure, there are instructions on where to find the info, what structure should be followed,... There is also a very nice "example" project (designed by one of the mentors), which provides a lot of useful info (how to filter missing values from variables,...). But there is no real hint as to the depth of analysis we are expected to complete. This is definitely a source of confusion, not only for me, but also for a few other learners, from what I gathered in the discussion forums. The result is that the projects you get to review are of very disparate levels. Some end up in calculating one figure per research question, without any attempt at deriving trends or patterns, others do not include any plots at all,... The thing is that the peer review criteria do not really provide a good basis to ensure that learners did indeed assimilate the course contents. Most of the questions in the peer review assignment have a lot more to do with following a canvas and not so much with the course substance itself. For instance, some of the peer review criteria have to do with the narratives for computed statistics and plots. The criteria are: "Is each plot/R outout followed by a narrative", "Does the narrative correctly interpret the plots, or statistics", "Does the narrative address the research question". But when the research question is a question of the type "What it the IQR for income per state", for instance, the narrative can be very short: "IQR per state shows that the state with higher variability of income is...". So, the narrative meets the 3 evaluation criteria: there is a narrative, it does address the research question, and it does correctly interpret the statistics. But it is not particularly useful. I do understand that Internet-based peer review is challenging, and that you have to settle for "neutral" criteria that are easy to assess by learners. But the peer review grading "grid" as it currently stands is not "that" helpful in assessing whether the course contents has been assimilated. To conclude, when I took the course, my initial plan was to follow the entire specialization. But after having completed the first course of the specialization, I have radically changed my mind, and will look for alternatives "elsewhere" to get the knowledge/skillset that I am after. | helpful in assessing whether the course | Content | has been assimilated. To conclude, when | Negative | -0.6 | 0.0 | 0.77 | 0.98 |
| 2dHcFsRdEeW2JxKnR3RyOw | Solid and efficient introduction to content, does not do enough teaching in R for the final project - which is *fine* because finding things out for yourself is the best way to learn, but R help online is often so dense that it's not that helpful to a beginner. More responsive mentors - especially nearer the end of the course - would be really helpful. | Solid and efficient introduction to | Content | does not do enough teaching in | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.77 | 0.98 |
| 2dHcFsRdEeW2JxKnR3RyOw | I really liked this course. The course comprises of lectures, which are clear and are rich in examples, and of practical assignments, which you do in R. The practical tasks is where the course shines - everything is explained very clearly, there is a lot of content, and the course works with databases that are huge (thousands of cases and hundreds of variables) and have some of the more common problems (eg. missing data). I have little to no prior programming experience, just for the record. Mind you, this is an introductory course, as the name states, so don't expect to be a master of R or data handling after finishing it, but I feel I learned a lot here. | clearly, there is a lot of | Content | and the course works with databases | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.77 | 0.98 |
| 2dHcFsRdEeW2JxKnR3RyOw | This course is definitly suitable for learners who don't have any related background. Dr. Mine Cetinkaya-Rundel has an amiable speaking style and always highlighted the key points in teaching videos, which helped me understand other contents in the textbook. Besides, the time and assignment arrangement of this course are also very reasonable. The only thing I could complain about is a system bug of the Amazon AWS and the grading system. My final project file went blank after the system told me the file uploading is sucessfully completed on August 3, and I got three 0 point from three peers since they only saw a blank file, of which I had no idea, and all I could see is "Grading in progress" on the system. Until the final grading day is over, which is August 12, the system finally reminded me of this horrible thing. I came to mentors, disscussion forum as well as the help center, reuploaded my file, desperately tried to find peers who can still spare some time to review my file, and it is finally fixed today. I got my certificate in the end, but the grading process is really frustrating. Hope this bug won't happen to anyone ever ag | videos, which helped me understand other | Content | in the textbook. Besides, the time | Negative | -0.6 | 1.0 | 0.77 | 0.98 |
| 2dHcFsRdEeW2JxKnR3RyOw | One of the well made MOOCs. There are many courses in Coursera taught by good professors from good universities but are badly designed for an MOOC environment making it a bad experience. This course is really well designed. The contents is modular and lectures are split into easy to grasp chunks. The weekly lab exercises using R using real datasets is a plus. Though not much of R syntax is taught and it is up to us to explore(understandable since the goal of this course is not to teach R). The final project was a bit challenging but fun. The course 'mentors' are helpful. | course is really well designed. The | Content | is modular and lectures are split | Negative | -0.6 | 1.0 | 0.77 | 0.98 |
| 2dHcFsRdEeW2JxKnR3RyOw | Excellent content - Also greatly helped improve my R programming skills | Excellent | Content | - Also greatly helped improve my | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.77 | 0.98 |
| 2dHcFsRdEeW2JxKnR3RyOw | The content of this course is not terribly difficult, I thought, but it's a very good introduction into most aspects of Data Science. You learn to familiarize yourself with R quite well and get a lot of independence to create a final project based on a huge data set. One thing I would've liked is a sample completed project, start to finish, to see what was expected- the things that got produced (which you peer review) varied hugely in quality. | The | Content | of this course is not terribly | Negative | -0.7 | 0.5 | 0.77 | 0.98 |
| 2dHcFsRdEeW2JxKnR3RyOw | Great course - content and presentation are awesome! I am a digital marketer with nearly 8 years of experience. I am looking forward to develop my analytics skills which will help me to deep dive further in to consumer data and I think this course is just what I needed. Really helpful! | Great course - | Content | and presentation are awesome! I am | Positive | 0.9 | 1.0 | 0.77 | 0.98 |
| 2dHcFsRdEeW2JxKnR3RyOw | This course was excellent, the teaching material top-notch and with excellent pedagogy. It's amazing that the course authors offer a statistics textbook almost exactly covering the course content for free. The idea to combine R and statistics is right on the money too, thanks to this one can learn 2 skills at the same time, with statistical analysis letting you practice coding in R and R helping you visualise your statistics. The lectures are divided into small, easy to absorb chunks and the teacher does an excellent job explaining the material, giving very good examples and analogies to help the students understand concepts. The exercises and assignments are fun to complete, and the course offers a flexibility in how much time you spend on it per week, e.g. there are non-mandatory exercises to do. | textbook almost exactly covering the course | Content | for free. The idea to combine | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.77 | 0.98 |
| 2dHcFsRdEeW2JxKnR3RyOw | Very informational, really good speed and content. Nice examples to illustrate the learnings. | Very informational, really good speed and | Content | Nice examples to illustrate the learnings. | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.77 | 0.98 |
| 2dHcFsRdEeW2JxKnR3RyOw | The content is very well structured, the explanations are clear and full of useful examples. Some concepts were a bit difficult to grasp and required reviewing outside the material of the course. In general, excellent. | The | Content | is very well structured, the explanations | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.77 | 0.98 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | A great course of beginers in game development. The content is clear and concise. Brian has a good command over the topics. | of beginers in game development. The | Content | is clear and concise. Brian has | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.39 | 0.98 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | I totally enjoyed the course. Very well structured and organized. Contents are clear and relevant. I learned a lot. Great opportunity for beginners! | course. Very well structured and organized. | Content | are clear and relevant. I learned | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.39 | 0.98 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | Great lecturer, easy to understanding and extra content to explore more of the course. Give it a 5 star! | lecturer, easy to understanding and extra | Content | to explore more of the course. | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.39 | 0.98 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | Brian Winn is an astoundingly good teacher, and has leveraged a huge amount of professional knowledge to pour his heart into what is arguably the best $400 I've ever spent in my life. This teaching/learning format is inordinately effective, and I'm 100% looking forward to course 2, 3, 4, and the capstone. Thank you for going above and beyond in creating a truly fantastic learning environment, syllabus, and a plethora of wonderful content. | syllabus, and a plethora of wonderful | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.39 | 0.98 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | Very basic introduction. Though it covers all the needed information it lacks of interesting content. | needed information it lacks of interesting | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.39 | 0.98 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | Great course for introduce. Review the content of the four week. | Great course for introduce. Review the | Content | of the four week. | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.39 | 0.98 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | A nice introduction to Game Development. The content is great and it doesn't overextend to the point of scaring you off game dev. I would give this course 5 stars if it had a little more spice. Everything in the course felt too scripted. I would suggest doing some fun live sessions on the side or something to let us know we're not being taught by robots. | nice introduction to Game Development. The | Content | is great and it doesn't overextend | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.39 | 0.98 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | Excellent video content and quality, engaging assignments and helpful resources. | Excellent video | Content | and quality, engaging assignments and helpful | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.39 | 0.98 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | Love the projects and classes!, but i was expecting more interaction with the teacher due that we found some bugs in the content , we were able to solved using the forum, but i was expecting that the teacher step up | we found some bugs in the | Content | , we were able to solved | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.39 | 0.98 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | Interesting and useful course, easy to follow and full of contents | easy to follow and full of | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.39 | 0.98 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | Good course, I learned a lot about Unity. However, I feel that it does not promote investigation by ourselves. Basically, the videos are the steps we need to do to complete one half of the assignment, and the other half is just about repeating those steps we were shown. Also, I expected a bit more depth in the scripts week, but I understand it's hard to add a lot of content for just a week. The course is still good, but maybe too easy. | hard to add a lot of | Content | for just a week. The course | Negative | -0.6 | 0.5 | 0.39 | 0.98 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | This course is very good at explaining both how and why you would do things a certain way in Unity, something that is missing from most of the tutorials you can find out on the Internet. The professor explains concepts behind why you need to use certain components instead of just giving a list of things to match up to replicate the projects. I've rated it 4 out of 5 stars not based on the content, but because the response time, interaction, and feedback could be improved upon. The content is definitely 5 of 5. I took this during the first run of the course, so I'm sure that the course staff will improve on this in the future once they get a bit more used to running a MOOC on Coursera. | feedback could be improved upon. The | Content | is definitely 5 of 5. I | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.39 | 0.98 |
| 2UHGXkNtEeSfwCIACxeXRw | I had a lot of fun learning with Dr SEVERANCE, the content of the course effectively covers the three topics of History, Technology and Security, is nicely organized, and very accessible for someone without a scientific background. | fun learning with Dr SEVERANCE, the | Content | of the course effectively covers the | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.37 | 1.18 |
| 2UHGXkNtEeSfwCIACxeXRw | I am an English language professor. I took this course for "fun"--my BA minor was in history and I am a curious person. I love this course and Dr. Chuck! The way he explains things is "IN ENGLISH!!" I mean that the way he explains things makes sense to a non-literate IT person. In addition, the content is both interesting and informative. The structure of the course is easy to follow. I have taken a few courses where I was not sure what I was supposed to do next, but not in this course. Frankly, I prefer a course where I take quizzes. Projects can be educational and interesting and sometimes necessary to the course content, but I am working 40 to 60 hours a week and don't always have time for courses with projects--and those are the courses I have not completed. I liked just taking quizzes about the content. So far, this has been the best course I have taken in Coursera. And I have already signed up for a second course with Dr. Chuck and the University of Michigan. | non-literate IT person. In addition, the | Content | is both interesting and informative. The | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.37 | 1.18 |
| 2UHGXkNtEeSfwCIACxeXRw | I am an English language professor. I took this course for "fun"--my BA minor was in history and I am a curious person. I love this course and Dr. Chuck! The way he explains things is "IN ENGLISH!!" I mean that the way he explains things makes sense to a non-literate IT person. In addition, the content is both interesting and informative. The structure of the course is easy to follow. I have taken a few courses where I was not sure what I was supposed to do next, but not in this course. Frankly, I prefer a course where I take quizzes. Projects can be educational and interesting and sometimes necessary to the course content, but I am working 40 to 60 hours a week and don't always have time for courses with projects--and those are the courses I have not completed. I liked just taking quizzes about the content. So far, this has been the best course I have taken in Coursera. And I have already signed up for a second course with Dr. Chuck and the University of Michigan. | and sometimes necessary to the course | Content | but I am working 40 to | Negative | -0.6 | 1.0 | 0.37 | 1.18 |
| 2UHGXkNtEeSfwCIACxeXRw | This course is a must for anyone who wants to understand the fundamentals of how the internet works. The content, videos, and the teachings of Dr. Charles severance are just great, very precise and to the point with real life examples and interviews. It has been much more than what I had imagined and expected. Thanks very much Dr. Charles Severance and Coursera for a great course. | of how the internet works. The | Content | videos, and the teachings of Dr. | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.37 | 1.18 |
| 2UHGXkNtEeSfwCIACxeXRw | Great content and well paced lectures | Great | Content | and well paced lectures | Positive | 0.9 | 1.0 | 0.37 | 1.18 |
| 2UHGXkNtEeSfwCIACxeXRw | Great content, structure, depth, course leader. All in all a brilliant course. | Great | Content | structure, depth, course leader. All in | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.37 | 1.18 |
| 2UHGXkNtEeSfwCIACxeXRw | Excellent course! This with content brought by the tech Giants themselves. All of which is clearly explained and elaborated upon by Dr. Chuck. Ever wondered who invented JavaScript? How and why? You'll find out here and many more. This all brought in the right flexible and mobile format for me | Excellent course! This with | Content | brought by the tech Giants themselves. | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.37 | 1.18 |
| 2UHGXkNtEeSfwCIACxeXRw | nice content | nice | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.37 | 1.18 |
| 2UHGXkNtEeSfwCIACxeXRw | Video quality is poor. The content is quite interesting, but while navigating, the quality of the video disturbs me. It would be better, if you can upgrade this. | Video quality is poor. The | Content | is quite interesting, but while navigating, | Negative | -0.7 | 0.5 | 0.37 | 1.18 |
| 2UHGXkNtEeSfwCIACxeXRw | Very interesting content, good level of difficulty each week, and very entertaining teacher! | Very interesting | Content | good level of difficulty each week, | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.37 | 1.18 |
| 2UHGXkNtEeSfwCIACxeXRw | Very good content, explains in a simple way technical things, making far easier to understand everything, it's also fun because it shows the history from the eyes of people that actually made it happen. | Very good | Content | explains in a simple way technical | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.37 | 1.18 |
| 2UHGXkNtEeSfwCIACxeXRw | Really interesting material on the inner workings of the internet and how it came about. Would recommend it to anyone with an interest in computers and networking. Content is very engaging and pitched at a level that even a non computer scientist like myself finds it e | an interest in computers and networking. | Content | is very engaging and pitched at | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.37 | 1.18 |
| 2UHGXkNtEeSfwCIACxeXRw | great content | great | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.37 | 1.18 |
| 33tTdzylEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | Great Course with high uality content | Great Course with high uality | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 1.04 | 1.12 |
| 33tTdzylEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | one of the most boring courses I have ever taken.....I had to force myself to finish it. the teacher is charismatic but the content is just theories and abstract ideas.....just blah blah blah | the teacher is charismatic but the | Content | is just theories and abstract ideas. | Positive | 0.6 | -1.0 | 1.04 | 1.12 |
| 33tTdzylEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | The content drags and can be boring | The | Content | drags and can be boring | Negative | -0.9 | 0.0 | 1.04 | 1.12 |
| 33tTdzylEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | Excellent content that can be used daily in an international organization. The course allowed me to improve my negotiation skills and manage different points of view using the technical concepts offered by the International Leadership and Organizational Behavior class. | Excellent | Content | that can be used daily in | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 1.04 | 1.12 |
| 3c1bSkIJEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | Need more content for SVM and Random Forest | Need more | Content | for SVM and Random Forest | Negative | -0.6 | 0.5 | 0.76 | 0.86 |
| 3c1bSkIJEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | AWESOME COURSE!! Carlos and Emily are incredible teachers and the course contents are truly informative and well-paced for beginners. | are incredible teachers and the course | Content | are truly informative and well-paced for | Positive | 0.9 | 1.0 | 0.76 | 0.86 |
| 3c1bSkIJEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | First. I like these courses allot. They are pretty close to covering just what you need to actually do machine learning in the real world and not dive too deep into topics that have no practical value. However: This course was a bit too thin, the last 4 weeks of the course contained little in depth informations and seemed to brush over allot of different topics that could have contained more information. Although they where important topics the course could go more in depth on at least 3 or 4 of those topics. The last 3 weeks could have been a course on its own if properly explored. However the concepts are well enough covered to be usable in practice i belive. The programming exercises where ridiculously simple. Everything was reduced to filling in 1 or two lines in a bigger function. I understand that the point was to see how these functions are made and that it increases our understanding of the algorithms already existing in packages like schikit-learn and graphlab. Also the content became a bit too repetetive (actually started in the second course but continues in this course). The time used on variation over the same topic in different models made it challenging to pay attention when the lecture finally came to a new point (brain fell a sleep while waiting for something new). | like schikit-learn and graphlab. Also the | Content | became a bit too repetetive (actually | Positive | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.76 | 0.86 |
| 3c1bSkIJEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | The contents are really clear and professors are great! | The | Content | are really clear and professors are | Negative | -0.6 | 1.0 | 0.76 | 0.86 |
| 3c1bSkIJEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | The course content seemed to be rushed out, as a result, the quality is not as good as the first two. | The course | Content | seemed to be rushed out, as | Negative | -0.6 | 0.0 | 0.76 | 0.86 |
| 3c1bSkIJEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | The course is interesting and well taught. The professor is very enthusiastic and it makes the course fun to watch. The problem in my opinion is that the content is too superficial. It's completely lack of mathematical background and the programming exercises are sometimes no more than copy paste. | in my opinion is that the | Content | is too superficial. It's completely lack | Negative | -0.7 | 0.0 | 0.76 | 0.86 |
| 3c1bSkIJEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | This series is taught by Emily and Carlos. Course 2 was Emily and this course 3 is Carlos. Carlos takes a more practical approach by showing how things are related using pictures, trial and error, what happens when we do this vs. that. Emily on the other hand dives down into the math and actual facts. I feel Emily is more difficult overall - but once I got through it, I had a better foundation and intuition as to how things work and better overall understanding. So - giving this class 4 stars as compared to Emily's class that is 5 stars. I feel if they would mix it with Emily doing the math immediately followed by Carlos explanations it would be best. Finally - I don't feel this course on classification had as much content. We could've done more. | course on classification had as much | Content | We could've done more. | Negative | -0.6 | 0.5 | 0.76 | 0.86 |
| 3c1bSkIJEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | Very good content, very well explained... great course. Classification its a very broad topic but i think this is great introduction. The hands on where kinda on the easy side... but very interesting. | Very good | Content | very well explained. . . great | Positive | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.76 | 0.86 |
| 3c1bSkIJEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | The contents are very interesting and well explained. Nevertheless, unlike the Regression module, the current one suffers of some technical problem, like slides not well formatted, noisy audio in some video, weekly work load not perfectly calibrated. Despite all this, if you are interested in the subject, you will definitely love this course!!! | The | Content | are very interesting and well explained. | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.76 | 0.86 |
| 3c1bSkIJEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | Take you too long to come back, but the content is great. Good job | long to come back, but the | Content | is great. Good job | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.76 | 0.86 |
| 3e249OIsEeSdRSIAC3-Q-A | Very bad audio and video. Couldn't understand most of the content. | video. Couldn't understand most of the | Content | | Negative | -0.7 | -1.0 | 0.95 | 1.24 |
| 3e249OIsEeSdRSIAC3-Q-A | Hated the course and the content. I truly regret investing my money on this course. | Hated the course and the | Content | I truly regret investing my money | Negative | -0.8 | -1.0 | 0.95 | 1.24 |
| 3e249OIsEeSdRSIAC3-Q-A | Capstone exercises were very ambiguous, the students were left to interpret they way they had to finish and how they rated their peers. The peer reviews were poor with little to no feedback and the focus was on how the material was laid out vs what the content was. I have done other coursers and capstones in Coursera this was one of the poorest. UIUC has to revamp this. More guidance to students in the instructions would be the first step. | was laid out vs what the | Content | was. I have done other coursers | Negative | -0.7 | -1.0 | 0.95 | 1.24 |
| 3e249OIsEeSdRSIAC3-Q-A | Great course with excellent content | Great course with excellent | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.95 | 1.24 |
| 3KNgoXgcEeWrAxJQXw-8PQ | The content is interesting, but not rich enough for a course. I finished all the videos and assignments in only 2 days. | The | Content | is interesting, but not rich enough | Negative | -0.6 | 0.5 | 0.65 | 1.0 |
| 3KNgoXgcEeWrAxJQXw-8PQ | fabulous course with lot of do's and don'ts... and an inspirational guide and techniques for a startup writer or a beginer. course with its full content , quality and knowledge . | a beginer. course with its full | Content | , quality and knowledge . | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.65 | 1.0 |
| 3KNgoXgcEeWrAxJQXw-8PQ | Besides an engaging instructor (Brandon Skyhorse), the modules' content is accessible for nascent writers. Moreover, I enjoy the shop talk series with authors. These lectures cum interviews show a fulfilling, intimate view of writing lives. I feel more confident in my writing and have been a better, more critical reader of others' work, especially my own. I recommend this course to anyone who needs to brush up on their creative writing skills and for those who want to start from a clean slate. | engaging instructor (Brandon Skyhorse), the modules' | Content | is accessible for nascent writers. Moreover, | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.65 | 1.0 |
| 3KNgoXgcEeWrAxJQXw-8PQ | Very well lead, clear explanations and great content. I found this course both useful and delivering to my expectations. | well lead, clear explanations and great | Content | I found this course both useful | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.65 | 1.0 |
| 3KNgoXgcEeWrAxJQXw-8PQ | While this course was interesting, it seemed very light. There was only about 10 or so minutes of 'content' a week, plus some interviews (which were very interesting, but didn't feel as though they taught too much). The assignments were all good except for the third one about the physical object. It was a weird prompt and not in a good way. I would recommend this course, but I'd also love to see it expanded a bit. | about 10 or so minutes of | Content | a week, plus some interviews (which | Negative | -0.7 | 0.5 | 0.65 | 1.0 |
| 3KNgoXgcEeWrAxJQXw-8PQ | The content of the course is very useful and delivered in a structured and effective way. I enjoyed the writing assignments and feedback opportunities. My only complaint is that there are a great number of people auditing the course and we had to create our own google community to share and get feedback as the assignments and feedback sections of the course are locked for all of the non-paying students. Other than that is was very enjoyable and informative. | The | Content | of the course is very useful | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.65 | 1.0 |
| 3UY0FCmGEeWFggqB2SRvtQ | Great course, very nice professor. Lots of content about one | course, very nice professor. Lots of | Content | about one | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.85 | 1.14 |
| 3UY0FCmGEeWFggqB2SRvtQ | There is much to praise: nice mapwork, a steady and organized march through time, and some interesting case studies (I especially enjoyed the lecture on Henry Adams). However, the title is a complete misnomer, as the course is regrettably white bread history. I found the approach stale and western-centric, as the content actually covers western Europe and the stretch of its influence through the time period. I also found myself questioning the veracity of many conclusions, as the lecture often had difficulty citing more than a couple specific points of evidence for his arguments. | approach stale and western-centric, as the | Content | actually covers western Europe and the | Negative | -0.6 | 0.0 | 0.85 | 1.14 |
| 3UY0FCmGEeWFggqB2SRvtQ | I think Professor Philip Zelikow is a charismatic speaker. I enjoy listening such an eloquent teacher. The content of the lesson is compact, complete, enlightening and inspiring. I find some of the quiz questions ambiguous. Thank you very much. | listening such an eloquent teacher. The | Content | of the lesson is compact, complete, | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.85 | 1.14 |
| 3UY0FCmGEeWFggqB2SRvtQ | Although the content is interesting, I would have liked it better had the content and the instructor been a little more engaging. | Although the | Content | is interesting, I would have liked | Positive | 0.6 | -1.0 | 0.85 | 1.14 |
| 3UY0FCmGEeWFggqB2SRvtQ | Although the content is interesting, I would have liked it better had the content and the instructor been a little more engaging. | have liked it better had the | Content | and the instructor been a little | Positive | 0.6 | -1.0 | 0.85 | 1.14 |
| 3UY0FCmGEeWFggqB2SRvtQ | Great content, the teacher makes it easy to understand in few minutes the general idea of every topic | Great | Content | the teacher makes it easy to | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.85 | 1.14 |
| 3UY0FCmGEeWFggqB2SRvtQ | This was my first course, so I don't have any comparison. But I found it really well done. Clearly spoken, interesting content, well understandable. A good introduction to worlds recent history! | really well done. Clearly spoken, interesting | Content | well understandable. A good introduction to | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.85 | 1.14 |
| 3UY0FCmGEeWFggqB2SRvtQ | Amazing content and the professor makes the lecture very friendly and interesting. | Amazing | Content | and the professor makes the lecture | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.85 | 1.14 |
| 3UY0FCmGEeWFggqB2SRvtQ | Perhaps the reason why I really like this course is that I am very excited about learning world history. But the course content and the way professor delivers lectures is amazing. | learning world history. But the course | Content | and the way professor delivers lectures | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.85 | 1.14 |
| 3Vo3Am1LEeWMPAqsmzmVew | The course is fine in the content. As usual, the presentation from Brian Caffo is rather rushed and stumbling. A better presenting style would improve the course no end, but ultimately, what is covered is what you need. I generally just avoid the videos and read the slides. | The course is fine in the | Content | As usual, the presentation from Brian | Positive | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.82 | 1.1 |
| 3Vo3Am1LEeWMPAqsmzmVew | Although it is an easy course to pass, it is very important in content. It teaches the finishing moves, the ones you'll need after all your hard work. 5-star without doubt. | pass, it is very important in | Content | It teaches the finishing moves, the | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.82 | 1.1 |
| 3Vo3Am1LEeWMPAqsmzmVew | Great course. Very practical and state-of-the-art contents. | Great course. Very practical and state-of-the-art | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.82 | 1.1 |
| 3Vo3Am1LEeWMPAqsmzmVew | Great introduction for how to deliver content that is easily digestible by non-technical people. | Great introduction for how to deliver | Content | that is easily digestible by non-technical | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.82 | 1.1 |
| 3Vo3Am1LEeWMPAqsmzmVew | This review does not reflect the course content. The new Coursera UI makes it impossible to download transcripts or slides of the videos. Without these features, following the lectures is significantly more difficult, and I can't rate this course any higher than 1 star. I would rate it zero stars if that was possible. | review does not reflect the course | Content | The new Coursera UI makes it | Positive | 0.6 | -1.0 | 0.82 | 1.1 |
| 3Vo3Am1LEeWMPAqsmzmVew | The new platform is very versatile and easy to navigate. The page layout is much more clear. It is easy to navigate from course material to discussion boards. I like the Quiz format, including expanding the number of choices for the multiple choice selections, but the grading was confusing. For Quiz 3, some questions came back with multiple "Well Done" comments, even when I had not selected the answer for which I was being praised. I also was told I made errors on the same question.... and this was after I answered the question (Question 2, on R generic functions) the exact same as I had answered it when I took the course earlier this year. I was not a fan of not having to take a picture to submit work, so I am pleased that is no longer a requirement. I hope the typing pattern match is sufficient to affirm identity. I have one comment on content specific to this class. Week 3 content lacks relevancy to the project and data products in general. I agree that knowledge of R packages, classes, and methods is an important part of understanding R. I am not sure where that fits in the Data Science curriculum as a whole, though. Maybe expanding the curriculum to include a second, more advanced R class, with a project to write our own methods, build an R package, or do something with yhat. That would assign relevant work to reinforce the lectures. I would be happy to do further beta testing. DCP | identity. I have one comment on | Content | specific to this class. Week 3 | Negative | -0.6 | 1.0 | 0.82 | 1.1 |
| 4tHoAq3EEeSk9iIAC49U6w | An absolutely complete course that teaches about Luxury companies, but mainly about Fashion. There are 2 great teachers that gives contents, but also makes sudents think about future and trends. Cases and interviews are also great !! I got very impressed about quality of Albini Group. Its clearer for me definition luxury vs fashion, business models, differences, challenges and opportunities in Fashion companies. Thank you Bocconi ! | are 2 great teachers that gives | Content | but also makes sudents think about | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.73 | 0.97 |
| 4tHoAq3EEeSk9iIAC49U6w | Excellent content! | Excellent | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.73 | 0.97 |
| 4tHoAq3EEeSk9iIAC49U6w | great material content and overall structure | great material | Content | and overall structure | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.73 | 0.97 |
| 4tHoAq3EEeSk9iIAC49U6w | Excellent contents, but relator's english is pretty bad. :-) | Excellent | Content | but relator's english is pretty bad. | Negative | -0.6 | 0.5 | 0.73 | 0.97 |
| 4tHoAq3EEeSk9iIAC49U6w | While the content of the course is interesting and useful, the delivery desperately needs improvement. The professors speak in an extremely monotonous way, making it seem like they are reading their lines from behind the camera. Just awful, and makes it really hard to follow and stay interested and connected with the topic (even when you're passionate about the subject). I would rather have the course in Italian, and read the subtitles, if that means a more energetic delivery. | While the | Content | of the course is interesting and | Positive | 0.6 | -0.5 | 0.73 | 0.97 |
| 4tHoAq3EEeSk9iIAC49U6w | I loved this course, the content is good, has a lot of interviews and cases. | I loved this course, the | Content | is good, has a lot of | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.73 | 0.97 |
| 4tHoAq3EEeSk9iIAC49U6w | The content of the course is very interesting, and I plan to go go through with it. A huge downside is that it is very difficult to follow the course because of the professors' strong accent and, at times, incorrect pronunciation. It is distracting. Also, it would be good to have weekly assignments, to stay on track. | The | Content | of the course is very interesting, | Positive | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.73 | 0.97 |
| 4tHoAq3EEeSk9iIAC49U6w | Contents are good and interesting, but speakers' english is so low and bad (pronunciation) that the course becomes almost unpleasant. | | Content | are good and interesting, but speakers' | Positive | 0.6 | -0.5 | 0.73 | 0.97 |
| 4tHoAq3EEeSk9iIAC49U6w | The Management of Fashion and Luxury Companies offered by Bocconi & Coursera is a wonderfully informative, interactive and innovative course. The course uses real world high fashion and luxury examples and iconic figures to deliver their content. This engages the student with real life examples and helps us see what the future of fashion and luxury holds for us as potential managers. | and iconic figures to deliver their | Content | This engages the student with real | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.73 | 0.97 |
| 4tHoAq3EEeSk9iIAC49U6w | Although I did not finish the course, I enjoyed and was very satisfied with the content. The lecturers, although not very fluent English, were the best and new exactly what they were teaching which made me very happy. I easily understood what was being taught from the beginning. Although my passion is Fashion Design, this course helped me understand more about the Fashion Industry and everything behind the scene within the Industry. I am very happy with the knowledge gained :) | and was very satisfied with the | Content | The lecturers, although not very fluent | Negative | -0.6 | 1.0 | 0.73 | 0.97 |
| 4tHoAq3EEeSk9iIAC49U6w | Very good course, sad its finished. Good level of content aimed at a business professional interested in the fashion and luxury segment. | sad its finished. Good level of | Content | aimed at a business professional interested | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.73 | 0.97 |
| 4tHoAq3EEeSk9iIAC49U6w | The course content of this course is not much and thus one can finish it rather very quickly. However one of the lecturer's had such a heavy accent I had to use subtitles just to understand the content. I am not in anyway in the fashion industry nor aspiring to be so this was just like a "tester" for me. I was however surprised that its not all about modelling and the sorts but incorporates some business aspect about the fashion industry. | The course | Content | of this course is not much | Negative | -0.7 | 0.0 | 0.73 | 0.97 |
| 4tHoAq3EEeSk9iIAC49U6w | The course content of this course is not much and thus one can finish it rather very quickly. However one of the lecturer's had such a heavy accent I had to use subtitles just to understand the content. I am not in anyway in the fashion industry nor aspiring to be so this was just like a "tester" for me. I was however surprised that its not all about modelling and the sorts but incorporates some business aspect about the fashion industry. | use subtitles just to understand the | Content | I am not in anyway in | Negative | -0.6 | 0.0 | 0.73 | 0.97 |
| 4tHoAq3EEeSk9iIAC49U6w | Amazing teachers, great content! | Amazing teachers, great | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.73 | 0.97 |
| 4tHoAq3EEeSk9iIAC49U6w | The quality of the content is very good. However, the content should be more detailed. Further, certain key subject-areas are missing such as the fashion calendar, quality control, merchandising, cool-hunting and forecasting, market research, event management, public relations management, retail operations in more detail, logistics, store operations etc. Overall, however, the course is a good overview about managing fashion and luxury companies. Moreover, interviews with CEOs and brand directors would make the course more interesting. | The quality of the | Content | is very good. However, the content | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.73 | 0.97 |
| 4tHoAq3EEeSk9iIAC49U6w | The quality of the content is very good. However, the content should be more detailed. Further, certain key subject-areas are missing such as the fashion calendar, quality control, merchandising, cool-hunting and forecasting, market research, event management, public relations management, retail operations in more detail, logistics, store operations etc. Overall, however, the course is a good overview about managing fashion and luxury companies. Moreover, interviews with CEOs and brand directors would make the course more interesting. | content is very good. However, the | Content | should be more detailed. Further, certain | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.73 | 0.97 |
| 4vLX1NAeEeWihQ6ogHC6vQ | The course content is highly challenging and that's great for a sense of accomplishment. The biological problems motivates the biologist to go through the abstract mathematical concepts(but I have to admit there is a threshold where the biologist can not get it well anymore(greedy motifs, gibbs ...) and I wonder if he does really need it to be practical with day to day problems with chip array seq selex...) be ready you will struggle hard here | The course | Content | is highly challenging and that's great | Positive | 0.9 | 0.5 | 0.9 | 0.92 |
| 4vLX1NAeEeWihQ6ogHC6vQ | Very badly linked with other websites that provide the actual content. This is more like a click-bait setup than the actual course. I'm not sure why it's even offered on Coursera, other than to make money on a more popular website using the content hosted by less popular one. Very bad experience. | a more popular website using the | Content | hosted by less popular one. Very | Positive | 0.6 | -1.0 | 0.9 | 0.92 |
| 4vLX1NAeEeWihQ6ogHC6vQ | This is not a beginner's course unless you already have previous programming experience. The Python lessons are just samples taken from a completely different curriculum on Codecademy and poorly integrated into the bio-centric course content. The lessons are disjointed, taken out of context, and some of the examples are using the wrong version of Python and missing parentheses. It would be a lot better if they took the time to actually craft custom Python lessons designed specifically for this course instead of using ill-fitting lessons from other classes. | poorly integrated into the bio-centric course | Content | The lessons are disjointed, taken out | Negative | -0.6 | 0.0 | 0.9 | 0.92 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Good quality content and great instructor. I recommend it! It does not cover though a very important feature from angular: directives. | Good quality | Content | and great instructor. I recommend it! | Positive | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.78 | 0.88 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Had good content but description was a like scattered manner. It could have better if explanation should be in fluent manner. | Had good | Content | but description was a like scattered | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.78 | 0.88 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Great Content, and by the end of the course you have a full fledged Front-end website working. | Great | Content | and by the end of the | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.78 | 0.88 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | A massive amount of content to cover, some of it quite advanced. The exercises become fraught if your code is out of sync with the tutor's code. Things won't work, you won't know why, and there's no real recovery from that. | A massive amount of | Content | to cover, some of it quite | Negative | -0.6 | 0.0 | 0.78 | 0.88 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Pros: a lot of good content, worth 8 weeks of study, so good bang for the buck. Takes modular approach, where things are gradually taken apart and shown how to improve using another Angular module or approach. Cons: can be a little academical, very time-intensive. I have a much better understanding now of MVC concept using JS framework. | Pros: a lot of good | Content | worth 8 weeks of study, so | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.78 | 0.88 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | This course is deceivingly full of content. If you want to get through this course you need to have a lot of time on your hands because of the shear amount of debugs your code will produce even if you follow the steps to the letter. So many things are taught over a 4 week period that if you do not do the extra reading to understand what is happening you will get an overview of angularjs, bower, gulp, grunt, yo, yeoman and so on without really knowing how to use any of these tools again. Also because of the number of interdependent parts to the application you create, when the professor decides to give you one of the html or js files again to do an assignment, chances are everything will break and you will spend a long time figuring out which variables' names have been changed and blabla... The professor does not give you a good basis for debugging your code, you need to modify the set up of gulp to show understandable stack traces to figure out what is going wrong. If you want a challenging course where you have to go the extra mile learning things from documentation and blogs to substitute the lack of detail in order to complete the course, than this is the course for you! I think this course needs to be restructured and the length increased to 6 weeks instead of 4, with more detailed content and understand of each tool and especially more on angularjs | instead of 4, with more detailed | Content | and understand of each tool and | Positive | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.78 | 0.88 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Excelente curso, un gran agradecimiento al profesor Jogesh por su maravilloso curso, explicaciones y distribución de los contenidos, apropiados, acertados, con ejemplos claros y totalmente coherentes con los contenidos. Great course, special thanks to Jogesh for your well defined contents and explanations. Wish you understand some spanish :D | to Jogesh for your well defined | Content | and explanations. Wish you understand some | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.78 | 0.88 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Pity that people had to spend more time on making the plugins work than actually doing the exercises/assignments but good content nonetheless. | actually doing the exercises/assignments but good | Content | nonetheless. | Positive | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.78 | 0.88 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Awesome course content, nice explanation by the tutor. Must for beginners who want to have a start with AngularJS, grunt, gulp and other tools. | Awesome course | Content | nice explanation by the tutor. Must | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.78 | 0.88 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Interesting content, but sooo slow. 20 minutes long videos could have been done in 5 minutes. Moreover, the teacher's voice and tone did nothing to make the content live. | Interesting | Content | but sooo slow. 20 minutes long | Negative | -0.7 | -0.5 | 0.78 | 0.88 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Interesting content, but sooo slow. 20 minutes long videos could have been done in 5 minutes. Moreover, the teacher's voice and tone did nothing to make the content live. | tone did nothing to make the | Content | live. | Negative | -0.7 | -0.5 | 0.78 | 0.88 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | What an awesome course. The teacher is top-class, really knows the subject, and how to continually explain each module. The video exercises are just made for the student to grasp the content. One of the best courses I hev experienced on Coursera. | for the student to grasp the | Content | One of the best courses I | Positive | 0.9 | 1.0 | 0.78 | 0.88 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Good introduction to AngularJS. Moreover their provide a wide variety of additional information related to the course, which is very useful to enlarge the basic contents studied. | very useful to enlarge the basic | Content | studied. | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.78 | 0.88 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Very good course. It allows to learn the basics of angular js very fast and easily. I only missed a little more of content in directives scopes, but here you can learn a lot. | only missed a little more of | Content | in directives scopes, but here you | Negative | -0.6 | 0.5 | 0.78 | 0.88 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | I was able to grasp the overview of the course. The instructions are delivered well and the flow seems in order. However my lack of background with the topic discussed cause me to stop watching everything. Plus, I can't do the said assignment because I am a beginning on this topic. it seems this is not a course for me to rate based on content. However I will rate it in terms of the aesthetic, organization or structure of the slides . The organization of the content of the slides needs to be properly organized. Long paragraphs are a pain to read. Further when comparing, two concepts, it is easier to comprehend when they are in table form. For instance in FrontEnd JavaScript Framework Overview video, it is better in terms of organization and aesthetic to show library vs. framework in table form. Also, the volume of Introduction to AngularJS video is too loud. Though I can adjust it and lower the volume, but sudden high volume sound is discouraging when the next video has normal volume causing me to adjust it again. I was only able to watch few of the videos but they are good. Just a little improvement needed. | for me to rate based on | Content | However I will rate it in | Negative | -0.6 | 0.0 | 0.78 | 0.88 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | I was able to grasp the overview of the course. The instructions are delivered well and the flow seems in order. However my lack of background with the topic discussed cause me to stop watching everything. Plus, I can't do the said assignment because I am a beginning on this topic. it seems this is not a course for me to rate based on content. However I will rate it in terms of the aesthetic, organization or structure of the slides . The organization of the content of the slides needs to be properly organized. Long paragraphs are a pain to read. Further when comparing, two concepts, it is easier to comprehend when they are in table form. For instance in FrontEnd JavaScript Framework Overview video, it is better in terms of organization and aesthetic to show library vs. framework in table form. Also, the volume of Introduction to AngularJS video is too loud. Though I can adjust it and lower the volume, but sudden high volume sound is discouraging when the next video has normal volume causing me to adjust it again. I was only able to watch few of the videos but they are good. Just a little improvement needed. | slides . The organization of the | Content | of the slides needs to be | Negative | -0.6 | 0.0 | 0.78 | 0.88 |
| 5_M54uIIEeSsKCIAC3iEqA | Honestly didn't learn much from this course. The majority of content is simply common sense, and things you'll know if you've spent any time on the internet in the recent years. The good parts were the evaluation of different marketing channels (traditional and digital) and various stats on how people spend from the industry (ownership of TV networks, time spent per day on different media, etc.). | from this course. The majority of | Content | is simply common sense, and things | Negative | -0.6 | -0.5 | 0.72 | 0.82 |
| 5_M54uIIEeSsKCIAC3iEqA | This is basic content i wish it was a more outside just a lecture style where the lecturer just reads from the slides. | This is basic | Content | i wish it was a more | Negative | -0.6 | 0.0 | 0.72 | 0.82 |
| 5_M54uIIEeSsKCIAC3iEqA | The content is good, but the way the lectures are given not so much. | The | Content | is good, but the way the | Positive | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.72 | 0.82 |
| 5_M54uIIEeSsKCIAC3iEqA | Very light in useful content | Very light in useful | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | -0.5 | 0.72 | 0.82 |
| 5_M54uIIEeSsKCIAC3iEqA | Not up to my expectations. Compared to the previous modules in this specialisation, the lectures are dry, the presenter is not focused and slides are sometimes mixed up. The reading material is great and a definite plus is that it is free. But the lectures should be more practical (not just the bullet points of the book), and the weekly assignment should not be a chapter summary question. The course developers should have taken the time to develop a case study for each topic, like in the first module in this spec. I highly recommend reviewing and improving the content. | highly recommend reviewing and improving the | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | -0.5 | 0.72 | 0.82 |
| 5_M54uIIEeSsKCIAC3iEqA | The presenter in this course is hard to follow and does not have good slides. She often does not put her bullet points or lists on the slides ( I am a visual learner and she does not provide enough on screen info) She is really uncomfortable and makes it really hard to listen to her talk. She struggles through the entire presentation which is just super distracting. Content is good though. | presentation which is just super distracting. | Content | is good though. | Positive | 0.6 | -0.5 | 0.72 | 0.82 |
| 5_M54uIIEeSsKCIAC3iEqA | The content of this course is very good. However I feel it is unfortunate that the lecturer did not make an effort in preparing the presentation of the material. This makes a huge difference. Especially when it is an online course, the lecturer needs to bring the story to life rather than simply reading with hesitation from the slides in most instances. | The | Content | of this course is very good. | Positive | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.72 | 0.82 |
| 5_M54uIIEeSsKCIAC3iEqA | The professor is just reading the text. Not really a good example of interactive e-learning content. | a good example of interactive e-learning | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | -1.0 | 0.72 | 0.82 |
| 5_M54uIIEeSsKCIAC3iEqA | Hated the course and the content. I truly regret investing my money on this course. | Hated the course and the | Content | I truly regret investing my money | Negative | -0.8 | -1.0 | 0.72 | 0.82 |
| 5_M54uIIEeSsKCIAC3iEqA | The course structure is okay and availability of course material e-book is big plus for the course. However there are negatives also. This is a course on "Digital Marketing" and it has to be taken to great heights in terms of content and delivery. Most critical issue is delivery. The most happening and lively subject like this needs a delivery in a exalted method. Though reference material is good collection but there is total disconnect between video lectures and those reference material at many instances. Revamp all video series. Add more case studies videos. | to great heights in terms of | Content | and delivery. Most critical issue is | Positive | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.72 | 0.82 |
| 5_M54uIIEeSsKCIAC3iEqA | A great course with good literature, easy to follow videos, a nice community, and very helpful content! | a nice community, and very helpful | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.72 | 0.82 |
| 5_M54uIIEeSsKCIAC3iEqA | very slow pacing but ok content | very slow pacing but ok | Content | | Negative | -0.6 | 0.0 | 0.72 | 0.82 |
| 6DwzaCw7EeWGvAojQA48rw | Nice organisation of course contents. Every stage, you can see your own game getting better. The peer students are especially good! | Nice organisation of course | Content | Every stage, you can see your | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.73 | 0.94 |
| 6DwzaCw7EeWGvAojQA48rw | It felt few content, i think there could be more content in this course. Though i have to say i learn new stuff, but i which it had more content to learn more. | It felt few | Content | i think there could be more | Negative | -0.6 | 0.0 | 0.73 | 0.94 |
| 6DwzaCw7EeWGvAojQA48rw | It felt few content, i think there could be more content in this course. Though i have to say i learn new stuff, but i which it had more content to learn more. | i think there could be more | Content | in this course. Though i have | Negative | -0.6 | 0.0 | 0.73 | 0.94 |
| 6DwzaCw7EeWGvAojQA48rw | Enjoyable but limited content | Enjoyable but limited | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | -0.5 | 0.73 | 0.94 |
| 6DwzaCw7EeWGvAojQA48rw | good course, really an introduction =) But the teacher is always reading a "Teleprompter". He is not spontaneous... Except when He uses RPG to demonstrate an example ;-) But the content is great | demonstrate an example ;-) But the | Content | is great | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.73 | 0.94 |
| 6DwzaCw7EeWGvAojQA48rw | Great content, nice way to get a basic notion of what it takes to creat a game, nice classes and method of learning, | Great | Content | nice way to get a basic | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.73 | 0.94 |
| 6DwzaCw7EeWGvAojQA48rw | The course was fun and the progression through the weeks assignments was good. The contents were presented in a interesting way and were pertinent, but i would know a little more deeper. | the weeks assignments was good. The | Content | were presented in a interesting way | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.73 | 0.94 |
| 6DwzaCw7EeWGvAojQA48rw | Even if simple (it's an introduction, after all), the contents are well structured and I appreciate how the assignments can derive from the previous one and peers' feedback. It's satisfying to see the initial idea evolve into something more developed. | (it's an introduction, after all), the | Content | are well structured and I appreciate | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.73 | 0.94 |
| 6DwzaCw7EeWGvAojQA48rw | The instructor is good but the amount of content is severely lacking compared to alternatives. | is good but the amount of | Content | is severely lacking compared to alternatives. | Positive | 0.6 | -0.5 | 0.73 | 0.94 |
| 6DwzaCw7EeWGvAojQA48rw | Great Course, great professor, great videos and very very good content. Eve if you're not a beginner you should do this course to refresh your knowledge. | great videos and very very good | Content | Eve if you're not a beginner | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.73 | 0.94 |
| 6JyoHjVOEeWBMQ5pdIoFkQ | I appreciate the fact that this course doesn't go into the fine detail on how to code everything, I believe there is still more information on the coding and data management practices that could be included in the course content. In addition to that, I feel the course could use the following adjustments to make it better: 1 - Have Python students grade other Python students and SAS students grade other SAS students. While it is nice to get exposure to another language, it is more than enough to learn one at a time. 2 - Add quizes and/or other well formed questions that are graded (automatically, not peer graded) to help enforce the concepts being taught. 3 - Make the assignment instructions/expectations more clear. I feel there are times when the grading criteria don't exactly match the requested assignment. While people follow the spirit of the assignment, the grading questions may ask for slightly different or additional items. 4 - Certain aspects of statistical analysis are glossed over and should be covered in more depth in the training videos. While I like the short videos for brevity, I would prefer to watch 10-15 minutes more content and really feel like the material was well covered. | could be included in the course | Content | In addition to that, I feel | Negative | -0.7 | 0.0 | 0.77 | 0.84 |
| 6JyoHjVOEeWBMQ5pdIoFkQ | I appreciate the fact that this course doesn't go into the fine detail on how to code everything, I believe there is still more information on the coding and data management practices that could be included in the course content. In addition to that, I feel the course could use the following adjustments to make it better: 1 - Have Python students grade other Python students and SAS students grade other SAS students. While it is nice to get exposure to another language, it is more than enough to learn one at a time. 2 - Add quizes and/or other well formed questions that are graded (automatically, not peer graded) to help enforce the concepts being taught. 3 - Make the assignment instructions/expectations more clear. I feel there are times when the grading criteria don't exactly match the requested assignment. While people follow the spirit of the assignment, the grading questions may ask for slightly different or additional items. 4 - Certain aspects of statistical analysis are glossed over and should be covered in more depth in the training videos. While I like the short videos for brevity, I would prefer to watch 10-15 minutes more content and really feel like the material was well covered. | prefer to watch 10-15 minutes more | Content | and really feel like the material | Negative | -0.6 | 0.0 | 0.77 | 0.84 |
| 6JyoHjVOEeWBMQ5pdIoFkQ | Choosing an actual research question allows you to find a topic of interest. This makes the content more meaningful and accelerates understanding of the concepts. | topic of interest. This makes the | Content | more meaningful and accelerates understanding of | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.77 | 0.84 |
| 6JyoHjVOEeWBMQ5pdIoFkQ | The content is easy to follow and is clearly explained without adding unnecessary complexity at this entry level. This specialization reaches its goals. Instead of trying to over achieve it keeps things simple. I would recommend taking the "Data Science Specialization" as the next step. | The | Content | is easy to follow and is | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.77 | 0.84 |
| 6JyoHjVOEeWBMQ5pdIoFkQ | So far, course is one of the best I am taking. It moves at a slow enough pace that you feel you can actually learn explore but at the same time are not bored. The videos are well done and have the right balance of interesting content and skill building. | have the right balance of interesting | Content | and skill building. | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.77 | 0.84 |
| 6JyoHjVOEeWBMQ5pdIoFkQ | The content is OK, but that's about it. Near zero interaction from staff, short videos leave a lot to be desired, and worst of all, there seems to be a problem getting everyone's assignments peer reviewed (which makes no sense). There is a somewhat comical thread wherein staff direct students to contact coursera directly via a "contact us" link on a page, but get this, the link isn't there. Students repeatedly pointed this out only to get directed again to the non-existant link. In an online forum it's important to actually address concerns. Replys that avoid directly addressing concerns sound like automated messages. And that's the feeling I get here. This course requires a DIY attitude and a willingness to proceed without feedback. If you're looking for a good example of online learning, look elsewhere. | The | Content | is OK, but that's about it. | Positive | 0.6 | -0.5 | 0.77 | 0.84 |
| 6kAowBObEeWfzgpfp_iBVw | I found the lectures very interesting; but was surprised at how the quizzes / assignments focused so much on facts and figures - surely these aren't nearly as important as understanding the content? | nearly as important as understanding the | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.73 | 0.88 |
| 6kAowBObEeWfzgpfp_iBVw | Thank you to the instructors and the university! A very interesting course that not only focuses on the content and quality of Scandinavian TV and movie productions but also on the broader (institutional and cultural) framework in which they are produced. I would have rated it 4.5 starts if possible, but as halves are not possible I give it 4. Possible improvements: -the delivery of the course can be a bit livier, smoother; some instructors seem a bit at unease with this format -while an interest in Scandinavian movies and TV series is an implicit prerequisite for a course like this, sometimes simply mentioning 'lists' of directors, movies, series you might never have heard of can make it a bit overwhelming, hard to relate to -students' engagement could be enhanced with more interactive assignments | that not only focuses on the | Content | and quality of Scandinavian TV and | Negative | -0.6 | 0.5 | 0.73 | 0.88 |
| 6kAowBObEeWfzgpfp_iBVw | I'm three weeks into and really enjoying this course. It's light – about 2-3 hours a week so far, plus maybe one film, feels sufficient. The student is free to choose her degree of intensity. At the same time it opens a richness of vistas on the study of film in general as well as the course content. I think it's a good model for the massive online course: both highly customisable and sufficiently demanding (deadlines are essential) to maintain engagement. | general as well as the course | Content | I think it's a good model | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.73 | 0.88 |
| 6lQZLjVvEeWfzhKP8GtZlQ | Very nice content and presented so nicely. Must read and highly recommended course for all managers and business analysts. | Very nice | Content | and presented so nicely. Must read | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.43 | 0.98 |
| 6lQZLjVvEeWfzhKP8GtZlQ | Excellent course and excellent content | Excellent course and excellent | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.43 | 0.98 |
| 6lQZLjVvEeWfzhKP8GtZlQ | Simply listening to somebody talk about the fundamentals of Agile, with no practical work whatsoever, could be an extremely boring experience. Thumbs up to the two people delivering the contents, because they both managed to do that in a very engaging way. Thanks! | to the two people delivering the | Content | because they both managed to do | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.43 | 0.98 |
| 6lQZLjVvEeWfzhKP8GtZlQ | Thanks a lot for all the instructors and the team behind this course. The content quality reminds me of some agile principles. Simplicity of the words, the illustrations, the examples Feedback from students through the discussions Technical excellence and good design Welcoming change (I've witnessed commitments of the team to improve some points in the content) I'm thrilled to go on and look at the next courses I say Bravo ! Smail | the team behind this course. The | Content | quality reminds me of some agile | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.43 | 0.98 |
| 6lQZLjVvEeWfzhKP8GtZlQ | Great production values and more "meat" to it than the intro course. I like the scenario based questions. It still seems a little light on content, but the content that is present is good. | still seems a little light on | Content | but the content that is present | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.43 | 0.98 |
| 6lQZLjVvEeWfzhKP8GtZlQ | Great production values and more "meat" to it than the intro course. I like the scenario based questions. It still seems a little light on content, but the content that is present is good. | little light on content, but the | Content | that is present is good. | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.43 | 0.98 |
| 6lQZLjVvEeWfzhKP8GtZlQ | A very well organized and presented course with relevant content. | organized and presented course with relevant | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.43 | 0.98 |
| 6lQZLjVvEeWfzhKP8GtZlQ | Good course! Excellent to reinforce my knowledge on scrum, xp and agile. In the end however I think that the content was somehow repetitive, but this not change the quality of the course. | end however I think that the | Content | was somehow repetitive, but this not | Negative | -0.8 | 0.5 | 0.43 | 0.98 |
| 6mOCpgP8EeWmBSIAC9UI2A | I really appreciate being able to do this course for free. It is by far the best course I have done in Coursera yet. The content is great and very well planned. So much to get your inspiration from and qualified to teachers to guide you along the way. What more can one ask for? | have done in Coursera yet. The | Content | is great and very well planned. | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.84 | 0.95 |
| 6mOCpgP8EeWmBSIAC9UI2A | Far too basic in content. It's clearly aimed at people with next to no experience at all on writing and publishing! However, it still is insightful and inspirational as, 'Writing for Young Readers' is taught by two established children writers and, packed with interviews of other writers from all around the world. A nice introduction but, just that -an introduction. If you have experience writing (for children or else) | Far too basic in | Content | It's clearly aimed at people with | Negative | -0.6 | 0.0 | 0.84 | 0.95 |
| 6mOCpgP8EeWmBSIAC9UI2A | These were very short lectures without a lot of content. For example the different kinds of publishing were described but no time was spent on how to evaluate publishers or how to decide what might work best for the author. The interviews with the published authors was by far the best part of this class and I enjoyed listening to them describe their writing lives. | short lectures without a lot of | Content | For example the different kinds of | Positive | 0.6 | -0.5 | 0.84 | 0.95 |
| 6mOCpgP8EeWmBSIAC9UI2A | This course is excellent, the content is rich, the videos are amusing and helpful, the interviews are just great. Thank you so much for such a high quality course! | This course is excellent, the | Content | is rich, the videos are amusing | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.84 | 0.95 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | As annoying as the auto-grader was at times, I still enjoyed the course. The material was properly presented and curated which goes to say a lot of blood, tears and sweat was definitely put into the course. I highly recommend this course for beginning programmers and/ or more experienced programmers who many want to familiarize themselves with python syntax or get a refresher. A big thank you to the team and the initiatives behind this course most especially Professor Severance who has a unique style and engaging style of content delivering. | unique style and engaging style of | Content | delivering. | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.38 | 1.18 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | This course is excellent and it's very easy for me to understand the content .Also,the teacher is very humerous. | easy for me to understand the | Content | . Also, the teacher is very | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.38 | 1.18 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Awesome course, I can not believe few weeks back I could not write a single statement in programming and now I can do basic things in programming, very well made course and it's content. Chuck is gem and his way of teaching is awesome. I really want to thank him. Thanks a lot team. | very well made course and it's | Content | Chuck is gem and his way | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.38 | 1.18 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Content presented well. Professor Chuck is great and feels like he's right there with you. Very taken with his dedication and love of teaching. It shines though and the course is wonderful. I'm in it simply for the knowledge and it's all FREE!!! This course should be mandatory in middle/high school. So critical to just basic thinking and problem solving completely unrelated to programming. | | Content | presented well. Professor Chuck is great | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.38 | 1.18 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Great intro to python for non programmers. I have experience with programming and Python; was looking for a refresher, so I ended up finding this remedial (not surprising). Ended up breezing through the content in a weekend on 2x speed. With that said, this class is an excellent introduction to programming and python. Anyone should be able to pick Python up from this class. However, the only downside to this course in my opinion is that the programming assignments are trivial. In order to start thinking in terms of algorithms, you need to program. If you supplement this class with some programming challenges (which should be easy to find online), this will be a great way to get into Python. | surprising). Ended up breezing through the | Content | in a weekend on 2x speed. | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.38 | 1.18 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | The professor's lecture is so awesome, however, the content is adjust to the new programming learners. I heared extended part of the course is charged, you can purchased it if you want deeper learning | lecture is so awesome, however, the | Content | is adjust to the new programming | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.38 | 1.18 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Great introduction! The content seems like it was put together in a very thoughtful way! | Great introduction! The | Content | seems like it was put together | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.38 | 1.18 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | I enjoy the course, lectures, quises and complementary content a lot. One of my favourite studies. | the course, lectures, quises and complementary | Content | a lot. One of my favourite | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.38 | 1.18 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | This is my first course in Coursera, it's so excellent a trip. The content is so friendly for the beginners to start with and the logic in teaching methods are nice, too. Hope someday I can continue my further study with again. Thanks a lot. | it's so excellent a trip. The | Content | is so friendly for the beginners | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.38 | 1.18 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Hello, I am glad that I am getting this course from one of the (Best) Author of Python Book. I am really happy with the contents & teaching style that made me so confident about coding in Python. Contents are helpful, discussion forum clarifies many doubts & the deep understanding of each module in this course make it a perfect choice for anyone to who even does not know 'A' of Python's Alphabet or of any coding language can start & learn to code. Good initiative by Author & Mentor. Please provide many such courses in near future so that we can learn best from Top University which is anyway not possible for students like us with financial problems! We learn many things from home & from Greatest University like in this case University of Michigan! Thanks for all work for making this course available online. | I am really happy with the | Content | & teaching style that made me | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.38 | 1.18 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Hello, I am glad that I am getting this course from one of the (Best) Author of Python Book. I am really happy with the contents & teaching style that made me so confident about coding in Python. Contents are helpful, discussion forum clarifies many doubts & the deep understanding of each module in this course make it a perfect choice for anyone to who even does not know 'A' of Python's Alphabet or of any coding language can start & learn to code. Good initiative by Author & Mentor. Please provide many such courses in near future so that we can learn best from Top University which is anyway not possible for students like us with financial problems! We learn many things from home & from Greatest University like in this case University of Michigan! Thanks for all work for making this course available online. | so confident about coding in Python. | Content | are helpful, discussion forum clarifies many | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.38 | 1.18 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Really good introduction to Programming and also complete introduction to Python. Content is shown with an easy-to-follow logic recommended for everyone. | and also complete introduction to Python. | Content | is shown with an easy-to-follow logic | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.38 | 1.18 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | The professor made the content easy to understand. As a beginner, this course introduces programming in a very thoughtful way. It keeps me focus on the right things so that I did not get freaked out at the beginning when the working environment looks very different from the experience of an end-user. And it step by step build up my understanding in programming elements. I signed up this course with rather strong motivation (my ultimate goal is to run statistical simulation and develop statistic packages for other users), so when I see the course introducing the elements I did not understand at all before, I can see the power behind those programming building blocks. Hence, this course really made me wanting to program more! | The professor made the | Content | easy to understand. As a beginner, | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.38 | 1.18 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | good content, but slow pace. tiny increments per week | good | Content | but slow pace. tiny increments per | Positive | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.38 | 1.18 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Excellent Course Content with good assignment work !!! Dr Severance is a Great Professor. | Excellent Course | Content | with good assignment work ! ! | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.38 | 1.18 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Prof Severance is great, and while the course content is very basic, he makes it super easy to follow | is great, and while the course | Content | is very basic, he makes it | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.38 | 1.18 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | I did like this course however it is very very basic. I think it should have been merged with course 2 as the course contents are as good as one week work. | with course 2 as the course | Content | are as good as one week | Positive | 0.8 | -1.0 | 0.38 | 1.18 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | An excellent teacher and excellent content for people interested in programming (even if they don't have the basic knowledge of algorithm) | An excellent teacher and excellent | Content | for people interested in programming (even | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.38 | 1.18 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | It is really great step-by-step tutorial which helps you to make first steps with python. Good samples, easy to get content, nice additional materials. | python. Good samples, easy to get | Content | nice additional materials. | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.38 | 1.18 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | awesome lecturer and content thnx for your time!!!! | awesome lecturer and | Content | thnx for your time! ! ! | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.38 | 1.18 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Excellent programming course for beginners. Awesome instructor and a very well structured course content. | and a very well structured course | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.38 | 1.18 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | the content and exercise are very helpful | the | Content | and exercise are very helpful | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.38 | 1.18 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Awesome content, awesome professor. | Awesome | Content | awesome professor. | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.38 | 1.18 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very Informative and the course is designed well to make the contents clear. | is designed well to make the | Content | clear. | Negative | -0.7 | 1.0 | 0.38 | 1.18 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Great teaching style and well explained content. | Great teaching style and well explained | Content | | Positive | 0.9 | 1.0 | 0.38 | 1.18 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | good, he is so funny and contents also good and easy to understand. | good, he is so funny and | Content | also good and easy to understand. | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.38 | 1.18 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good content for getting started in Python. | Very good | Content | for getting started in Python. | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.38 | 1.18 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | To be honest, I thought the course stumbled and fell short. It was too basic and slow paced. The tone was a bit immature at times, and perhaps appropriate only for a grade school level classroom--not something for working professionals. And it's certainly not mature enough or challenging enough for a university class. Even if the goal were to teach those with no programming experience, it could accomplish that while providing more content, and making the content relevant. Is the course worth the price? Hell no. If you do pay, you may feel very cheated at the end. The entire course can be reduced to 3 pages of notes. One would be better off checking into other free, online tutorials. I'm not sure about the value of the videos titled "Office Hours." They all appeared as self-promotional behavior from the professor, as if to say, "hey look how great I am making this video in Paris." They're really nothing more than that. In one video, he corners a guest speaker at a conference, who appears annoyed after a few minutes and gives the professor a polite brush-off: "other people here would like to talk with me too." After all of these videos, you will ask yourself, "okay, why did Severance make me watch that?" "What was the point?" And you'll shrug your shoulders and say, "another waste of time." | could accomplish that while providing more | Content | and making the content relevant. Is | Positive | 0.7 | -1.0 | 0.38 | 1.18 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | To be honest, I thought the course stumbled and fell short. It was too basic and slow paced. The tone was a bit immature at times, and perhaps appropriate only for a grade school level classroom--not something for working professionals. And it's certainly not mature enough or challenging enough for a university class. Even if the goal were to teach those with no programming experience, it could accomplish that while providing more content, and making the content relevant. Is the course worth the price? Hell no. If you do pay, you may feel very cheated at the end. The entire course can be reduced to 3 pages of notes. One would be better off checking into other free, online tutorials. I'm not sure about the value of the videos titled "Office Hours." They all appeared as self-promotional behavior from the professor, as if to say, "hey look how great I am making this video in Paris." They're really nothing more than that. In one video, he corners a guest speaker at a conference, who appears annoyed after a few minutes and gives the professor a polite brush-off: "other people here would like to talk with me too." After all of these videos, you will ask yourself, "okay, why did Severance make me watch that?" "What was the point?" And you'll shrug your shoulders and say, "another waste of time." | providing more content, and making the | Content | relevant. Is the course worth the | Positive | 0.7 | -1.0 | 0.38 | 1.18 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | The course as well as the course contents are perfect. Dr. Chuck explains all the concepts really well. Whether one has done programming earlier or not, this course will give you an insight of what programming means. I would highly recommend this course to everyone who wants to learn Python. Go for it . Good Luck! | course as well as the course | Content | are perfect. Dr. Chuck explains all | Positive | 0.9 | 1.0 | 0.38 | 1.18 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very educative course, amiable teacher and relevant content! | educative course, amiable teacher and relevant | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.38 | 1.18 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | It is great course and the Content is well explained and very interesting | It is great course and the | Content | is well explained and very interesting | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.38 | 1.18 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | The pace of this course & the course content, along with the Creative Commons material is fabulous for anyone who has no prior experience in programming. Prof. Severance is great at what he does, and the assignments are also brilliant. I wished there were more peer review assignments or more assignments so that we could practice more. | of this course & the course | Content | along with the Creative Commons material | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.38 | 1.18 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | One of the best courses I've taken on Coursera. The content is very crisp and not too overly simplistic and very, very engaging. The faculty, Charles Severance is superb. His explanations and videos are a good balance of fun and learning. This course rekindled my love for coding and the Bonus videos are kinda..they are simply great. | courses I've taken on Coursera. The | Content | is very crisp and not too | Negative | -0.6 | 1.0 | 0.38 | 1.18 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good course content. | Very good course | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.38 | 1.18 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | This course, as its name suggests is for anyone including people who have no previous background in programming. One can skip parts based on her experience. Having some experience in programming, I still found it useful. It gives the basics of the language, syntax, what happens when we interact with a computer etc. The instructor was well prepared not only in terms of content but also it is obvious he cares about things like teaching at scale. I also liked he gave credit to everyone who helped him to prepare for the course. I suggest this to anyone who wants to learn python, based on ones experience and dedication, completing all the content can take down to 1-2 days. | prepared not only in terms of | Content | but also it is obvious he | Negative | -0.6 | 0.5 | 0.38 | 1.18 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | This course, as its name suggests is for anyone including people who have no previous background in programming. One can skip parts based on her experience. Having some experience in programming, I still found it useful. It gives the basics of the language, syntax, what happens when we interact with a computer etc. The instructor was well prepared not only in terms of content but also it is obvious he cares about things like teaching at scale. I also liked he gave credit to everyone who helped him to prepare for the course. I suggest this to anyone who wants to learn python, based on ones experience and dedication, completing all the content can take down to 1-2 days. | experience and dedication, completing all the | Content | can take down to 1-2 days. | Negative | -0.6 | 0.5 | 0.38 | 1.18 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Great professor, great content. It can give you a great idea of what is Python and how it works. | Great professor, great | Content | It can give you a great | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.38 | 1.18 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Awesome Course. The way Respected Instructor teaches, even a person without technical background can become an expert. Due to his style of teaching and content people start loving programming | to his style of teaching and | Content | people start loving programming | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.38 | 1.18 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Excellent content, very clear and easy to understand with good examples and exercises! | Excellent | Content | very clear and easy to understand | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.38 | 1.18 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | The professor is so interesting! He also makes the content easy to understand. Highly recommend for beginners! | so interesting! He also makes the | Content | easy to understand. Highly recommend for | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.38 | 1.18 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Great course, step-by-step learning. Content is easy to understand and well explained. Videos provide further explanation, if required. If you want to learn Python by yourself, get enrolled now! | Great course, step-by-step learning. | Content | is easy to understand and well | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.38 | 1.18 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Interesting and useful contents, knowledgeable yet humorous lecturer! Really enjoy the course! | Interesting and useful | Content | knowledgeable yet humorous lecturer! Really enjoy | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.38 | 1.18 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Dr Chuck is a very good instructor who manage to inject both humor and clarity into his teaching. He got me hooked on Python! I always look forward to the next lesson. The lesson content is well-planned and paced..Great work! | to the next lesson. The lesson | Content | is well-planned and paced. . Great | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.38 | 1.18 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Lectures clearly explained & good content shared. Enjoyed the classes. | Lectures clearly explained & good | Content | shared. Enjoyed the classes. | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.38 | 1.18 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Great course! Very happy with the course structure and content and most of all, Dr. Chuck's teaching style is compare to none. Mind blowing! | happy with the course structure and | Content | and most of all, Dr. Chuck's | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.38 | 1.18 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Well organized contents. Great for Python beginners with some experiences of other programming language (like R). The only pity is that some of the functions (like the "raw-input", "print", etc.) are not compatible with the latest versions of Python, so you have to check it out online by yourself. | Well organized | Content | Great for Python beginners with some | Positive | 0.9 | 1.0 | 0.38 | 1.18 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | I love this class because the teacher is humorous and the content is understandable. It triggers my interest to take more courses about Python. Thanks very much! | the teacher is humorous and the | Content | is understandable. It triggers my interest | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.38 | 1.18 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Fantastic class. The teacher is amazing. The content is paced well. I love everything about this... | class. The teacher is amazing. The | Content | is paced well. I love everything | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.38 | 1.18 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | The right course which gets you started with programming. The instructor makes it right too by putting in tremendous effort in explaining the content with so much fun. | in tremendous effort in explaining the | Content | with so much fun. | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.38 | 1.18 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Un curso muy útil para aprender Python des de 0. Contenido muy didáctico y muy bien explicado! ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Very usefull course for learning Python with no previous experience. Very didactic content and with well explained classes. Thanks Dr. Severance! | with no previous experience. Very didactic | Content | and with well explained classes. Thanks | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.38 | 1.18 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Excellent course, specially if you want to start from scratch. It gives you the feeling of being in an actual class. I've done the whole codecademy python course, which was very focused on the practical side, and it is great now to do this course to understand the theory behind it, and what was I actually doing. I'll certainly continue. Thanks for the awesome content! | certainly continue. Thanks for the awesome | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.38 | 1.18 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Great and interesting course introducing Programming in Python! The instructor and his style makes it much easier to remember course content and learn Python. Besides, it was fun, because Dr.Chuck has great sense of humor. | it much easier to remember course | Content | and learn Python. Besides, it was | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.38 | 1.18 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Charles Severance is a BRILLIANT teacher. The way he explains the content, and how he asures that you UNDERSTAND the basics of Python programming makes this course great. Highly recomendable for those who aim getting strong basic programming skills. | teacher. The way he explains the | Content | and how he asures that you | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.38 | 1.18 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Great introduction to programming, I brought the course book, it makes the assignments easier and the content is better understood and retained. The pdf version is available free, but for me having a paper copy is just easier to flick through, read and reference. | makes the assignments easier and the | Content | is better understood and retained. The | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.38 | 1.18 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | I appreciate the efforts made by the team, especially Dr.Chuck the way the content is delivered. | especially Dr. Chuck the way the | Content | is delivered. | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.38 | 1.18 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | This is an awesome class for beginning programmers! The course content is easy and the instructor is very tho | class for beginning programmers! The course | Content | is easy and the instructor is | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.38 | 1.18 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Outstanding teaching. Great content. Very well designed. Excellent tools. Thank you very much for this. | Outstanding teaching. Great | Content | Very well designed. Excellent tools. Thank | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.38 | 1.18 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Great course that makes the content self-paced. The book is accessible and the expectation of assignments is reasonable. I highly recommend. | Great course that makes the | Content | self-paced. The book is accessible and | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.38 | 1.18 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | The content inside this course is well tought through. Questions and asignments holds high quality. If you haven't been in contact with Python before, this might be the first step for you, and when I say first step, then I really mean first step. | The | Content | inside this course is well tought | Positive | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.38 | 1.18 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Great professor, very humor, great course content, very inspiring. | Great professor, very humor, great course | Content | very inspiring. | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.38 | 1.18 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very informative course. Anyone who wants to start learning python, should start with this course and subsequently opt for other courses into Python specialization. And, 5 out of 5 for Dr. Charles Severance and team. Love the way this course content is structured and is presented to students. Thanks, Rakesh | team. Love the way this course | Content | is structured and is presented to | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.38 | 1.18 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good information and great delivery of content. | good information and great delivery of | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.38 | 1.18 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Excellent content. A good start for people who does't have any knowledge about programming. | Excellent | Content | A good start for people who | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.38 | 1.18 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | A lot of enthusiasm from the lecturer. Lecturer explains well. Very easy to understand. Content sequenced well | explains well. Very easy to understand. | Content | sequenced well | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.38 | 1.18 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | The content is good and easy to follow but lack depth. | The | Content | is good and easy to follow | Positive | 0.8 | 0.0 | 0.38 | 1.18 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good didactics and content. | Good didactics and | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.38 | 1.18 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Great introduction for programming. I think it can be improved with more logic content and assignments, as well as some real cases (such as real examples of text file parsing, etc). | can be improved with more logic | Content | and assignments, as well as some | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.38 | 1.18 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Thank you for preparing this excellent class, it helps me a lot. The videos after the class content is great as well. | lot. The videos after the class | Content | is great as well. | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.38 | 1.18 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | very well thought of course content and delivery ... | very well thought of course | Content | and delivery . . . | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.38 | 1.18 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | The course content is good. As a beginner i found it very much helpful for learning python. | The course | Content | is good. As a beginner i | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.38 | 1.18 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | A very good content with additional inspiring interviews. Names on it, it is getting started course, it is giving foundations of Python. Because I have some programming background in Java, I have completed it in a week without skipping anything. Dr. Charles Severance makes his job very well and more importantly in very enjoying way :). I'm looking forward to taking next Python course from him. Last but not least, very thanks to Coursera for providing us accessing top class courses in free of charge. Best wishes for all from Turkey. | A very good | Content | with additional inspiring interviews. Names on | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.38 | 1.18 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | I like the interactive way of teaching by Dr. Chuck and a great content for starting python | by Dr. Chuck and a great | Content | for starting python | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.38 | 1.18 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | This was my first Coursera course I ever completed. As programmer most of the content I already knew, but I believed there is also some info might be between the lines, which it was actually true, and in top of that it was fun all the way. Thank you Dr. Chunck | completed. As programmer most of the | Content | I already knew, but I believed | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.38 | 1.18 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Great content. | Great | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.38 | 1.18 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Specific to the point,Course content is very simple and easily understandable. | Specific to the point, Course | Content | is very simple and easily understandable. | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.38 | 1.18 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | We tried to use this class to teach a brown bag lunch for our employees interested in programming. Python is a great language but this class has a very low content to volume ratio (nobody wants to watch the instructor meet his life-time idol at a trade-show or watch the Intel versus AMD melt-down commercials over their lunch break). | this class has a very low | Content | to volume ratio (nobody wants to | Negative | -0.7 | -1.0 | 0.38 | 1.18 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Ideal for starters of python programming.. Content is easy to understand and the delivery by the prof is exceptional. | for starters of python programming. . | Content | is easy to understand and the | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.38 | 1.18 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Excellent course, the content is very good and the explanations are clear. Un curso excelente, buen contenido y buenas explicaciones. Muy recomendado. | Excellent course, the | Content | is very good and the explanations | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.38 | 1.18 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Great content, great tutorials. | Great | Content | great tutorials. | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.38 | 1.18 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | The class is well paced and the instructor provides the content in a very easy to digest mode. | paced and the instructor provides the | Content | in a very easy to digest | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.38 | 1.18 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | It is just amazing course for student who want to start learning. The content of this course is arranged such that student is completely understand why you study this course? and all those type of questions.. | who want to start learning. The | Content | of this course is arranged such | Negative | -0.6 | 1.0 | 0.38 | 1.18 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Course content was very simple which helps a new-bee to get acquainted with python in an easy manner. Professor Chuck is also great. | Course | Content | was very simple which helps a | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.38 | 1.18 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Dr. Severance's way of explaining the simplest of things with immense enthusiasm and great examples can hold the attention of anyone- be it an experienced programmer or an absolute layman. I like how the entire course content is available for anyone under the Creative Commons, this can do wonders in imparting programming education in countries like mine. Also, he seems to be a cool teacher. | I like how the entire course | Content | is available for anyone under the | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.38 | 1.18 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | This course has fun lectures and very interesting bonus content. | fun lectures and very interesting bonus | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.38 | 1.18 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | The quality of the content is excellent and is presented clearly (although the lecturer drinking various things throughout the lectures was odd...). I plowed through all seven weeks in a day because I had already finished the first three weeks of the Rice University Python course (also on Coursera); I would say this entire course is nearly equivalent to the first three weeks of the Rice course. My reasons for doing this are two-fold: (1) practice, practice, practice, and (2) I plan to take all four courses in this series from U Mich - I am interested in the web and database aspects that do not seem to be covered in the Rice course. I did learn a thing or two from each course that was not presented in the other, but those points were relatively minor and would probably be stumbled across on a future troubleshooting visit to stackoverflow. | The quality of the | Content | is excellent and is presented clearly | Positive | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.38 | 1.18 |
| 7gLccRnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Compared to the other Coursera course I attended ,this one is by far the least useful one. The instructor is super brief and his slides are mostly made of a list of acronyms! I would not recommend it until they make some serious changes to the content and presentation of material. | make some serious changes to the | Content | and presentation of material. | Negative | -0.6 | -1.0 | 0.82 | 0.9 |
| 7gLccRnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Excellent content and references to additional materials. | Excellent | Content | and references to additional materials. | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.82 | 0.9 |
| 7gLccRnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Content of the course is very good, useful and interesting, I greatly appreciate the knowledge delivered. But assignments could improve: -All module assignments seems mostly focalize on using Microstrategy tool. In assignments, i would like to see more exercises so that students learn through practice of business cases. For example, I prefer the way modules are organized in courses 1,2, and 3: concepts with examples, practice exercise, then assignment through similar exercise + a quiz. -In last assignment, there was no suggested solution(s) for the last question, i think this is missing for a good understanding. | | Content | of the course is very good, | Positive | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.82 | 0.9 |
| 7jEat7ioEeWfYA612mWHZw | Awesome course. Content was delivered in a clear, concise, and precise manner. | Awesome course. | Content | was delivered in a clear, concise, | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.65 | 0.88 |
| 7jEat7ioEeWfYA612mWHZw | Well matured course that provides a great digest over a very complex topic and is a fantastic gateway to get started on the topic. Don't expect a terribly engaging set of presentations, but it is factually very useful and worth the time for those relatively new to the subject. I found the amount of content easy to handle on the side, while working full time. | subject. I found the amount of | Content | easy to handle on the side, | Negative | -0.6 | 0.5 | 0.65 | 0.88 |
| 8GTGgDxOEeWdUgozVKt3nw | Great Content!. | Great | Content | . | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 1.08 |
| 8GTGgDxOEeWdUgozVKt3nw | I really like the content of this course and the quality of the readings. The videos are intuitive and help you go through the most important concepts. I definitely recommend it! And big thank you to the teachers that delivered high standard course! | I really like the | Content | of this course and the quality | Negative | -0.6 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 1.08 |
| 8GTGgDxOEeWdUgozVKt3nw | This is a rather pleasant course with a mix of advantages and disadvantages. For me, the advantages outweigh the negative sides. It slides on the surface of things, though, so don't expect to get too much 'in the know' after it. What I liked (and you might too) -> Short, visually engaging, clear in their purpose videos -> Interesting recommended/required literature/video content to solidify the concepts presented in the videos -> Comfortable layout of the transcripts so you can DL them and check them out as PDFs -> The course is focused on a very interesting, dynamic topic -- and lives up with a dynamic, fun and engaging approach What I didn't like that much -> Quizzes had some rather easy questions and as a whole weren't that serious. You can retake them -- you need to rely on your honesty to assess how much you've learned. -> The brisk nature of the videos is nice, but sometimes the narrative would jump from one point to another too abruptly. I still recommend the course for those who want to get their feet a little bit wet when it comes to innovation, digital affairs and basic entrepreneurship concepts. | purpose videos -> Interesting recommended/required literature/video | Content | to solidify the concepts presented in | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 1.08 |
| 8GTGgDxOEeWdUgozVKt3nw | Very good MOOC ; clear and quick with high quality contents and lessons. Thanks | clear and quick with high quality | Content | and lessons. Thanks | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 1.08 |
| 8GTGgDxOEeWdUgozVKt3nw | Amazing course! The best course I've taken at Coursera so far. Great lectures content + additional material with real world examples. | at Coursera so far. Great lectures | Content | + additional material with real world | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 1.08 |
| 8GTGgDxOEeWdUgozVKt3nw | This MOOC is just brilliant to catch up on the digital revolutions happening just now (organization, content). It gives the keys to understand and projet oneself, and also gives the users guide on how to innovate in this world. A MUST LEARN & SEE. THANKS A LOT FOR THIS! | digital revolutions happening just now (organization, | Content | It gives the keys to understand | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 1.08 |
| 8GTGgDxOEeWdUgozVKt3nw | Awesome vidéos and great content | Awesome vidéos and great | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 1.08 |
| 8UQBnm04EeWyAQ6K5KeLkw | Grate Course content and very well explained. | Grate Course | Content | and very well explained. | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.79 | 0.99 |
| 8UQBnm04EeWyAQ6K5KeLkw | Awesome content, all the requiered foundations for the real beginning in the Android world. | Awesome | Content | all the requiered foundations for the | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.79 | 0.99 |
| 8UQBnm04EeWyAQ6K5KeLkw | I liked the course contents, but in my opinion the slides should be more modern, and the main idea in each lesson should get more highlight, and the ideas to retain too. | I liked the course | Content | but in my opinion the slides | Positive | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.79 | 0.99 |
| 8UQBnm04EeWyAQ6K5KeLkw | i gave this course 1 star not because its bad in content, its just because i was expecting more due to the fact it has been delayed several times; then when it finally came it was like any other youtube or online tutorial. i was expecting something as big as udacity but unfortunately its not. Don't expect to know or understand java with this course, no practical or step by step example in this course. what makes it worst is the fact they never show you how to build an app from scratch while the only app they have in this course, they dont do it. you have to do it on your own. dont get me wrong. all of them are good instructors but the way they did it, its definitely is not a beginner friendly. give a calculator as an assignment to build while you never built one app in this course, i think its not an effective way to teach. i will not pay for this specialization. i will do the udacity nanodegree one | star not because its bad in | Content | its just because i was expecting | Negative | -0.7 | -1.0 | 0.79 | 0.99 |
| 8UQBnm04EeWyAQ6K5KeLkw | The content is very rich! | The | Content | is very rich! | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.79 | 0.99 |
| 9p1NWzJzEeWFJhJQP1CW-Q | Contents were short and great but some tools and practicle s/w should be introduced in it. | | Content | were short and great but some | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.9 | 0.95 |
| 9p1NWzJzEeWFJhJQP1CW-Q | articulation needs to be improved, talked too fast, content doesn't give much | to be improved, talked too fast, | Content | doesn't give much | Negative | -0.7 | -0.5 | 0.9 | 0.95 |
| 9p1NWzJzEeWFJhJQP1CW-Q | Very poor content. Everything is already said in last courses in this specialization. Also they didnt gave any techniques or tips how to easier create game worlds | Very poor | Content | Everything is already said in last | Negative | -0.7 | -0.5 | 0.9 | 0.95 |
| 9p1NWzJzEeWFJhJQP1CW-Q | Great content and great assignments ! | Great | Content | and great assignments ! | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.9 | 0.95 |
| 9p1NWzJzEeWFJhJQP1CW-Q | Useful but as with the first course of the specialization very light on content | of the specialization very light on | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 0.0 | 0.9 | 0.95 |
| 9p1NWzJzEeWFJhJQP1CW-Q | I had good assignments, but less content than I expected. | I had good assignments, but less | Content | than I expected. | Negative | -0.7 | 0.5 | 0.9 | 0.95 |
| 9p1NWzJzEeWFJhJQP1CW-Q | Great teacher, great videos, great staff, this course, and CalArts course in general, know how to create great learning content that engages and promotes learning, there is never a second when I'm thinking "man, when is this going to end?". | know how to create great learning | Content | that engages and promotes learning, there | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.9 | 0.95 |
| A0IYf6jOEeSnlCIAC1EMbw | Excellent content and lecture! | Excellent | Content | and lecture! | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.61 | 0.97 |
| A0IYf6jOEeSnlCIAC1EMbw | Very dense yet exciting content. | Very dense yet exciting | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.61 | 0.97 |
| A0IYf6jOEeSnlCIAC1EMbw | Excellent content and nicely delivered. Would have liked some more variation in the delivery - show us videos, problems to solve, more details for example on Munich massacre - detailed deconstruction of the act of terror. Found it difficult with the tests that involved "check all that apply". Recommended course. | Excellent | Content | and nicely delivered. Would have liked | Positive | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.61 | 0.97 |
| A0IYf6jOEeSnlCIAC1EMbw | Very compelling arguments and facts. I was looking for something to do and always enjoy broadening knowledge. The content was heavy enough to be meaningful, but light enough to be enjoyable. I enjoyed the discussion forums. I will be continuing the series. | and always enjoy broadening knowledge. The | Content | was heavy enough to be meaningful, | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.61 | 0.97 |
| A0IYf6jOEeSnlCIAC1EMbw | Theoretically the course is very lacking. There is little focus on the scholarly work in the field except perhaps the first few lectures. The content and scope of the course is too small. Overall however the content is good for a very basic introduction and | is too small. Overall however the | Content | is good for a very basic | Positive | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.61 | 0.97 |
| A0IYf6jOEeSnlCIAC1EMbw | Average. Doesn't really like the Professor's style. He spends too many time trying to explain that he feels really concern about the victims etc. I feel that the content of the class could have been interesting but the organization was messy. Finally it gives the impression that academics know barely anything about the subject. I would have prefer a more historical approach. Overall i've watched all the content but in the future i won't spend much time checking for new Mooc from him. Thanks for the try though | victims etc. I feel that the | Content | of the class could have been | Negative | -0.7 | 0.0 | 0.61 | 0.97 |
| A0IYf6jOEeSnlCIAC1EMbw | Good fist MOOC experience. Pity the google hangout wasn't up but never mind. Would prefer more questions in the videos to check I'm listening attentively. Would also like to see a list of all the reading material in one place rather than per lectiure. Then I can go to each web page and save as epub usiing the crhome dotepub extension and copy to my ereader. Anyway you can streamline that kind of admin task would be appreciated. You ought to spruke ways to read the web pages, because reading it on a laptop or even tablet is a bit tedious. Also with the PDFs, some info on saving them as resizable PDFs would be appreciated. Course content was good and I like the coursera front end. Need someway to manage tthe growing library of reading material that accumalates not just with this one course but if you do multiple MOOCs over time, Thank! | resizable PDFs would be appreciated. Course | Content | was good and I like the | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.61 | 0.97 |
| A0IYf6jOEeSnlCIAC1EMbw | Great contents and better professor | Great | Content | and better professor | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.61 | 0.97 |
| A0IYf6jOEeSnlCIAC1EMbw | It was a good course, however, it seems that the recording was from the earlier course. Which I don't mind, however, some of the comment wasn't relevant, so it was a bit weird. In terms of content and how the course run, it was beyond my expectation. The list of literature provided were quite extesive and strategicaly chosen. I wish there's a whole syllabus that we can access in the beginning of the course to prepare for the assignment. | a bit weird. In terms of | Content | and how the course run, it | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.61 | 0.97 |
| A0IYf6jOEeSnlCIAC1EMbw | I have learned a lot since the very beginning of this course, i found very accurate the content in each module, and i should mention that profesor Bakker is very objective at explaining, and when it comes to sharing his opinions he gives reasonable arguments. | course, i found very accurate the | Content | in each module, and i should | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.61 | 0.97 |
| A0IYf6jOEeSnlCIAC1EMbw | A very good and thought provoking course. It is a re-run of an archived course and sadly a number of reference materials that had been on the dashboard are not reposted with it. Also there are references to discussion forums that don't exist. If the missing material and content were up to date it would be a strong and complete course. | exist. If the missing material and | Content | were up to date it would | Negative | -0.6 | -0.5 | 0.61 | 0.97 |
| a0OJ1ha4EeWKlgqs7LdhRw | Incredible and very useful content made in a very good estructure. | Incredible and very useful | Content | made in a very good estructure. | Positive | 0.9 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 1.06 |
| a0OJ1ha4EeWKlgqs7LdhRw | Enjoyed the course Kimberley. You made it fun and informative and I used the content to make a slew of changes! I had a real distilling of exactly where I am going with my brand and I'm off on this adventure of creating it now. Can I convince you to do a course ORM through Coursera? | and informative and I used the | Content | to make a slew of changes! | Negative | -0.6 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 1.06 |
| a0OJ1ha4EeWKlgqs7LdhRw | excellent content, supported by the fact it is supported by Prof Jonahs book, and some excellent on line essays /blogs & applications of the ideas he recounts. Very memorably presented. Pithy & relevant. | excellent | Content | supported by the fact it is | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 1.06 |
| a0OJ1ha4EeWKlgqs7LdhRw | Great communicator! Just it needs more content. I already knew most of the things! However I have enjoyed. Congrats! | Great communicator! Just it needs more | Content | I already knew most of the | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 1.06 |
| a0OJ1ha4EeWKlgqs7LdhRw | Great instructor! Very good content and reference readings. I only wish the course wouldn't be so introductory. | Great instructor! Very good | Content | and reference readings. I only wish | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 1.06 |
| a0OJ1ha4EeWKlgqs7LdhRw | Excellent teacher. Very well recorded videos. Good lectures and nice content. It changes the way how you see your life (personal and professional aspects). Congratulations. I recommend to all. | recorded videos. Good lectures and nice | Content | It changes the way how you | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 1.06 |
| a0OJ1ha4EeWKlgqs7LdhRw | Amazing content! I learned so much during this course. The instructor is absolutely awesome, my favorite on Coursera so far. | Amazing | Content | I learned so much during this | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 1.06 |
| a0OJ1ha4EeWKlgqs7LdhRw | Great content, engaged and energetic professor made the material fun. Worthwhile course! | Great | Content | engaged and energetic professor made the | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 1.06 |
| A4W_GyDjEeW5Rwo0txKkgQ | Amazing instructors, very appreciate their input and explanations by typing it on the system. Very well thought and excellent material content. | Very well thought and excellent material | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.43 | 1.02 |
| A4W_GyDjEeW5Rwo0txKkgQ | Great course! From the lucid, well presented content, it is a joy for a beginner as well as a seasoned programmer to take home something from this course. Please do bring out an extended version dedicated to image processing, signal processing which MATLAB mainly covers :) | course! From the lucid, well presented | Content | it is a joy for a | Positive | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.43 | 1.02 |
| A4W_GyDjEeW5Rwo0txKkgQ | Homework assignments are much more difficult and time-consuming than the contents of the lectures, especially for the last three weeks. Fortunately, the tutors are very patient and respond to your questions quickly. | more difficult and time-consuming than the | Content | of the lectures, especially for the | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.43 | 1.02 |
| A4W_GyDjEeW5Rwo0txKkgQ | This is the only one course, I have paid for certificate. I liked most of the course. Instructor has a unique way of teaching Matlab. He started Matlab basics. After that, he had shown functions. The reason of showing functions at the very first times was to evaluate the problems. I am so surprised when I have seen the usage of column operator in such different ways. Course was followed by decision structures, loops, strings and file I/O. The course content was well prepared. Video lectures are quite helpful. Especially, 1 hour problem solving example video was so beneficial. However, at the end of the course, problems become quite challenging and time consuming. In first 6 problem set, my success rate was 100%. But, in last two week's problems I was able to solve only 5 of 8. The problems become difficult to understand, there were not enough explanations or hints. Discussion pages were not useful some times. I had to make further research on internet to understand the problem and it was time consuming. In the new version of the course, it would be better if problems are clear to understand. In short, the Instructors and Mentors did great job. Do I suggest this course to anyone else? The answer is definitely YES! Thank you. | strings and file I/O. The course | Content | was well prepared. Video lectures are | Negative | -0.6 | 1.0 | 0.43 | 1.02 |
| A4W_GyDjEeW5Rwo0txKkgQ | The assignments´assessments are really smartly set up and help tracking the content of the course by practising yourself | set up and help tracking the | Content | of the course by practising yourself | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.43 | 1.02 |
| A4W_GyDjEeW5Rwo0txKkgQ | great course. It is easy for me, a new man, to understand these basic content. Thank Coursera. | new man, to understand these basic | Content | Thank Coursera. | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.43 | 1.02 |
| A4W_GyDjEeW5Rwo0txKkgQ | Very good course, with clear explanations of the key concepts. However, I felt hindered in being able to complete all tasks in the homeworks each week as many questions alienate someone like me with little mathematics/physics background. I feel if the questions were more general I would have been able to perform better each week. Very good lecture content though. | better each week. Very good lecture | Content | though. | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.43 | 1.02 |
| aaNxjzc9EeWO-Qq6rEZAow | Really horrible in instruction, experience and application ability of lecturers, poorly put together and assembled. It was astonishing to experience such self-promoting hacks rather than knowledgeable practitioners of the art of meditation. It is very important to clarify the content of a somewhat titled misnomer. The course was an academic study in mediation bring is rather esoteric, questionable, and personal opinion concepts and comments; in effect a mesh-mash. | is very important to clarify the | Content | of a somewhat titled misnomer. The | Positive | 0.6 | -1.0 | 0.71 | 0.9 |
| aaNxjzc9EeWO-Qq6rEZAow | I am very disappointed about the content. It is not a course. Pr David Germano is just reading text. No design no learning experience. I would learn much better with just reading a book. It is a shame I was very interested in the subject. | I am very disappointed about the | Content | It is not a course. Pr | Negative | -0.8 | -1.0 | 0.71 | 0.9 |
| aaNxjzc9EeWO-Qq6rEZAow | This course was one of the most useful of my undergraduate and graduate career. I have been a long time Buddhist practitioner, primarily in the Zen tradition and found it difficult to integrate, both in my own practice and through understanding popular literature. This course provided much of the intellectual background that I have wanted for a long time. I am particularly interested in the discussion of Buddhist Meditation as a religious vs. secular practice, and the cultural content of the various practices one encounters. David Germano's lectures are incredibly information dense. I learned to download the transcript and outline and highlight them as well as listen to the audio. Now I wouldn't cut out a thing. I particularly appreciate the many guest lectures, interviews and guided meditation sessions. All of my questions are not yet answered but I have some clearer understanding and ideas for moving forward. | vs. secular practice, and the cultural | Content | of the various practices one encounters. | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.71 | 0.9 |
| aaNxjzc9EeWO-Qq6rEZAow | The course gives multi-dimensional (traditional, scientific, research) perspective about Buddhist philosophy, primarily on meditation. A highly self-contained course, content completeness is remarkable. A systematic description of various type meditations is high appreciated. | on meditation. A highly self-contained course, | Content | completeness is remarkable. A systematic description | Positive | 0.9 | 1.0 | 0.71 | 0.9 |
| aaNxjzc9EeWO-Qq6rEZAow | Great content - learned a lot. Would be easier to follow if David's lectures would be presented more accessible - not read in a monotone voice. | Great | Content | - learned a lot. Would be | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.71 | 0.9 |
| aaNxjzc9EeWO-Qq6rEZAow | Very nice course, it varies a lot with the content so many different angles are mentioned. | it varies a lot with the | Content | so many different angles are mentioned. | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.71 | 0.9 |
| aaNxjzc9EeWO-Qq6rEZAow | The course was a very comprehensive introduction to Buddhist Meditation: - there were lectures about the different Buddhist meditation traditions - practical trainings on Buddhist meditation - neurological and psychological view on the effects of meditation on the human body and many more topics related to meditation. I found the course was actually overloaded with content: most videos were too long and there were too many videos. Some videos were more like reading a text: the lecturer was most likely reading his own script from a Teleprompter instead of really talking to the audience. The videos were not bad, but I see some room for improvement for most videos of most lecturers. My favourite videos were from Anam Thubten, he was most genuine and convincing to me. All in all it was still an excellent introduction into the topic for me: a big thank you to all people involved, you did a great job!! | the course was actually overloaded with | Content | most videos were too long and | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.71 | 0.9 |
| aaNxjzc9EeWO-Qq6rEZAow | This course contains a balanced content of meditation practice and scientific studies on the topic. I enjoyed the content and delivery of the course. The course helped me understand the structure and organization of the Buddhist teachings. Looking forward to the next courses. N.B: First few sessions might seem a bit slow and boring. My suggestion is to be patient and not drop out, great material will come afterwards. | This course contains a balanced | Content | of meditation practice and scientific studies | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.71 | 0.9 |
| aaNxjzc9EeWO-Qq6rEZAow | This course contains a balanced content of meditation practice and scientific studies on the topic. I enjoyed the content and delivery of the course. The course helped me understand the structure and organization of the Buddhist teachings. Looking forward to the next courses. N.B: First few sessions might seem a bit slow and boring. My suggestion is to be patient and not drop out, great material will come afterwards. | on the topic. I enjoyed the | Content | and delivery of the course. The | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.71 | 0.9 |
| aaNxjzc9EeWO-Qq6rEZAow | Good content. MIght want to change up the presentations for variety - add visual aids, etc. | Good | Content | MIght want to change up the | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.71 | 0.9 |
| aaNxjzc9EeWO-Qq6rEZAow | (I posted this review in a blog [https://guhyasamajacenter.wordpress.com/2015/10/03/review-of-the-free-coursera-tibetan-buddhist-meditation-and-the-modern-world-lesser-vehicle-course-given-by-uva/]. Much of the courseware was outstanding. Many of the videos were so poorly done (boring) that I couldn't watch them. (I do not watch people read prepared text in a video. Ever.) ----------- From the blog ---------------------------------- I recently took the FREE Coursera course, "Tibetan Buddhist Meditation and the Modern World". (https://www.coursera.org/learn/buddhist-meditation) From the course catalog: " Tibetan Buddhist Meditation and the Modern World explores the immense variety of meditation practices past and present. We present their histories, their philosophical underpinnings, their transformations in the modern global world, and we give you a chance to reflect upon meditation practices through secular contemplations designed just for this course." (Note: In the class overview, it is noted that the term "Lesser Vehicle" is "perjorative" but they use it anyway. ??") There are many FREE reasons to take this FREE "Lesser Vehicle" course (the first of four): #1 - An awesome, wonderful hour-long interview with Sharon Salzberg, one of the founders of the Insight Meditation Society. What an awesome lady. I was not aware that she is also a Dzogchen student. (Did I mention it was FREE?) Worth signing up for the course just to skip to Week 6 to watch this interview. #2 - Guided Meditations by Dr. Anne Klein and Anam Thubten. Very, very, very nice. FREE, it's ALL FREE. #3 - The Science of Mindfulness against the Background of the Scientific Study of Meditation videos with Dr. Clifford Saron, neuroscientist. His videos start in Week 1 and continue through Week 6 in building a basis for understanding the scientific research on meditation. He (and the course) demonstrates what can and cannot (presently) be scientifically proven about meditation. One excellent example: Two trained pianists were told to learn a complicated piece of music, one with the piano, and the other only in his imagination. After 2 weeks (I think) of practice, their brains' MRI patterns exhibited almost the exact same changes. Dr. Saron noted that the results are not definitive but still may have implications for the compassion/bodhicitta meditations we do. #4: An interview on "Buddhist Modernism", with David McMahan. Very much academic-oriented. One statement, in particular, struck me since, the more I think about it, the more I think it might be true: "The Buddhist Tantra teachings are not accepted nor are they popular in the West." For all the Buddhist monastics that visit the USA and the West to grab donations and go back to their home countries, few of them are sticking around to teach complete Tantra classes. The few that do (and do it well) are having a hard time making ends meet. (That's just my opinion, I guess.) There are also short 5-10 minute interviews with Khenpo Tsultrim Lodro (a short "snapshot" of the Tibetan take on the week's particular subject, which was often better (to me) than the 90min-long "talking head" version ) and Ven. Tsoknyi Rinpoche ("How does Buddhism change in a New Culture" and "Benefits and Dangers of Secularing Buddhism", the TB rebuttal, as it were. He did note that motivation is the key. Bad agenda = bad results, good motivation will cause good results.) Have I noted the course is FREE? So you can take the course, and the following courses, without doing any of the assignments/quizzes. Watch (or download) any video or transcript to your heart's content whenever you wish in any order you wish. (That assumes the courses are not taken off-line at a future date.) Further in the course description is a blurb that may point to at least 3 future courses in "Mahāyāna, …Vajrayāna, …and a fourth vehicle, which is explicit in many Tibetan materials, though no standard term ever emerged that was accepted by all sectarian traditions - we will thus term it as the “Natural Vehicle” or “Post Tantra”." If the quality of guided meditations (GM) in following classes are even half the quality of this course's GM's, then that's all the reason I need to continue the future classes, too. Course gotchas: #1. That said (other shoe dropping here), the other half of the course was videos of people reading their prepared academic papers, in monotone or semi-monotone voices. (Transcripts are available. I figure I can read a paper in 5% of the time someone else reads it to me in a video. Ugh.) However, they would probably need the voice of Morgan Freeman, James Earl Jones, B. Cumberbatch or James Spader to keep me awake. To be fair, the content is golden, although the papers seems to be geared to the academic community, rather than the student community. Books and Videos on these subjects are all over Amazon, YouTube, FPMT, Dharma-Documentaries, etc. #2. The Sharon Salzberg (SS), in her interview, brought up an excellent point. She noted that she and a noted clinical psychology (CP) scientist (researcher) (whose name I have forgotten) were at a conference where the issue on the table was that someone was having trouble with "loving kindness" meditation as a first meditation class. SS noted that she would instantly recommend the student change to "calm abiding" meditation whereas the CP could not change that student's meditation technique to another technique (such as calm abiding) as her research findings would then be invalid. Similarly, many of the non-Buddhist guided meditations that I viewed in this course felt like a physical education or "How To" class. Do this. Do that. It did not feel as though they lived the material, just taught it. (Whereas it was patently obvious Dr. Klein & Anam Thubten were definitely "walking the walk", so to speak, so were able to speak from the heart.) Interviews I did not watch, that may be of great interest to others, include meditation in the school system by Tish Jennings, meditation in the Business Community (an interview with David Mick), the Burmese meditation tradition in an interview with Erik Braun, the MBSR (Meditation Based Stress Reduction) with Susan Bauer-Wu, and meditation in the legal community with Rhonda Magee. And all that is just the first course. Many of it's "failings" may just be my karmic opinions. The course is worth checking out and watching/reading/meditating on those parts that interest you. In that respect, the breadth of the course content is quite nice and so well done. Grade: B-. | video or transcript to your heart's | Content | whenever you wish in any order | Positive | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.71 | 0.9 |
| aaNxjzc9EeWO-Qq6rEZAow | (I posted this review in a blog [https://guhyasamajacenter.wordpress.com/2015/10/03/review-of-the-free-coursera-tibetan-buddhist-meditation-and-the-modern-world-lesser-vehicle-course-given-by-uva/]. Much of the courseware was outstanding. Many of the videos were so poorly done (boring) that I couldn't watch them. (I do not watch people read prepared text in a video. Ever.) ----------- From the blog ---------------------------------- I recently took the FREE Coursera course, "Tibetan Buddhist Meditation and the Modern World". (https://www.coursera.org/learn/buddhist-meditation) From the course catalog: " Tibetan Buddhist Meditation and the Modern World explores the immense variety of meditation practices past and present. We present their histories, their philosophical underpinnings, their transformations in the modern global world, and we give you a chance to reflect upon meditation practices through secular contemplations designed just for this course." (Note: In the class overview, it is noted that the term "Lesser Vehicle" is "perjorative" but they use it anyway. ??") There are many FREE reasons to take this FREE "Lesser Vehicle" course (the first of four): #1 - An awesome, wonderful hour-long interview with Sharon Salzberg, one of the founders of the Insight Meditation Society. What an awesome lady. I was not aware that she is also a Dzogchen student. (Did I mention it was FREE?) Worth signing up for the course just to skip to Week 6 to watch this interview. #2 - Guided Meditations by Dr. Anne Klein and Anam Thubten. Very, very, very nice. FREE, it's ALL FREE. #3 - The Science of Mindfulness against the Background of the Scientific Study of Meditation videos with Dr. Clifford Saron, neuroscientist. His videos start in Week 1 and continue through Week 6 in building a basis for understanding the scientific research on meditation. He (and the course) demonstrates what can and cannot (presently) be scientifically proven about meditation. One excellent example: Two trained pianists were told to learn a complicated piece of music, one with the piano, and the other only in his imagination. After 2 weeks (I think) of practice, their brains' MRI patterns exhibited almost the exact same changes. Dr. Saron noted that the results are not definitive but still may have implications for the compassion/bodhicitta meditations we do. #4: An interview on "Buddhist Modernism", with David McMahan. Very much academic-oriented. One statement, in particular, struck me since, the more I think about it, the more I think it might be true: "The Buddhist Tantra teachings are not accepted nor are they popular in the West." For all the Buddhist monastics that visit the USA and the West to grab donations and go back to their home countries, few of them are sticking around to teach complete Tantra classes. The few that do (and do it well) are having a hard time making ends meet. (That's just my opinion, I guess.) There are also short 5-10 minute interviews with Khenpo Tsultrim Lodro (a short "snapshot" of the Tibetan take on the week's particular subject, which was often better (to me) than the 90min-long "talking head" version ) and Ven. Tsoknyi Rinpoche ("How does Buddhism change in a New Culture" and "Benefits and Dangers of Secularing Buddhism", the TB rebuttal, as it were. He did note that motivation is the key. Bad agenda = bad results, good motivation will cause good results.) Have I noted the course is FREE? So you can take the course, and the following courses, without doing any of the assignments/quizzes. Watch (or download) any video or transcript to your heart's content whenever you wish in any order you wish. (That assumes the courses are not taken off-line at a future date.) Further in the course description is a blurb that may point to at least 3 future courses in "Mahāyāna, …Vajrayāna, …and a fourth vehicle, which is explicit in many Tibetan materials, though no standard term ever emerged that was accepted by all sectarian traditions - we will thus term it as the “Natural Vehicle” or “Post Tantra”." If the quality of guided meditations (GM) in following classes are even half the quality of this course's GM's, then that's all the reason I need to continue the future classes, too. Course gotchas: #1. That said (other shoe dropping here), the other half of the course was videos of people reading their prepared academic papers, in monotone or semi-monotone voices. (Transcripts are available. I figure I can read a paper in 5% of the time someone else reads it to me in a video. Ugh.) However, they would probably need the voice of Morgan Freeman, James Earl Jones, B. Cumberbatch or James Spader to keep me awake. To be fair, the content is golden, although the papers seems to be geared to the academic community, rather than the student community. Books and Videos on these subjects are all over Amazon, YouTube, FPMT, Dharma-Documentaries, etc. #2. The Sharon Salzberg (SS), in her interview, brought up an excellent point. She noted that she and a noted clinical psychology (CP) scientist (researcher) (whose name I have forgotten) were at a conference where the issue on the table was that someone was having trouble with "loving kindness" meditation as a first meditation class. SS noted that she would instantly recommend the student change to "calm abiding" meditation whereas the CP could not change that student's meditation technique to another technique (such as calm abiding) as her research findings would then be invalid. Similarly, many of the non-Buddhist guided meditations that I viewed in this course felt like a physical education or "How To" class. Do this. Do that. It did not feel as though they lived the material, just taught it. (Whereas it was patently obvious Dr. Klein & Anam Thubten were definitely "walking the walk", so to speak, so were able to speak from the heart.) Interviews I did not watch, that may be of great interest to others, include meditation in the school system by Tish Jennings, meditation in the Business Community (an interview with David Mick), the Burmese meditation tradition in an interview with Erik Braun, the MBSR (Meditation Based Stress Reduction) with Susan Bauer-Wu, and meditation in the legal community with Rhonda Magee. And all that is just the first course. Many of it's "failings" may just be my karmic opinions. The course is worth checking out and watching/reading/meditating on those parts that interest you. In that respect, the breadth of the course content is quite nice and so well done. Grade: B-. | me awake. To be fair, the | Content | is golden, although the papers seems | Negative | -0.6 | 0.0 | 0.71 | 0.9 |
| aaNxjzc9EeWO-Qq6rEZAow | (I posted this review in a blog [https://guhyasamajacenter.wordpress.com/2015/10/03/review-of-the-free-coursera-tibetan-buddhist-meditation-and-the-modern-world-lesser-vehicle-course-given-by-uva/]. Much of the courseware was outstanding. Many of the videos were so poorly done (boring) that I couldn't watch them. (I do not watch people read prepared text in a video. Ever.) ----------- From the blog ---------------------------------- I recently took the FREE Coursera course, "Tibetan Buddhist Meditation and the Modern World". (https://www.coursera.org/learn/buddhist-meditation) From the course catalog: " Tibetan Buddhist Meditation and the Modern World explores the immense variety of meditation practices past and present. We present their histories, their philosophical underpinnings, their transformations in the modern global world, and we give you a chance to reflect upon meditation practices through secular contemplations designed just for this course." (Note: In the class overview, it is noted that the term "Lesser Vehicle" is "perjorative" but they use it anyway. ??") There are many FREE reasons to take this FREE "Lesser Vehicle" course (the first of four): #1 - An awesome, wonderful hour-long interview with Sharon Salzberg, one of the founders of the Insight Meditation Society. What an awesome lady. I was not aware that she is also a Dzogchen student. (Did I mention it was FREE?) Worth signing up for the course just to skip to Week 6 to watch this interview. #2 - Guided Meditations by Dr. Anne Klein and Anam Thubten. Very, very, very nice. FREE, it's ALL FREE. #3 - The Science of Mindfulness against the Background of the Scientific Study of Meditation videos with Dr. Clifford Saron, neuroscientist. His videos start in Week 1 and continue through Week 6 in building a basis for understanding the scientific research on meditation. He (and the course) demonstrates what can and cannot (presently) be scientifically proven about meditation. One excellent example: Two trained pianists were told to learn a complicated piece of music, one with the piano, and the other only in his imagination. After 2 weeks (I think) of practice, their brains' MRI patterns exhibited almost the exact same changes. Dr. Saron noted that the results are not definitive but still may have implications for the compassion/bodhicitta meditations we do. #4: An interview on "Buddhist Modernism", with David McMahan. Very much academic-oriented. One statement, in particular, struck me since, the more I think about it, the more I think it might be true: "The Buddhist Tantra teachings are not accepted nor are they popular in the West." For all the Buddhist monastics that visit the USA and the West to grab donations and go back to their home countries, few of them are sticking around to teach complete Tantra classes. The few that do (and do it well) are having a hard time making ends meet. (That's just my opinion, I guess.) There are also short 5-10 minute interviews with Khenpo Tsultrim Lodro (a short "snapshot" of the Tibetan take on the week's particular subject, which was often better (to me) than the 90min-long "talking head" version ) and Ven. Tsoknyi Rinpoche ("How does Buddhism change in a New Culture" and "Benefits and Dangers of Secularing Buddhism", the TB rebuttal, as it were. He did note that motivation is the key. Bad agenda = bad results, good motivation will cause good results.) Have I noted the course is FREE? So you can take the course, and the following courses, without doing any of the assignments/quizzes. Watch (or download) any video or transcript to your heart's content whenever you wish in any order you wish. (That assumes the courses are not taken off-line at a future date.) Further in the course description is a blurb that may point to at least 3 future courses in "Mahāyāna, …Vajrayāna, …and a fourth vehicle, which is explicit in many Tibetan materials, though no standard term ever emerged that was accepted by all sectarian traditions - we will thus term it as the “Natural Vehicle” or “Post Tantra”." If the quality of guided meditations (GM) in following classes are even half the quality of this course's GM's, then that's all the reason I need to continue the future classes, too. Course gotchas: #1. That said (other shoe dropping here), the other half of the course was videos of people reading their prepared academic papers, in monotone or semi-monotone voices. (Transcripts are available. I figure I can read a paper in 5% of the time someone else reads it to me in a video. Ugh.) However, they would probably need the voice of Morgan Freeman, James Earl Jones, B. Cumberbatch or James Spader to keep me awake. To be fair, the content is golden, although the papers seems to be geared to the academic community, rather than the student community. Books and Videos on these subjects are all over Amazon, YouTube, FPMT, Dharma-Documentaries, etc. #2. The Sharon Salzberg (SS), in her interview, brought up an excellent point. She noted that she and a noted clinical psychology (CP) scientist (researcher) (whose name I have forgotten) were at a conference where the issue on the table was that someone was having trouble with "loving kindness" meditation as a first meditation class. SS noted that she would instantly recommend the student change to "calm abiding" meditation whereas the CP could not change that student's meditation technique to another technique (such as calm abiding) as her research findings would then be invalid. Similarly, many of the non-Buddhist guided meditations that I viewed in this course felt like a physical education or "How To" class. Do this. Do that. It did not feel as though they lived the material, just taught it. (Whereas it was patently obvious Dr. Klein & Anam Thubten were definitely "walking the walk", so to speak, so were able to speak from the heart.) Interviews I did not watch, that may be of great interest to others, include meditation in the school system by Tish Jennings, meditation in the Business Community (an interview with David Mick), the Burmese meditation tradition in an interview with Erik Braun, the MBSR (Meditation Based Stress Reduction) with Susan Bauer-Wu, and meditation in the legal community with Rhonda Magee. And all that is just the first course. Many of it's "failings" may just be my karmic opinions. The course is worth checking out and watching/reading/meditating on those parts that interest you. In that respect, the breadth of the course content is quite nice and so well done. Grade: B-. | respect, the breadth of the course | Content | is quite nice and so well | Positive | 0.8 | 0.0 | 0.71 | 0.9 |
| aaNxjzc9EeWO-Qq6rEZAow | The content of this course was superb. The level of detail and the connections between traditional teaching with modern science and western practice was very helpful, and much appreciated. The interviews and additional content on practice and historical significance was wonderful. The neuroscience content was presented very effectively, with just the right amount of detail needed here, and the critique and straightforward way that the research was presented was masterful, and so much needed in today's cult-like vision of meditation. I look forward to the other 3 segments of the course. I would recommend putting the transcripts of the lectures together in a more easily readable format, then use the videos by Dr. Germano to highlight the issues presented rather than just reading. | The | Content | of this course was superb. The | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.71 | 0.9 |
| aaNxjzc9EeWO-Qq6rEZAow | The content of this course was superb. The level of detail and the connections between traditional teaching with modern science and western practice was very helpful, and much appreciated. The interviews and additional content on practice and historical significance was wonderful. The neuroscience content was presented very effectively, with just the right amount of detail needed here, and the critique and straightforward way that the research was presented was masterful, and so much needed in today's cult-like vision of meditation. I look forward to the other 3 segments of the course. I would recommend putting the transcripts of the lectures together in a more easily readable format, then use the videos by Dr. Germano to highlight the issues presented rather than just reading. | much appreciated. The interviews and additional | Content | on practice and historical significance was | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.71 | 0.9 |
| aaNxjzc9EeWO-Qq6rEZAow | The content of this course was superb. The level of detail and the connections between traditional teaching with modern science and western practice was very helpful, and much appreciated. The interviews and additional content on practice and historical significance was wonderful. The neuroscience content was presented very effectively, with just the right amount of detail needed here, and the critique and straightforward way that the research was presented was masterful, and so much needed in today's cult-like vision of meditation. I look forward to the other 3 segments of the course. I would recommend putting the transcripts of the lectures together in a more easily readable format, then use the videos by Dr. Germano to highlight the issues presented rather than just reading. | historical significance was wonderful. The neuroscience | Content | was presented very effectively, with just | Positive | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.71 | 0.9 |
| aaNxjzc9EeWO-Qq6rEZAow | I enjoyed and benefitted from some of this course. In particular I would highly recommend the Meditation Labs, the Science of Meditation videos and the short presentations from the Tibetan Buddhist monks . But I think the creators of this course need to be a lot clearer about what their aims are in that part of the course which Dr Germano presented. Since this was he was presenting the main overview of Buddhist content it was particularly disappointing that his presentations were so bad. I understand that there were difficulties in getting the course up and running from the various delays in its starting date and the change to its title and perhaps Dr Germano's role was more affected than the other lecturers. However it's pretty damning when he manages to to be so off-putting to so many of the students, going on the discussion comments. For my own part, I've studied and practiced Buddhism for more than 30 years and I am left with little sense of what his aims were for his lectures. To be more specific Dr Germano's Presentation: -he read from what I presume were lecture notes but more likely he was reading from an academic paper. the language was pretty turgid. -he could have just provided a PDF of his paper / notes for us to download. That would have been much more helpful as presumably it would have had some structure to it. doing that would have enabled him to use his video time in a more creative way. -MOOCs are wonderful audio-visual opportunities but he had no slides or illustrations at all. The few text headers which appeared then disappeared in only a very few seconds and sometimes did not relate directly to what he was saying at that time. Dr Germano's content: the amended title was Tibetan Buddhist Meditation. This is a complex subject which encompasses many layers of meditation practice culled from historically earlier Buddhist traditions. Can I suggest that any future version of this course includes the following: -include a video which presents the main aspects of the historical development of Buddhism. There was some mention of this in Germano's material but he did it from the Tibetan point of view. Surely what a modern day presentation needs is a modern impartial historical analysis of the subject. It's not as if there aren't plenty of academics and practitioners who are active in this field. -it's confusing to describe Tibetan Lesser Vehicle practices but then illustrate them with Pali text sources, modern Mindfulness practice, and modern Brahma Vihara practice all of which have emerged from the modern Theravadin tradition. -it's also perplexing to include information about many modern Theravadin teachers (Sayadaw, Goenka) in a course apparently not about them. Don't get me wrong, I enjoyed the videos about Sayadaw and the interview with Sharon Saltzberg, but I am left in the dark about just what differences, if any, there are between them and Tibetan meditation. Overall I think this course was offered prematurely. Much of its content was enthralling, inspiring and very useful practically. However much of it was not. | saying at that time. Dr Germano's | Content | the amended title was Tibetan Buddhist | Negative | -0.6 | -0.5 | 0.71 | 0.9 |
| aaNxjzc9EeWO-Qq6rEZAow | I enjoyed and benefitted from some of this course. In particular I would highly recommend the Meditation Labs, the Science of Meditation videos and the short presentations from the Tibetan Buddhist monks . But I think the creators of this course need to be a lot clearer about what their aims are in that part of the course which Dr Germano presented. Since this was he was presenting the main overview of Buddhist content it was particularly disappointing that his presentations were so bad. I understand that there were difficulties in getting the course up and running from the various delays in its starting date and the change to its title and perhaps Dr Germano's role was more affected than the other lecturers. However it's pretty damning when he manages to to be so off-putting to so many of the students, going on the discussion comments. For my own part, I've studied and practiced Buddhism for more than 30 years and I am left with little sense of what his aims were for his lectures. To be more specific Dr Germano's Presentation: -he read from what I presume were lecture notes but more likely he was reading from an academic paper. the language was pretty turgid. -he could have just provided a PDF of his paper / notes for us to download. That would have been much more helpful as presumably it would have had some structure to it. doing that would have enabled him to use his video time in a more creative way. -MOOCs are wonderful audio-visual opportunities but he had no slides or illustrations at all. The few text headers which appeared then disappeared in only a very few seconds and sometimes did not relate directly to what he was saying at that time. Dr Germano's content: the amended title was Tibetan Buddhist Meditation. This is a complex subject which encompasses many layers of meditation practice culled from historically earlier Buddhist traditions. Can I suggest that any future version of this course includes the following: -include a video which presents the main aspects of the historical development of Buddhism. There was some mention of this in Germano's material but he did it from the Tibetan point of view. Surely what a modern day presentation needs is a modern impartial historical analysis of the subject. It's not as if there aren't plenty of academics and practitioners who are active in this field. -it's confusing to describe Tibetan Lesser Vehicle practices but then illustrate them with Pali text sources, modern Mindfulness practice, and modern Brahma Vihara practice all of which have emerged from the modern Theravadin tradition. -it's also perplexing to include information about many modern Theravadin teachers (Sayadaw, Goenka) in a course apparently not about them. Don't get me wrong, I enjoyed the videos about Sayadaw and the interview with Sharon Saltzberg, but I am left in the dark about just what differences, if any, there are between them and Tibetan meditation. Overall I think this course was offered prematurely. Much of its content was enthralling, inspiring and very useful practically. However much of it was not. | was offered prematurely. Much of its | Content | was enthralling, inspiring and very useful | Positive | 0.6 | -0.5 | 0.71 | 0.9 |
| aaNxjzc9EeWO-Qq6rEZAow | The content of the course is amazingly rich. I've particularly appreciated all the interviews. The science was also very interesting, although at the end (starting from week 4 if I remember well), the result don't seem so convincing. But it is still really amazing. (May I suggest to try to use Machine Learning algorithm to analyze the huge amount of result from the retreat project, they are getting pretty good at facial recognition and analysis.) The contemplative labs were an interesting plus. The only caveats is that, although the content presented by Germano and Schaeffer is amazing (and precious to me), I think they could improve the presentation. I would suggest to consult with a specialist in communication who will be able to point out what could be improved and how. I feel that without that, the communication objective will fail (as reported by most students including myself). Here are a few points I have noticed. Complex background create a distraction, especially when the reading is monotonous, it's preferable to have simple neutral background, like a library. Reading in a monotonous voice is not engaging for the viewer. Dandling around and all sort of gestural distractions don't help us focusing on the content. Sentences are too long and use too many technical words, two things that any communicator will immediately suggest to drop especially if you are targeting a large audience. In one video the background was nice (a forest), yet the noise of the bird were too loud compare to the voice. Plus there was many cut in this video and almost every time the camera had moved from its previous position creating yet another distraction. But don't get me wrong, I have appreciated this content, I just felt that it needed a huge investment from my part to be able to grab it into memory and learn from it. This is the reason why I haven't graded this course with 5 stars. I think that if the speaker could improve this part it would facilitate the students work and improve greatly the overall learning. | The | Content | of the course is amazingly rich. | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.71 | 0.9 |
| aaNxjzc9EeWO-Qq6rEZAow | The content of the course is amazingly rich. I've particularly appreciated all the interviews. The science was also very interesting, although at the end (starting from week 4 if I remember well), the result don't seem so convincing. But it is still really amazing. (May I suggest to try to use Machine Learning algorithm to analyze the huge amount of result from the retreat project, they are getting pretty good at facial recognition and analysis.) The contemplative labs were an interesting plus. The only caveats is that, although the content presented by Germano and Schaeffer is amazing (and precious to me), I think they could improve the presentation. I would suggest to consult with a specialist in communication who will be able to point out what could be improved and how. I feel that without that, the communication objective will fail (as reported by most students including myself). Here are a few points I have noticed. Complex background create a distraction, especially when the reading is monotonous, it's preferable to have simple neutral background, like a library. Reading in a monotonous voice is not engaging for the viewer. Dandling around and all sort of gestural distractions don't help us focusing on the content. Sentences are too long and use too many technical words, two things that any communicator will immediately suggest to drop especially if you are targeting a large audience. In one video the background was nice (a forest), yet the noise of the bird were too loud compare to the voice. Plus there was many cut in this video and almost every time the camera had moved from its previous position creating yet another distraction. But don't get me wrong, I have appreciated this content, I just felt that it needed a huge investment from my part to be able to grab it into memory and learn from it. This is the reason why I haven't graded this course with 5 stars. I think that if the speaker could improve this part it would facilitate the students work and improve greatly the overall learning. | don't help us focusing on the | Content | Sentences are too long and use | Negative | -0.6 | 0.5 | 0.71 | 0.9 |
| aaNxjzc9EeWO-Qq6rEZAow | The content of the course is amazingly rich. I've particularly appreciated all the interviews. The science was also very interesting, although at the end (starting from week 4 if I remember well), the result don't seem so convincing. But it is still really amazing. (May I suggest to try to use Machine Learning algorithm to analyze the huge amount of result from the retreat project, they are getting pretty good at facial recognition and analysis.) The contemplative labs were an interesting plus. The only caveats is that, although the content presented by Germano and Schaeffer is amazing (and precious to me), I think they could improve the presentation. I would suggest to consult with a specialist in communication who will be able to point out what could be improved and how. I feel that without that, the communication objective will fail (as reported by most students including myself). Here are a few points I have noticed. Complex background create a distraction, especially when the reading is monotonous, it's preferable to have simple neutral background, like a library. Reading in a monotonous voice is not engaging for the viewer. Dandling around and all sort of gestural distractions don't help us focusing on the content. Sentences are too long and use too many technical words, two things that any communicator will immediately suggest to drop especially if you are targeting a large audience. In one video the background was nice (a forest), yet the noise of the bird were too loud compare to the voice. Plus there was many cut in this video and almost every time the camera had moved from its previous position creating yet another distraction. But don't get me wrong, I have appreciated this content, I just felt that it needed a huge investment from my part to be able to grab it into memory and learn from it. This is the reason why I haven't graded this course with 5 stars. I think that if the speaker could improve this part it would facilitate the students work and improve greatly the overall learning. | me wrong, I have appreciated this | Content | I just felt that it needed | Negative | -0.6 | 0.5 | 0.71 | 0.9 |
| aaNxjzc9EeWO-Qq6rEZAow | I am afraid this is only two stars from me for now. It is a course with great content and a lot of potential, but the way how it is delivered can be greatly improved to make it easier to understand and more engaging. I just hope the team do not give up, but improve this to be one of the best courses on Coursera - it can well be! | It is a course with great | Content | and a lot of potential, but | Positive | 0.7 | -0.5 | 0.71 | 0.9 |
| aaNxjzc9EeWO-Qq6rEZAow | The content is great, I think the delivery could be better, and there was a great deal of interesting but difficult and for me peripheral stuff about how the brain worked. Nevertheless, even this had me wowed at times. I have learnt a great deal from every aspect of this course, and am greatly looking forward to future courses, as you have promised!. A | The | Content | is great, I think the delivery | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.71 | 0.9 |
| afay6xVFEeWfzgpfp_iBVw | I was disappointed by this Course maybe because I had a great expectations for it. Months of delay and poor content. | it. Months of delay and poor | Content | | Negative | -0.7 | -0.5 | 0.63 | 0.82 |
| afay6xVFEeWfzgpfp_iBVw | This specialisation started off good in the first 1-2 courses but has since taken many steps back. The content is dated and not well though through, and it feels like the whole thing could have been put into 2-3 courses | since taken many steps back. The | Content | is dated and not well though | Negative | -0.6 | -0.5 | 0.63 | 0.82 |
| afay6xVFEeWfzgpfp_iBVw | I was quite disappointed by this course, after several delays the course stated months later than originally planned. The videos are badly edited, and there did not seem to be a lot of content within this course. | seem to be a lot of | Content | within this course. | Negative | -0.6 | -0.5 | 0.63 | 0.82 |
| afay6xVFEeWfzgpfp_iBVw | I expected to see much more about "Information" Design, in a sense of Design of Comunication, Design of the Data, Theory of Comunication and how can you remove ambiguity from a design (visual, industrial, content or what ever design it is). Still ok, but I expected better than wireframes and mockups which we already learned a while back. Nice roadmap although. | ambiguity from a design (visual, industrial, | Content | or what ever design it is). | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.63 | 0.82 |
| AMBr8zelEeWJaxK5AT4frw | I am disappointed with the course because of its only focus on Apple TV and smartwatch apps. The course structure is a bit messy and the content is quite technical. Don't call it "App Design" since it's more App Development! | is a bit messy and the | Content | is quite technical. Don't call it | Positive | 0.6 | -1.0 | 0.63 | 0.91 |
| AMBr8zelEeWJaxK5AT4frw | Content is taught too fast! | | Content | is taught too fast! | Negative | -0.6 | 0.0 | 0.63 | 0.91 |
| AMBr8zelEeWJaxK5AT4frw | Bad content and instructor. no logistic in place. if you are planning to pay to get certificate. I would suggest look else where. my $279 are stuck in here and they don't reply to forum posts. | Bad | Content | and instructor. no logistic in place. | Negative | -0.7 | -1.0 | 0.63 | 0.91 |
| AMBr8zelEeWJaxK5AT4frw | This course had too much content in one-run and some of the topic-assignments had too much confusing questions and answers which were hard to figure out made this course a bit a bad experience. The same goes for the end-assignment project where much functionality was required within a short time -- and the course was delayed so many of the students could not fit it into their schedule. | This course had too much | Content | in one-run and some of the | Negative | -0.6 | -0.5 | 0.63 | 0.91 |
| aPvqvZlYEeWQGBKrxISOrQ | Very nice course. However, the final project is not very close to the course content. Still, it is very well doable thanks to the very helpful tutor / mentor. | not very close to the course | Content | Still, it is very well doable | Negative | -0.6 | 0.5 | 0.87 | 0.98 |
| aPvqvZlYEeWQGBKrxISOrQ | I have very mixed feelings after completing this course. I can hardly say I feel I have learned any valuable stuff, especially in contrast to the first course when I had a feeling "I am growing with knowledge". Here, I was able to follow lectures' instructions but I did not fully understand why I was doing this and that. I believe not enough foundation was given to make people use the Galaxy tools consciously. The final project was ridiculously far more difficult than what had been covered in the class. I truly believe in the idea of giving ambitious final projects, but I do not believe in the idea of giving the project that is by no means doable based on the course content. Very discouraging. | means doable based on the course | Content | Very discouraging. | Positive | 0.6 | -0.5 | 0.87 | 0.98 |
| aPvqvZlYEeWQGBKrxISOrQ | This course did not make any effort until I had to dig deep into biology by myself. The course content is insufficient. I think if a sample input was used and every field of the input were explained and also the outputs were explained then it would make much more sense. Poorly designed and demonstrated. Thankfully I started the last assignment very quickly, it took me 10 days to understand how to proceed with the assignment. The TA is excellent, without his help I wouldn't pass this course. | into biology by myself. The course | Content | is insufficient. I think if a | Negative | -0.6 | -1.0 | 0.87 | 0.98 |
| aPvqvZlYEeWQGBKrxISOrQ | This course's content is useful but honestly the final project is ridiculous because it is peer reviewed and the project is not very straightforward. Everyone gets different answers and without an answer key, no one knows what is right and wrong making it is almost impossible to pass. This needs to change. | This course's | Content | is useful but honestly the final | Negative | -0.6 | -1.0 | 0.87 | 0.98 |
| aPvqvZlYEeWQGBKrxISOrQ | This course was very disappointing and much of the content in the tests and course did not show up in the course project. I felt like the course project was far more advanced than all the other detail. In addition, there was minimal to NO detail on instruction. VERY poor development here and I would not recommend it to anyone. All you need to do is look at all the threads of complaints. I am looking forward to the next Python course and h | very disappointing and much of the | Content | in the tests and course did | Negative | -0.7 | -1.0 | 0.87 | 0.98 |
| aPvqvZlYEeWQGBKrxISOrQ | clear content | clear | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.87 | 0.98 |
| Auue1KA-EeS9VCIACyUcdg | This is absolutely fantastic course. Thank you very much for offering it! The course content is very good and there pointers to enormous amount of very enlightening literature! | much for offering it! The course | Content | is very good and there pointers | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 1.15 |
| Auue1KA-EeS9VCIACyUcdg | Was excellent. Content and layout | Was excellent. | Content | and layout | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 1.15 |
| Auue1KA-EeS9VCIACyUcdg | Well organized content, excellent instructors! Easy and fun! | Well organized | Content | excellent instructors! Easy and fun! | Positive | 0.9 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 1.15 |
| Auue1KA-EeS9VCIACyUcdg | I almost gave this two stars, but the content of the course is excellent, and I didn't want to take away from that. To start off, for an introductory class, this covers a large amount and variety of material. It might be better served to break it up into even smaller sections over the course of something like ten weeks or even twelve instead of cramming it all into seven weeks. The lectures are enjoyable, but often they consist of nothing but the professor speaking. There are so many new terms, definitions, and ideas being introduced that it would help if these lectures also included slides or graphs with some of these ideas being broken down, as you would have in a regular class on a projector or on a chalkboard. Frequently, the practice quizzes are just the same questions from the video lectures repeated over again, and offer very little prep for the actual quizzes, which are painfully pedantic for a non-credit course. Every section has a different style of quiz, which is hard to prepare for. I am someone who usually tests well and have been struggling with most of these, even when I read all of the handouts and take notes. So, if this same course could be broken up over a slightly longer time and the quizzes could be more uniform, the lectures contained some slides, the course would be a brilliant introduction to philosophy overall. It's got all of the meat there, the presentation just makes it tough to digest. | gave this two stars, but the | Content | of the course is excellent, and | Positive | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 1.15 |
| Auue1KA-EeS9VCIACyUcdg | Great lectures and nicely explained, apart from one lecture (6th - maybe it was me, not understanding the topic properly). For the future, I suggest to have more "visible" support of the lecturers; lecturers should address us directly and enage us more to interact with the content as well as our classmates. Moreover, and I am speaking subjectivily, I found all topics very simple. To deepen my understand, I would suggest to have compulsory essays to elaborate the aquired knowledge. Thank you for your effort! | us more to interact with the | Content | as well as our classmates. Moreover, | Positive | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 1.15 |
| Auue1KA-EeS9VCIACyUcdg | Fully satisfied with this course. Very good program and content, good videos, professional teachers... I really learned a lot. I recommend the course 100 % | this course. Very good program and | Content | good videos, professional teachers. . . | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 1.15 |
| Auue1KA-EeS9VCIACyUcdg | This was a fantastic course! The content was very interesting, especially the section on time-travel, which I absolutely loved. I also liked that the course was perfectly manageable, unlike all the other MOOC's that I have attempted, where the time commitment turns out to be much bigger than expected. | This was a fantastic course! The | Content | was very interesting, especially the section | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 1.15 |
| Auue1KA-EeS9VCIACyUcdg | the course content was very much good and it was very useful. | the course | Content | was very much good and it | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 1.15 |
| Auue1KA-EeS9VCIACyUcdg | Very good course, Offers insights from various domains of Philosophy, which one doesn't go in usually. And ends up discovering that there are in fact various ways to look at this subject which is an essential tool for living and constant improving our quality of life. The University of Edinburgh has structured this course well, and the faculties, bright and deep in their domains makes you understand the contents more easily then they are. Thank you. | their domains makes you understand the | Content | more easily then they are. Thank | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 1.15 |
| Auue1KA-EeS9VCIACyUcdg | I really enjoyed this course because contents were very interesting and contemporaneous. Reading about travelling time was a real pleasure. Teachers nice, quizzes and texts supported well my development. Congratulations. | I really enjoyed this course because | Content | were very interesting and contemporaneous. Reading | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 1.15 |
| Auue1KA-EeS9VCIACyUcdg | It is a good course with great content. The professors are well prepared and share their knowledge in an easy way so that everyone can understand their explanations. | is a good course with great | Content | The professors are well prepared and | Positive | 0.9 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 1.15 |
| Auue1KA-EeS9VCIACyUcdg | I didn't find the overall content of the course very well chosen for an introduction to philosophy - since it covers so little. The title of this course should have been "An Introduction to Just a Couple of Topics in Philosophy." And there are so few philosophers covered. However, the biggest problem was instructor Alasdair Richmond, whose response to debate was locking threads down every time his ideological positions were challenged. He showed himself completely inept to have a debate with more than one course participant and chose to censor a variety of viewpoints he dislikes. It was particularly ironic to see an instructor exercise censorship in a Philosophy course - a domain whose objective, after all, is the pursuit of truth as well as to ask and debate the "why" of everything! A petty tyrant does not make a good teacher. Should I ever meet anyone interested in studying Philosophy, my first recommendation to them will be stay away from the University of Edinburgh, since there is no respect for debate, freedom of expression, or inquiry there. | I didn't find the overall | Content | of the course very well chosen | Negative | -0.6 | -1.0 | 0.5 | 1.15 |
| a_xPWXNVEeWxvQr3acyajw | This course is the first one in the Data Science series to lapse in terms of the clarity of the lectures, and the sense of cohesiveness of the material. Brian Caffo's lectures in Statistical Inference were good; in this course they seem to veer left and right rather than get straight to the essence of whatever subject he is lecturing about. A more structured final project would have been helpful. The instructions on this project weren't quite so blunt as to say "Take this data set, do some regression-y stuff and come back with something about these two variables," but that's basically as far as our instructions went. It could have been a great learning experience to have a more detailed guide through the construction of a regression analysis, but instead an assignment which was 40% of our grade was put together as an afterthought. It was the assignment equivalent of stopping in the 7-11 a block away from a birthday party to buy a card. Also, in terms of delivering the content: Mr. Caffo needs to structure his slide/video arrangements so that he is not standing in front of the text. Think of it from the point of view of somebody wanting to listen and read at the same time. | Also, in terms of delivering the | Content | Mr. Caffo needs to structure his | Positive | 0.6 | -0.5 | 0.87 | 0.89 |
| a_xPWXNVEeWxvQr3acyajw | The course content was very brief and well structured, Regression being a rather vast topic demands a lot more time. 4 weeks seemed a bit less! Overall satisfied by what the course offered. | The course | Content | was very brief and well structured, | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.87 | 0.89 |
| a_xPWXNVEeWxvQr3acyajw | There's just something about the course content that is difficult to attain. It's presented at way too high of a level without enough tangible examples of getting down into the weeds of how to actually perform and interpret the models and functions. | There's just something about the course | Content | that is difficult to attain. It's | Negative | -0.6 | 0.0 | 0.87 | 0.89 |
| a_xPWXNVEeWxvQr3acyajw | Loved the course and the content. Only critique is that I would have liked to have a lecture about transformations, and interpretation of transformed data coefficients. | Loved the course and the | Content | Only critique is that I would | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.87 | 0.89 |
| a_xPWXNVEeWxvQr3acyajw | This course goes on a very fast pace and simply does not have the charm of all the other courses in the specialization. I understand that a lot of content is covered within a month, but there should be supplementary course material available. Moreover, TAs should be more active on the forums. I have seen most of the questions just being discussed among the students. A little disappointed. Will probably have to watch all the material again to have confidence with it. | I understand that a lot of | Content | is covered within a month, but | Negative | -0.7 | 0.0 | 0.87 | 0.89 |
| bGZkCuIJEeSqWiIAC0gGHw | Again the content and presentation is great. But the web site is getting really annoying, especially in the assignment area. The editor is faulty and on the submission on visualization you cannot use visualizations(!) to make your point due to technical limitations (can't paste charts or screenshots).Sometimes verification does not work. Support is sometimes very good, sometimes useless, depends with whom you chat. | Again the | Content | and presentation is great. But the | Positive | 0.6 | -0.5 | 1.05 | 1.1 |
| bGZkCuIJEeSqWiIAC0gGHw | This course hardly has any new content and a lot of it is also repeat from previous courses. | This course hardly has any new | Content | and a lot of it is | Negative | -0.6 | -1.0 | 1.05 | 1.1 |
| bGZkCuIJEeSqWiIAC0gGHw | I liked the 5 highlights per lesson - it helped recap the most important content. | it helped recap the most important | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 1.05 | 1.1 |
| bGZkCuIJEeSqWiIAC0gGHw | Great content and well presented by the lecturer connecting to the previous module. | Great | Content | and well presented by the lecturer | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 1.05 | 1.1 |
| bGZkCuIJEeSqWiIAC0gGHw | Hated the course and the content. I truly regret investing my money on this course. | Hated the course and the | Content | I truly regret investing my money | Negative | -0.8 | -1.0 | 1.05 | 1.1 |
| bGZkCuIJEeSqWiIAC0gGHw | Fantastic content, gives me a better understanding of the methodology which I was missing. I had a few problems with the platform, but managed to work after a few days. | Fantastic | Content | gives me a better understanding of | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 1.05 | 1.1 |
| bIkXsq9HEeSmzyIAC0yFng | I was disappointed because the name is misleading. The course provides a good introduction & overview of the responsibilities of the CTO, but has very little specifically digital content. It deals with two-speed IT in a single short lecture, so of course the treatment is superficial. It is easy to find more in-depth material freely available, on the McKinsey website for example. | but has very little specifically digital | Content | It deals with two-speed IT in | Positive | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.63 | 0.82 |
| bIkXsq9HEeSmzyIAC0yFng | Super content. I'll definitely re-do the course | Super | Content | I'll definitely re-do the course | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.63 | 0.82 |
| bIkXsq9HEeSmzyIAC0yFng | Is there any reason why you should not apply the course by BCG?) It's content is pretty unique and includes a high level analysis and a wide range of knowledge needed to cover all detailed aspects. Best regards, Oleg Serov | the course by BCG? ) It's | Content | is pretty unique and includes a | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.63 | 0.82 |
| bIkXsq9HEeSmzyIAC0yFng | Good content, but the course setting does (at least for me) not allow learn the content long term due to missing reading material. | Good | Content | but the course setting does (at | Positive | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.63 | 0.82 |
| bIkXsq9HEeSmzyIAC0yFng | Good content, but the course setting does (at least for me) not allow learn the content long term due to missing reading material. | for me) not allow learn the | Content | long term due to missing reading | Negative | -0.7 | 0.0 | 0.63 | 0.82 |
| bIkXsq9HEeSmzyIAC0yFng | The course content is quite good, though it could have been deeper in some areas. But its peer review system is not working well, if at all. Regards, An Le. | The course | Content | is quite good, though it could | Positive | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.63 | 0.82 |
| Bq5Eo50bEeW_wArffOXkOw | Great content provided by great & dedicated man! | Great | Content | provided by great & dedicated man! | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.7 | 0.92 |
| Bq5Eo50bEeW_wArffOXkOw | Enjoyed the content, but wish there was better assistance in working through problems. The message boards have not hit the mark, but I will make a better effort in these next module | Enjoyed the | Content | but wish there was better assistance | Negative | -0.6 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 0.92 |
| bRPXgjY9EeW6RApRXdjJPw | Great course, very informative and well structured. Content is explained in a very clean and building-up mode. This course fits the intermediate level quite well. | course, very informative and well structured. | Content | is explained in a very clean | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.83 | 1.07 |
| bRPXgjY9EeW6RApRXdjJPw | I really enjoyed this course, the assignments are challenging and well designed. The course content is really relevant for those who want to learn the principles of functional programming. | challenging and well designed. The course | Content | is really relevant for those who | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.83 | 1.07 |
| bRPXgjY9EeW6RApRXdjJPw | Content is not updated. Now is 2016. | | Content | is not updated. Now is 2016. | Negative | -0.6 | 0.5 | 0.83 | 1.07 |
| bRPXgjY9EeW6RApRXdjJPw | Very helpful course for beginners, and congratulations for putting up such a great work together! But a few suggestions - 1) Most importantly, the assignments were very VERY hard for starters in functional programming and Scala. It would be much more enjoyable to many more if it's made a little easier. 2) The content was great, but I believe a little more (both in breadth and depth) was needed to be covered. Moreover the categorization can be rethought and a little re-organized. Nevertheless, a great course! Will surely recommend this one. | made a little easier. 2) The | Content | was great, but I believe a | Negative | -0.6 | 0.5 | 0.83 | 1.07 |
| bRPXgjY9EeW6RApRXdjJPw | The content is great! But the rearrangement of lectures is not synced with intros at the beginning of some videos. I know it takes a lot of time and effort to make or alter a video. After all it doesn't affect much. | The | Content | is great! But the rearrangement of | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.83 | 1.07 |
| bRPXgjY9EeW6RApRXdjJPw | This course is a little bit difficult to get started with if you do not have any code experience. However, it is a really great course because the content is sufficient but not too much and the course is clear enough. The last two assignments are tough for me and they took me a long time to figure out, also I read a number of materials about Scala functions on Internet. This is the first course that I finished and I really like this course. | a really great course because the | Content | is sufficient but not too much | Negative | -0.6 | 1.0 | 0.83 | 1.07 |
| bRPXgjY9EeW6RApRXdjJPw | This is a great course for learning Functional Programming language. All the course content including Assignments are up to the mark. I thank the tutors for providing such great information. | Functional Programming language. All the course | Content | including Assignments are up to the | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.83 | 1.07 |
| bRPXgjY9EeW6RApRXdjJPw | Great Content. Please keep up the good work. | Great | Content | Please keep up the good work. | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.83 | 1.07 |
| bRPXgjY9EeW6RApRXdjJPw | I am a statistician who works primarily with R, with some Python for the things Python is better for. I know how to program, but I explicitly note I am not a computer science student. I have only limited experience with the command prompt. I was very excited when I heard about this course, but the amount of work and frustration just to get started programming in Scala has been obscene. I am very, very glad I decided to check out the course for free before paying for the specialization. The course has a lot of required software. The tutorials to get this software often involve "You need this, but so save time we're going to skip showing you how to get it. If it doesn't work, you need to install it." There is a lot of variability in OSs. Many errors are often encountered. There is no help. Among the things the course requires are two (three?) IDEs for Scala (I note the video tutorials says you just need some sort of IDE... but you need IntelliJ, and Eclipse to submit...). The guides show how to get started on a Mac. The software is not the same on Windows, and so 'step by step instructions' become a guessing game, because many options or menus are missing or different. There are many better and more friendly guides on the internet. I may return to the transcripts of the course content here, but I won't be submitting any coursework. I'm going to warn my colleagues away as well. Forget Coursera - I'll just buy a book and work through it like everyone else I know. | to the transcripts of the course | Content | here, but I won't be submitting | Negative | -0.7 | -1.0 | 0.83 | 1.07 |
| bzK7K9cYEeSV9iIAC0wBBw | I like the course content but the presenter needs to have a more friendly way to present it. | I like the course | Content | but the presenter needs to have | Negative | -0.6 | 0.0 | 0.83 | 0.89 |
| bzK7K9cYEeSV9iIAC0wBBw | The extra/outside content provided is great. As others have stated, but clearly not adjusted, some of the quiz questions aren't clear items covered in the material (which is frustrating). | The extra/outside | Content | provided is great. As others have | Positive | 0.8 | 0.0 | 0.83 | 0.89 |
| bzK7K9cYEeSV9iIAC0wBBw | Overly-remedial information, but that is not what earns this course such a poor evaluation from me. The poor evaluation comes from the composition of the review quizzes: The end-of-section quizzes ask questions to which there can be more than one correct answer, yet only a single response will receive credit. Example: "A recommended solution to a problem is valued by an executive because..." Followed by four possible answers: One of which is clearly incorrect while one makes an awful assumption. These two choices can be eliminated easily. However, the final two options are BOTH UNARGUABLY CORRECT, but only one was briefly mentioned in the material (reading or video), and thus only that one receives credit. Unfortunately, this demonstrates the course creators' desire to value a student's memorization of the instructor's own unique words over the student's assimilation of the course content and ideas. Course-takers beware, this course seems more tailored to stroking Ms. Bravo's ego than to you actually learning anything of commercial value. | the student's assimilation of the course | Content | and ideas. Course-takers beware, this course | Negative | -0.6 | -1.0 | 0.83 | 0.89 |
| bzK7K9cYEeSV9iIAC0wBBw | The content of the course was good. Lectures were effective. I specially liked the last statement after every lecture "where ever you may be have a great time" | The | Content | of the course was good. Lectures | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.83 | 0.89 |
| bzK7K9cYEeSV9iIAC0wBBw | Nicely fine-tuned content -- relevant to multiple settings and spaces of work. | Nicely fine-tuned | Content | -- relevant to multiple settings and | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.83 | 0.89 |
| bzK7K9cYEeSV9iIAC0wBBw | I think the teacher was very welcoming, but the content was less than enough to answer the quizzes. In the quizzes, every answer choice was correct and there wasn't any possible way to discern. What the teacher said and complemented with the lectures didn't match with the question answers. So, my score is "2". | teacher was very welcoming, but the | Content | was less than enough to answer | Negative | -0.6 | -0.5 | 0.83 | 0.89 |
| bzK7K9cYEeSV9iIAC0wBBw | Great course, but really short. Could have more content! :) | but really short. Could have more | Content | :) | Negative | -0.6 | 0.5 | 0.83 | 0.89 |
| bzK7K9cYEeSV9iIAC0wBBw | Not enough videos. Content very generic. | Not enough videos. | Content | very generic. | Negative | -0.6 | -1.0 | 0.83 | 0.89 |
| bzK7K9cYEeSV9iIAC0wBBw | A good introduction to Workplace Communication. The resources supplied were extremely helpful. I didn't pay so much attention to the slides that came with this - in fact, I'm not even sure how relevant they are looking back. I had expected the overview videos to be an insight to the resource content, but it wasn't quite compiled that way. The tests could have been longer, and perhaps could have contained obvious solutions - in some instances the solutions provided were all applicable, leaving the student to select the best option. In other instances the options available weren't even discussed in the content, confusing the student. | be an insight to the resource | Content | but it wasn't quite compiled that | Negative | -0.6 | 0.0 | 0.83 | 0.89 |
| bzK7K9cYEeSV9iIAC0wBBw | A good introduction to Workplace Communication. The resources supplied were extremely helpful. I didn't pay so much attention to the slides that came with this - in fact, I'm not even sure how relevant they are looking back. I had expected the overview videos to be an insight to the resource content, but it wasn't quite compiled that way. The tests could have been longer, and perhaps could have contained obvious solutions - in some instances the solutions provided were all applicable, leaving the student to select the best option. In other instances the options available weren't even discussed in the content, confusing the student. | available weren't even discussed in the | Content | confusing the student. | Negative | -0.7 | 0.0 | 0.83 | 0.89 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | excellent content ,very useful | excellent | Content | , very useful | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.41 | 1.03 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | Very good, with relevant content to nowadays. | Very good, with relevant | Content | to nowadays. | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.41 | 1.03 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | Very good content, clear and effective way to explain the core concepts. | Very good | Content | clear and effective way to explain | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.41 | 1.03 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | Nice work, excellent content as well as faculty. Keep it up. | Nice work, excellent | Content | as well as faculty. Keep it | Positive | 0.9 | 1.0 | 0.41 | 1.03 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | Course is very well structured and content is really easy to digest! Really liked the short video where actual components were shown in the instructor's lab. Made it easy to connect theoretical concepts with real-life stuff. | Course is very well structured and | Content | is really easy to digest! Really | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.41 | 1.03 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | Not only very interesting but also an instructor with entertaining way of communicating the content. | with entertaining way of communicating the | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.41 | 1.03 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | Excellent pedagogy, and concise, comprehensive and engaging content! | pedagogy, and concise, comprehensive and engaging | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.41 | 1.03 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | Excellent Content and excellent domain of the topic by the Professor. | Excellent | Content | and excellent domain of the topic | Positive | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.41 | 1.03 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | Content is very light but it is good for an absolute beginner. | | Content | is very light but it is | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.41 | 1.03 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | Nice introduction to the IoT world. Course contents are a bit repetitive and lessons could have been a bit shorter. | introduction to the IoT world. Course | Content | are a bit repetitive and lessons | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.41 | 1.03 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | I thought the content was great, but I thought the assignments were too onerous. I did the first one, but I didn't feel like I learned from it and peer feedback was very slow. I looked at the other assignments, but I thought they only asked me to put to paper things I was already thinking about anyway. Given the untimely and low quality of peer feedback on the first assignment, I didn't feel like I'd learn anything from completing and submitting any assignments. I refuse to buy a webcam for Coursera (I have a phone with that capability but the Coursera app doesn't support it for identity verification), so I can't get a certification anyway. I thought the content was interesting, but too basic to pay for. The major value I see in the certification path is extensive feedback on the capstone project, as I thought peer feedback came too late and wasn't extensive enough to be valuable. I do think the instructor does a good job of presenting the content | a certification anyway. I thought the | Content | was interesting, but too basic to | Negative | -0.6 | 0.0 | 0.41 | 1.03 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | I thought the content was great, but I thought the assignments were too onerous. I did the first one, but I didn't feel like I learned from it and peer feedback was very slow. I looked at the other assignments, but I thought they only asked me to put to paper things I was already thinking about anyway. Given the untimely and low quality of peer feedback on the first assignment, I didn't feel like I'd learn anything from completing and submitting any assignments. I refuse to buy a webcam for Coursera (I have a phone with that capability but the Coursera app doesn't support it for identity verification), so I can't get a certification anyway. I thought the content was interesting, but too basic to pay for. The major value I see in the certification path is extensive feedback on the capstone project, as I thought peer feedback came too late and wasn't extensive enough to be valuable. I do think the instructor does a good job of presenting the content | a good job of presenting the | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 0.0 | 0.41 | 1.03 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | Really crisp content as introduction to world of IoT. MANET's, network layer sessions are very informative. | Really crisp | Content | as introduction to world of IoT. | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.41 | 1.03 |
| CJs0DTk_EeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Great content and I like the peer graded assignments the most. | Great | Content | and I like the peer graded | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.7 | 0.94 |
| CJs0DTk_EeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Thanks a lot for putting together the course content so neatly. It was a good course. | lot for putting together the course | Content | so neatly. It was a good | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 0.94 |
| CJs0DTk_EeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | very clear content , easy to follow and understand . first step in the word of javascript thank you so much | very clear | Content | , easy to follow and understand | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 0.94 |
| CJs0DTk_EeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Teacher's narrative is pretty clear, easy to follow. good for beginners. But the course content is very simple, somewhat too simple for the course title, it only touches on very very basic of javascript. | good for beginners. But the course | Content | is very simple, somewhat too simple | Positive | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 0.94 |
| CJs0DTk_EeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Very limited content. Not possible to complete the projects at the end. -( | Very limited | Content | Not possible to complete the projects | Negative | -0.6 | -1.0 | 0.7 | 0.94 |
| ClCx1sbdEeShXyIAC5MC2w | Excellent content very well set out | Excellent | Content | very well set out | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.74 | 1.0 |
| ClCx1sbdEeShXyIAC5MC2w | A great introduction to the variety of knowledge and skills a first year veterinary student encounters. Found the content regarding animal care, body systems and clinical skills interesting. | year veterinary student encounters. Found the | Content | regarding animal care, body systems and | Negative | -0.6 | 0.5 | 0.74 | 1.0 |
| ClCx1sbdEeShXyIAC5MC2w | good course, but did not understand some of the content in week 2 | did not understand some of the | Content | in week 2 | Negative | -0.7 | 0.5 | 0.74 | 1.0 |
| ClCx1sbdEeShXyIAC5MC2w | Good course and quite plain with materials and important content for learning from that course. Good teachers and very well explain. | quite plain with materials and important | Content | for learning from that course. Good | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.74 | 1.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Congratulations! I really appreciate the classes and the course content. The videos are very objective and synthesizes, in a cleaver way, hart English knowledge. | appreciate the classes and the course | Content | The videos are very objective and | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.58 | 1.03 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | I am Brazilian, and I have been studying English since 2011 as a second language. So far, I have not found I course like Grammar and Punctuation. What makes the difference is that it explains the content in a simple way so that students can learn easily. Besides, I learned things on the lecture videos that I had not learned until then. | difference is that it explains the | Content | in a simple way so that | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.58 | 1.03 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | very good content | very good | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.58 | 1.03 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Good course, although no proctor or supervision at all. No place to go for questions or help. Please be aware this is primarily designed for non-native english speakers. This was not clear to me when I joined. And although the content is thorough, it is dull and the assignments uninspiring. If you want to know more about grammar, good (be sure to bone up through, because she assumes a lot about what you might remember from high school and for those of us over 40 ... hmmm). If you want to feel inspired to write something of value and interest to yourself or others, not so good. Over all I would not recommend this course or series of courses. And would suggest seeking out a course that has some kind of proctor or supervisory help available. | when I joined. And although the | Content | is thorough, it is dull and | Negative | -0.7 | 0.0 | 0.58 | 1.03 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | There's some room for improvement, that's for sure. The last video was really bad, not because of the content, but because the Professor was very sloppy in her speaking. I also think there should be more practice exercises and a better way to know if the answers were correct. But overall, was very happy with it. | really bad, not because of the | Content | but because the Professor was very | Negative | -0.8 | 0.5 | 0.58 | 1.03 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Excellent course to refresh the English Grammar and its Punctuation. An overview to students who want to understand the fundamentals of the English Language and utilize the content as a reference for upcoming studies. | the English Language and utilize the | Content | as a reference for upcoming studies. | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.58 | 1.03 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | well designed course that is rich in content. | designed course that is rich in | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.58 | 1.03 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Contents are interesting and useful, even if the course deals with few topics. I think it is too expensive! A good grammar book is cheaper and more complete. I would not enroll this course anymore. | | Content | are interesting and useful, even if | Positive | 0.6 | -0.5 | 0.58 | 1.03 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Good Content and Clear explanation. | Good | Content | and Clear explanation. | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.58 | 1.03 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | This course's content and delivery are excellent. This gave proper understanding of grammar and punctuation usage. Many a times, I used to believe, I properly use punctuation, but this course set the scores right. Thanks a lot for such an extraordinary course. | This course's | Content | and delivery are excellent. This gave | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.58 | 1.03 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Hello, The overall content or education on English grammar was good. It made me to correct lot of things which I used to find difficult or project it wrong. Thank you for educating me correctly. Appreciate your work. | Hello, The overall | Content | or education on English grammar was | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.58 | 1.03 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Good contents and practise question to help understand the knowledge and concept. | Good | Content | and practise question to help understand | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.58 | 1.03 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Simple: Thank you for your effort. Compound : From now, I will observe when ever i read books, paper, or blog, and i will daily practice writing. Complex : Because the Instructor made the content structure vey well, made me easy to follow and understand. | : Because the Instructor made the | Content | structure vey well, made me easy | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.58 | 1.03 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | I found this course practical and straightforward. After I took the pretest, I found that the contents were targeted towards me. I would recommend this course to anyone who would like to know some rules and structure to improve the professionalism of their writing. | the pretest, I found that the | Content | were targeted towards me. I would | Negative | -0.6 | 1.0 | 0.58 | 1.03 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Well structured and good content. very helpful | Well structured and good | Content | very helpful | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.58 | 1.03 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Good content, but without a creative didatic. | Good | Content | but without a creative didatic. | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.58 | 1.03 |
| c_rkuRoBEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Great videos, interesting content. Quizzes were good, assignments were clearly stated. There could have probably been more coding work involved, but it is definitely a good first course as an introduction to programming in general. | Great videos, interesting | Content | Quizzes were good, assignments were clearly | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.75 | 0.96 |
| c_rkuRoBEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | An excellent course that is so easy to follow and comprehend. It has everything that a beginner needs. Wonderful teachers and very good content. I really enjoyed this course. Thank you so much! | needs. Wonderful teachers and very good | Content | I really enjoyed this course. Thank | Positive | 0.9 | 1.0 | 0.75 | 0.96 |
| c_rkuRoBEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Although I have been studying programming for four years, this course still managed to surprise me in terms of content offered - really interested for the image editing and formatting from HTML and JS. Really worth the money!! | to surprise me in terms of | Content | offered - really interested for the | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.75 | 0.96 |
| c_rkuRoBEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Lessons are too compact and some of the videos too long and full of content, so it's hard to process all the information at once. | videos too long and full of | Content | so it's hard to process all | Negative | -0.6 | 0.0 | 0.75 | 0.96 |
| c_rkuRoBEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good overall but the content uses library and other content that make it hard to apply the technologies to the real world, an emphasis on orienting the content to 'from scratch development' would be duly appreciated I think. Nevertheless interesting and well presented over all. | Good overall but the | Content | uses library and other content that | Positive | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.75 | 0.96 |
| c_rkuRoBEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | I learnt a lot of new information and I found the course content easy to understand and follow. | information and I found the course | Content | easy to understand and follow. | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.75 | 0.96 |
| c_rkuRoBEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | okay for an intro, not the most boring content. It is a bit aweful that the insist on you using their libraries and programming environments. You spend perhaps 20% of your actually practicing coding, and the rest is wasted in libraries you will never use again | an intro, not the most boring | Content | It is a bit aweful that | Negative | -0.6 | -0.5 | 0.75 | 0.96 |
| c_rkuRoBEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Granted it's an online course so there's not the back and forth provided at a physical classroom. However, the presentation of content is efficient and if an individual puts in enough time and effort, they'll get what they're looking from with this course. | physical classroom. However, the presentation of | Content | is efficient and if an individual | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.75 | 0.96 |
| c_rkuRoBEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Everything apart from Steganography was well explained with examples. I liked that the quizzes were fairly engaging and required programming exercises to familiarize you with the content. | exercises to familiarize you with the | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.75 | 0.96 |
| c_rkuRoBEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | very poor content on Java Script. If you just started JS do not take this course. It will be too hard. | very poor | Content | on Java Script. If you just | Negative | -0.6 | -0.5 | 0.75 | 0.96 |
| c_rkuRoBEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Quick introduction to HTML, CSS, and Javascript for beginners. Compactly organised content. Excellent course. | and Javascript for beginners. Compactly organised | Content | Excellent course. | Positive | 0.9 | 1.0 | 0.75 | 0.96 |
| d0bq5PkAEeSBSSIAC7JSBQ | I think the teacher should speak more clearly, he has a strong accent, however, the materials and contents in this lessons are pretty good. | strong accent, however, the materials and | Content | in this lessons are pretty good. | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.75 | 0.83 |
| d0bq5PkAEeSBSSIAC7JSBQ | The course has a good content. I wish there was an active participation by the mentors on the discussion forum. | The course has a good | Content | I wish there was an active | Negative | -0.6 | 0.0 | 0.75 | 0.83 |
| d0bq5PkAEeSBSSIAC7JSBQ | This is one of the best introductory courses on image processing. The lectures are very good and cover a large variety of topics. The only thing that I didn't like about this course is that the homework problems do not cover all the content. The programming problems should be designed to be more challenging. | problems do not cover all the | Content | The programming problems should be designed | Negative | -0.7 | 1.0 | 0.75 | 0.83 |
| D5GKj_UHEeSBSSIAC7JSBQ | Excellent content very well set out | Excellent | Content | very well set out | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.42 | 1.12 |
| D5GKj_UHEeSBSSIAC7JSBQ | Opened my eyes a lot regarding the welfare of all kinds of animals and their situations. Really sad course content, but needed to show the severity of how bad it can be for an animal, and the ways being used to stop and protect them. | and their situations. Really sad course | Content | but needed to show the severity | Negative | -0.8 | 1.0 | 0.42 | 1.12 |
| D5GKj_UHEeSBSSIAC7JSBQ | Loved this course. It has really sparked my interest in learning more and building my small store of knowledge further. Good content, interesting lecturers, varied strands within overall subject. This is my second course run by Edinburgh University and I will certainly be looking for more. | small store of knowledge further. Good | Content | interesting lecturers, varied strands within overall | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.42 | 1.12 |
| D5GKj_UHEeSBSSIAC7JSBQ | i found this a great overview of animal welfare, i enjoyed the videos, and found the questions relevant to the content. | found the questions relevant to the | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.42 | 1.12 |
| D5GKj_UHEeSBSSIAC7JSBQ | It would be perfect if within the learning material is included in PDF files. The content is wonderful | is included in PDF files. The | Content | is wonderful | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.42 | 1.12 |
| D5GKj_UHEeSBSSIAC7JSBQ | Informative and rational. Content stayed right in line with the objectives. Clearly outlined and discussed via lectures and informative readings. | Informative and rational. | Content | stayed right in line with the | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.42 | 1.12 |
| D5GKj_UHEeSBSSIAC7JSBQ | Great.!!! But if the content would be more. I find it unfair for a topic of such importance to be given so less attention. People will also respect it if the content would be more than it is right now...!! | will also respect it if the | Content | would be more than it is | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.42 | 1.12 |
| D5GKj_UHEeSBSSIAC7JSBQ | Fantastic course, well presented. Easy to take at your own pace, videos allow you to pause and rewind learning at any point. Excellent content, with knowledgeable presenters. Highly recommend | rewind learning at any point. Excellent | Content | with knowledgeable presenters. Highly recommend | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.42 | 1.12 |
| dh3wTQZNEeWJMSIAC7Jl0w | I don't see how the assignments would make me a more creative person. Some of the content was new and interesting but overall I din't think it was a good use of my time. | more creative person. Some of the | Content | was new and interesting but overall | Positive | 0.6 | -1.0 | 0.77 | 0.85 |
| dh3wTQZNEeWJMSIAC7Jl0w | There is some good content on creativity in this course, thoug it barely addresses problem solving. "Do something different" assingments were an interesting idea. Some content material is missing, including the link to a text that is needed to answer a quizz which will influence your final grade. Grading standards are weird: maximum grades are to be given to assignments performed in public, as if things done in private aren't creative; there are better ways to have someone get out of their comfort zone. Assingments request that you be photographed or filmed, and there is no disclaimer that your photos or your privacy will be protected. If you are an introvert or simply a person who values privacy, this is not the course for you. | There is some good | Content | on creativity in this course, thoug | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.77 | 0.85 |
| dh3wTQZNEeWJMSIAC7Jl0w | There is some good content on creativity in this course, thoug it barely addresses problem solving. "Do something different" assingments were an interesting idea. Some content material is missing, including the link to a text that is needed to answer a quizz which will influence your final grade. Grading standards are weird: maximum grades are to be given to assignments performed in public, as if things done in private aren't creative; there are better ways to have someone get out of their comfort zone. Assingments request that you be photographed or filmed, and there is no disclaimer that your photos or your privacy will be protected. If you are an introvert or simply a person who values privacy, this is not the course for you. | assingments were an interesting idea. Some | Content | material is missing, including the link | Negative | -0.7 | 0.5 | 0.77 | 0.85 |
| dh3wTQZNEeWJMSIAC7Jl0w | Not all the DSDs were useful, and some of the content is very dated (such is the nature of a MOOC that isn't maintained), but it was useful to learn about methodologies and tools to think creatively about issues and solving problems. | were useful, and some of the | Content | is very dated (such is the | Positive | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.77 | 0.85 |
| DYv7azSfEeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | great intro to the rest of the course content. Course material and external resources were relevant and gave good insight into SPM at a high level. | to the rest of the course | Content | Course material and external resources were | Negative | -0.6 | 1.0 | 0.95 | 1.09 |
| DYv7azSfEeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | Very useful course and excellent quality content. | Very useful course and excellent quality | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.95 | 1.09 |
| DYv7azSfEeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | I can't complete the course without passing the graded content, but I can't complete the graded content unless I pay money and upgrade. Not the purpose of thes courses. | the course without passing the graded | Content | but I can't complete the graded | Negative | -0.7 | -1.0 | 0.95 | 1.09 |
| DYv7azSfEeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | I can't complete the course without passing the graded content, but I can't complete the graded content unless I pay money and upgrade. Not the purpose of thes courses. | but I can't complete the graded | Content | unless I pay money and upgrade. | Negative | -0.7 | -1.0 | 0.95 | 1.09 |
| DYv7azSfEeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | Nice introduction, although I don't see any reason to call this "a course", if it's less than 2 hours total (at least it felt that way) while we have to listen to an intro every 5 minutes of it. Would've rated it 2 stars based on the content, but the level of presentation was really good and I appreciate the effort. | it 2 stars based on the | Content | but the level of presentation was | Negative | -0.6 | 0.0 | 0.95 | 1.09 |
| DYv7azSfEeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | Excellent lessons and course content to get an overview of Software Product Management. | Excellent lessons and course | Content | to get an overview of Software | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.95 | 1.09 |
| DYv7azSfEeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | I highly recommend this course. Easy to follow, good contents and great teaching methodology. It's an introductory course. | this course. Easy to follow, good | Content | and great teaching methodology. It's an | Positive | 0.9 | 1.0 | 0.95 | 1.09 |
| DYv7azSfEeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | Maybe not enough content to be a course. | Maybe not enough | Content | to be a course. | Negative | -0.6 | 0.0 | 0.95 | 1.09 |
| DYv7azSfEeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | Very well structured course. Course content was simple to understand and rich enough to cover important aspects of the discipline. Well articulated and well delivered by the teachers. Would like to deep dive into other related topics and specifically looking forward to Scrum tools and techniques in detail. | Very well structured course. Course | Content | was simple to understand and rich | Positive | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.95 | 1.09 |
| DYv7azSfEeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | Excellent course content and presentation | Excellent course | Content | and presentation | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.95 | 1.09 |
| DYv7azSfEeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | Great content! | Great | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.95 | 1.09 |
| DYv7azSfEeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | Great content delivered in a lucid way ! I am hooked to all courses in SPM specialization. | Great | Content | delivered in a lucid way ! | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.95 | 1.09 |
| DYv7azSfEeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | A bit 'light' on content but ok for an introduction. | A bit 'light' on | Content | but ok for an introduction. | Positive | 0.8 | 0.0 | 0.95 | 1.09 |
| DzPiWTeDEeWCYBKNeFwojw | I like it and I did never imagined the abundance of its content based on today's market. Really the course helped me a lot and immediately started implementing what I learned. Thank you Coursera | never imagined the abundance of its | Content | based on today's market. Really the | Negative | -0.6 | 1.0 | 0.78 | 0.93 |
| DzPiWTeDEeWCYBKNeFwojw | The course content is amazing and very informative. I am not from hospitality sector but I understood all the concepts and because of all the quizzes and assignments, now I feel more confident in finding a job in hospitality sector. | The course | Content | is amazing and very informative. I | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.78 | 0.93 |
| DzPiWTeDEeWCYBKNeFwojw | Very good and uptaded content on new hotel distribution ecosystem | Very good and uptaded | Content | on new hotel distribution ecosystem | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.78 | 0.93 |
| DzPiWTeDEeWCYBKNeFwojw | Great content, valuable insights. Thanks! | Great | Content | valuable insights. Thanks! | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.78 | 0.93 |
| DzPiWTeDEeWCYBKNeFwojw | Great content- videos and assignments were fantastic. Little partecipation and interaction with staff and other partecipants makes the course lose a lot of its attractiveness- most of the concepts are not rocket science and one would really benefit from confrontation with other students. | Great | Content | videos and assignments were fantastic. Little | Positive | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.78 | 0.93 |
| DzPiWTeDEeWCYBKNeFwojw | The content of the course is basically on how hotels distribute their contents (their rooms to sale). The different channels are explained, such as the OTA, brand.com, meta search, and direct channels. The course also includes a very interesting point of view from OTA where Expedia and Booking.com explains their offers to hotels. I would love to have the views from hotel too, which are missing here. The suggested readings are quite a lot, basically from the online sites, many from the hotel and travel industry (skift, for example). Those readings are very useful in digging deeper on the subject. The assignments, are, on the other hand, quite weak. It consists of 4 peer review assignments. The first week contains a pretty quantitative analysis, but the other 3 assignments are basically conversational and just repeating what you have learnt in the class. The non-noted quizzes were pretty easy, you almost no need to think deeper to answer those questions. | The | Content | of the course is basically on | Negative | -0.6 | 0.5 | 0.78 | 0.93 |
| DzPiWTeDEeWCYBKNeFwojw | The content of the course is basically on how hotels distribute their contents (their rooms to sale). The different channels are explained, such as the OTA, brand.com, meta search, and direct channels. The course also includes a very interesting point of view from OTA where Expedia and Booking.com explains their offers to hotels. I would love to have the views from hotel too, which are missing here. The suggested readings are quite a lot, basically from the online sites, many from the hotel and travel industry (skift, for example). Those readings are very useful in digging deeper on the subject. The assignments, are, on the other hand, quite weak. It consists of 4 peer review assignments. The first week contains a pretty quantitative analysis, but the other 3 assignments are basically conversational and just repeating what you have learnt in the class. The non-noted quizzes were pretty easy, you almost no need to think deeper to answer those questions. | basically on how hotels distribute their | Content | (their rooms to sale). The different | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.78 | 0.93 |
| DzPiWTeDEeWCYBKNeFwojw | In my humble opinion it is necessary to review some points in this module: 1) Video Content: Making more dynamic, switch between explanations and slides in full screen. Only explanations, it is very tiring to attend the classes. The video would be ideal as shown in week 4 of this Mooc: How the hotel shouldnt work with Expedia? or video: How to hotel shouldnt work with Booking.com? 2) Analysis requested: In the first week the requested analysis was of a very high level, it required knowledge of financial analysis and hotel area. In my case, I felt much difficulty because I do not have any knowledge in the hotel industry. And analyzing the exercise, I realized it was necessary to have knowledge of financial ratios of profitability and a certain familiarity in the hotel industry. I left a comment on the discussion board stating that I was not feeling safe to do the exercise. However, there was no demonstration by the teachers of the course. In short, I was not feeling prepared, let alone analyze colleagues. The first time, did not get the minimum score. The second time, with the longest time, I could better perform the exercise. But rather it was the result of review of financial ratios and other other accessories. I realized that those who examined me in the first and second time, had little or no idea about financial analysis. And another point that struck me was that one of the people who fell for me to analyze, was all in white and the person apologized for failing to do. With nothing to analyze, I did not think fair to give a low rating, so I preferred not to analyze. If the person left blank, something needs to be revised. When mounting a course, you have to take into consideration that there are different levels of students: beginner, intermediate and advanced in the subject matter. The first week was not to have been given is analysis. It could have been the third or fourth week of this Mooc, so it would have time for a further deepening of the matter addressed. 3) Amount of content: Adding the video, quiz and analysis, are about 30 content. It is very tiring and little time for such content. Could decrease the amount of video and quiz, relocating to another week course or Mooc. 4) Feedback: Teachers need to leave a contact way (facebook, twitter, etc.) and be active in Coursera forum or leave a wizard to ask questions when needed. 5) Notes: He missed the weight of the notes. I found a little confusing the allocation of notes. 6) Curriculum: Missed curriculum (biography) of teachers. No contact information. 7) Books: Missed suggestions of books in the hotel industry. Anyway, these are only observed points in order to contribute to development of course. Thanks for listening. | the matter addressed. 3) Amount of | Content | Adding the video, quiz and analysis, | Negative | -0.6 | 0.0 | 0.78 | 0.93 |
| DzPiWTeDEeWCYBKNeFwojw | In my humble opinion it is necessary to review some points in this module: 1) Video Content: Making more dynamic, switch between explanations and slides in full screen. Only explanations, it is very tiring to attend the classes. The video would be ideal as shown in week 4 of this Mooc: How the hotel shouldnt work with Expedia? or video: How to hotel shouldnt work with Booking.com? 2) Analysis requested: In the first week the requested analysis was of a very high level, it required knowledge of financial analysis and hotel area. In my case, I felt much difficulty because I do not have any knowledge in the hotel industry. And analyzing the exercise, I realized it was necessary to have knowledge of financial ratios of profitability and a certain familiarity in the hotel industry. I left a comment on the discussion board stating that I was not feeling safe to do the exercise. However, there was no demonstration by the teachers of the course. In short, I was not feeling prepared, let alone analyze colleagues. The first time, did not get the minimum score. The second time, with the longest time, I could better perform the exercise. But rather it was the result of review of financial ratios and other other accessories. I realized that those who examined me in the first and second time, had little or no idea about financial analysis. And another point that struck me was that one of the people who fell for me to analyze, was all in white and the person apologized for failing to do. With nothing to analyze, I did not think fair to give a low rating, so I preferred not to analyze. If the person left blank, something needs to be revised. When mounting a course, you have to take into consideration that there are different levels of students: beginner, intermediate and advanced in the subject matter. The first week was not to have been given is analysis. It could have been the third or fourth week of this Mooc, so it would have time for a further deepening of the matter addressed. 3) Amount of content: Adding the video, quiz and analysis, are about 30 content. It is very tiring and little time for such content. Could decrease the amount of video and quiz, relocating to another week course or Mooc. 4) Feedback: Teachers need to leave a contact way (facebook, twitter, etc.) and be active in Coursera forum or leave a wizard to ask questions when needed. 5) Notes: He missed the weight of the notes. I found a little confusing the allocation of notes. 6) Curriculum: Missed curriculum (biography) of teachers. No contact information. 7) Books: Missed suggestions of books in the hotel industry. Anyway, these are only observed points in order to contribute to development of course. Thanks for listening. | quiz and analysis, are about 30 | Content | It is very tiring and little | Negative | -0.7 | 0.0 | 0.78 | 0.93 |
| e4SzF9c1EeS-LCIAC3icWw | This course has a lots of knownledge and well-structured contents. | a lots of knownledge and well-structured | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 1.07 | 1.12 |
| e4SzF9c1EeS-LCIAC3icWw | the course structure and content are very good and interesting! | the course structure and | Content | are very good and interesting! | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 1.07 | 1.12 |
| e4SzF9c1EeS-LCIAC3icWw | Very bad course. The content can barely be applied outside US, you don't know from which perspective it's explained (for sales or purchasing people), the videos are bad quality, the teacher is babbling, no extra resources, no interaction with the audience outside the assessments. | Very bad course. The | Content | can barely be applied outside US, | Negative | -0.8 | -1.0 | 1.07 | 1.12 |
| e4SzF9c1EeS-LCIAC3icWw | Too short, too easy, too costly. Beautiful picture, beautiful title, but low content. | Beautiful picture, beautiful title, but low | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | -1.0 | 1.07 | 1.12 |
| eBEnnYkqEeWGBwqGAoUFww | I thoroughly enjoyed the course and greatly benefitted from its content. As a fresh MBA admit coming from scientific background, I was looking for a course that would cover the basics of Financial accounting, the so-called language of business. Marc Badia's Principles of Financial Accounting was the answer to it. After having had following the course, and of course passing it, I have gained a thorough understanding of the basic concepts of Accounting that I am now using in the Accounting class of IESE Business School. | course and greatly benefitted from its | Content | As a fresh MBA admit coming | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.58 | 1.15 |
| eBEnnYkqEeWGBwqGAoUFww | Great content explained in a very concise and understandable way! | Great | Content | explained in a very concise and | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.58 | 1.15 |
| eBEnnYkqEeWGBwqGAoUFww | Great course thanks to its content and to its progressive step-by-step increase in complexity. | Great course thanks to its | Content | and to its progressive step-by-step increase | Positive | 0.9 | 1.0 | 0.58 | 1.15 |
| eBEnnYkqEeWGBwqGAoUFww | Excellent course. Excellent content Excellent and lucid presentation. Now I got a feel that I understand standards of accounting, and I am a hard core engineer. Thanks a lot. | Excellent course. Excellent | Content | Excellent and lucid presentation. Now I | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.58 | 1.15 |
| eBEnnYkqEeWGBwqGAoUFww | Quite confusing if you do not have a background already in accounting. The information in the course content does not match up with the quizzes. Great experience but a little lacking on the details needed to pass the quizzes each week....especially week | accounting. The information in the course | Content | does not match up with the | Negative | -0.7 | 0.0 | 0.58 | 1.15 |
| EGWVwnE7EeWxvQr3acyajw | I thought this course would be kinda boring, but I have been pleasantly surprised at how interesting it is. Steve Parenti has a dry and sly sense of humor and the content gives me great historical and current perspective on the way healthcare works in the U.S. and to a lesser degree, in the rest of the world. Only quibble: There are lots of typos on the slides. Sometimes these are pretty amusing, but sometimes confusing. Also, some of the listed handouts seem to be relevant to the next course in the series, rather than to this one. All said, I think Dr. Parenti would be someone fun to go and have a beer with. | sly sense of humor and the | Content | gives me great historical and current | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 1.06 | 1.07 |
| EGWVwnE7EeWxvQr3acyajw | The professor just read the materials through all the modules, and the course was really boring. But, the content was quite updated that was the only good thing. Does not worth such a high payment. | course was really boring. But, the | Content | was quite updated that was the | Negative | -0.7 | -0.5 | 1.06 | 1.07 |
| eH8S1b38EeWxzxJER_JW2w | This is an interesting course, though it is taught from the perspective of design with less focus on content or how to actually write an infographic. Still, very useful. | of design with less focus on | Content | or how to actually write an | Negative | -0.6 | 1.0 | 0.82 | 0.98 |
| eH8S1b38EeWxzxJER_JW2w | Very good. Good Content | Very good. Good | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.82 | 0.98 |
| eH8S1b38EeWxzxJER_JW2w | I enjoyed this course but I was not satisfied with the assessment. The content kept me engaged and highly motivated. I acquired some very specific and useful skills, which I developed by completing projects on topics of my choosing that were meaningful to me. I really liked Karl's casual and somewhat spontaneous style - this is a breath of fresh air from the video tutorials out there where lecturers are reading from prompts or reciting from memory. The biggest drawback to this course is that it relied completely on peer grading for the assessment (which you have to pay for). I don't think this assessment method was sufficiently designed to reduce the influence of graders who were overly subjective, hadn't sufficiently mastered the content themselves, or were disinterested in putting effort into the peer review. From now on, I will think twice about paying for any course where all of the assessment is based on how my classmates grade me. While peer review can be useful for learning, I don't think it's an accurate assessment tool. Especially if I'm paying to learn from a professional in a field, I'd expect to receive some feedback and assessment from that pro. Another area of improvement is that there were several instances where videos repeated things covered in previous videos. These things could be cleaned up a bit and the course would be more polished. | not satisfied with the assessment. The | Content | kept me engaged and highly motivated. | Positive | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.82 | 0.98 |
| eH8S1b38EeWxzxJER_JW2w | I enjoyed this course but I was not satisfied with the assessment. The content kept me engaged and highly motivated. I acquired some very specific and useful skills, which I developed by completing projects on topics of my choosing that were meaningful to me. I really liked Karl's casual and somewhat spontaneous style - this is a breath of fresh air from the video tutorials out there where lecturers are reading from prompts or reciting from memory. The biggest drawback to this course is that it relied completely on peer grading for the assessment (which you have to pay for). I don't think this assessment method was sufficiently designed to reduce the influence of graders who were overly subjective, hadn't sufficiently mastered the content themselves, or were disinterested in putting effort into the peer review. From now on, I will think twice about paying for any course where all of the assessment is based on how my classmates grade me. While peer review can be useful for learning, I don't think it's an accurate assessment tool. Especially if I'm paying to learn from a professional in a field, I'd expect to receive some feedback and assessment from that pro. Another area of improvement is that there were several instances where videos repeated things covered in previous videos. These things could be cleaned up a bit and the course would be more polished. | overly subjective, hadn't sufficiently mastered the | Content | themselves, or were disinterested in putting | Negative | -0.7 | 0.0 | 0.82 | 0.98 |
| eH8S1b38EeWxzxJER_JW2w | Great content! Just have fun and learn new things about info graphics | Great | Content | Just have fun and learn new | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.82 | 0.98 |
| eLzp7w-NEeWPhwrBf2tcNQ | Very good overview course. This helps you understand the terms used in Big Data, Cloud Computing and Content Delivery Networks. You will understand most of the terms fairly well by the end of this course. I'm impressed by the instructor, his English is very good. His command of the subject is great. He manages to structure this course in a way that makes it more understandable than it would otherwise be. | in Big Data, Cloud Computing and | Content | Delivery Networks. You will understand most | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| eLzp7w-NEeWPhwrBf2tcNQ | Course is very basic , although contents are compact and informative. | Course is very basic , although | Content | are compact and informative. | Positive | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| eLzp7w-NEeWPhwrBf2tcNQ | Very good content and presentations, Thanks, | Very good | Content | and presentations, Thanks, | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| eLzp7w-NEeWPhwrBf2tcNQ | Thank youu very much for the very comprehensive and informative content of this course. | for the very comprehensive and informative | Content | of this course. | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| eLzp7w-NEeWPhwrBf2tcNQ | Map Reduce needs more crisp explanation. Too much content explained in short slides. Scope for improvement | needs more crisp explanation. Too much | Content | explained in short slides. Scope for | Negative | -0.6 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| eLzp7w-NEeWPhwrBf2tcNQ | For a beginer, this is a very good starting point.. I am loving the contents and enjoying my learning.. | point. . I am loving the | Content | and enjoying my learning. . | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| eLzp7w-NEeWPhwrBf2tcNQ | The contents of PPTs are just read out in the video lectures. It's as good as providing only the PPTs. | The | Content | of PPTs are just read out | Negative | -0.6 | -1.0 | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| emCu12atEeW2DA58V0Z6GQ | The assignments are not really commensurate to the content, i.e. they are much simpler and superficial and do not really test the content, which is deeper and implies practical activities difficult to measure. The title is also partially misleading, at least for me, and I would rather call it a blues introduction to jazz improvisation. But the content and the exercises proposed are great, one of the best and no nonsense approach to bebop improvisation I've ever found | are not really commensurate to the | Content | i. e. they are much simpler | Negative | -0.6 | 1.0 | 0.65 | 1.1 |
| emCu12atEeW2DA58V0Z6GQ | The assignments are not really commensurate to the content, i.e. they are much simpler and superficial and do not really test the content, which is deeper and implies practical activities difficult to measure. The title is also partially misleading, at least for me, and I would rather call it a blues introduction to jazz improvisation. But the content and the exercises proposed are great, one of the best and no nonsense approach to bebop improvisation I've ever found | and do not really test the | Content | which is deeper and implies practical | Negative | -0.6 | 1.0 | 0.65 | 1.1 |
| emCu12atEeW2DA58V0Z6GQ | The assignments are not really commensurate to the content, i.e. they are much simpler and superficial and do not really test the content, which is deeper and implies practical activities difficult to measure. The title is also partially misleading, at least for me, and I would rather call it a blues introduction to jazz improvisation. But the content and the exercises proposed are great, one of the best and no nonsense approach to bebop improvisation I've ever found | introduction to jazz improvisation. But the | Content | and the exercises proposed are great, | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.65 | 1.1 |
| emCu12atEeW2DA58V0Z6GQ | Excellent content and faculty ! thoroughly enjoying it : ) Thanks a lot to all who have worked towadrds making this material available | Excellent | Content | and faculty ! thoroughly enjoying it | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.65 | 1.1 |
| eUI0xjeIEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | this was thefirst course i payed for and unfortunately the worst expierience. lack of content beyond the stuff in the available simple swift tutorials and from an eduucational pint of view afwully if at all prepared its as shame that i cannot give this "course" ZERO stars which it deserves! i should have checked the very negative feedback of the former participants before bying it i will be much MUCH more alert regarding content on coursera from now on | unfortunately the worst expierience. lack of | Content | beyond the stuff in the available | Negative | -0.9 | -1.0 | 0.78 | 0.95 |
| eUI0xjeIEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | There are only a few hours of content across the five weeks. The whole course can be done in a single evening. However, if you try this starting from no programming experience it will likely be extremely hard to complete. Since the course has as a prerequisite that you can already code this shouldn't be an issue for anyone. | are only a few hours of | Content | across the five weeks. The whole | Negative | -0.6 | 0.0 | 0.78 | 0.95 |
| eUI0xjeIEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | Bad content and instructor. no logistic in place. if you are planning to pay to get certificate. I would suggest look else where. my $279 are stuck in here and they don't reply to forum posts. | Bad | Content | and instructor. no logistic in place. | Negative | -0.7 | -1.0 | 0.78 | 0.95 |
| eUI0xjeIEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | It is very god so far I am on the second week and I am very happy and pleased with the content also lecturers are very educated and calm. STRONGLY RECOMMENDED | very happy and pleased with the | Content | also lecturers are very educated and | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.78 | 0.95 |
| eUI0xjeIEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | The content is absolutely amazing. What I didn't really like was that the last assignment was a curve ball to me and most of the other students in my class. There was very little preparation to it and thus took a while to understand how to get started on it. | The | Content | is absolutely amazing. What I didn't | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.78 | 0.95 |
| eUI0xjeIEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | Should be lecture by Professor instead of BS student. The content was not well organized. Also should prepare slides and explain the Swift for more details. More exercises needed in each weeks lecture. Hopefully, this course should improve next time. | Professor instead of BS student. The | Content | was not well organized. Also should | Negative | -0.6 | -0.5 | 0.78 | 0.95 |
| eUI0xjeIEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | The Good: The idea of having the lectures in a Q&A style, two experts in continuous conversation about the topic has a potential The Bad: That potential is wasted on poorly planned lessons and course content The Ugly: Instructors run the Swift code that is written during the lesson and they get a wrong result due to an error in the code. They both agree that the result is weird but then continue to explain that this is how Swift works. In short, they are misleading and confusing you on a topic you are trying to learn. This is of course unintentional but gives you a clue about how the quality check on lecture videos are taken care of. Details here: https://www.coursera.org/learn/swift-programming/discussions/DBk-SJO2EeWNbBIwwhtGwQ | on poorly planned lessons and course | Content | The Ugly: Instructors run the Swift | Negative | -0.8 | -0.5 | 0.78 | 0.95 |
| eUI0xjeIEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | I am sure if you are familiar with the content or an expert programmer looking for an overview of a new language then this would be perfect but you do need to understand swift before starting this introduction to swift. The lessons felt very unstructured, unplanned and ad hoc almost like the people presenting didn't know they were being recorded, this meant that the examples given were contrived without consideration to the suitability to present the concept succinctly and would require anyone but an existing swift programmer needing to carry out additional reading which rather defeats the purpose of an "introduction to..." course. A little scripting and lesson planning and preparation of content would have made the difference between this excellently produced and edited course being awkward and an effort to attend into a really useful reference for beginers of swift programming. To summarise, the obviously expert technical knowledge of the speakers and the quality of the editing are let down by rushed lesson content. | if you are familiar with the | Content | or an expert programmer looking for | Positive | 0.6 | -0.5 | 0.78 | 0.95 |
| eUI0xjeIEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | I am sure if you are familiar with the content or an expert programmer looking for an overview of a new language then this would be perfect but you do need to understand swift before starting this introduction to swift. The lessons felt very unstructured, unplanned and ad hoc almost like the people presenting didn't know they were being recorded, this meant that the examples given were contrived without consideration to the suitability to present the concept succinctly and would require anyone but an existing swift programmer needing to carry out additional reading which rather defeats the purpose of an "introduction to..." course. A little scripting and lesson planning and preparation of content would have made the difference between this excellently produced and edited course being awkward and an effort to attend into a really useful reference for beginers of swift programming. To summarise, the obviously expert technical knowledge of the speakers and the quality of the editing are let down by rushed lesson content. | are let down by rushed lesson | Content | | Negative | -0.6 | -0.5 | 0.78 | 0.95 |
| eUI0xjeIEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | This course was little more than a haphazard, ambling preview of a tiny bit of Swift. There was some useful content in the class but the organization was poor and there was almost no evidence of course design or use of the teaching techniques I expected to see from a major university. The best section of the course was week 5, where they syntax of Objective-C and Swift were superficially compared. That section did give some clear opinions on why Swift should be chosen over Objective-C for new development. The other sections just contained too many confusing, unrehearsed diversions into esoteric topics to be of much use. I ended getting more out of the Apple documentation on Swift than I did from this class. However, the instructors have received ample feedback of this nature and they do seem genuinely concerned with improving the course. Assuming that they will make major improvements for the next round and noting that Coursera's infrastructure is excellent, don't be scared to take the class. The email reminders from Coursera about assignments, etc... kept me on track and kept me in the class. | of Swift. There was some useful | Content | in the class but the organization | Negative | -0.6 | -0.5 | 0.78 | 0.95 |
| eUI0xjeIEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | I wish I had paid closer attention to the refund policy. The production quality and content did not meet my expectations. | refund policy. The production quality and | Content | did not meet my expectations. | Negative | -0.6 | -1.0 | 0.78 | 0.95 |
| eUI0xjeIEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | The lectures for this course seem unorganized and often had poor audio. The content covered in many lectures seemed off topic. Quiz questions would then focus on the off topic information making it confusing with regard to what material to focus on during a lecture. Do I focus on the proposed subject of the video or the many tangents about other topics. This combined with the unorganized nature of videos(just winging it) made the lectures distracting. The lecture videos are full of code that simply does not work in the real world and help from staff takes literally days to get(and not just over the weekend). | and often had poor audio. The | Content | covered in many lectures seemed off | Negative | -0.7 | -0.5 | 0.78 | 0.95 |
| eUI0xjeIEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | This course is poorly designed. What course on a programming language jumps first into how to use the debugger and what went wrong with a program? You are not introducing Swift, you are introducing xcode (and doing a terrible job of it). Also, I have been using xcode and Swift for 8 months now and producing some really good work, but I could only get 3/7 on your quiz because you have written questions with the purpose of tricking people instead of reinforcing or checking knowledge of the content. When you teach a new application, consider introducing the interface first. Explain what the various areas are, what they are needed for, and how to control them. This orients the user in the application and helps them to find their way around when they are trying to reinforce your teachings later. The presentation for this course is so unprofessional. It's like a running commentary on a movie instead of an educational presentation. I felt like I was listening to two geeks stuffing around and having a good time, instead of people who are professional teachers! I'm so incredibly disappointed with this course. Back to the wonderful work of Paul Hegarty from Stanford University on iTunes University and YouTube for me. University of Toronto - you should really consider what your teaching staff are doing before you unleash them on the world. | reinforcing or checking knowledge of the | Content | When you teach a new application, | Positive | 0.6 | -1.0 | 0.78 | 0.95 |
| eUI0xjeIEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | The professors did no prepared the classes. They make so many mistakes in the video lectures and they also laughts in the middle of the course and they send a non-professional feeling to the students. The content of the course is very good, but the proffesors could really do better. | non-professional feeling to the students. The | Content | of the course is very good, | Positive | 0.7 | -0.5 | 0.78 | 0.95 |
| eV-OTCTuEeWCGRL6mLoB5w | I have adored this course, the content and Mr. Wright's approach. His enthusiasm and knowledge of Classical Music shine throughout the course. He has made classical music far more approachable for those less in tune. Thank you for the wonderful course Mr. Wright! | I have adored this course, the | Content | and Mr. Wright's approach. His enthusiasm | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.55 | 1.09 |
| eV-OTCTuEeWCGRL6mLoB5w | During this course, as a complete novice, I am shocked daily by how much there is to learn about music. The course does an excellent job of inspiring one to learn more and providing the quality of content to enable one to do so. | more and providing the quality of | Content | to enable one to do so. | Negative | -0.6 | 1.0 | 0.55 | 1.09 |
| eV-OTCTuEeWCGRL6mLoB5w | Thank you Pr. Wright for this excellent course, I really enjoyed the content, the structure as well as your way of explaining things! As simple music lover, I have been listening to classical music since a while, this course helped me to have a more structured knowledge of it. Hope you would think of recording more and deeper courses. | excellent course, I really enjoyed the | Content | the structure as well as your | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.55 | 1.09 |
| eV-OTCTuEeWCGRL6mLoB5w | Great course! I learned a lot, discovered new music and the way mr. Wright presents the content is very good. | the way mr. Wright presents the | Content | is very good. | Positive | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.55 | 1.09 |
| EwR6zhSDEeWCWhKuhISYpw | Great introduction to the big history concept. Awesome production. Content of the last two weeks is significantly weaker than the rest though | the big history concept. Awesome production. | Content | of the last two weeks is | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 1.1 |
| EwR6zhSDEeWCWhKuhISYpw | The high quality of videos and content makes this course an outstanding, fantastic and entertainment MOOC course for everyone who wish to learn the big history that is hidding in the Universe. Thanks coursera and macquare University for let us access to this beatiful show of altruism and openness, both of you deserve not only a big five star but a great standing applasue. Congratulations great course. All my best Coursera community, Carlos Arturo Pimentel. | The high quality of videos and | Content | makes this course an outstanding, fantastic | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 1.1 |
| EwR6zhSDEeWCWhKuhISYpw | Excellent course in integrating all the 'ologies' that give insight into how it all came together from the Big Bang to the development of life to a vision of the future landscape of human existence. Excellent presenters, the right level of subject matter content and an exceptional level of production quality. A great job done by the entire staff and much appreciated. | the right level of subject matter | Content | and an exceptional level of production | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 1.1 |
| EwR6zhSDEeWCWhKuhISYpw | This is definitely my favorite course on Coursera and anywhere else in internet! So glad I accidentally ran into it! Under a name that doesn't tell much about the content there is a real jewel - a multidisciplinary course that is truly able to connect many of the dots and make perfect sense of all these endless math and science, history and many other classes we all had to sit throughout our school years. I loved every minute of this course, all the experts zooming into subjects, all of additional materials (especially Crushcourse videos). Big History course is awesome for those always asking "but why?" questions. A very big thank you to The Big History course team for finding time and passion for making it available to everyone in the world! | that doesn't tell much about the | Content | there is a real jewel - | Negative | -0.6 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 1.1 |
| EwR6zhSDEeWCWhKuhISYpw | Enjoyable course and I appreciated the interdisciplinary nature. At times, I felt like I wanted to delve deeper into the content, but I understand that this MOOC, like most others, are breadth courses designed for incoming Freshmen. | wanted to delve deeper into the | Content | but I understand that this MOOC, | Negative | -0.6 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 1.1 |
| EwR6zhSDEeWCWhKuhISYpw | The course content had met its objectives. I loved the way interdisciplinary sciences were explained precisely from Astronomy to paleontology to economics | The course | Content | had met its objectives. I loved | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 1.1 |
| EwR6zhSDEeWCWhKuhISYpw | Fantastic course - great content, very informative, and engaging presentations | Fantastic course - great | Content | very informative, and engaging presentations | Positive | 0.9 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 1.1 |
| EwR6zhSDEeWCWhKuhISYpw | The course is very nicely done and well organized. The fundamental organization around sources of learning and the progression of lessons are well done and strongly support knowledge building. Some of the speakers have verbal patterns or flows of speaking that can be a bit distracting, but they are all interesting and informative. I like that you can also download transcripts. I am a very visual learner whose mind tends to wander off when faced with a talking head. Having the transcript to follow as I listen allowed me to highlight and make notes while listening, ensuring greater attention to the content. Ultimately, I made the decision to not finish the course. Not because the course was not well done but because it doesn't align with my own interests in systems thinking and complexity. It is a good course and well worth engaging in, even if you discover, as I did, that it doesn't quite match one's learning needs. I do recommend it if you are interested in cosmology and theories related to the origins of the universe. | listening, ensuring greater attention to the | Content | Ultimately, I made the decision to | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 1.1 |
| EwR6zhSDEeWCWhKuhISYpw | This course covers a lot of complex material in a concise and approachable manner. It is possible to understand the content (and most importantly learn about the subject) without having a scientific background. | It is possible to understand the | Content | (and most importantly learn about the | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 1.1 |
| EwR6zhSDEeWCWhKuhISYpw | Incredible course in every way: Highly competent lecturers, excellent video quality in both content and production, great pacing and delivery of information and dozens of links to engaging resource material. One of the best MOOCs I have ever participated in: fun, informative and intriguing! | lecturers, excellent video quality in both | Content | and production, great pacing and delivery | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 1.1 |
| eXbmvDe9EeWO-Qq6rEZAow | Poor alignment between assignments and lectures. Lots of content poorly explained. | between assignments and lectures. Lots of | Content | poorly explained. | Negative | -0.6 | -1.0 | 0.85 | 0.94 |
| eXbmvDe9EeWO-Qq6rEZAow | It's a very course content, but level of difficulty is hard for an online training. | It's a very course | Content | but level of difficulty is hard | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.85 | 0.94 |
| eXbmvDe9EeWO-Qq6rEZAow | Good contents but a bit over-complicated assignments. | Good | Content | but a bit over-complicated assignments. | Positive | 0.7 | -0.5 | 0.85 | 0.94 |
| eXbmvDe9EeWO-Qq6rEZAow | Hi there, this course was great but i will recommend to split the large lectures in 2 and add more dynamic content and make the examples in rails project instead of the console will be great this course has been in the end a bit boring because i the professor need to be more fluid and make it more funny! for say it in some way for everything else it was a great course thanks you! | in 2 and add more dynamic | Content | and make the examples in rails | Negative | -0.6 | 0.5 | 0.85 | 0.94 |
| eXbmvDe9EeWO-Qq6rEZAow | All the information and content given is great and necessary to work with mongo db. unfortunately, the timing and pacing is really tough because it relies on pretty long assignments. Take this course if you can handle going through 20 pages of instructions for a homework or 2, or you need a fast paced review of mongo and mongoid coupled with rails. | All the information and | Content | given is great and necessary to | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.85 | 0.94 |
| eXbmvDe9EeWO-Qq6rEZAow | course work is too hectic. its hard for some one who is new to web app development and new to ruby! but over all strength and content of the course is good. | ruby! but over all strength and | Content | of the course is good. | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.85 | 0.94 |
| fCKQimXqEeSuUyIAC0mIhA | Very thought provoking course. The online content was well presented, and the supporting reading was highly quality, relevant material that expanded my knowledge on this subject and I am sure it will be really helpful in improving my future research projects and planning. Highly recommended. | Very thought provoking course. The online | Content | was well presented, and the supporting | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.84 | 1.0 |
| fCKQimXqEeSuUyIAC0mIhA | Content is good. I found the information in the videos valuable, albeit short and leaving me wanting more. I suppose that's what research is for. In general great and short course to get one on track with research methods.Take this course, as it is good. So why three stars? I know it is a long review, and feel free to remove it from the list, if you deem it appropriate. I have learned a lot in the course, and it is a valuable experience still. My problem lies with the design of the course, that seems to have started with great vigour at then lost the steam at the end. I would like to suggest few pointers. Especially since the presenters have another courses in the catalogue with similar issues. 1. Help learners to focus - Body language, and position in the room. Standing in front of windows with the traffic outside may seem a minor thing, but it detracts form you and the content. As a course designer it is a responsibility to set it right. Same applies for hands in back pockets, posture when sat down, lens flare etc. 2 - As instructors you have offered very little teaching. All was left to the guest speakers. All very good and knowledgeable. Some graphic and own mini lecture would help to establish you as experts (not that you are not, but we would not know that from the videos), rather than mere interviewers. (Summary of what was said). 3 - match the video and e-tivity focus. And think about the accessibility of the material to your learners, especially if no previous knowledge is required. Week three was about managing research and planning. The reading, was surprisingly different (week 4 activity would be more suitable here) and really hard to access to someone, who hasn't done much reading in theories of knowledge etc. This would be more accessible as a guided lecture and quiz, rather than 400 words response. I hope I was not offensive to anyone. I was trying to help you to help us learn better, if that makes sense. M | | Content | is good. I found the information | Positive | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.84 | 1.0 |
| fCKQimXqEeSuUyIAC0mIhA | Content is good. I found the information in the videos valuable, albeit short and leaving me wanting more. I suppose that's what research is for. In general great and short course to get one on track with research methods.Take this course, as it is good. So why three stars? I know it is a long review, and feel free to remove it from the list, if you deem it appropriate. I have learned a lot in the course, and it is a valuable experience still. My problem lies with the design of the course, that seems to have started with great vigour at then lost the steam at the end. I would like to suggest few pointers. Especially since the presenters have another courses in the catalogue with similar issues. 1. Help learners to focus - Body language, and position in the room. Standing in front of windows with the traffic outside may seem a minor thing, but it detracts form you and the content. As a course designer it is a responsibility to set it right. Same applies for hands in back pockets, posture when sat down, lens flare etc. 2 - As instructors you have offered very little teaching. All was left to the guest speakers. All very good and knowledgeable. Some graphic and own mini lecture would help to establish you as experts (not that you are not, but we would not know that from the videos), rather than mere interviewers. (Summary of what was said). 3 - match the video and e-tivity focus. And think about the accessibility of the material to your learners, especially if no previous knowledge is required. Week three was about managing research and planning. The reading, was surprisingly different (week 4 activity would be more suitable here) and really hard to access to someone, who hasn't done much reading in theories of knowledge etc. This would be more accessible as a guided lecture and quiz, rather than 400 words response. I hope I was not offensive to anyone. I was trying to help you to help us learn better, if that makes sense. M | it detracts form you and the | Content | As a course designer it is | Positive | 0.8 | 0.0 | 0.84 | 1.0 |
| fCKQimXqEeSuUyIAC0mIhA | It is like for kids, I think all courses must mention their target audience. Contents, Videos, talks nothing was value for time. | courses must mention their target audience. | Content | Videos, talks nothing was value for | Negative | -0.6 | -1.0 | 0.84 | 1.0 |
| fCKQimXqEeSuUyIAC0mIhA | In terms of delivery, the course delivery was very simple, critical and relevant. The course content was very engaging as it included interviews with graduate students and professors alike who are doing their researches. Quite fittingly, I commend the creators of this course for recognizing the fact that most online courses on research methods out there focus on having a linear tackling of lesson topics. For this course, it stressed the key issues and reflections of individuals who are doing the actual rudiments of the thing we call "research". More importantly, this course was also critical and relevant in many respects as it allowed us to have some write-ups about the topics without requiring us to go through many readings. It is in this sense that I would say that it its relevant--concise and direct in its approach, the instructors have seen to it that what they are to discuss will be the things which new comers to the research endeavor might ask. Kudos to the team! And my warmest regards to all of you! =D | simple, critical and relevant. The course | Content | was very engaging as it included | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.84 | 1.0 |
| fCKQimXqEeSuUyIAC0mIhA | There was very little actual content in this course, and I can't say I learned very much. In hindsight, I wish I hadn't paid for a verified certificate. | There was very little actual | Content | in this course, and I can't | Negative | -0.8 | -0.5 | 0.84 | 1.0 |
| fCKQimXqEeSuUyIAC0mIhA | High quality content. Congratulations to the team! | High quality | Content | Congratulations to the team! | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.84 | 1.0 |
| fCKQimXqEeSuUyIAC0mIhA | Great introduction to research methods for anyone contemplating a research masters of Phd. I haven't studied for a while, so found the course content particularly useful. Course is taught through a combination of videos, readings and weekly assignments which are peer reviewed. Weeks 2 and 3 of the course are particularly useful. | a while, so found the course | Content | particularly useful. Course is taught through | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.84 | 1.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Really enjoyed this course - very appealing mix of different ways of presenting content and engaging users. | mix of different ways of presenting | Content | and engaging users. | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.74 | 1.06 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Empty of content | Empty of | Content | | Negative | -0.7 | -0.5 | 0.74 | 1.06 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | I didn't knew anything about marketing when I started the course. I liked the lecture's content and all the activities. This is my first online course that I've finished | the course. I liked the lecture's | Content | and all the activities. This is | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.74 | 1.06 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | I found this course to be very basic. I appreciate that Marketing requires a broad interaction, but a course designed to take 4 weeks (with 2~3 weeks of actual content) is too much. I need to learn about cost-per-click, impressions, ROI on ad spend - that sort of thing. I don't see how 3D printing is relevant to the majority of people in marketing today. | weeks (with 2~3 weeks of actual | Content | is too much. I need to | Negative | -0.7 | -1.0 | 0.74 | 1.06 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Really also and relevant content | Really also and relevant | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.74 | 1.06 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Excellent option for those with no preview experience on marketing. Really enjoyed the content and found it very useful for my professional life | experience on marketing. Really enjoyed the | Content | and found it very useful for | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.74 | 1.06 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Good content but would have preferred if it was more interactive. There is no way to discuss in detail and debate over a topic. I still have many questions unanswered and forum is very inactive. Wish there was a thread for each topic where people could just discuss their perspective. Overall good content but lack of interaction makes it incomplete in my opinion. | just discuss their perspective. Overall good | Content | but lack of interaction makes it | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.74 | 1.06 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Well Detailed and helpful content | Well Detailed and helpful | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.74 | 1.06 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Excellent format of online education. Participative and top graded content | online education. Participative and top graded | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.74 | 1.06 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | The course offered an interesting overview and introduction to digital marketing; it is also a good start to the specialization in Digital Marketing. This was the first time I have taken a Coursera course and was able to complete it, and I've tried several. Quite often, the content is just too difficult to wade through without 1:1 human support. I think the workload was pitched correctly. I also liked how some theory was taught, and some research based on the theory. It is not just a bunch of case studies. There is an effort to describe the general principles that can apply across both firms and specific technologies, although there is a lot of both (firms and technologies) addressed as well. The most useful part of the course was a rather extensive discussion around pay what you want (PWYW), and the theory behind that, and the supporting case-based and research-based evidence, is really compelling. I plan to use a PWYW strategy as I develop my online startup. Thanks, Coursera and University of Illinois! On the negative side (and there's not much of that), some of the interviews of students on the U of I quad were ridiculously pointless. They really offered nothing of great value and took up substantial time. They were too anecdotal and at times the resulting content worked against the principles being taught in the course. I would rather see user-generated content, created by students and grads of the course, perhaps, from around the world, each discussing some aspect of that unit's topic. Just focusing on student interviews at U of I seems pretty parochial. I would also love to participate in UGC for a newsletter spinning off from this course. They use the courage presumably to extend the U of I community, but here's the thing: it creates its own community, and U of I would be well-served to re-oriented around it, rather than assuming that the only path forward is the reverse. Again, this is one of the most successful courses at Coursera. So maybe this is the direction for U of I to be heading...For example, I would anticipate offers from U or I for how they can get me into additional non-traditional business (or other) Coursera courses, or U of I courses or programs, or heck, teaching for U o I. Anyway, embrace the disruption! | I've tried several. Quite often, the | Content | is just too difficult to wade | Negative | -0.7 | 1.0 | 0.74 | 1.06 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | The course offered an interesting overview and introduction to digital marketing; it is also a good start to the specialization in Digital Marketing. This was the first time I have taken a Coursera course and was able to complete it, and I've tried several. Quite often, the content is just too difficult to wade through without 1:1 human support. I think the workload was pitched correctly. I also liked how some theory was taught, and some research based on the theory. It is not just a bunch of case studies. There is an effort to describe the general principles that can apply across both firms and specific technologies, although there is a lot of both (firms and technologies) addressed as well. The most useful part of the course was a rather extensive discussion around pay what you want (PWYW), and the theory behind that, and the supporting case-based and research-based evidence, is really compelling. I plan to use a PWYW strategy as I develop my online startup. Thanks, Coursera and University of Illinois! On the negative side (and there's not much of that), some of the interviews of students on the U of I quad were ridiculously pointless. They really offered nothing of great value and took up substantial time. They were too anecdotal and at times the resulting content worked against the principles being taught in the course. I would rather see user-generated content, created by students and grads of the course, perhaps, from around the world, each discussing some aspect of that unit's topic. Just focusing on student interviews at U of I seems pretty parochial. I would also love to participate in UGC for a newsletter spinning off from this course. They use the courage presumably to extend the U of I community, but here's the thing: it creates its own community, and U of I would be well-served to re-oriented around it, rather than assuming that the only path forward is the reverse. Again, this is one of the most successful courses at Coursera. So maybe this is the direction for U of I to be heading...For example, I would anticipate offers from U or I for how they can get me into additional non-traditional business (or other) Coursera courses, or U of I courses or programs, or heck, teaching for U o I. Anyway, embrace the disruption! | anecdotal and at times the resulting | Content | worked against the principles being taught | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.74 | 1.06 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Amazing content and a great refresher as a former marketing student looking to enhance my skills! | Amazing | Content | and a great refresher as a | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.74 | 1.06 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Good start to the course. Though I feel more energy and enthusiasm by the instructors would uplift the course. Some content is not prevalent at present (outdated). | instructors would uplift the course. Some | Content | is not prevalent at present (outdated). | Negative | -0.6 | 0.0 | 0.74 | 1.06 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | The content of the course is very good. What I would improve are the Quizes; I'd concentrate more on key stuff, not include any questions concerning irrelevant details. Some of the assignment questions were also a bit unclear and the rating scales did not make sense at times. | The | Content | of the course is very good. | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.74 | 1.06 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Content needs to be updated | | Content | needs to be updated | Negative | -0.6 | -1.0 | 0.74 | 1.06 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Really liked the flow of content and the instructor. Some content is dated (RedLaser) and makes one assignment clunky since it was based on that app. Since this course focuses on digital and the inherent speed-to-market the platform affords, one would expect more up-to-date/timely examples for current content/exercises. Aside from that, the course was engaging and informative. Thanks, Aric! | Really liked the flow of | Content | and the instructor. Some content is | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.74 | 1.06 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Really liked the flow of content and the instructor. Some content is dated (RedLaser) and makes one assignment clunky since it was based on that app. Since this course focuses on digital and the inherent speed-to-market the platform affords, one would expect more up-to-date/timely examples for current content/exercises. Aside from that, the course was engaging and informative. Thanks, Aric! | of content and the instructor. Some | Content | is dated (RedLaser) and makes one | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.74 | 1.06 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | I think the content was quite interesting; as someone new to marketing, I was really looking forward to the lectures and exercises. However, the content was simply too much for me to complete. It's a bit ironic that a course about marketing missed its market. To give a bit more detail: there were 12 video lectures, 3 assignments that had to be done days before the end of the week to be peer-reviewed, and then I had to peer review others work, while also going through all the assigned reading. It seemed more like a courseload for a full time student or perhaps a part-time student. As online students typically are neither, I'm surprised the course content wasn't better managed. I take a lot of notes, so perhaps that's what slowed me down, but I also have a full time job and I intern on the weekends. I was hoping this course could easily be done in the evening hours. Other coursera courses provided an excellent balance of content and courseload, I'm disappointed that this course wasn't one of them. It seemed very useful and interesting. | the lectures and exercises. However, the | Content | was simply too much for me | Negative | -0.7 | -0.5 | 0.74 | 1.06 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | I think the content was quite interesting; as someone new to marketing, I was really looking forward to the lectures and exercises. However, the content was simply too much for me to complete. It's a bit ironic that a course about marketing missed its market. To give a bit more detail: there were 12 video lectures, 3 assignments that had to be done days before the end of the week to be peer-reviewed, and then I had to peer review others work, while also going through all the assigned reading. It seemed more like a courseload for a full time student or perhaps a part-time student. As online students typically are neither, I'm surprised the course content wasn't better managed. I take a lot of notes, so perhaps that's what slowed me down, but I also have a full time job and I intern on the weekends. I was hoping this course could easily be done in the evening hours. Other coursera courses provided an excellent balance of content and courseload, I'm disappointed that this course wasn't one of them. It seemed very useful and interesting. | are neither, I'm surprised the course | Content | wasn't better managed. I take a | Negative | -0.7 | -0.5 | 0.74 | 1.06 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | I think the content was quite interesting; as someone new to marketing, I was really looking forward to the lectures and exercises. However, the content was simply too much for me to complete. It's a bit ironic that a course about marketing missed its market. To give a bit more detail: there were 12 video lectures, 3 assignments that had to be done days before the end of the week to be peer-reviewed, and then I had to peer review others work, while also going through all the assigned reading. It seemed more like a courseload for a full time student or perhaps a part-time student. As online students typically are neither, I'm surprised the course content wasn't better managed. I take a lot of notes, so perhaps that's what slowed me down, but I also have a full time job and I intern on the weekends. I was hoping this course could easily be done in the evening hours. Other coursera courses provided an excellent balance of content and courseload, I'm disappointed that this course wasn't one of them. It seemed very useful and interesting. | courses provided an excellent balance of | Content | and courseload, I'm disappointed that this | Positive | 0.7 | -0.5 | 0.74 | 1.06 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | I undertook this marketing course as a marketer keen to make sure I was up to date and thinking about new ideas. It was a shame redlaser.com is no longer active, however I'm sure there are other tools, the course content just needs to be updated. I liked the Quad elements but found the Quizzes a bit frustrating particularly when they asked questions for which the answer was covered in the next topic. Overall however, time well spend. Thanks to Aric and team. | there are other tools, the course | Content | just needs to be updated. I | Negative | -0.6 | 0.5 | 0.74 | 1.06 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Well structured content and interesting assignments! | Well structured | Content | and interesting assignments! | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.74 | 1.06 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Interesting content on digital trends. This course encourages you to think critically about how digital trends are changing the marketing landscape. Excellent delivery by the professor! | Interesting | Content | on digital trends. This course encourages | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.74 | 1.06 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Interesting content, practical exercises and well structured. | Interesting | Content | practical exercises and well structured. | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.74 | 1.06 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | This course was outstanding in it's presentation, content, and seamless ability to progress. | course was outstanding in it's presentation, | Content | and seamless ability to progress. | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.74 | 1.06 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Some good case studies and interesting content, but it's a 50,000 foot view of marketing. I was seeking a more technical and channel specific insights. This is much more conceptual and high level, so it was less useful for me. | Some good case studies and interesting | Content | but it's a 50, 000 foot | Positive | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.74 | 1.06 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Excellent course content | Excellent course | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.74 | 1.06 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | This is a great stuctured course wich the professor gives us tool to comprehend easyly the content given. It made a huge impact on my academical progress. | us tool to comprehend easyly the | Content | given. It made a huge impact | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.74 | 1.06 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Hated the course and the content. I truly regret investing my money on this course. | Hated the course and the | Content | I truly regret investing my money | Negative | -0.8 | -1.0 | 0.74 | 1.06 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | The content is great and the professor is excelent to engage the audience. The excercises are focused to the practise of theory presented during the videolectures. | The | Content | is great and the professor is | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.74 | 1.06 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Great content, very informative, engaging and up to date. | Great | Content | very informative, engaging and up to | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.74 | 1.06 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Marketing in a Digital World presents many key concepts of modern-day marketing. The professor provides links to great reading material and resources that supplement the excellent video content hosted on Coursera. | resources that supplement the excellent video | Content | hosted on Coursera. | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.74 | 1.06 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | excellent content and format. more than a recorded lecture, really an online education experience | excellent | Content | and format. more than a recorded | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.74 | 1.06 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Excellent content and very good usage of resources to share knowledge. | Excellent | Content | and very good usage of resources | Positive | 0.9 | 1.0 | 0.74 | 1.06 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | It has great content but assignments are promotions... Like, really, shamy promoted assignments. | It has great | Content | but assignments are promotions. . . | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.74 | 1.06 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Enjoyed the course, especially the awesome research work by other professors. However, was expecting a more content heavy course, which is a part of the full specialization, kinda unaffordable for me :( Anyways, great course, loved it! :) | professors. However, was expecting a more | Content | heavy course, which is a part | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.74 | 1.06 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Very good content and presentation | Very good | Content | and presentation | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.74 | 1.06 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | GREAT CONTENT!!! | GREAT | Content | ! ! | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.74 | 1.06 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | IMHO a very superficial course. Lots of outdated material (user-generated content was a big thing 5 to 10 years ago, not anymore). Lacked going in depth. It discouraged me from pursuing the rest of the specialisation. | course. Lots of outdated material (user-generated | Content | was a big thing 5 to | Negative | -0.6 | -1.0 | 0.74 | 1.06 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Great course, good content and easy pace. Introduced me to great new ideas like 3d printing and looking forward to the next course | Great course, good | Content | and easy pace. Introduced me to | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.74 | 1.06 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Well prepared videos from quality side. Content is nice. Gave a lot of new insights. Professor is great | Well prepared videos from quality side. | Content | is nice. Gave a lot of | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.74 | 1.06 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Loved the content. The instructor was great. The assignments were interesting and beneficial. I feel like I learnt a lot. The only aspect I didn't like was the "view from the quad" section. I quality wasn't great, and I didn't learn any new insights. Plus they always had the same 4 people they were interviewing so not a great sample size. | Loved the | Content | The instructor was great. The assignments | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.74 | 1.06 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Content was easy to understand and some of the core concepts have, in my case, found immediate professional application. This course is truly opening my mind to digital marketting, without making it overwhelming. Thank you. | | Content | was easy to understand and some | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.74 | 1.06 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Excellent content!! | Excellent | Content | ! | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.74 | 1.06 |
| FjD-ZB8oEeScWCIACnuVZQ | Although the content was informational, the presenters were uninteresting and made watching the videos hard to do. | Although the | Content | was informational, the presenters were uninteresting | Negative | -0.6 | 0.0 | 0.89 | 0.96 |
| FjD-ZB8oEeScWCIACnuVZQ | Content was easy to follow and the tutors delivered material appropriately | | Content | was easy to follow and the | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.89 | 0.96 |
| FjD-ZB8oEeScWCIACnuVZQ | Amazing and simple introduction to epidemiology! The additional resources resume the information very well and facilitate reviewing the content of the course | very well and facilitate reviewing the | Content | of the course | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.89 | 0.96 |
| FjD-ZB8oEeScWCIACnuVZQ | There is no real flow between videos and questions, not easy to follow. Good efford, good content, just wrong methodology for online training for 2015. | easy to follow. Good efford, good | Content | just wrong methodology for online training | Positive | 0.7 | -1.0 | 0.89 | 0.96 |
| fTnuinwaEeS7SCIACxCljA | Listening to Tucker Balch talk is a pain. He keeps repeating himself... Not much content in the latter half of the course | repeating himself. . . Not much | Content | in the latter half of the | Negative | -0.7 | 0.0 | 0.68 | 0.83 |
| fTnuinwaEeS7SCIACxCljA | I enjoyed this course. The content was good and the assignments challenging. The presenter was OK but he seemed a little unprepared at times. I think the course is a little dated in that the strategies taught simply don't work anymore, but as an introduction to some techniques and considerations for technical analysis then I recommend it. I also recommend that anyone considering this course without a strong python background takes some time to learn how to use Pandas - it will make your life much easier! | I enjoyed this course. The | Content | was good and the assignments challenging. | Positive | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.68 | 0.83 |
| fTnuinwaEeS7SCIACxCljA | Easy to understand. Homework is somewhat challenging and the contents are very useful for novice. | Homework is somewhat challenging and the | Content | are very useful for novice. | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.68 | 0.83 |
| G6m5MzTeEeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Horrific. If I could rate this ZERO I would. The instructor will give you a one sentence explanation and definition for a term (literally, I downloaded the transcripts to help with my notes and assignments) and then say, "Now that we learned x..." and fly right into the next term. Worse, many of the sentences don't even make sense and completely incoherrant, even in the written transcript. I am having to go out and find additional textbooks to research the basic definitions of what is required to pass the course. There is even less explanation of real-world applications, examples, and demonstration. It is almost as though she tried to memorize a sheet of definitions and repeated them without the use of her notes. This results in a highly monotonous monologue with awkward gestures and little actual content. I was planning on going for the PR for Digital Media Certification, but I can't handle another course like this. It's a waste of time and money. | with awkward gestures and little actual | Content | I was planning on going for | Negative | -0.7 | -1.0 | 0.7 | 0.92 |
| G6m5MzTeEeWWBQrVFXqd1w | I am sorry, but this course is made by PR specialist, people that should know how to talk to the public. Some teachers of this specialisation should been trained on how to behave in front of a camera. The content is nice but you repeat too many time the same stuff, in a very neutral voice, so it is really hard to keep watching the course. Thanks for sharing your knowledge, it is really helpful and rich, but as communication specialist, you can't just read a text, you have to live it. The source is important when releasing a message ! that's what you said ! The source should a good CV, but also has to know how to present the message. | in front of a camera. The | Content | is nice but you repeat too | Positive | 0.6 | -0.5 | 0.7 | 0.92 |
| GEfA2A0UEeSWFyIACpBHcA | It has better content provided than ours. | It has better | Content | provided than ours. | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.75 | 1.11 |
| GEfA2A0UEeSWFyIACpBHcA | Excellent course for students with some finance background. Content is nicely paced and well illustrated through models and examples. The quizzes range from straight forward application to challenging (given there is no feedback on where you got a question incorrect). | for students with some finance background. | Content | is nicely paced and well illustrated | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.75 | 1.11 |
| GEfA2A0UEeSWFyIACpBHcA | Awesome...the concepts have been explained in a superb way, the contents are itself high class, he example computations are jist wonderful. Although I am yet to finish it, I am just enthralled with it and have been a fan of coursera big time!! Expecting more detailed and rigorous course on financial engg which can be a testimony itself for an entry to the industry!! | explained in a superb way, the | Content | are itself high class, he example | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.75 | 1.11 |
| GEfA2A0UEeSWFyIACpBHcA | This course is a great, from the perspective of how it is organized as well as the assignments provided at the end of each module. The way the content layout is well-suited and leads student step by step gaining insight to the mechanics of different financial derivatives and working on those assignments is a great method of pushing student spend time to understand how the mechanics works. Both instructors are great! and I appreciated greatly their effort as well as Coursera. The only one improvement I would suggest is that if a TA can be assigned for this course, it'll be a great help to all students. Thanks! | of each module. The way the | Content | layout is well-suited and leads student | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.75 | 1.11 |
| GEfA2A0UEeSWFyIACpBHcA | The content of the course looked promising. But then I took a first look: the instructor is reading formulas from a slide. This is missing the whole point of a online class. There is no motivation for the formulars, no context why they are important. And from a learning point of view the course is very hard to follow. No real advantage compared to reading a book on that matter. I just took the "Economics of Money and Banking course", which is one of the best courses I ever attended (personally in class or online). There are other great courses on Coursera. And for easy introduction to some of the concepts Khan University courses are unmatched in accessability. Too bad that this course doesn't match up to the above examples. The topics would deserve that they are presented in a way that they can be understood by a wide audience. | The | Content | of the course looked promising. But | Negative | -0.6 | -1.0 | 0.75 | 1.11 |
| gh5rVEd3EeW2ZBIIl17oPw | Great way of learning Arduino, and a great way of providing info. by video lectures. The best part being the questions that are asked in between the lectures and that makes it more interactive virtually. The course content is no doubt enjoyable and its worth taking this course as it builds up our basic concepts of embedded systems. | it more interactive virtually. The course | Content | is no doubt enjoyable and its | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.58 | 1.0 |
| gh5rVEd3EeW2ZBIIl17oPw | It can be nice to walk through this process with a lecturer. Ian Harris does it well and knows the content well enough. Most of this content however is given sufficiently in the pamphlet with the Arduino Uno Starter Kit. Some problems and applications above and beyond the starter kit's intro guide would be nice and appropriate for the course. Additionally, given that this is also supposed to be an intro to C, a bit more detail and some programmatic problem solving in C would have also added good value to the course. | does it well and knows the | Content | well enough. Most of this content | Positive | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.58 | 1.0 |
| gh5rVEd3EeW2ZBIIl17oPw | It can be nice to walk through this process with a lecturer. Ian Harris does it well and knows the content well enough. Most of this content however is given sufficiently in the pamphlet with the Arduino Uno Starter Kit. Some problems and applications above and beyond the starter kit's intro guide would be nice and appropriate for the course. Additionally, given that this is also supposed to be an intro to C, a bit more detail and some programmatic problem solving in C would have also added good value to the course. | content well enough. Most of this | Content | however is given sufficiently in the | Negative | -0.6 | 0.0 | 0.58 | 1.0 |
| gh5rVEd3EeW2ZBIIl17oPw | Even though very basic ... but great content & great instructor | basic . . . but great | Content | & great instructor | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.58 | 1.0 |
| gh5rVEd3EeW2ZBIIl17oPw | Nice course, with relevant content. | Nice course, with relevant | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.58 | 1.0 |
| gh5rVEd3EeW2ZBIIl17oPw | this course has a very good content very good instructor and increased my experience a lot | this course has a very good | Content | very good instructor and increased my | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.58 | 1.0 |
| gh5rVEd3EeW2ZBIIl17oPw | Although most information in the course can be easily obtained via the internet, the packaging of the right content in the form of video lectures accelerates the learning process ten-fold! One can get started within the hour with Arduino programming without reading a single article on the web! Great course. One suggestion for improvement is to spend more time on the discussion library functions that are relevant to the IoT technology. | internet, the packaging of the right | Content | in the form of video lectures | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.58 | 1.0 |
| gh5rVEd3EeW2ZBIIl17oPw | The interface of the classes is too straight, not very flexible. It almost looks like a real classroom, which isn't good in case we're at home learning by ourselves. Still, it has a very good content. | Still, it has a very good | Content | | Positive | 0.9 | 0.0 | 0.58 | 1.0 |
| gh5rVEd3EeW2ZBIIl17oPw | not a great amount of content | not a great amount of | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.58 | 1.0 |
| gh5rVEd3EeW2ZBIIl17oPw | Excellent Professor. Great pace and content | Excellent Professor. Great pace and | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.58 | 1.0 |
| GixeETxVEeW0tw4knrMo3Q | Excellent course! The course content was informative and the instructor kept the flow going at a nice pace and was interesting to listen to. I highly recommend this course! | Excellent course! The course | Content | was informative and the instructor kept | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.48 | 1.13 |
| GixeETxVEeW0tw4knrMo3Q | I'm a new horse owner. I've taken this course multiple times. It is the BEST introduction to being a responsible horse owner that I have found. I can't say enough good things. Even the content that didn't apply to my situation | say enough good things. Even the | Content | that didn't apply to my situation | Negative | -0.6 | 1.0 | 0.48 | 1.13 |
| GixeETxVEeW0tw4knrMo3Q | Great introductory content to Equines! | Great introductory | Content | to Equines! | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.48 | 1.13 |
| GixeETxVEeW0tw4knrMo3Q | I've owned and ridden horses for 20+ years and found plenty of content in this course of value. I definitely recommend it for the horse obsessed and inquisitive folks! | 20+ years and found plenty of | Content | in this course of value. I | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.48 | 1.13 |
| GMSg0yWsEeWCGRL6mLoB5w | The course had some useful content, but there was too much time spent on USA centred materials for an iavailabe course. | The course had some useful | Content | but there was too much time | Negative | -0.7 | 0.0 | 0.77 | 0.97 |
| GMSg0yWsEeWCGRL6mLoB5w | My 2-years old niece in China has just been diagnosed as a ASD child. I took this class to help the parents understand the disorder and take prompt steps to start intervention when she is still young. The class is concise and informative. The 5 week contents provide just enough information for parents who have ASD children that has just been diagnosed to briefly understand the challenge and solutions of having an ASD child. I find the videos that illustrates how ASD children behave and what the proper intervention needed from parents, friends, and teachers very useful. By participating the class, I understand what ASD disorder is and I will pass what I have learnt to our big family so everyone has a correct and positive perspective to ASD and offer help to alleviate the anxiety for the parents. This is a very good course. | concise and informative. The 5 week | Content | provide just enough information for parents | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.77 | 0.97 |
| GMSg0yWsEeWCGRL6mLoB5w | The course is quite amazing.. It improved my knowledge regarding behavioral changes and role of educators and therapist in this field.. I must appreciate the way of delivering lectures and the content.. I wish i could attend classes in UC Davis Mind institute as i found this spectrum quite interesting... I hope other classes would be conducted regarding Autism or other neurodevelopmental disorders with further content at coursera so that i could better understand the process of dealing with those suffering individuals.. Thankyou v. Much the instructors :) | way of delivering lectures and the | Content | . I wish i could attend | Negative | -0.7 | 1.0 | 0.77 | 0.97 |
| GMSg0yWsEeWCGRL6mLoB5w | The course is quite amazing.. It improved my knowledge regarding behavioral changes and role of educators and therapist in this field.. I must appreciate the way of delivering lectures and the content.. I wish i could attend classes in UC Davis Mind institute as i found this spectrum quite interesting... I hope other classes would be conducted regarding Autism or other neurodevelopmental disorders with further content at coursera so that i could better understand the process of dealing with those suffering individuals.. Thankyou v. Much the instructors :) | or other neurodevelopmental disorders with further | Content | at coursera so that i could | Negative | -0.7 | 1.0 | 0.77 | 0.97 |
| GMSg0yWsEeWCGRL6mLoB5w | This course is informative and introductory. It has a value in generating a general awareness about ASD. It would be useful for parents and learners who are new to disability issues. The content can be used for introducing and familiarizing with clinical practice with ASD. But this course has the limitation on following grounds 1. The contents of the course are coloured with medical perspective and with pathological view point 2. At some point this course appeared like an advertisement for the institute and its research work 3. This course tried to cover too many things like theory, practice, research, experience and so on. But at the end it failed to do justice all 4. Finally the contents are infected with virus of medicine, market and military science. Terms such as intervention, package, therapy so many terminology. The unfaithful use of "social" in few instance look like an altruism to social science by dominant discipline. I am sure that this course has market. Evidence based research/ practice will corroborate it. Best wishes | do justice all 4. Finally the | Content | are infected with virus of medicine, | Negative | -0.6 | -0.5 | 0.77 | 0.97 |
| gttJnUtZEeW4rRLEP0z9Bw | As a seasoned teacher, 20 years, much of this content is intuitive or has already been in place in my classroom. The course validated much of the methodology I already use, but I did lose interest from time to time. | teacher, 20 years, much of this | Content | is intuitive or has already been | Negative | -0.6 | 0.5 | 0.79 | 1.01 |
| gttJnUtZEeW4rRLEP0z9Bw | WOW! I learned so much my head is spinning--EXCELLENT Course! Amazing Content! Fantastic Examples! Well Organized! Superb Teachers! Thank you for the opportunity to learn! | my head is spinning--EXCELLENT Course! Amazing | Content | Fantastic Examples! Well Organized! Superb Teachers! | Positive | 0.9 | 1.0 | 0.79 | 1.01 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | The course content was systematically organized with increasing complex algorithms covered as the weeks progressed. Prof Ng's enthusiasm for the subject also made the course enjoyable. Thank you so much. | The course | Content | was systematically organized with increasing complex | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Awesome course. The details and well explained content for professor Ng is the key of successful of this course. | course. The details and well explained | Content | for professor Ng is the key | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Just completed the course myself and I have to say this is a great course for anyone who wants to get a comprehensive understanding of Machine Learning. First of all, the content of the course is very well structured. It covers a lot of machine learning algorithms and also includes a lot of practical applications. Professor Ng is very gifted in teaching and he can explain some difficult topics in very simple terms. I also found he is very engaging and the quick questions inserted in the middle of the videos are very helpful to keep the students focused on the lecture. The programming assignments are at the right level of difficulty, and I found the instruction for each assignment works like a great summary of the corresponding materials. Didn't use their discussion forum much, but for a couple times I used, the mentor was able to respond in a very timely manner. Overall, this is a great course and I am so happy to be able to take it myself. Thank you, Professor Ng! | Machine Learning. First of all, the | Content | of the course is very well | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | It was very fun! I really enjoyed the videos and programming assignments. I think the class contents are well-paced and Andrew is really good at explaining. Thank you! | programming assignments. I think the class | Content | are well-paced and Andrew is really | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | So good content and teacher. Thanks you Andrew. | So good | Content | and teacher. Thanks you Andrew. | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great methodology! Interesting content and easy to follow even if the student does not have a strong background. | Great methodology! Interesting | Content | and easy to follow even if | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Excelent Course. Great teacher and great content. Thank you! | Excelent Course. Great teacher and great | Content | Thank you! | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | After completing the Machine Learning Course and after going through all of these videos and assignments, now I can say that I have learnt a lot from this course and content of the course have good quality and helps you expertise this field. Thanks a ton Prof. Andrew NG. | a lot from this course and | Content | of the course have good quality | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Well organized content and delivery | Well organized | Content | and delivery | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great! Explained wonderfully! content is worth it! | Great! Explained wonderfully! | Content | is worth it! | Positive | 0.9 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Exceptional course! I recomend it to everyone trying to learn machine learning. Awesome tutor, awesome content !!! | learn machine learning. Awesome tutor, awesome | Content | ! ! ! | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Really solid course content, lucidly taught by Professor Andrew, at a pace neither too fast nor too slow. Got to learn a lot about octave, vector mathematics and a bunch of other stuffs apart from machine learning, which I may add, seemed quite real world and logically sound, in spite of being quite advanced both in terms of the engineering and mathematics involved. I can thank Professor Andrew only so much, but I must also add that the amount of materials available in the Resources and Discussion Forum, also helps this course to be one of the most enjoyable one that I have taken till date. Ps - Thanks to this course I know how exactly Coursera will process my Review and what exactly it will do with it. Cheers :) | Really solid course | Content | lucidly taught by Professor Andrew, at | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | exceptional content, easy to understand and great explanation | exceptional | Content | easy to understand and great explanation | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | I am a big advocate of MOOCs as it definitely democratize education. Only challenge with MOOCs is that over time they become too monotonous and one looses out the interest. I've tried to take up few machine learning courses over past few years, but never got past first few steps. I am still in the going through the course, but so far it has been an outstanding experience. Not only the content is engaging, it has been really simplified. If you're new to Machine learning, I can't recommend this highly enough. | an outstanding experience. Not only the | Content | is engaging, it has been really | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | About me: I'm a professional industrial control systems programmer. About this course: It contains challenging math for someone who has been out of school for 25 years. I'm no where close to the 3 hour time estimate for the exercises (more like +12 hours) but the course content and presentation is exceptional. This is the course that is finally giving me a working nuts a bolts understanding of machine learning, AI, and neural networks. | like +12 hours) but the course | Content | and presentation is exceptional. This is | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This is one great course which is exciting throughout all the weeks of content. You'll be thorough with almost all basic concepts of machine learning by the end. But programming assignments are needed to be submitted using matlab or octave, Introducing python would be a great update to this. | exciting throughout all the weeks of | Content | You'll be thorough with almost all | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Excellent content and clear understanding of all ML Concepts. A must course for ML Aspirants. | Excellent | Content | and clear understanding of all ML | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Excellent - both content and delivery wise. Thanks very much... More than certifying the course, I believe I've learned immensely from this "not so easy" course, and was able to related quite a lot to some of the work I did on ANNs (MLP) back in the 90s. | Excellent - both | Content | and delivery wise. Thanks very much. | Positive | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good introduction to machine learning. The content is fairly basic, it's up to you is you want to go deeper into the subject. Only one downside, the quality of videos is low. | good introduction to machine learning. The | Content | is fairly basic, it's up to | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Excellent work from mister Ng, everything flows. Maybe just a note on the exams where the difficulty sometimes spike a bit from the content of the courses. But you'll always get pass it if you try hard enough. | sometimes spike a bit from the | Content | of the courses. But you'll always | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | I am confident on the content I learned in this course that I will be able to deliver and work efficiently in Machine Learning projects. Thank you. | I am confident on the | Content | I learned in this course that | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | amazing way of teaching best content can't imagine machine learning can be made so easy | amazing way of teaching best | Content | can't imagine machine learning can be | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great Introductory course about Machine Learning. Not knowing anything about ML, came out understanding a good bit. The examples in the course gives you a real world applications of ML and helps you understand the content. Highly recommend this course to anyone. | ML and helps you understand the | Content | Highly recommend this course to anyone. | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | It's a great Course overall. Its Content is great and the method of teaching is amazing. | It's a great Course overall. Its | Content | is great and the method of | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Easy to understand and very nice relevant contents. Way the lectures are delivered made it much easier to understand | to understand and very nice relevant | Content | Way the lectures are delivered made | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Amazing and easy to follow content. Many thanks to Andrew NG for making this course available. | Amazing and easy to follow | Content | Many thanks to Andrew NG for | Positive | 0.9 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Stunning amazing content, which is clear and quite fun . Amazing insight to model selection! | Stunning amazing | Content | which is clear and quite fun | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Excellent course both with quality content and teaching. Loved the way Prof NG taught this class. Really happy to complete this course. | Excellent course both with quality | Content | and teaching. Loved the way Prof | Positive | 0.9 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Comprehensive course, amazing mentor and very good content. | course, amazing mentor and very good | Content | | Positive | 0.9 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Excellent course content. A must for anyone in the machine-learning industry! | Excellent course | Content | A must for anyone in the | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Excellent course. Complex content explained pretty well. | Excellent course. Complex | Content | explained pretty well. | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great introductory course to machine learning. There were some quirks to workout in the assignments and the course could use a refresh to make it more current (content is from 2011, I think). However, many of the learnings will build a strong foundation upon which any learner can continue into the interesting discipline of machine and deep learning. | refresh to make it more current | Content | is from 2011, I think). However, | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very useful course. Content and structure of the course will improve our view on data. | Very useful course. | Content | and structure of the course will | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Thank you so much for offering this course! It has so much contents and explains those concepts very well. I love the programming assignments and the availability of different helps I can easily get from this course. | this course! It has so much | Content | and explains those concepts very well. | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great course, Andrew Ng does a good job at easing you into this complex subject, particularly for somebody like myself without much maths background. Looking at other video courses on the subject, I think more interactive visualisations could've been a great help, for example to gain some intuition about polynomials with different input parameters. Drawing lines on screen works, but I've had many revelations when working with the interactive tools linked from the wiki content. In some course exercises, the tutor and lecturer disagreed on the approach (e.g. vectorised vs. iterative), so the videos/PDFs were inconsistent with discussions/tutorials - a bit confusing. | interactive tools linked from the wiki | Content | In some course exercises, the tutor | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Loved it. Perfectly paced. Great content. Well presented. Kudos & many-a-thanks to the whole team! | Loved it. Perfectly paced. Great | Content | Well presented. Kudos & many-a-thanks to | Positive | 0.9 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Fantastic course - very interesting content and assignments are perfectly designed to come to grips with the content. Very engaging lecturer. | Fantastic course - very interesting | Content | and assignments are perfectly designed to | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Fantastic course - very interesting content and assignments are perfectly designed to come to grips with the content. Very engaging lecturer. | to come to grips with the | Content | Very engaging lecturer. | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very easy-to-understand but in-depth course contents, tough some assignments contained certain bugs. Highly recommended. | Very easy-to-understand but in-depth course | Content | tough some assignments contained certain bugs. | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Amazing contents and excellent Mentors | Amazing | Content | and excellent Mentors | Positive | 0.9 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | The course is very well organized covering a lot of topics. The assignments are mapped well with the course content and help to understand the system development well. Professor ANg is very clear in his explanations and makes you feel very comfortable even with the difficult concepts. I highly recommend this course if you plan to learn machine learning using open source tools and practical examples. | are mapped well with the course | Content | and help to understand the system | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Its a good course for Machine Learning and content is thorough that even beginner/non-coders wouldn't miss a step. | good course for Machine Learning and | Content | is thorough that even beginner/non-coders wouldn't | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Excellent lecture. Very clear and informational. The depth of content is just right. Great course. Looking for more courses like this. | clear and informational. The depth of | Content | is just right. Great course. Looking | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This is excellent course for anyone to understand what machine learning is all about. Prof. Andrew does a great job of explaining the concepts candidly. The course content is well designed both is content and structure. Would love to see an advanced version of the course where we apply the learning on some complex real world problems. | explaining the concepts candidly. The course | Content | is well designed both is content | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This is excellent course for anyone to understand what machine learning is all about. Prof. Andrew does a great job of explaining the concepts candidly. The course content is well designed both is content and structure. Would love to see an advanced version of the course where we apply the learning on some complex real world problems. | content is well designed both is | Content | and structure. Would love to see | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | The course content helps in successfully writing code for the Machine Learning algorithms taught lucidly by the professor. Thank you sir Dr. Andrew Ng ! One of the gurus I will never forget! | The course | Content | helps in successfully writing code for | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | I can highly recommend this course to anyone interest in the topic of machine learning. The course not only provides a nice and broad overview of the topic, but also offers some well prepared programming tasks that are easy to work through helping to deepen the understanding of the courses content. Moreover, Prof. Ng offers useful advice for practical application of machine learning throughout the course. However, for my taste the lessons could assume a higher level of the basic knowledge of mathematics of the attendees, which would get some lessons more to the point. All in all Professor Ng did a great job and it was a joy to follow his course. Thanks for that. | deepen the understanding of the courses | Content | Moreover, Prof. Ng offers useful advice | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Good overview of machine learning. In general focuses more on how to do, but due to course length skipped on some of the how or why in certain topics. Good mentor responses. Lecture video pause points are bugged. Lecture and assignments are quite detailed to walk you through it. Course content not designed to be difficult. Weeks are not very balanced. Some weeks take longer than other weeks, and you don't really know until the week starts. One thing I really dislike is you can't take notes online while watching the video. You'll have to do it elsewhere (on paper, on notepad). There isn't a quick summary of topics covered in the video you can go to. This would help if you wanted to rewatch a certain part but couldn't recall which video it was in. | to walk you through it. Course | Content | not designed to be difficult. Weeks | Negative | -0.8 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Easy to understand. Great teacher, passionate and professional. Some content a bit (out)dated, but still very much applicable today. | Great teacher, passionate and professional. Some | Content | a bit (out)dated, but still very | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Good pacing, very interesting content. The exercises are moderately challenging and help better integrate the content. | Good pacing, very interesting | Content | The exercises are moderately challenging and | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Good pacing, very interesting content. The exercises are moderately challenging and help better integrate the content. | challenging and help better integrate the | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Exceptional course. My thanks and congratulations to Andrew Ng and Coursera for this offering. I especially appreciated Professor Ng's combination of academic (Stanford) and real world (Baidu, Google) experience, and his efforts to help students gain an intuitive understanding of the content. I think anyone who wants an overview of Machine Learning will find this very helpful. | gain an intuitive understanding of the | Content | I think anyone who wants an | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This course had fantastic content, and very clear lecturing style, and minimal errors. At times I felt the lectures were a bit too long and repetitive, and found myself jumping through them quickly. I found that Andrew took minutes to say something that should only take 10 seconds; but I am aware that most students would appreciate this. The assignments were great, only with a few bits of information lacking and one assignment requiring me to dig around in the Discussion Boards for a solution (an error in the supplied code was causing me to fail the assignment). If I could give 4.5 stars I would, but I can't give the course 5 stars given the points above. Overall: Very enjoyable and insightful! | This course had fantastic | Content | and very clear lecturing style, and | Positive | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great teacher and content. | Great teacher and | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | GREAT TEACHER and GREAT CONTENT! Thanks! | GREAT TEACHER and GREAT | Content | Thanks! | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | The content of the course is really great. Could we have some more like this?:) | The | Content | of the course is really great. | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Excellent course, covers a lot of content and is easy to understand. | Excellent course, covers a lot of | Content | and is easy to understand. | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great content! Absolute MUST for every maker & startup & company that are willing to make something clever out of data-mining! | Great | Content | Absolute MUST for every maker & | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Its an excellent course. It gives exposure to variety of problems. Further, the basic concepts are explained nicely without going very deep in mathematics. The programming assignments are simply fantastic and it will enhance the understanding of the course content. | enhance the understanding of the course | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great content that's well explained, with exercises that suit the content well. Content is also presented in a friendly and manageable manner, making going through the course much easier. Be wary of the middle weeks though, as the content in those are heavier than the rest of the course! | Great | Content | that's well explained, with exercises that | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great content that's well explained, with exercises that suit the content well. Content is also presented in a friendly and manageable manner, making going through the course much easier. Be wary of the middle weeks though, as the content in those are heavier than the rest of the course! | explained, with exercises that suit the | Content | well. Content is also presented in | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great content that's well explained, with exercises that suit the content well. Content is also presented in a friendly and manageable manner, making going through the course much easier. Be wary of the middle weeks though, as the content in those are heavier than the rest of the course! | exercises that suit the content well. | Content | is also presented in a friendly | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great content that's well explained, with exercises that suit the content well. Content is also presented in a friendly and manageable manner, making going through the course much easier. Be wary of the middle weeks though, as the content in those are heavier than the rest of the course! | the middle weeks though, as the | Content | in those are heavier than the | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Exceptional content and absolutely amazing tutor. | Exceptional | Content | and absolutely amazing tutor. | Positive | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Best course content! | Best course | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Amazing course! Clear and progressive, with a lot of contents. A must take! | and progressive, with a lot of | Content | A must take! | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Excellent class, in terms of specific content and didactical approach. All addressed topics are well motivated with real examples, and elaborated in great details, at the right pace. Lecture videos are clear, very accurate, and very accessible at the same time. Lab exercises are challenging and very much helping in fully grasping the concepts. One of the best classes I have ever attended, much better of many courses I attended in my university years. Thank you very much Professor Andrew Ng, Coursera, and Stanford ! | Excellent class, in terms of specific | Content | and didactical approach. All addressed topics | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Excellent pacing, content, instructional technique, and assignments. I particularly like how all the algorithms are grounded in real world problems and the assignments are using real data to demonstrate how the algorithms are applied. | Excellent pacing, | Content | instructional technique, and assignments. I particularly | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This course is amazing. Really clear, informative, and hands-on. The content does not get too bogged down with complex details, and really gives a great overview of many of the most used machine learning algorithms and machine learning applications. | Really clear, informative, and hands-on. The | Content | does not get too bogged down | Negative | -0.6 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great and Engaging videos , Just enough time is given to assimilate the course content . Love the exercises. | is given to assimilate the course | Content | . Love the exercises. | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This is a great introductory course. The course materials are carefully organized, to avoid lengthy mathematical content, yet conveying the key idea of machine learning. The selection of the topic also seems quite reasonable. This course builds a somewhat solid ground for beginners. After finishing this course, one can either try to move towards the more theoretical side, maybe by reading the books such as Learning From Data by Yaser Abu-Mostafa, or the lecture notes/video of the Standford course CS229, or the more applied and practical side, depending on the preference. | carefully organized, to avoid lengthy mathematical | Content | yet conveying the key idea of | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | There's some great material in here, though it doesn't have the maturity in terms of content development as many newer courses. A lot of the material is very accessible, but some is less so. | have the maturity in terms of | Content | development as many newer courses. A | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Adding more contents may make it even better. | Adding more | Content | may make it even better. | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Learned a lot of new concepts, perfectly organized content and assignments. I strongly recommend this course for the students in the domain of Data Science. | lot of new concepts, perfectly organized | Content | and assignments. I strongly recommend this | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | beyond fantastic. Have learned so much, and this is the best taught online course I have done to date. The content is fascinating, and is taught in a really accessible way. | I have done to date. The | Content | is fascinating, and is taught in | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | I've always had passion for AI and in particular Machine Learning. The Machine Learning course offered by Stanford University was a great experience (And very challenging too !). I'm glad I didn't let my busy life make excuses for not taking this course Thank you Coursera, Thank you Stanford University And Thank you Andrew Ng for presenting the course contents in your lectures | Andrew Ng for presenting the course | Content | in your lectures | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | excellent content | excellent | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Really nice introduction to Machine Learning. It contains essential contents which is not difficult and also not easy. | to Machine Learning. It contains essential | Content | which is not difficult and also | Negative | -0.6 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Clear content brings great ease in understanding. | Clear | Content | brings great ease in understanding. | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | The teaching content is excellent. The instructor's explanation is clear and intuitive. It would be more helpful if the instructor can address the forums at times rather than leaving it entirely to the TAs. | The teaching | Content | is excellent. The instructor's explanation is | Positive | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Professor Andrew Ng has presented the content in a really learner friendly way. The student absorbs the knowledge without even noticing. 10 weeks later, you wake up - and just know it all. Great job Mr Professor. | Professor Andrew Ng has presented the | Content | in a really learner friendly way. | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Contents are carefully organized with good exercises. The course covers the topics which are required to apply machine learning to real-world problems at basic levels. The topics are consistently addressed with motivation, theory, and implementation in order. The exercises are provided to teach the concepts of machine learning and their applications. Prof. Andrew Ng tried to eliminate technical barriers in writing codes in Matlab and let students understand the concepts fully. This class is the first choice of learning Machine Leaning for a self-driven learner. | | Content | are carefully organized with good exercises. | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | I am half way through this course and I feel this is the best online course available today. The content is superb, the subject is interesting and the instructor/the professor explains the topic in a very easy way. One more thing which makes this course great is the tools - the quizes and assignment framework (including the submission process) is very well designed. I aim to pursue career in Machine Learning at some point in time in (near) future. I am sure I am on right track. Anyone new to ML must start with this course. | best online course available today. The | Content | is superb, the subject is interesting | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Excellent teacher and content!!!! | Excellent teacher and | Content | ! ! ! | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great content, very helpful. Special thanks to Andrew. | Great | Content | very helpful. Special thanks to Andrew. | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Information presented was well explained, efficient yet thorough. Assignments matched the content well and afforded learning at a challenging yet manageable levels. | efficient yet thorough. Assignments matched the | Content | well and afforded learning at a | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | The course fully filled my expectations. The content is interesting and each part is given adequate treatment. All topics are exceptionally explained and the homework is not difficult and very illustrative on how to apply all gained knowledge. | course fully filled my expectations. The | Content | is interesting and each part is | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This was my first class on Coursera and I couldn't have been more happier about it. Content is very well presented, mathematics standing behind various ML models is served to the listener with just enough details to understand it, but not to add any confusion. Assignments are great and really help you to understand how algorithms works. The only thing I'd change is questions about Octave in Quizes. Octave is very nice tool, no doubt, but I personally want to stick to R language and I really didn't want to memorize certain functions or syntax that Octave is using. Great job! I can recommend this class to anyone with a clean conscious. | have been more happier about it. | Content | is very well presented, mathematics standing | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | the lecture is great !! Prof. explained every complicated concept and theory in the way that easy to understand and remember. The programming assignments are also carefully designed to help us further capture the main points of course contents as well as exposing us to some real applications. | capture the main points of course | Content | as well as exposing us to | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Awesome lecture content for beginner and intermediate student craving for the latest statistical skills. Exercises are well-designed and helpful to the learning experience. Definitely recommended! | Awesome lecture | Content | for beginner and intermediate student craving | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | I am really satisfied with the course. I'm really glad I stuck with it. Looking forward to putting it to practice. The way the course is organized is really good. It's amazing to look back in all the subjects studied and how each one is built on top of each other. It is also good how there is always a programming exercise that really makes you think about the content studied on that lesson. I think the videos really need some post production. Some videos could be shortened since there is repeated material: Andrew decides to restart the explanation, because he messed up or something, but the part the he messed up is still in the video. It would be good if the Wiki that is present in Week 1 could also be present in all other Weeks, so we as students could feel encouraged to write the Wiki of each Week. | really makes you think about the | Content | studied on that lesson. I think | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This is great course. The content is very focussed and is apt for professionals who wants a quick peek into the fundamentals but mostly focus on application of the theory. The delivery is awesome. The quizzes, assignments are very helpful. I ended up learning a very deep and complex subject with much ease. Kudos to the professor for making it look so simple. | This is great course. The | Content | is very focussed and is apt | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Didn't have time to finish it, but i'll get it next time! great content. | i'll get it next time! great | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Flawless lectures, easy to understand contents and great mentors! I <3 it. | Flawless lectures, easy to understand | Content | and great mentors! I <3 it. | Positive | 0.9 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Excellent course! Highly recommended for anyone interested in Machine Learning. Professor NG is clear and articulate and presents the content in an interesting and engaging manner. | clear and articulate and presents the | Content | in an interesting and engaging manner. | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | The instructor is awesome and the contents are very efficient Thank you :) | The instructor is awesome and the | Content | are very efficient Thank you :) | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Brilliant!! the course explains beautifully complex content. | ! the course explains beautifully complex | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great course content. Andrew Ng is a great teacher, and the course structure worked really well for me. | Great course | Content | Andrew Ng is a great teacher, | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This was an extremely well put together course. The lectures content and format were amazing and made complex topics very approachable. I am very happy I took the course. | well put together course. The lectures | Content | and format were amazing and made | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Andrew is excellent at explaining things. Unfortunately the course doesn't go through some of the derivations because it is introductory, but he still offers a reasonable explanation / intuition for most of the content. This is the de-facto standard ML class for beginners and a good intro to coursera and online courses in general. Take this course! | / intuition for most of the | Content | This is the de-facto standard ML | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Awesome instructor and great course overall! Materials are well presented and the programming assignments helped me reinforce the contents from lecture videos! I definitely recommend anyone with even slight curiosity about what machine learning is about take this course from professor Andrew Ng! | programming assignments helped me reinforce the | Content | from lecture videos! I definitely recommend | Negative | -0.6 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | A truly fantastic course. Extremely useful, practical, relevant content and examples, plus such a great teacher as well as very helpful course staff and other students. Thanks Andrew, team and the rest of the students. For anyone considering doing the course, note that the time requirements can be a lot - the lectures are fine but two or three of the assignments took far more than 3 hours (if you plan on actually battling through the coding this is relevant. I'd highly recommend that anyone considering doing the course does the assignments since this is where the real magic happens - Andrew quite deviously leaves a bit of the theory to be fully worked out by yourself in the assignments). | fantastic course. Extremely useful, practical, relevant | Content | and examples, plus such a great | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great content, well documented, good exercises and scripts for work submission | Great | Content | well documented, good exercises and scripts | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Excellent lectures and material. Very motivating content with the presentation of real life applications! Thanks. | Excellent lectures and material. Very motivating | Content | with the presentation of real life | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | The course content was excellent. Only drawback was voice recording quality. | The course | Content | was excellent. Only drawback was voice | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Andrew Ng is such a great teacher. The course content is well structured, that it makes learning very easy. | such a great teacher. The course | Content | is well structured, that it makes | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great course with great content that provides practical knowledge and requires true mind work presented in a digestible way - as it is possible. | Great course with great | Content | that provides practical knowledge and requires | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Lectures contents are clearly explained and well organized. Math is clear; equations and symbols are consistent. Programming assignments are well organized and to-the-point; everything you need to know to do the assignments was covered in lectures. Submission process is easy. | Lectures | Content | are clearly explained and well organized. | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | The content was well presented but perhaps the assignments could be made a bit more challenging. The amount of work required for the programming assignments was a bit on the small side. | The | Content | was well presented but perhaps the | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Bad videos but intense content ! | Bad videos but intense | Content | ! | Negative | -0.7 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | It's an amazing course that introduces you to Machine Learning through different techniques. Each week content will be the foundation to the next. | Learning through different techniques. Each week | Content | will be the foundation to the | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | The course content is just right with practical exemples and less overwhelming theory. | The course | Content | is just right with practical exemples | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This is a great intro course to ML. The content is focused on the techniques used to build basic ML algorithms rather than the tools used to conduct analysis. Andrew Ng choice to use matlab as the programming language is great, so the focus is on understanding the mechanics of ML and not on programming itself. Coming from a Engineering background, I had so much fun watching the lessons and working on the assigments. | great intro course to ML. The | Content | is focused on the techniques used | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Extremely good course to start with machine learning. Clears basic concepts without going into too much detail which makes it ideal for students with no background in calculus. Also, the structure and content is well organized and topics are not rushed upon. You not only learn algorithms but also best practrices to follow to achieve better accuracy. The programming exercises are also really good. All of this makes coupled with the helpful Coursera community to guide you when you are stuck- up with a problem makes it an ideal course to start learning machine learning. | in calculus. Also, the structure and | Content | is well organized and topics are | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Stellar course. The content is great, good pacing, and the teacher is interesting and passionate about the subject. There are a few mistakes in the videos here and there, but nothing major. Definitely a great course that I'd recommand without hesitation to anyone curious about Machine Learning. | Stellar course. The | Content | is great, good pacing, and the | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Lots of great condensed content. I miss a written summary of the videos though. Furthermore, the quality of sound is awful. Well designed quizzes and assignments. Good: In-video quizzes. | Lots of great condensed | Content | I miss a written summary of | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great course with a professor that puts emphasis on an intuitive understanding of the concepts. Many interesting algorithms are taught and the programming assignments help to get a deeper and very hands-on understanding of each week's content. Thanks to all people involved in creating that course! | very hands-on understanding of each week's | Content | Thanks to all people involved in | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This is a very interesting course, with much content for me to start precticing and making my business around IA and Machine Learning, and also with a remarkable Professor, Mr. Andrew Ng. | a very interesting course, with much | Content | for me to start precticing and | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Machine learning is the best online module I've taken so far. Professor Ng makes those technical concepts visible us in a very understandable way, and the course assignments are at just right difficulty. I'm quite inspired by the content of machine learning and want to pursue a future career in this area. It would so great if some higher level courses come next, with focus on the application of machine learning algorithms. | difficulty. I'm quite inspired by the | Content | of machine learning and want to | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Absolutely top-quality. Excellent choice of content. Goes into much detail | Absolutely top-quality. Excellent choice of | Content | Goes into much detail | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This course is simply amazing, all the content from the video lessons, through the quizzes and the programming exercises are really well done, and also, there are really good mentors helping on the Discussion areas. If one with the will to really dive into these complex things to extract knowledge, I assure you, you will. The course is well made, but doesn't mean it's easy. I questioned myself through a lot of times in the beginning if I really was capable of learning all of this stuff. But I didn't give up, and well, this might be one of the most important decisions I've made in my life. This course aroused in me the passion to carry this knowledge, and keep improving it through my career. | course is simply amazing, all the | Content | from the video lessons, through the | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | I thought this was an excellent course and only have positive feedback for it. The lecture contents were interesting and well tied to exercise questions and programming assignments. The programming assignments were challenging overall but forced me to really learn the details of each machine learning algorithm. When things got a little too frustrating, such as for the neural network backpropagation assignment, the forums provided ample direction for me to move forward. | positive feedback for it. The lecture | Content | were interesting and well tied to | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | I would like to express my gratitude to Mr. Ng for such an excellent course. It helped me to get through such enlightening subject. The instructor was very clear. The contents and other support materials are well organized and satisfying. The programming assignments are suitable even for the ones who have little knowledge on MATLAB/Octave, since it is required only to fulfill the core parts. I hope finding more courses like this on Coursera. | The instructor was very clear. The | Content | and other support materials are well | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Thanks guys! Thoroughly enjoying this course. Excellently structured and content is engaging. Very chuffed. | enjoying this course. Excellently structured and | Content | is engaging. Very chuffed. | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Awesome content! | Awesome | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This course covers very useful material with clarity. Since it has run for multiple iterations, the content is very polished and it makes participating easy and smooth. | has run for multiple iterations, the | Content | is very polished and it makes | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This is one of the best courses on Coursera! I really learn a lot from Prof Ng. The course content is not hard for beginner, but it doen't mean trival. It covers mOst of the basic knowledges of Machine Learning. I hope Prof Ng can give advanced version of Machine Learning in the future. | lot from Prof Ng. The course | Content | is not hard for beginner, but | Negative | -0.6 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Amazing course! Content is easy to follow. Material that seems daunting on first inspection is dissected and presented in a very intuitive way. The quizzes and especially the Octave/Matlab practice problems are extremely helpful to check your understanding. The scripts are organized very clearly and provides insight on how all the modelling steps should be structured. Mentors for the course are exceptionally helpful. I cannot think of a single criticism. It is hard for me to imagine anyone who is interested in machine learning and is new to the subject walking away disappointed. Thank you Andrew Ng! | Amazing course! | Content | is easy to follow. Material that | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This class is a fantastic introduction to machine learning. The concepts are presented using a clear and concise nomenclature that is easy to understand and provide a foundation to move on to more advance topics as the course progresses. In additional to providing a firm foundation in various machine learning algorithms practical examples are developed using Octave/Matlab. Tutorials are provided along the way and help is readily available if you get stuck on a problem. The course also focuses on best practices which are interwoven in various topics throughout the course making the content relevant and practical for solving real world problems. Kudos to Andrew Ng and Coursea. | topics throughout the course making the | Content | relevant and practical for solving real | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | a. very good coverage of standard algorithmic approaches. b. good suggestive guidelines on specifics of algorithms like issues / details one need to be careful, need not to bother etc.. c. broad coverage of examples.. d. tricky questions...good to experience... Overall I liked this course content and the breadth of coverage. Based on the difficulty i experienced let me place some points of improvements that would help every student.... e. could have dealt some specific examples in full (from definition to implementation) as part of video lecture which would helped better understanding of the problems, algorithms, impact of specifics, implementation issues, analysis methods, inferences that could be derived, final expected solution. f. expecting feedback on exercises.... not only correct or incorrect but reasoning for the responses could be of great help in better understanding.... g. downloadable videos could contain in video quiz... h. Octave content could be increased..... i. audio of the lectures needs fine tuning, hissing sounds could be filtered. For some of the lectures subtitles does not match at all... Thank you very much for coursera.... Thank you very much Prof. Andrew Ng..... Looking forward for mor courses related to ML by you.... | . Overall I liked this course | Content | and the breadth of coverage. Based | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | a. very good coverage of standard algorithmic approaches. b. good suggestive guidelines on specifics of algorithms like issues / details one need to be careful, need not to bother etc.. c. broad coverage of examples.. d. tricky questions...good to experience... Overall I liked this course content and the breadth of coverage. Based on the difficulty i experienced let me place some points of improvements that would help every student.... e. could have dealt some specific examples in full (from definition to implementation) as part of video lecture which would helped better understanding of the problems, algorithms, impact of specifics, implementation issues, analysis methods, inferences that could be derived, final expected solution. f. expecting feedback on exercises.... not only correct or incorrect but reasoning for the responses could be of great help in better understanding.... g. downloadable videos could contain in video quiz... h. Octave content could be increased..... i. audio of the lectures needs fine tuning, hissing sounds could be filtered. For some of the lectures subtitles does not match at all... Thank you very much for coursera.... Thank you very much Prof. Andrew Ng..... Looking forward for mor courses related to ML by you.... | video quiz. . . h. Octave | Content | could be increased. . . . | Negative | -0.6 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Lots of work, very applied and excellent content and teaching. Loved the homework problems! | of work, very applied and excellent | Content | and teaching. Loved the homework problems! | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This course is great fun. The lectures are easy to understand and the exercises are excellent for understanding and thinking through the practical implementations of the contents without having to deal with the implications of loading the data properly and coming up with tests for your functions. | through the practical implementations of the | Content | without having to deal with the | Negative | -0.6 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | The content of the course and the way it is explained is wonderful. | The | Content | of the course and the way | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | I am week 9 of current course but I already feel so good about the subject. The content covered by Professor and the ease with which he has gone over such complex subjects is beyond commendable. I thoroughly enjoyed the course. I just want Professor Ng to consider another advanced course which covers topics which he hasn't covered in this one, in detail, due to time and audience constraints. Also, there should be an option to get the certificate at the end of the course too, like, in my case, I wasn't sure if I will be able to follow deadlines due to work schedule but now at almost end of it, I feel like I should have opted for it. All in all, thank you so much! | so good about the subject. The | Content | covered by Professor and the ease | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | perfect content and presentation. The professor has an undeniable insight in the subject area. | perfect | Content | and presentation. The professor has an | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very nice course! Andrew explains everything clearly and in enough details for anyone to understand. The content is very informative and gives a good coverage of ML algorithms and their applications as well as many practical pieces of advice of how to tune them or where to look for if something does not work. The coding tasks are also extremely useful as they help you try out in practice what you've just learned and help memorize the material better. Thank you Andrew! | details for anyone to understand. The | Content | is very informative and gives a | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Well-organized and detailed-explained content, user-friendly Matlab code provided. | Well-organized and detailed-explained | Content | user-friendly Matlab code provided. | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very interesting content, very well explained. Minor issues: some quizzes or questions appear a little early sometimes regarding the order of the videos though, and subtitles are not always correct. | Very interesting | Content | very well explained. Minor issues: some | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Brilliant course! Highly recommand for its concise and wonderful content! Btw, Andrew Ng is really a cool professor > < | recommand for its concise and wonderful | Content | Btw, Andrew Ng is really a | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Structured course content. Thanks alot Coursera !! | Structured course | Content | Thanks alot Coursera ! ! | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Excellent course. Contents, videos, quizzes and programming exercises are very well contrived and conducted. I learnt a lot. | Excellent course. | Content | videos, quizzes and programming exercises are | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Excellent content and excellent teacher. | Excellent | Content | and excellent teacher. | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Fantastic teacher, content and coursera intiation. | Fantastic teacher, | Content | and coursera intiation. | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | the content is well chosen, easy to understand yet it contains a valuable piece of information | the | Content | is well chosen, easy to understand | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | The topic is interesting, the course content is presented clearly, and the lectures are informative. While the assignments can be challenging, they really help to reenforce the lessons. From what I gather, the class was recently moved over from an older Coursera model/design. This is frustratingly apparent at times. Some information can be difficult to find, particularly in the Discussion section. I would love to see this class updated to match the quality of some more recent classes I have taken. | The topic is interesting, the course | Content | is presented clearly, and the lectures | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Best CS Course. The content is practical in industry, the depth of the course is quite appropriate, the intuition is enough for each new materials. | Best CS Course. The | Content | is practical in industry, the depth | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Superb content, brilliantly taught. Cannot ask for more. Many thanks Andrew Ng for bringing us this amazing course and Coursera.org | Superb | Content | brilliantly taught. Cannot ask for more. | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Absolutely the best course you can find on the internet! Thanks for a great content :) | the internet! Thanks for a great | Content | :) | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Course content is well organized and explained in simple way. Thank you very much for offering this course. | Course | Content | is well organized and explained in | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Amazing content Amazing teacher Cool interesting assignments Gives the big picture necessary to get going Some more optional videos with more mathematical details would be nice Why octave instead of python? | Amazing | Content | Amazing teacher Cool interesting assignments Gives | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Excellent course. Concepts were explained very well and the hands on exercises helped to gain confidence in implementing some of the algorithms. This course is simply magical in transforming a person who is new to machine learning into an expert. I have already started applying machine learning techniques in real life problems. Thanks to Stanford University and Mr. Andrew for providing such high quality content. | Andrew for providing such high quality | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Awesome instructor, and content. Tough course, but worth the time. | Awesome instructor, and | Content | Tough course, but worth the time. | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | A great course for revolution in advance machine learning, I am attempting it 2nd time very useful content about Machine Learning and great teaching methodology | attempting it 2nd time very useful | Content | about Machine Learning and great teaching | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Content is just great. Just the right level of challenge for me, also. | | Content | is just great. Just the right | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | It is long ago (25+ years) that I dealt with ANNs by that time. This course is terms of content and didactial concept very well built. I can only recommend it. In particular, as it is not only taking care of the theoretical background but also has a lot of good stuff for me as a practitioner. Thanks | time. This course is terms of | Content | and didactial concept very well built. | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Interesting classes, awesome instructor, and valuable content!! | Interesting classes, awesome instructor, and valuable | Content | ! | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This is the best online course I've ever watched without a doubt! ( including many youtube videos, online content in many different formats etc and coursera). It's very well laid out with real-world practical exercise after every lecture! Andrew Ng really did a great job with this course. I recommend this course to everyone interested in ML ! | ( including many youtube videos, online | Content | in many different formats etc and | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Exciting course! Astonishing work to develop all videos and prepared files and guidelines for programming exercices. Andrew Ng make concepts very accessible and very illustrated. The real life exercices immediately give ideas of implementations. We have quickly hands-on thanks to exercices. The diversity of covered fields through the examples taken is quite impressive and useful. I found the difficulty of exercices very subtly tuned to develop really interesting tools thanks to the pre-written codes. These codes also give opportunities to exploit further Octave/Matlab capabilities. I deeply thank the team for granting us access to a such high quality content. | access to a such high quality | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Course content is really good. Assignments are in depth and help you build your concepts. | Course | Content | is really good. Assignments are in | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | I really enjoyed the content of this course. Andrew Ng is great at explaining machine learning concepts and gives practical advice along the way. | I really enjoyed the | Content | of this course. Andrew Ng is | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great content! | Great | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This class is a dope. Well organized, right on the point. with emphasize on the practical side and application and the industry. really well designed homework and tests. really makes you understand and get deep into the content. in fact, it was fun just to solve the homework problems. your brain can breath in fresh thoughts. | understand and get deep into the | Content | in fact, it was fun just | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | The course is awesome and we need more videos to learn more about the content so clearly. I think lessons about coding in Matlab must be there for the beginners to get familiar with Matlab. | videos to learn more about the | Content | so clearly. I think lessons about | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Brilliant course. Great content and an excellent professor! Thank you. | Brilliant course. Great | Content | and an excellent professor! Thank you. | Positive | 0.9 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | The new self-paced version has a lot more content, including very practical cases and recommendations! And the programming assignments are still quite easy, so it makes it a perfect starter course after which you can dive into more technical material. | self-paced version has a lot more | Content | including very practical cases and recommendations! | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Content of the course was great! Sound quality is a bit lower, but you'll get used to it | | Content | of the course was great! Sound | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | A fantastic course. The content is informative and clearly outlined by the professor in the excellent set of video lectures. The quizzes and weekly projects are also an excellent learning tool. I greatly enjoyed this course and learned a lot that I will use in my career moving forward. Highly recommended. | A fantastic course. The | Content | is informative and clearly outlined by | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This course was very informative because there were not only theory lessons but practical assignments with lot of tips. I learnt a lot and hope to use it and learn more in future. Thanks to Prof. Andrew for the wonderful delivery and content. | Andrew for the wonderful delivery and | Content | | Positive | 0.9 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Interesting and practically applicable course content. Really no particular prerequisite - UNIVERSAL. Enjoying doing the course. Great Stuff! | Interesting and practically applicable course | Content | Really no particular prerequisite - UNIVERSAL. | Negative | -0.6 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great teacher Great content Great presentation | Great teacher Great | Content | Great presentation | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | An amazing course of machine learning, having this kind of content for free is just incredible. Thank you Coursera and Andrew Ng. | machine learning, having this kind of | Content | for free is just incredible. Thank | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great Course. The content is explained clearly, with just basic prerequisite knowledge. | Great Course. The | Content | is explained clearly, with just basic | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Beyond my expectation! Such an amazing professor and a great content. This is my first course on machine learning and/or data science and I feel that I am confident to apply it on some small projects. And I am eager to learn more. I am even considering to pursue my masters degree in this area. Thank you Andrew! You are awesome! | an amazing professor and a great | Content | This is my first course on | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.19 |
| GVy8tIIKEeWXmQ4F86nmrw | The course if good, but i believe the content should be more didactic. | if good, but i believe the | Content | should be more didactic. | Positive | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.65 | 1.0 |
| GVy8tIIKEeWXmQ4F86nmrw | Parallel Programming course in Scala will help you to program at a higher level, reason about task and data parallel programs, express common algorithms in a functional style and solve them in parallel, competently microbenchmark parallel code, and write programs that effectively use parallel collections to achieve performance. The course content was well organized and it had in - depth assignments which were relatively difficult for me to complete. I would recommend this course to everyone, and one should take it only after taking the 'Fundamental Programming Principles in Scala' and 'Functional Program Design in Scala' courses. | collections to achieve performance. The course | Content | was well organized and it had | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.65 | 1.0 |
| GVy8tIIKEeWXmQ4F86nmrw | I like the course. I learned some nice ideas for parallel computations, not just Scala specific API. To polish: sometime lectures and tasks contain many complicated but not significant details. And some important ideas are not emphasized. I had to filter the content carefully. | emphasized. I had to filter the | Content | carefully. | Negative | -0.6 | 1.0 | 0.65 | 1.0 |
| GVy8tIIKEeWXmQ4F86nmrw | The content of the course is great, will review this course again as i think i left out some concepts. | The | Content | of the course is great, will | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.65 | 1.0 |
| H02KsW1DEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Very good content for beginner, lot of learning in machine learning special caret package in R. | Very good | Content | for beginner, lot of learning in | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.66 | 0.84 |
| H02KsW1DEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Of all the JHU Data Science specialization courses I've had, this was by far the most enjoyable. I really liked how the class was more in the style of 'here's some techniques, now do whatever you want on the project.' Prior courses are, and understandably so, more constrained in the assignments. It's not until here that the student really has the tools to be able to flex their analytical muscles, and it pays off. Also, of the three instructors, I am most favorable to Jeff Leek, who teaches this class. He communicates much clearer than Roger Peng or Brian Caffo. I find I learn more from his content than the others. Lastly, I will say that this class doesn't hold a torch to University of Washington's Machine Learning specialization. That's expected since this is one class and that's a whole series of classes. If you're hungry for more after this one, I highly recommend UWash's Machine Learning specialization. | find I learn more from his | Content | than the others. Lastly, I will | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.66 | 0.84 |
| H02KsW1DEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | the lack of assisted practices made it harder to digest the contents and methodologies. strongly suggest to develop some practice problems with explanations. | made it harder to digest the | Content | and methodologies. strongly suggest to develop | Negative | -0.7 | 0.0 | 0.66 | 0.84 |
| H02KsW1DEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | I believe this course is critical and much needed given where the Industry is heading. Prof Leek, has tried his best to explain the concepts in a lucid manner, however the complexity of the content, may challenge most students. A few more examples with R code would have been helpful as translating problem statement to R code may not be intuitive. I would highly recommend that students should plan to study some advance statistics before attempting this course. Having said that, i think this is a wonderful starter course to get a glimpse of what Machine Learning is all about. | manner, however the complexity of the | Content | may challenge most students. A few | Positive | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.66 | 0.84 |
| HFhDw-STEeWYOBIRup69HQ | Consider adding a programming assignment to the course curriculum. Please address content issues in a timely manner. Thank you. | to the course curriculum. Please address | Content | issues in a timely manner. Thank | Positive | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.79 | 0.81 |
| HFhDw-STEeWYOBIRup69HQ | Coming out from two very good predecessors (C3, parts 1&2), this course is somewhat a disappointment. The contents are too broad without real focused depth, and too much time spent on background info in almost all lectures. There ought to be more hands-on practices, and the assessments should be more challenging towards understanding, rather than matching terms. | course is somewhat a disappointment. The | Content | are too broad without real focused | Negative | -0.8 | -0.5 | 0.79 | 0.81 |
| hgw1Nkd5EeW8cBKtDAegYw | The Good: Very palatable content and provides information at a very slow pace for ease of learning.More reasonable content and far more worthwhile than the first Arduino course of the series. The Bad: Not worth the money when looked at generally. The first and second course could easily have been merged. A lack of introduction to electronic circuits also hinders full use of what is being taught. | The Good: Very palatable | Content | and provides information at a very | Positive | 0.8 | 0.0 | 0.66 | 0.79 |
| hgw1Nkd5EeW8cBKtDAegYw | The Good: Very palatable content and provides information at a very slow pace for ease of learning.More reasonable content and far more worthwhile than the first Arduino course of the series. The Bad: Not worth the money when looked at generally. The first and second course could easily have been merged. A lack of introduction to electronic circuits also hinders full use of what is being taught. | for ease of learning. More reasonable | Content | and far more worthwhile than the | Positive | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.66 | 0.79 |
| hgw1Nkd5EeW8cBKtDAegYw | Absolutely loved this course. Despite a very seemingly 'casual' method of instruction, the content surely keeps the student on their toes. There is just oodles of stuff to learn in this Course! You'll leave enlightened in the Arduino Space! Great course, I recommend it to everyone who wants to learn how the shields work, internet connectivity with Arduino and even basics of Arduino. | seemingly 'casual' method of instruction, the | Content | surely keeps the student on their | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.66 | 0.79 |
| hgw1Nkd5EeW8cBKtDAegYw | Course contents are fine. Unfortunately the absence of a course board where students can discuss and eventually receive help from the teacher has an bad influence on the course overall rating | Course | Content | are fine. Unfortunately the absence of | Negative | -0.6 | 0.0 | 0.66 | 0.79 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Excellent Course. Great instructors, very well structured content. I loved the last assignment, had a lot of fun building my own webpage. Brilliant learning experience, will definitely keep practising. | Course. Great instructors, very well structured | Content | I loved the last assignment, had | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.75 | 1.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Content and pace are appropriate for beginners, and provide a high level overview of the technologies involved in Frontend web design with modern technologies. | | Content | and pace are appropriate for beginners, | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.75 | 1.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Great content so far. | Great | Content | so far. | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.75 | 1.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Bright instructors delivering succinct and interesting content, with quick-paced videos and quizzes make a great learning experience. I am really impressed! Thank you, University of London people! | Bright instructors delivering succinct and interesting | Content | with quick-paced videos and quizzes make | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.75 | 1.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Course content is way too easy and inadequate to do any useful work. | Course | Content | is way too easy and inadequate | Negative | -0.6 | -1.0 | 0.75 | 1.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Needs way bigger scope and a bit more going into details. The Full Stack Web Development course is somewhat like that. Lectures are good and easy to understand, both visuals and speak are nice and clear. Hopefully next one remains great quality but with more content :) | remains great quality but with more | Content | :) | Positive | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.75 | 1.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Great content, simple , easy to understand! | Great | Content | simple , easy to understand! | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.75 | 1.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | The content was simple and well organized out for a good introductory course. The first step is often the most difficult one to take, so it's nice that they kept it easy. | The | Content | was simple and well organized out | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.75 | 1.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | I'm finding this course tremendously helpful in getting up to speed on responsive web design. The content is structured to be digestible and doesn't overwhelm. The videos are engaging enough to watch all the way through. | speed on responsive web design. The | Content | is structured to be digestible and | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.75 | 1.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Presenters are awesome! Content is profound! | Presenters are awesome! | Content | is profound! | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.75 | 1.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | The course covered quite a decent amount of content, but personally I think it was a bit fast for a beginner. | covered quite a decent amount of | Content | but personally I think it was | Negative | -0.6 | 0.5 | 0.75 | 1.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Excellent content and delivery style | Excellent | Content | and delivery style | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.75 | 1.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | It's a awesome course! I'm enjoying a lot the explanation of the teatchers and the content is really usefull and intersting! | explanation of the teatchers and the | Content | is really usefull and intersting! | Negative | -0.6 | 1.0 | 0.75 | 1.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Great course! But the pace and content can be improved on. Issuing of lecture slides in pdf would definitely help too. | Great course! But the pace and | Content | can be improved on. Issuing of | Positive | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.75 | 1.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Nice job of simplifying the content. Simple and clear examples provided removing all the code that is unrelated to the topic at hand! Well worth taking for those new and for those wanting to get a refresher on the topic. | Nice job of simplifying the | Content | Simple and clear examples provided removing | Positive | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.75 | 1.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Use this course to reinforce your front end skills and not to learn for the first time. There's too many gaps in the presented content for a beginner. The video and audio were presented in a professional high quality format that you would expect from a major university. However, the course structure was slightly unorganized and didn't flow as well as other courses of similar content. Sometimes the instructors seemed to be at a loss for words and stumbled along with arms flailing. At 2X speed it's very obvious and entertaining. It was a fair attempt for their first online Coursera Web Development course. Hopefully, University of London will improve with future courses. | too many gaps in the presented | Content | for a beginner. The video and | Negative | -0.6 | 0.0 | 0.75 | 1.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Use this course to reinforce your front end skills and not to learn for the first time. There's too many gaps in the presented content for a beginner. The video and audio were presented in a professional high quality format that you would expect from a major university. However, the course structure was slightly unorganized and didn't flow as well as other courses of similar content. Sometimes the instructors seemed to be at a loss for words and stumbled along with arms flailing. At 2X speed it's very obvious and entertaining. It was a fair attempt for their first online Coursera Web Development course. Hopefully, University of London will improve with future courses. | well as other courses of similar | Content | Sometimes the instructors seemed to be | Positive | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.75 | 1.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | This course have excellent title but not that great contents. It touched html, css, javascript, bootstrap and jquery most of part as just touched. contents are too less | excellent title but not that great | Content | It touched html, css, javascript, bootstrap | Positive | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.75 | 1.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | This course is very good. Well organized, a lot of stuff to learn, great contents. | lot of stuff to learn, great | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.75 | 1.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | I have followed 2 courses at the same time: this one and "HTML, CSS and Javascript". They are covering the similar topics but this class has fallen short on most of the subject. Lecture time is very little. Short videos, and few of them. Each video is mostly non-focused talking, very few examples and so you don't learn much. By comparison, the other class has a lot of videos, each video is much longer and goes into many examples. Time is spent on focusing on the things to learn, and you get a lot out of it. I am dropping out of this specialization and will follow the other one which I hope will bring good content (unfortunately the following classes are not from the same teacher but from the same university). The following classes from this specialization are from the same teacher, so I don't think things will improve much. | which I hope will bring good | Content | (unfortunately the following classes are not | Negative | -0.6 | -0.5 | 0.75 | 1.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Got really bonkers listening to the University of London jingle at the start AND end of each of the 38 video's in this course. The content is just ok.. but not explanation is very high level. It is good for someone who has never had experience with web technologies before. | 38 video's in this course. The | Content | is just ok. . but not | Negative | -0.6 | 0.0 | 0.75 | 1.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Straightforward, quality content. | Straightforward, quality | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.75 | 1.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | An outstanding course with extraordinary intuition behind to make clear basic calculus. Many thanks for the content and especially for the creativity and motivation of the lecturer to deliver the lessons. | basic calculus. Many thanks for the | Content | and especially for the creativity and | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.56 | 1.13 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | awesome course！The professor is very funny so that i can pay more attention to the content. | can pay more attention to the | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.56 | 1.13 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | you must use the exact format to get the correct answer on problems, or it will be marked wrong the course is "as is" meaning when there are mistakes in the coursework neither web hosting nor faculty have are available to correct mistakes moderators are not allowed to correct course content, so what they end up doing is editing your post in the forum. get use to this: "A moderator deleted your post in Calculus One because of spam" "Review our forum Code of Conduct to learn more about guidelines for participating in course discussions", but i and others are only posting problem areas, thus rendering the forum discussions useless since the moderators only have the power to delete and edit your post, there is a list of content errors for the course that you will need to look at. real smart. i asked to have my grade adjusted, but they deleted that post also | are not allowed to correct course | Content | so what they end up doing | Negative | -0.7 | -1.0 | 0.56 | 1.13 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | A very good course because of its content and its professor. Thank you for your help. | very good course because of its | Content | and its professor. Thank you for | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.56 | 1.13 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | Great teacher with a very interesting content and approach. To totally benefit from this course, going through the associated Mooculus print is really complementary to the video. This enthusiastic mathematician, beyond the raw mathematics, will give you insights, practical and inspired examples or applications, interests, and much more. You might end up seeing integral calculus as an epic rpg battle versus an ogre after this course (special thanks to the professor for this amazing image ), but you would have been well trained, fully equipped, and wisely guided. | Great teacher with a very interesting | Content | and approach. To totally benefit from | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.56 | 1.13 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | The content of this course is fantastic, if you read the textbook with it. It would be 5 stars, but there are a number of glitches in the quizzes and exams. Information about the textbook and quiz issues can be found in the first post on the discussion board. | The | Content | of this course is fantastic, if | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.56 | 1.13 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | Great Teachers, great content | Great Teachers, great | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.56 | 1.13 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | The content is good. Needs better maintenance. Certain bugs and assignment errors should be rectified. | The | Content | is good. Needs better maintenance. Certain | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.56 | 1.13 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | Great course content. Great professor. What more could you ask for? | Great course | Content | Great professor. What more could you | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.56 | 1.13 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | Some of the contents just seem overly complex, especially the videos. If they would do a few problems similar to those in the quizzes, it would be much more better. | Some of the | Content | just seem overly complex, especially the | Positive | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.56 | 1.13 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | Not only the contents but also how it is presented. Jim Fowler, PhD, presents the content of this course with so much enthousiasm. A very nice example of how teaching calculus, mathematics or any course/module at any educational institution should be done. | Not only the | Content | but also how it is presented. | Negative | -0.6 | 1.0 | 0.56 | 1.13 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | Not only the contents but also how it is presented. Jim Fowler, PhD, presents the content of this course with so much enthousiasm. A very nice example of how teaching calculus, mathematics or any course/module at any educational institution should be done. | presented. Jim Fowler, PhD, presents the | Content | of this course with so much | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.56 | 1.13 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | Very clear explanations. Funny content. And the most important:Challenging! | Very clear explanations. Funny | Content | And the most important:Challenging! | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.56 | 1.13 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | Great content, thanks. | Great | Content | thanks. | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.56 | 1.13 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Excellent course. Understood the basic principles of the design. Keep practicing makes you better and better. Very well organized with the information of the content and course structure. | organized with the information of the | Content | and course structure. | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.2 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Great content, presented in a clear and direct manner and then applied with assignments that are accessible to all skill levels. Highly recommend. | Great | Content | presented in a clear and direct | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.2 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | I really liked the course, the content and flow of information not being too saturated, helps students to not lose interest on the course. | I really liked the course, the | Content | and flow of information not being | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.2 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Great course! This is the first course I've taken through Coursera and I am so impressed, both with the content and the delivery. It really influenced the way I look at design. I am really looking forward to completing this specialization. | am so impressed, both with the | Content | and the delivery. It really influenced | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.2 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Really nice introduction to fundamentals, very punctual, brief but juicy in content. So glad that I've found this Coursera. | very punctual, brief but juicy in | Content | So glad that I've found this | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.2 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Clear teaching line and complete content makes it a wonderful choice for starters who are interested in graphic design. However, as the name of the course indicates, it is not an advanced tutorial for those who wants to enhance their design skills in a more specific area. | Clear teaching line and complete | Content | makes it a wonderful choice for | Positive | 0.9 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 1.2 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | What a great course! The content was prescient to the artwork I do and the assignments fun and applicable. I look forward to taking the next course in the sequence. | What a great course! The | Content | was prescient to the artwork I | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.2 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Good content, it explains with so much clear and simplycity! Really love the course! | Good | Content | it explains with so much clear | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.2 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Very good and educational contents. Great practical exercises that help develop knowledge. | Very good and educational | Content | Great practical exercises that help develop | Positive | 0.9 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.2 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | The course was very cool. If you have already studied anything design-related, the content might be too basic and might look boarded in a rather shallow way. However, if you are new to the topic, I think the course is the perfect introduction to how the design process works and also, to the specialization (if you are interested in that). Additionally, the assignments offer a great chance to practice every concept reviewed in the videos, so that even a person who knows those things, but is a little rusty on the whole practice side, might benefit from the course. | have already studied anything design-related, the | Content | might be too basic and might | Negative | -0.6 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.2 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | I was satisfied by the content and the pace of learning. | I was satisfied by the | Content | and the pace of learning. | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.2 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Great course! Amazing teachers and good content! | Great course! Amazing teachers and good | Content | | Positive | 0.9 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.2 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Comprehensive and useful content | Comprehensive and useful | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.2 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Excellent course, videos are short and effective , the activities and content were also great . I would love more courses about desing like this one in Coursera | and effective , the activities and | Content | were also great . I would | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.2 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Good useful fundamental course content | Good useful fundamental course | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.2 |
| iN8yoSWdEeWCGRL6mLoB5w | I like the content and enjoyed the process but as this is online course, it should be better designed. The criteria for reviews and assignment direction is probably not too explicit that cause a lot of confusion, and people are submitting very different assignments from one another. It is not easy to grade and hard to understand what is expected. Also it is recommended that you know Adobe Illustrator or InDesign. I actually had to take additional course alongside of this course because although it was not mandatory, it was better to know how to use these software. | I like the | Content | and enjoyed the process but as | Positive | 0.8 | 0.0 | 0.68 | 0.68 |
| iN8yoSWdEeWCGRL6mLoB5w | The course content was good but the assignments weren't structured that well. While reviewing I realised some people made very simplistic stuff like me after following instructions, while others with more design experience created really amazing stuff. They should have included some advanced example for demo. | The course | Content | was good but the assignments weren't | Negative | -0.6 | 0.0 | 0.68 | 0.68 |
| iN8yoSWdEeWCGRL6mLoB5w | This course gave a great opportunity to explore one's creativity, with assignments that didn't require us to have skills in particular types of graphic expression. However, I also found that it didn't give me the richness of principles and techniques that I've found in other courses in this sequence. I expect that, for an in-person course, this instructor gives individualized feedback that provides that content. In a peer review situation, the feedback is quite general and so doesn't take up the slack from the lectures. I suggest that Coursera work with the instructor to retain the current content, but produce much richer lectures that have concepts and principles which students can put into practice even after the course ends. | gives individualized feedback that provides that | Content | In a peer review situation, the | Positive | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.68 | 0.68 |
| iN8yoSWdEeWCGRL6mLoB5w | This course gave a great opportunity to explore one's creativity, with assignments that didn't require us to have skills in particular types of graphic expression. However, I also found that it didn't give me the richness of principles and techniques that I've found in other courses in this sequence. I expect that, for an in-person course, this instructor gives individualized feedback that provides that content. In a peer review situation, the feedback is quite general and so doesn't take up the slack from the lectures. I suggest that Coursera work with the instructor to retain the current content, but produce much richer lectures that have concepts and principles which students can put into practice even after the course ends. | the instructor to retain the current | Content | but produce much richer lectures that | Negative | -0.6 | 0.0 | 0.68 | 0.68 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | This course is wonderful and very informative for complete beginners with nutrition and cooking. The teacher is knowledgeable of her subject and creates clear content that lends to a good learning experience. I would recommend this course to anyone who is not familiar with nutrition and who has no experience cooking. | of her subject and creates clear | Content | that lends to a good learning | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.51 | 1.13 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | I could learn more deeply and apply them in daily life. Every time I choose my diet, I remember contents of this lecture. Thank you for making such a good lecture and I hope to apply it again. | I choose my diet, I remember | Content | of this lecture. Thank you for | Negative | -0.6 | 1.0 | 0.51 | 1.13 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | Exceptional Content! If you have children - this is a must! Well done. | Exceptional | Content | If you have children - this | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.51 | 1.13 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | Child Nutrition and Cooking is good educational for those parents need to learn and more widen knowledge in the health of their kids. This content is the best that can recommend in all parents. | the health of their kids. This | Content | is the best that can recommend | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.51 | 1.13 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | Easy to follow, and good contents | Easy to follow, and good | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.51 | 1.13 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | nice content and videos, good examples. For people in the basic is real good. | nice | Content | and videos, good examples. For people | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.51 | 1.13 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | Very good content and best described | Very good | Content | and best described | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.51 | 1.13 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | I am really disappointed with the content of this course. If what you're looking for is the most basic of information on making better choices and remembering to wash your cutting board after handling raw meat, maybe this course is for you. If, however, you come to this course wanting specific information about how to build great meals for babies, toddlers, and young children, or you'd like to know how their needs change over time, this course is not for you. I was hoping for information like how to teach your toddler to chew/eat difficult things (ex: whole apples). I wanted to know at what age/weight you switch to 2% milk. I wanted to know how many calories a meal should be based on height and weight and how that changes over time. I wanted to know medically verified tips on getting the right amount of each nutrient into a toddler's diet and what, if any, extra vitamins should be added. I wanted tips on weaning if you're still nursing a toddler... I guess I just wanted more. In addition, the quizzes are so easy as to be silly. Actual quiz question and correct answer: Which is NOT a good way to approach grocery shopping if healthy choices are desired? Answer: Visit the supermarket hungry and walk through the candy aisle first. COME ON! Did I need a Stanford University course to tell me that one?!?!? While the instructor is knowledgeable, this course is geared toward someone with NO knowledge, not someone who wants to gain a deeper understanding. The videos are painfully slow (am I waiting for a doodle here???) and I could read the entire course worth of transcripts in under a half hour rather than go through all of the videos. And the recipes... good god! I don't think that someone interested in learning more about child nutrition is needing a slow tutorial on how to make basic oatmeal on the stove top. If she'd upped the game- showed basics and then talked about the benefits of adding, say, chia seeds, different fruits, flax, etc. and how best to make a basic bowl of oatmeal into a complete breakfast, that would have been a useful topic. I'm just hugely disappointed. This course is best suited to perhaps a health department; not to someone seeking college level information about a topic that matters to their children's lives. | I am really disappointed with the | Content | of this course. If what you're | Negative | -0.6 | -1.0 | 0.51 | 1.13 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | thanks very much for a very useful course! I am a mom-to-be, this course brings me a basic concept of food content and how to raise a healthy child. | me a basic concept of food | Content | and how to raise a healthy | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.51 | 1.13 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | Easy, simple and clear. Does not need extra learning time so you can do it even with a busy schedule. I think everybody should be aware and take in consideration eating aspects. Was totally happy with the course content. | Was totally happy with the course | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.51 | 1.13 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | This course helped me understand more about the science behind foods. A lot of the content I already knew but it was nice to have a refresher. A lot of the recipes were great ideas (I have already made most of them before being introduced to this course). The videos that involved making the meals were a bit "dumbed down" for people who are not used to cooking but I like the cheerful attitude of everybody who came on screen. | behind foods. A lot of the | Content | I already knew but it was | Negative | -0.6 | 1.0 | 0.51 | 1.13 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | Course content is balanced with demonstrations and charts, along with quizzes. Enjoyed it. | Course | Content | is balanced with demonstrations and charts, | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.51 | 1.13 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | Very useful nutritional and food information structured with care, combined with common sense advice to apply in every household. The whole package is served with delicate ambient music, practical recipes and kitchen advices, and last but not least, with love towards children and family. One might find inside some controversial aspects as maybe too much frying, cooking in aluminium foil presumed to be bad, using sugar when cooking, but everyone is free to adapt the content to his own perceptions, fears and style. The main philosophy proposed, the moderation, is a keeper though. I just loved taking this course | everyone is free to adapt the | Content | to his own perceptions, fears and | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.51 | 1.13 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | I enjoyed taking this course. I have learned several *new* things about buying, preparing and cooking food. The videos are straight-forward and the content is presented in a clear and concise way. | The videos are straight-forward and the | Content | is presented in a clear and | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.51 | 1.13 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | A long-time practitioner and a loving mother provides science-based learning about child nutrition. The content was very interactive and accessible. She not only conducts research in this area but also applies it to her daily life. | science-based learning about child nutrition. The | Content | was very interactive and accessible. She | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.51 | 1.13 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | Gave me a better understanding about how food works and the different influences on human health. Really easy to understand content as well. | human health. Really easy to understand | Content | as well. | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.51 | 1.13 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | Good and clear content. A bit from an American point of view... I missed some in depth explanation (like the class of the nerv-system or the Glycemic index). Overall easy to watch and good lessons. | Good and clear | Content | A bit from an American point | Positive | 0.8 | 0.0 | 0.51 | 1.13 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | The course is very helpful not only for Child Nutrition, but Personal Nutrition as well. The course content was very interesting and easy to follow. | Personal Nutrition as well. The course | Content | was very interesting and easy to | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.51 | 1.13 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | Excellent course. The material presented was not difficult to comprehend. I highly recommend this to parents who are in a quandry every night when the question, "what's for dinner?" presents itself. More than the content, I was most impressed by the manner in which the course was taught. Instead of a "talking head" format, the instructor used a variety of techniques to present the material, including teaching the majority of the class from her kitchen, using an interactive "blackboard" to illustrate concepts while she spoke and lots of cooking demonstrations. Kudos to Stanford for producing such high quality content. I have started a lot of Coursera courses and this is the first one that I've been able to complete because the content kept me engaged. | " presents itself. More than the | Content | I was most impressed by the | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.51 | 1.13 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | Excellent course. The material presented was not difficult to comprehend. I highly recommend this to parents who are in a quandry every night when the question, "what's for dinner?" presents itself. More than the content, I was most impressed by the manner in which the course was taught. Instead of a "talking head" format, the instructor used a variety of techniques to present the material, including teaching the majority of the class from her kitchen, using an interactive "blackboard" to illustrate concepts while she spoke and lots of cooking demonstrations. Kudos to Stanford for producing such high quality content. I have started a lot of Coursera courses and this is the first one that I've been able to complete because the content kept me engaged. | been able to complete because the | Content | kept me engaged. | Negative | -0.6 | 1.0 | 0.51 | 1.13 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | Lovely structure of the class combined with illustration, interview and cooking is the best part of this class. The contents are very helpful as well! I really recommend this class whoever wants to know about nutrition and change your diet habit to healthy way. | best part of this class. The | Content | are very helpful as well! I | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.51 | 1.13 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | Great course!. Content was clear and precise. I would have loved to learn more recipes for kids. | Great course! . | Content | was clear and precise. I would | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.51 | 1.13 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | Nicely organised and content rich course; helps to know a lot about child nutrition. | Nicely organised and | Content | rich course; helps to know a | Positive | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.51 | 1.13 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | Excellent!!! Marvelous content! | Excellent! ! ! Marvelous | Content | | Positive | 0.9 | 1.0 | 0.51 | 1.13 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | Very useful knowledge enhance my working task. The content is delivered well with suitable material. Great experiences for me to develop myself | knowledge enhance my working task. The | Content | is delivered well with suitable material. | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.54 | 0.99 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | The course is well prepared, thought through, coherent and structured in a way that it supports the content. However, it felt very much like being in an advertisement program for PMBOK. This feeling was supported by the unavailability of all course materials. Throughout the course the PMBOK guide was included as the suggested reading. The PMBOK materials were featured in each and every lecture and the guidebook was extensively presented and recommended in an extra video. This gives the impression that the course content cannot be sufficiently understood without this literature. Therefore, I would expect the specific recommend chapters to be made available for the participants of the course, especially since this is a paid course. | a way that it supports the | Content | However, it felt very much like | Positive | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.54 | 0.99 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | I found this course disappointing. Whilst the presenter, Margaret Meloni, was enthusiastic and pleasant to listen to, the content was very sparse indeed. A large part of the content each week was simply reading a presentation which you could get from a book. I would expect an online course to be more interactive, have more videos, and more varied content. I found the case studies (where you had to imagine a real life situation and select a decision) useful - there was one of these per week when I think there could have been more, perhaps three a week. The course would also have been improved by the use of peer assessment on the assignments. This would have made them feel more worthwhile and that someone else was actually reading them. | and pleasant to listen to, the | Content | was very sparse indeed. A large | Positive | 0.6 | -0.5 | 0.54 | 0.99 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | I found this course disappointing. Whilst the presenter, Margaret Meloni, was enthusiastic and pleasant to listen to, the content was very sparse indeed. A large part of the content each week was simply reading a presentation which you could get from a book. I would expect an online course to be more interactive, have more videos, and more varied content. I found the case studies (where you had to imagine a real life situation and select a decision) useful - there was one of these per week when I think there could have been more, perhaps three a week. The course would also have been improved by the use of peer assessment on the assignments. This would have made them feel more worthwhile and that someone else was actually reading them. | indeed. A large part of the | Content | each week was simply reading a | Positive | 0.6 | -0.5 | 0.54 | 0.99 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | I found this course disappointing. Whilst the presenter, Margaret Meloni, was enthusiastic and pleasant to listen to, the content was very sparse indeed. A large part of the content each week was simply reading a presentation which you could get from a book. I would expect an online course to be more interactive, have more videos, and more varied content. I found the case studies (where you had to imagine a real life situation and select a decision) useful - there was one of these per week when I think there could have been more, perhaps three a week. The course would also have been improved by the use of peer assessment on the assignments. This would have made them feel more worthwhile and that someone else was actually reading them. | have more videos, and more varied | Content | I found the case studies (where | Positive | 0.6 | -0.5 | 0.54 | 0.99 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | Very good and easy to understand course content. | good and easy to understand course | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.54 | 0.99 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | The content and the lay out of the course is amazingly prepared and presented. | The | Content | and the lay out of the | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.54 | 0.99 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | The content is good but the quiz and final exam are way too easy... | The | Content | is good but the quiz and | Positive | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.54 | 0.99 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | High fluidity lessons and a lot of content and advises, orientation, concepts compacted in a perfect way. High value knowledge for a manager or operational position. | fluidity lessons and a lot of | Content | and advises, orientation, concepts compacted in | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.54 | 0.99 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | Course content is well-structured and good references are given. What can be improved is that I want to see how these skills can be applied in real life situations. It'd be great if discussion session can be organized by Coursera, basically coordinate students to form discussion groups and meet at least once a week to discuss the topics covered that week. | Course | Content | is well-structured and good references are | Positive | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.54 | 0.99 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | The syllabus is carefully structured. Well defined topics and the content is very well written and easy to understand. As a beginner I had absolutely no problem whatsoever in completing the course. | structured. Well defined topics and the | Content | is very well written and easy | Positive | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.54 | 0.99 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | I really enjoyed the content presented!!! | I really enjoyed the | Content | presented! ! ! | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.54 | 0.99 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | Content is very well organized within flash presentation and video lectures that are complementary to one another and also interrelated. The step by step approach really helps students to go through its content smoothly. | | Content | is very well organized within flash | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.54 | 0.99 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | I really enjoyed the content and the instructor. | I really enjoyed the | Content | and the instructor. | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.54 | 0.99 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | it was a good learning experience , course content is excellent | a good learning experience , course | Content | is excellent | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.54 | 0.99 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | Informative and clearly structured course. However, its content is aimed at professional project managers - useful but not exactly what I was looking for ! | and clearly structured course. However, its | Content | is aimed at professional project managers | Positive | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.54 | 0.99 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | Excellent course content and support for the lectures! | Excellent course | Content | and support for the lectures! | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.54 | 0.99 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | Course goes over the most basic points, but also allows you (if you are interested) to dive much deeper into the content. Seems it has everything any project manager would want, so definitely worth taking. Would have wanted the questions to be a little more difficult and potentially more questions to help make sure the information was retained. Overall a great course. | to dive much deeper into the | Content | Seems it has everything any project | Negative | -0.6 | 0.5 | 0.54 | 0.99 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | The content is great, but the most part is presented using flash-based pages :/ | The | Content | is great, but the most part | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.54 | 0.99 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | A nice slow intro to Coursera, but not a ton of actual content. Good to get your feet wet, but skippable if you are familiar with the basics of the toolbox or taking courses on Coursera. | but not a ton of actual | Content | Good to get your feet wet, | Negative | -0.7 | 0.5 | 0.93 | 0.97 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | This was really basic information. It's not really a 4 week course. It takes several hours. The info is necessary, but it's sufficient as a single week of content for a larger course. | sufficient as a single week of | Content | for a larger course. | Negative | -0.6 | -0.5 | 0.93 | 0.97 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | A light introduction to the Data Science field, in many ways it can be difficult for inexperienced people with software or inexperienced with stats - in my case it was not very difficult since some of the topics were already familiar. The course can be done in a couple of days if the topics are already familiar, in my opinion the course's contents are perfect for someone very new to this field. I would have rated more stars if the course's content was more "objective" for people unfamiliar with the subject - other than that it's perfect. | familiar, in my opinion the course's | Content | are perfect for someone very new | Positive | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.93 | 0.97 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | A light introduction to the Data Science field, in many ways it can be difficult for inexperienced people with software or inexperienced with stats - in my case it was not very difficult since some of the topics were already familiar. The course can be done in a couple of days if the topics are already familiar, in my opinion the course's contents are perfect for someone very new to this field. I would have rated more stars if the course's content was more "objective" for people unfamiliar with the subject - other than that it's perfect. | rated more stars if the course's | Content | was more " objective" for people | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.93 | 0.97 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | This is a really basic course. If you have never touch code before, it's more useful, but little is actually covered here and the gap between it's contents and the next class, R programming is dramatic. | here and the gap between it's | Content | and the next class, R programming | Negative | -0.6 | 0.0 | 0.93 | 0.97 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Overall the course content is good, but the power points are not engaging and interactive. | Overall the course | Content | is good, but the power points | Positive | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.93 | 0.97 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Very little content | Very little | Content | | Negative | -0.6 | 0.0 | 0.93 | 0.97 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Extremely helpful. It was detailed and at the same time brief, made sure I am able to connect with the content and learn in ways that will be useful in career. Also, the exams and exercises made sure that my concepts are deep rooted into me. Great Course. | am able to connect with the | Content | and learn in ways that will | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.93 | 0.97 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Succeeds in conveying course prerequisites, contents and benefits. | Succeeds in conveying course prerequisites, | Content | and benefits. | Positive | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.93 | 0.97 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Useless. The information content is close to zero. Just some blah-blah and a long tutorial to install software. | Useless. The information | Content | is close to zero. Just some | Negative | -0.7 | -1.0 | 0.93 | 0.97 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Excelent introduction course, useful content. | Excelent introduction course, useful | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.93 | 0.97 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Way too basic for the price - almost no content - this is just setup - I resent paying for setup instructions. | for the price - almost no | Content | - this is just setup - | Negative | -0.6 | -1.0 | 0.93 | 0.97 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Not much content for this course, can be done in a few hours. | Not much | Content | for this course, can be done | Negative | -0.7 | 0.0 | 0.93 | 0.97 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | I found this course to have very useful material and good, clear explanations. My only criticism is that the last of the four weeks has practically no content. There are no lectures and the only assignment is grading the assignments of other students, which at most takes 20 minutes. | the four weeks has practically no | Content | There are no lectures and the | Negative | -0.6 | 0.5 | 0.93 | 0.97 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | great content, a little long course for the provided content | great | Content | a little long course for the | Positive | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.93 | 0.97 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | the speech is too fast to be catch up with and doesn't have much useful contents | with and doesn't have much useful | Content | | Negative | -0.7 | -0.5 | 0.93 | 0.97 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Experimental Design is very great. Other contents are just fundamental for beginners. | Experimental Design is very great. Other | Content | are just fundamental for beginners. | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.93 | 0.97 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | It has almost no content and isn't actually useful. I've heard later classes in the series are way tougher, so the ramp up isn't at all good. | It has almost no | Content | and isn't actually useful. I've heard | Negative | -0.7 | -1.0 | 0.93 | 0.97 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Awesome content. I'm happy with the results. | Awesome | Content | I'm happy with the results. | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.93 | 0.97 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Basic content with detail course materials. Helpful. | Basic | Content | with detail course materials. Helpful. | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.93 | 0.97 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Course content gives a clear and easy information. | Course | Content | gives a clear and easy information. | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.93 | 0.97 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | The course accomplished its goal. Nevertheless, since it is a paid course I expected to find more theoretical content | I expected to find more theoretical | Content | | Negative | -0.7 | 0.0 | 0.93 | 0.97 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Content is very nice. | | Content | is very nice. | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.93 | 0.97 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Only include very basic contents, doesn't need 4 weeks to finish this course. More like a one or two day induction session. | Only include very basic | Content | doesn't need 4 weeks to finish | Negative | -0.7 | 0.0 | 0.93 | 0.97 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Nicely taught and good course contents. | Nicely taught and good course | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.93 | 0.97 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | The instructors are great, but I think the content of this course should be embbeded in other module. Despiting being important, the topics covered here are very introductory. I recognizes, though, they are important to align expectation and to put everyone in a minimum ground of knowledge. However, I am not sure if Coursera should charge US$ 29,00 for it. | are great, but I think the | Content | of this course should be embbeded | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.93 | 0.97 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | The course is great, I just think the course should has a little more content to be perfect. | course should has a little more | Content | to be perfect. | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.93 | 0.97 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | very good content | very good | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.93 | 0.97 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | The overall outline are great. However, the contents and requirements of this course are too simple to be integrated as a whole course. I think 1 lecture should be enough. I am looking forward to deeper introduction. | overall outline are great. However, the | Content | and requirements of this course are | Positive | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.93 | 0.97 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Very nice introduction to the specialization. It provides a lot of useful content to start being a data scientist. | It provides a lot of useful | Content | to start being a data scientist. | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.93 | 0.97 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | I think there are only few contents. | I think there are only few | Content | | Negative | -0.6 | -1.0 | 0.93 | 0.97 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Good course about getting the basics for the Data Science specialization, but a bit overpriced, as the content is low, and can easily be done in 4-5 hours. | but a bit overpriced, as the | Content | is low, and can easily be | Positive | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.93 | 0.97 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Although the content is correct, quality models videos and materials is very low, wanted to make all the specialization, but I'm not satisfied with the quality of the course. It's a shame, because the JHU is an excellent University | Although the | Content | is correct, quality models videos and | Positive | 0.6 | -1.0 | 0.93 | 0.97 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Great course! Explains the details of what is in the content of the rest of the certificate while not being too detailed. Showed which classes will be related to the content of each part of the introduction. Did a great job of setting up all required tools for the the R programming course (which I am currently taking). | details of what is in the | Content | of the rest of the certificate | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.93 | 0.97 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Great course! Explains the details of what is in the content of the rest of the certificate while not being too detailed. Showed which classes will be related to the content of each part of the introduction. Did a great job of setting up all required tools for the the R programming course (which I am currently taking). | classes will be related to the | Content | of each part of the introduction. | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.93 | 0.97 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Too basic content. I have not learned anything with this course (installing R and RStudio should not be part of exercises or lectures). I hope R programming course will be better | Too basic | Content | I have not learned anything with | Negative | -0.7 | -1.0 | 0.93 | 0.97 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Not really enough content to be a course in it's own right, should be additional material as is useful, but definitely not a requirement. | Not really enough | Content | to be a course in it's | Negative | -0.6 | -1.0 | 0.93 | 0.97 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Very short and just a basic overview on how to install a few tools that most of them I already had installed. All this course content could be packed into an introductory lesson instead of having to pay for it. I abandoned the specialisation because of this, I know it's a big business but at least you need to offer some value for the money | already had installed. All this course | Content | could be packed into an introductory | Negative | -0.7 | -1.0 | 0.93 | 0.97 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | As advertised, satisfied with the content | As advertised, satisfied with the | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.93 | 0.97 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | I'm doing this training for the second time, now as a beta-tester. Particular comments about lecture content, problems, etc. have been put in every lecture. General comments, in short: 1) Related to the new platform and UI design: _ It is cleaner and simpler than the previous one. I like it, BUT... _ It lacks of some useful features: saving intermediate results in quizzes before submit them; calendar; limited number of subforums. _ The most relevant flaw: there are not downloadable versions of lecture slides. Unacceptable! No way to check most of the links we saw in slides (URLs not visible). _ Description and steps in course project appear "too packed" together. I prefer the former design. 2) Related to content: _ The course is mainly for preparing students for the rest of data science specialization program. When you said "toolbox" you mean the concrete toolbox you will need to do the program. Some people expect to have a general introduction to data science but that is only a half of the content. I think this is clear enough in the presentation but for some reasons there are people in forums who protest the content, so maybe you should insist more in this fact. _ I would like to suggest some kind of reorder of material: week 2 is all about installing a running tools and week 3 about key aspects of data analysis. Maybe you can split both types of content between wk2 and wk3 to make wk2 more appealing for not technical oriented students. _ Git is a source of problems for a good portion of people. See my comments in lectures about how Git is explained. | a beta-tester. Particular comments about lecture | Content | problems, etc. have been put in | Negative | -0.7 | 0.5 | 0.93 | 0.97 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | I'm doing this training for the second time, now as a beta-tester. Particular comments about lecture content, problems, etc. have been put in every lecture. General comments, in short: 1) Related to the new platform and UI design: _ It is cleaner and simpler than the previous one. I like it, BUT... _ It lacks of some useful features: saving intermediate results in quizzes before submit them; calendar; limited number of subforums. _ The most relevant flaw: there are not downloadable versions of lecture slides. Unacceptable! No way to check most of the links we saw in slides (URLs not visible). _ Description and steps in course project appear "too packed" together. I prefer the former design. 2) Related to content: _ The course is mainly for preparing students for the rest of data science specialization program. When you said "toolbox" you mean the concrete toolbox you will need to do the program. Some people expect to have a general introduction to data science but that is only a half of the content. I think this is clear enough in the presentation but for some reasons there are people in forums who protest the content, so maybe you should insist more in this fact. _ I would like to suggest some kind of reorder of material: week 2 is all about installing a running tools and week 3 about key aspects of data analysis. Maybe you can split both types of content between wk2 and wk3 to make wk2 more appealing for not technical oriented students. _ Git is a source of problems for a good portion of people. See my comments in lectures about how Git is explained. | is only a half of the | Content | I think this is clear enough | Negative | -0.7 | 0.5 | 0.93 | 0.97 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | I'm doing this training for the second time, now as a beta-tester. Particular comments about lecture content, problems, etc. have been put in every lecture. General comments, in short: 1) Related to the new platform and UI design: _ It is cleaner and simpler than the previous one. I like it, BUT... _ It lacks of some useful features: saving intermediate results in quizzes before submit them; calendar; limited number of subforums. _ The most relevant flaw: there are not downloadable versions of lecture slides. Unacceptable! No way to check most of the links we saw in slides (URLs not visible). _ Description and steps in course project appear "too packed" together. I prefer the former design. 2) Related to content: _ The course is mainly for preparing students for the rest of data science specialization program. When you said "toolbox" you mean the concrete toolbox you will need to do the program. Some people expect to have a general introduction to data science but that is only a half of the content. I think this is clear enough in the presentation but for some reasons there are people in forums who protest the content, so maybe you should insist more in this fact. _ I would like to suggest some kind of reorder of material: week 2 is all about installing a running tools and week 3 about key aspects of data analysis. Maybe you can split both types of content between wk2 and wk3 to make wk2 more appealing for not technical oriented students. _ Git is a source of problems for a good portion of people. See my comments in lectures about how Git is explained. | you can split both types of | Content | between wk2 and wk3 to make | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.93 | 0.97 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | I would like to report some major issues with the new interface. 1) We don't have access to the slides anymore. This is a major issues since some of the slides content important links. These links are not shown in the transcript (I've double checked). 2) When we try to download the videos, subtitles or transcript, the resulting file name is the same for all content of the same type. More specifically, all videos are named "index.mp4", all subtitle files are named "subtitles.vtt" and all transcript files are named "subtitle.txt". This makes it more difficult for the student to save the files. In the previous version I would only right-click and saved in the right directory. Now, I have to right click, type the right name (which could be long sometimes) and then save the file. 3) In the previous interface, it was possible to see all the threads we were subscribed to. It is no more the case. It is not a problem right now, because there is not a lot of posts, but in cases where the number of post increase, it will be a pain to go through the list of threads and find the ones of interest. Please ignore the review for now, I couldn't submit my comments without reviewing the course. More comments may follow later... | issues since some of the slides | Content | important links. These links are not | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.93 | 0.97 |
| jHCTx1u-EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | Very good contents. Excellent assignments. You'll need to work hard to pass it but you enjoy the effort. | Very good | Content | Excellent assignments. You'll need to work | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.56 | 0.92 |
| jHCTx1u-EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | Really testing course. Get's pretty tricky, especially the final assignment. The staff is really helpful and the content is top-notch. | staff is really helpful and the | Content | is top-notch. | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.56 | 0.92 |
| jHCTx1u-EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | Just perfect. Nice content, nice lectures and very helpful staff. | Just perfect. Nice | Content | nice lectures and very helpful staff. | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.56 | 0.92 |
| jHCTx1u-EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | This is a very nice class about the aerial robotics. If the more background materials about the quadrotor are provied in the class content, the class will be better. | quadrotor are provied in the class | Content | the class will be better. | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.56 | 0.92 |
| jHCTx1u-EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | I think there is need to provide clearer instructions on how to get the programming assignments done. The course content is good, but doing the programming assignments needs to be more clarified. | the programming assignments done. The course | Content | is good, but doing the programming | Positive | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.56 | 0.92 |
| jHCTx1u-EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | The course is interesting and entertaining at times, though seems relatively undercooked. Typos in video lectures and assignment writeups are still frequent. The course content is a bit rushed, with some rather difficult aspects left almost unexplained. Definitely not for begginers, as some knowledge of physics, differential equations, calculus, matlab programming is highly recommended! | writeups are still frequent. The course | Content | is a bit rushed, with some | Positive | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.56 | 0.92 |
| jHCTx1u-EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | Has allot of typos but the content is good overall | Has allot of typos but the | Content | is good overall | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.56 | 0.92 |
| jHCTx1u-EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | I found the course fun and engaging. I studied Physics a while ago; without this I think I would have had problems following the contents. I wish the first two programming assignments were combined, so that there was room for another assignment for implementing a full 3d controller that doesn't assume a linearization around the hover state. | would have had problems following the | Content | I wish the first two programming | Negative | -0.7 | 0.5 | 0.56 | 0.92 |
| jHCTx1u-EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | So close but yet so far ... Course concepts are interesting and the programming assignments are fun but the presentation can be greatly improved. Criticisms include: (i) The course isn't self contained. Physical concepts like 'resultant moment', 'inertial and body-fixed frame' and 'torque' are used without definition. Mechanics is not listed as a prerequisite but it should be. (ii) Lectures are very mathematical but proofs, intuition and good problem sets are all missing. Listening to a math lecture without doing challenging problems or deriving mathematical results to build intuition can be a waste of time. Check out John Cochrane's Asset Pricing 1 and 2 or Tim Roughgarden's Algo 1 and 2 for great examples of thoughtful problem sets and intuitive derivations. (iii) Way too much powerpoint! Speed reading a static powerpoint slide overloaded with dense mathematical formulas without using pointers or animations to focus the students attention is a recipe for confusion and frustration. I find hand written derivations, even when the handwriting is a little sloppy, much easier to follow than a static page of formulas plus a sound track. Hand written derivations impose a natural pace and focal point to the content. Check out Gilbert Strang's Linear Algebra, Sebastian Thrun's Artificial Intelligence for Robotics and Andrew Ng's Machine Learning for examples of good derivations of mathematically sophisticated material. (iv) The programming assignments while fun were somewhat ad hoc and disconnected from the lecture material, specifically, the main task of every single assignment was to hand tune a pd controller. No systematic approach was ever described for performing this task. | pace and focal point to the | Content | Check out Gilbert Strang's Linear Algebra, | Positive | 0.6 | -1.0 | 0.56 | 0.92 |
| jHCTx1u-EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | The content is awesome and the quizzes and assignments are challenging. What I would incorporate is a little bit more of examples to tackle all the problems new people might encounter (more sample numerical results, and probably samples on how to develop in Matlab, not just reserved words). | The | Content | is awesome and the quizzes and | Positive | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.56 | 0.92 |
| K28H5jJ0EeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | Enjoyable content and presentation but the coarse seemed very short compared to others I've taken. Not a criticism but rather and observation. If it was short on purpose that is one thing but I believe there is more to be said on this topic fundamentally and hope to see this course expanded or a second one produced. I would like to that those involved int its creation. | Enjoyable | Content | and presentation but the coarse seemed | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 0.97 |
| K28H5jJ0EeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | I learned good stuff. i gave four star because there could be more content some parts were written instead of a lecture. But i will recommend this course. | star because there could be more | Content | some parts were written instead of | Negative | -0.7 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 0.97 |
| K28H5jJ0EeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | I am glad that I have chosen to sign up to this course. It has open up my vision to a whole new world. Thanks so very much. The professor is engaging and the course content is fascinating. | professor is engaging and the course | Content | is fascinating. | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.7 | 0.97 |
| K28H5jJ0EeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | This Course helped me a whole lot in process of writing and how to break down the process for better performance. I really liked how easy and well sorted were the Content of the course and how the assignment was purposely designed for that week. | easy and well sorted were the | Content | of the course and how the | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.7 | 0.97 |
| K28H5jJ0EeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | The contents were comprehensive, and the assignments helped reinforce the theory. By using pre-existing references to other works, they were tighter, which I think is useful to focus on the objectives set for a particular week. Some additional creative freedom would also have been interesting. | The | Content | were comprehensive, and the assignments helped | Negative | -0.6 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 0.97 |
| knivtHEHEeSfpCIACzWBZw | The information was great. My only complaint would be how dry the lectures were, and I do not meant the content, I meant the delivery. | and I do not meant the | Content | I meant the delivery. | Negative | -0.6 | 0.5 | 0.78 | 1.09 |
| knivtHEHEeSfpCIACzWBZw | Thank you for this course, professor Kuhar. I really appreciate the organization and the contents. I appreciate your deeply interest for this subject. | really appreciate the organization and the | Content | I appreciate your deeply interest for | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.78 | 1.09 |
| knivtHEHEeSfpCIACzWBZw | The content was great, the presentation was a bit dry, but I feel I got a lot out of this course. | The | Content | was great, the presentation was a | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.78 | 1.09 |
| knivtHEHEeSfpCIACzWBZw | Great course! Extremely interesting. Very well presented with fantastic content. Thank you so much! | interesting. Very well presented with fantastic | Content | Thank you so much! | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.78 | 1.09 |
| knivtHEHEeSfpCIACzWBZw | Really disappointing course. Content is shallow, despite the impressive credentials of the Professor. Quizzes are ridiculously easy. | Really disappointing course. | Content | is shallow, despite the impressive credentials | Negative | -0.7 | -1.0 | 0.78 | 1.09 |
| knivtHEHEeSfpCIACzWBZw | I found both the course content and the Professor very engaging and thorough. I appreciated the methodical manner the scientific content was provided and the visuals were absolutely key to helping me to completely grasp. | I found both the course | Content | and the Professor very engaging and | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.78 | 1.09 |
| knivtHEHEeSfpCIACzWBZw | I found both the course content and the Professor very engaging and thorough. I appreciated the methodical manner the scientific content was provided and the visuals were absolutely key to helping me to completely grasp. | appreciated the methodical manner the scientific | Content | was provided and the visuals were | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.78 | 1.09 |
| KqKtbzXyEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Great course. I would like more on how to use Hootsuite and Klout. Also which one is better?? I am finding them a challenge to use. I like to search for my own content as I find the suggested content boring...and often not relevant to what I am looking for. I can't understand why I cannot cut and past links. So, like I said a primer on how to use these sites would be good. | like to search for my own | Content | as I find the suggested content | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 0.96 |
| KqKtbzXyEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Great course. I would like more on how to use Hootsuite and Klout. Also which one is better?? I am finding them a challenge to use. I like to search for my own content as I find the suggested content boring...and often not relevant to what I am looking for. I can't understand why I cannot cut and past links. So, like I said a primer on how to use these sites would be good. | content as I find the suggested | Content | boring. . . and often not | Negative | -0.9 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 0.96 |
| KqKtbzXyEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | A fantastic introduction into social networks and virtual communities! The Internet neophyte can begin with very little intimidation and come out with a larger picture on how information and content value is processed among online communities | larger picture on how information and | Content | value is processed among online communities | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 0.96 |
| KqKtbzXyEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | The content in this course was invaluable and I learned a lot from the instructor videos, guest lectures and assignments. It's already changed the way I am doing business. My one complaint is with the grading system - and this is on Coursera and not on the course. I can't understand first why a peer graded assignment is considered late when I submitted it on time, and it's not my fault that others hadn't reviewed it yet. Similarly on a quiz, there were points given for answers that were supposed to be skipped if you had done the assignment. Therefore, the highest grade you could get on that quiz was a 57%. While passing was a 1%, it's still averaged into my final grade as a 57%. That doesn't make any sense at all. | The | Content | in this course was invaluable and | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 0.96 |
| KqKtbzXyEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Excellent introduction to the essentials of Social Media Marketing. Great content and videos. | essentials of Social Media Marketing. Great | Content | and videos. | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 0.96 |
| KqKtbzXyEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | I am very happy with the Course content.After first module my understanding of using Social media for my benefit is bit improved.I am sure after Specialization i ll be able to run my business well. I am an Artist and need social/digital marketing to get noticed. Professor Randy Hlavac speech is clear and thoughtful which is very easy to follow for non native English speakers. I am glad i am his student and looking forward to learn more. | am very happy with the Course | Content | After first module my understanding of | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 0.96 |
| KqKtbzXyEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Not recommended for medium or advanced users. As the name says this is just an introduction in Social Media, so if you are already using it you don't have much to learn from this one. I look forward to the other courses from this Specialisation for more in depth content. | this Specialisation for more in depth | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | -0.5 | 0.8 | 0.96 |
| KqKtbzXyEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | It is a very practice course - easy but informative content gives me great insight and engage my interest to the next course. | practice course - easy but informative | Content | gives me great insight and engage | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 0.96 |
| KqKtbzXyEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | A little light on content, but has valuable resources for my wife's home business. | A little light on | Content | but has valuable resources for my | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 0.96 |
| KqKtbzXyEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | This course has provided me high quality of contents, tips and knowledge I had miss-understood about Social Media before taking the classes. Now I feel like a kind of expert in the issue of Social and an big enthusiast in the task of "identify as specific as you can the market you really want to develop". What amazing assessment! Thank you! | has provided me high quality of | Content | tips and knowledge I had miss-understood | Negative | -0.6 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 0.96 |
| KqKtbzXyEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Well organized, thoughtful, easy to follow. Useful, current content! | thoughtful, easy to follow. Useful, current | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 0.96 |
| KqKtbzXyEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | I think the content itself is somewhat too theoretical, it does not usually apply to the reality | I think the | Content | itself is somewhat too theoretical, it | Negative | -0.6 | -0.5 | 0.8 | 0.96 |
| KqKtbzXyEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Instructor was good. Content of whole program was focused on analytics. Perhaps a better title for this course is Social Media Analytics. | Instructor was good. | Content | of whole program was focused on | Positive | 0.6 | -0.5 | 0.8 | 0.96 |
| KqKtbzXyEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | The flow and content of this course is fantastic. It's engaging, thought-provoking and really keeps your interest throughout. It is evident that the course leaders have a real passion for this subject and it's an infectious trait for the learners too. | The flow and | Content | of this course is fantastic. It's | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 0.96 |
| KqKtbzXyEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | great content | great | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 0.96 |
| KqKtbzXyEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | A wonderful introduction into social media and how it can be used for promotional purposes. Prof Randy Hlavac is clear and insightful, the course content is engaging and interesting, and the assignments are meaningful. Really enjoyed doing this course and definitely considering taking up the other related MOOCs. | is clear and insightful, the course | Content | is engaging and interesting, and the | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 0.96 |
| KqKtbzXyEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | The content was very shallow. Not lot of hands on | The | Content | was very shallow. Not lot of | Negative | -0.6 | -0.5 | 0.8 | 0.96 |
| KqKtbzXyEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | This is a nice introduction to social media marketing with professional insight from Randy Hlavac. I felt the content was a little too basic though. | from Randy Hlavac. I felt the | Content | was a little too basic though. | Negative | -0.6 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 0.96 |
| KqKtbzXyEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | the professor was a little bit dry and repetitive but otherwise the content was interesting! | dry and repetitive but otherwise the | Content | was interesting! | Negative | -0.6 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 0.96 |
| kvco9XQ4EeWi0g6YoSAL-w | I highly recommend this course for those who want to learn content marketing. | for those who want to learn | Content | marketing. | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.63 | 1.02 |
| kvco9XQ4EeWi0g6YoSAL-w | Interesting and helpful content. Thanks！ | Interesting and helpful | Content | Thanks！ | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.63 | 1.02 |
| kvco9XQ4EeWi0g6YoSAL-w | I did not find this course as good as the other parts of the specialisation. There were some interesting elements there but also a lot of redundancy. I don't feel like I now have all the tools I need to do a through, structured content marketing analysis. | need to do a through, structured | Content | marketing analysis. | Negative | -0.6 | -0.5 | 0.63 | 1.02 |
| kvco9XQ4EeWi0g6YoSAL-w | Overall the course gives a general and broad perspective of content | a general and broad perspective of | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.63 | 1.02 |
| kvco9XQ4EeWi0g6YoSAL-w | Great content and ideas. Thank you. | Great | Content | and ideas. Thank you. | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.63 | 1.02 |
| L7stsPOKEeSlpiIAC7NwBA | I did all four courses - the whole specialization. Each course in itself was aright and I learned new things. However, the course certificate is meaningless. It neither states the content nor the effort (for example the hours). Instead, it even says "non-credit course". This is despite the fact that the course equates "35 PDU's" and "counts towards the UCI Project Management Certificate Programm"; as it was described in the FAQ. I feel betrayed. How can I apply with such a meaningless peace of paper anywhere? | is meaningless. It neither states the | Content | nor the effort (for example the | Negative | -0.7 | -1.0 | 0.78 | 1.2 |
| L7stsPOKEeSlpiIAC7NwBA | The course contents is delivered in a very easy to understand manner. | The course | Content | is delivered in a very easy | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.78 | 1.2 |
| L7stsPOKEeSlpiIAC7NwBA | Great lectures. I have also accomplished the certification from Adelaide University, however, found this one better in terms of course content and explanation. | one better in terms of course | Content | and explanation. | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.78 | 1.2 |
| L7stsPOKEeSlpiIAC7NwBA | The Course content is matured and well explained. | The Course | Content | is matured and well explained. | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.78 | 1.2 |
| L7stsPOKEeSlpiIAC7NwBA | The course content is quite elaborate and very detailed. Assignments and explanation,quiz was all excellent. | The course | Content | is quite elaborate and very detailed. | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.78 | 1.2 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Course had a good content and the exercises were able to make the use of the elements | Course had a good | Content | and the exercises were able to | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.41 | 1.05 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | I afraid to learn JS until take this course. Course has really good presentation and content to understand behaviour between HTML, CSS and JS. I would definitely recommend to take this course if you are interested in web development. | Course has really good presentation and | Content | to understand behaviour between HTML, CSS | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.41 | 1.05 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Fun to follow, light hearted, but with substantial content, that will help you web development career. | follow, light hearted, but with substantial | Content | that will help you web development | Positive | 0.9 | 1.0 | 0.41 | 1.05 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | The content was too basic, but good | The | Content | was too basic, but good | Negative | -0.6 | 0.5 | 0.41 | 1.05 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Gives a great overview, though a bit more depth and content would have been great. Still, overall a great course for beginners! | though a bit more depth and | Content | would have been great. Still, overall | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.41 | 1.05 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Nicely organized contents. Good work with assignments. | Nicely organized | Content | Good work with assignments. | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.41 | 1.05 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | great content. | great | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.41 | 1.05 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Reasonable contents. Focus on very useful knowledge. Perfect for beginners. | Reasonable | Content | Focus on very useful knowledge. Perfect | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.41 | 1.05 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | everything has been explained well the way of teaching the content everything was good | well the way of teaching the | Content | everything was good | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.41 | 1.05 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very poor CSS content | Very poor CSS | Content | | Negative | -0.7 | -0.5 | 0.41 | 1.05 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | The professor really needs to make the course more exciting - you don't need to be educated to know enthusiasm promotes content reception. | be educated to know enthusiasm promotes | Content | reception. | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.41 | 1.05 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Nice videos, nice content... incredible didactic! Coursera recommend a little knowledge from students, however you can learn web development concepts by zero! Recommended! | Nice videos, nice | Content | . . incredible didactic! Coursera recommend | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.41 | 1.05 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very simple way to teach the content. | Very simple way to teach the | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.41 | 1.05 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | very nice presentation and content for beginners | very nice presentation and | Content | for beginners | Positive | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.41 | 1.05 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | A bit too simple for my liking. And too many repeated content. But overall a good course for an absolute beginner. | my liking. And too many repeated | Content | But overall a good course for | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.41 | 1.05 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | very good content easy to learn. | very good | Content | easy to learn. | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.41 | 1.05 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | clear and good example but limited contents | clear and good example but limited | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.41 | 1.05 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | I liked the content, the way of teaching and most importantly everything is managed. | I liked the | Content | the way of teaching and most | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.41 | 1.05 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Content is good enough for beginners in web development but must have previously programming experience. The assignments are very strong and help understanding more. I think this is a good start point but some other operation on images and styles not covered. | | Content | is good enough for beginners in | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.41 | 1.05 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | I am satisfied with the course content. It gave me a great opportunity to learn programs and also a great step forward in web programming. | I am satisfied with the course | Content | It gave me a great opportunity | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.41 | 1.05 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Amazing presentation. Good content | Amazing presentation. Good | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.41 | 1.05 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Excellent course! Content is easy to comprehend and flexible. Professor is good having clear communication. I highly recommend this course for the beginners or if you want to refresh theses skills. | Excellent course! | Content | is easy to comprehend and flexible. | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.41 | 1.05 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Content is good but can include more advanced topics in Javascript like various patterns eg IIFE, Module etc. Also, I reckon there should have been some material on Javascript classes,objects etc. As a whole this tutorial is excellent but could have been even better wit above topics included in detail. | | Content | is good but can include more | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.41 | 1.05 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Lecturer explains very well. Content very well sequenced | Lecturer explains very well. | Content | very well sequenced | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.41 | 1.05 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | This course provides load of information to get beginners started. The course content and assignments are also challenging enough for me understand the concepts. However the videos are a bit long so it's easy to get distracted. I'd recommend who take this course to take a glimpse at the assignment first, then come back and watch the videos, you'll have better focus on what you want to learn from there. | to get beginners started. The course | Content | and assignments are also challenging enough | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.41 | 1.05 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Great instructor with great presentation methods that make learning course content simple and straight forward. Would recommend to anyone needing to get web basics into their toolbox of skills. | presentation methods that make learning course | Content | simple and straight forward. Would recommend | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.41 | 1.05 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Brilliant content! | Brilliant | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.41 | 1.05 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Great set of lessons, covers the specifics and important main things of each of the topics. But I must say that several time the evaluation is a little too hard given the content of the course (talking about quis and projects) and that also is a lot of ground to cover. | a little too hard given the | Content | of the course (talking about quis | Negative | -0.6 | 0.5 | 0.41 | 1.05 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | This is a very good introductive course. It's easy to follow, it's explicative and offers extra resources to complement the contents and deep. | offers extra resources to complement the | Content | and deep. | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.41 | 1.05 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | This is THE BEST course I have ever taken on coursera or else. Very simple but effective, complex things are made bit simple to learn. Just in 3 weeks, covered a good contents. Specially the way of teaching was bit simple but outstanding. Pleasure to be a part of this course | in 3 weeks, covered a good | Content | Specially the way of teaching was | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.41 | 1.05 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | The course is very complete. The lecturer explains very well. He presents the contents in a nice way and he always give good examples to accomplish the subjects. I definitely recommend this course! | explains very well. He presents the | Content | in a nice way and he | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.41 | 1.05 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very good content and very well taught. | Very good | Content | and very well taught. | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.41 | 1.05 |
| loAmvxJgEea8fxLSgUgxeQ | The course content is not update with the latest software that is used in the course. In addition there is a lot of default setting that is changed making it harder to know which setting to use to get the same result as in the tests. | The course | Content | is not update with the latest | Negative | -0.6 | -1.0 | 1.17 | 1.17 |
| loAmvxJgEea8fxLSgUgxeQ | The contents are very interesting, however some assignments are a little confusing. | The | Content | are very interesting, however some assignments | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 1.17 | 1.17 |
| lUcQU1MNEeSstCIAC1GOZw | Calling this a course is a stretch. It would even be a stretch to call it a workshop. Course material is thin and you can go through it in a couple of hours. If you squeeze the content, you can probably get a couple of pages of notes out of it. Having said that, it is somehow useful, if you don't already have a system in place that works for you. I would only recommend this course to someone with a serious personal management issue. | of hours. If you squeeze the | Content | you can probably get a couple | Positive | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.78 | 0.83 |
| lUcQU1MNEeSstCIAC1GOZw | I teach online rather than in the classroom, but the course content and strategies helped me to better organization my teaching, especially using my Google calendar, reminders and tasks. I am more in control of my daily work schedule and feel comfortable that I am accomplishing what I need to do and not overlooking important tasks. | in the classroom, but the course | Content | and strategies helped me to better | Negative | -0.6 | 1.0 | 0.78 | 0.83 |
| M9dntkEoEeWZtA4u62x6lQ | The course content is good. But it needs some polishing... Major comment: The assignment submission/review process should be improved. Grading system is not clearly defined at the time of submission. Some grading question are inherently subjective "Is the code at least somewhat efficient?". But even for inherently objective questions "Is the code correct?" (as does it give the correct answer" the staff does not provide the correct answer... I think the staff should create some automated review for what is objective: does the code compile? does it yield the correct answer? is it efficient enough? (Just like many other courses on Coursera) And only when it passes the automatic review, use peer grading for coding style. Finally there a lot of confusion with the deadlines. Minor comments: Lucky Coursera has an option to play twice faster! Not that the content is too easy, but the talking ... pace ... is ... hum... very ... ... slow. Also how come for a programming course the slides with code are so poorly formated??? | The course | Content | is good. But it needs some | Positive | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.63 | 0.71 |
| M9dntkEoEeWZtA4u62x6lQ | The course content is good. But it needs some polishing... Major comment: The assignment submission/review process should be improved. Grading system is not clearly defined at the time of submission. Some grading question are inherently subjective "Is the code at least somewhat efficient?". But even for inherently objective questions "Is the code correct?" (as does it give the correct answer" the staff does not provide the correct answer... I think the staff should create some automated review for what is objective: does the code compile? does it yield the correct answer? is it efficient enough? (Just like many other courses on Coursera) And only when it passes the automatic review, use peer grading for coding style. Finally there a lot of confusion with the deadlines. Minor comments: Lucky Coursera has an option to play twice faster! Not that the content is too easy, but the talking ... pace ... is ... hum... very ... ... slow. Also how come for a programming course the slides with code are so poorly formated??? | play twice faster! Not that the | Content | is too easy, but the talking | Negative | -0.6 | 0.0 | 0.63 | 0.71 |
| M9dntkEoEeWZtA4u62x6lQ | Very good course, the content is great and well organized. The slides with code are a bit of an embarrassment for the University of California. The code is presented on what looks like a power point slide with bullets so the formatting and alignment is totally messed up, and then there are no shortage of typo's and code errors. But, the material is very good and Ira Pohl does an excellent job presenting it. All in all a great course and exactly what I was looking for. | Very good course, the | Content | is great and well organized. The | Positive | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.63 | 0.71 |
| mG1NQnUvEeS8UyIACzYI5Q | Really enjoyable and with enough detailed information. I totally recommend this course to anyone interested in a good introduction to the field of astrobiology. Professor Cockell comunicates the contents clearly and makes you feel engaged. It was a wonderful learning experience. | of astrobiology. Professor Cockell comunicates the | Content | clearly and makes you feel engaged. | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.61 | 1.11 |
| mG1NQnUvEeS8UyIACzYI5Q | This course has been extremely helpful, captivating, and thoroughly enjoyable! I learned so much from this course, and it has only intensified my interest and curiosity for this field. PROS: -Oganization and structure of the content -Balanced in terms of duration, difficulty, etc. -Delivery of the instructor, who was very engaging and maintained interest throughout the course, and his personal interest and knowledge in this field was clearly evident. -The assignments were well weighted, relevant, and a good indicator of my understanding of the course content. CONS: -None! So thank you to the instructor, the institute, and everyone else involved in providing this wonderful course. I look forward to more in the future! | PROS: -Oganization and structure of the | Content | -Balanced in terms of duration, difficulty, | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.61 | 1.11 |
| mG1NQnUvEeS8UyIACzYI5Q | Great content and learning experience. Informative and enjoyable course, great lecture presentations and support materials. | Great | Content | and learning experience. Informative and enjoyable | Positive | 0.9 | 1.0 | 0.61 | 1.11 |
| mG1NQnUvEeS8UyIACzYI5Q | About the contents, I was expecting maybe less biological charge and a bit more about astronomy, but maybe that was my mistake. The teacher makes a great job, and I have been learning both astrobiology and English. About practicing English while studying another subject, I would like to appreciate the synchronizing of the subtitles, that were perfect. I totally recommend this course to anyone interesting in solar system, astronomy, biology and the search for extraterrestrial inteligence. | About the | Content | I was expecting maybe less biological | Negative | -0.7 | 0.5 | 0.61 | 1.11 |
| mG1NQnUvEeS8UyIACzYI5Q | I really enjoyed this course. I felt like some of the videos from the first week were a little too long, I preferred the shorter ones, and there was a mix up where the second week ended up being due before the first week which threw me off a little but the content itself was very interesting and I'm glad I took part in it. | me off a little but the | Content | itself was very interesting and I'm | Negative | -0.6 | 1.0 | 0.61 | 1.11 |
| mG1NQnUvEeS8UyIACzYI5Q | I already knew a little on this subject prior to completing the course but found the content and the delivery very interesting and engaging. Thank you for making this available. | completing the course but found the | Content | and the delivery very interesting and | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.61 | 1.11 |
| mGM6AmlPEeSdNiIACrbZkA | Solid content and a great foundation of different schools of thought on the topic. Interesting brain science that is fairly accessible even from someone who doesn't know much about the topic. Some lessons can be difficult to follow. | Solid | Content | and a great foundation of different | Positive | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.65 | 1.04 |
| mGM6AmlPEeSdNiIACrbZkA | Great lecturer, fascinating course content. Hoping for an intermediate program! | Great lecturer, fascinating course | Content | Hoping for an intermediate program! | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.65 | 1.04 |
| mGM6AmlPEeSdNiIACrbZkA | I have taken 3 weeks of this course already, and the content and rhythm of the course is excellent. I had read mainly about neuromarketing in the past, buy this introduction to neuroeconomics seems so far much more scientifically based than the commercial approach taken by most of neuromarketing experts. If you are looking for scientific evidence about the neuroscience behind decision making, take this course. The instructor’s Russian accent in English is a little disturbing at the beginning, but once you get used to it you just forget all about it and get immersed in this extremely exciting field. | of this course already, and the | Content | and rhythm of the course is | Negative | -0.6 | 1.0 | 0.65 | 1.04 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Exquisite course. A lot of content was covered quite thoroughly. | Exquisite course. A lot of | Content | was covered quite thoroughly. | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.42 | 1.13 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Good course content but it can be very difficult to get help if you are stuck on something. | Good course | Content | but it can be very difficult | Negative | -0.6 | 0.0 | 0.42 | 1.13 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Started a little slow, and it may seem repetitive if you see all videos from one week in one day, otherwise I feel it has a good pace.The content was interesting and well explained. | it has a good pace. The | Content | was interesting and well explained. | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.42 | 1.13 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Great content and very well instructions | Great | Content | and very well instructions | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.42 | 1.13 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | This course start from problems. So this great to motivate the content and let student know why. However, there are lot of confusion questions that lead to miss understand the exercise problems. | So this great to motivate the | Content | and let student know why. However, | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.42 | 1.13 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Really Nice contents! | Really Nice | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.42 | 1.13 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Course has covered regression in sufficient details and gave practical aspect of it. Thanks to Emily for very good content and teaching | Thanks to Emily for very good | Content | and teaching | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.42 | 1.13 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Exceptionally well organized, fun and full of useful content. Bravo to the course organizers! | organized, fun and full of useful | Content | Bravo to the course organizers! | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.42 | 1.13 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | I liked pretty much all of the content. The lectures are detailed. The assignments helped me understand the techniques used in regression. The step by step approach is great. What I dislike a bit is the promotion of proprietary and expensive Graphlab software. | liked pretty much all of the | Content | The lectures are detailed. The assignments | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.42 | 1.13 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Excellent, the materials and contents of this class are well organized, algorithms packed is for me to get started with Regression. | Excellent, the materials and | Content | of this class are well organized, | Positive | 0.9 | 1.0 | 0.42 | 1.13 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Can't praise enough! This IS THE COURSE for regression. Cannot believe I didn't stumble upon it earlier enough. Great Specialization, Great Course, Great Professors, Great thought provoking Quizzes and assignments, helpful mentors and more important that any of the above, amazing comprehensive content covering each and every topic from simple linear regression to feature selection and going all the way to kNN Regression. An enjoyable and great learning experience. Hope to carry on the same level of enthusiasm through the rest of the specialization. Thank You Emily, Carlos, Johan (mentor) and rest of my classmates. And of course, Thank You Coursera. | any of the above, amazing comprehensive | Content | covering each and every topic from | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.42 | 1.13 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | I saw a number of machine courses that are with too general contents and more like conference presentations. It's hard to learn and grasp something from them. However this is a real Machine Course that provides informative, appropriate details and derivations from which I can learn and understand the meaning and insights buried in math symbols and equations. No doubt, the optional video lectures are excellent enhanced "nutrition." Looking forward to the three courses in this specialization. Thanks, Profs. Emily Fox and Carlos Guestrin, for instructing such wonderful authentic courses. | courses that are with too general | Content | and more like conference presentations. It's | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.42 | 1.13 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | To start with, I have been dedicating time to improve my understanding and depth in statistics and calculus. The reason is that, I am totally impressed by the lecture videos. The videos are detail, precise and covers enough depth. It has helped me to correlate the statistical concepts and application areas and rekindled my interest to go back to learn and strengthen my basics. I like the contents that its not a overdose of many mathematical equations. Appreciate the pains taken by the expert professors in explaining every detail possible to make the course more interesting. Appreciate the mention about the topics not covered in the course. My suggestion is to include a seperate section for each course with a list of reference books, topics and weblinks of material to increase our depth and breadth of technical understanding of the statistical methods. Many Thanks to Emily Fox and Carles Guestrin for their time and efforts in making this specialization course, and of course providing us with the free license to use Dato for learning purposes. | strengthen my basics. I like the | Content | that its not a overdose of | Negative | -0.6 | 1.0 | 0.42 | 1.13 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | (Beta-Test review) Status: Still on the first week. The content is an easy follow, though it might seem to be a slight difficulty for those without a heavy background in calculus. So far, all the links (to the downloadable csv's and ipynb files) work well. All the videos have no apparent bugs and/or problems. I would also suggest to have the slides available for download as in the previous module. I don't think writing over the animation is a bad thing as long as it's still understandable. As an aside, I suggest editing out the swallowing sound you might occasionally hear whenever either instructor is speaking. To some, it seems a bit off-putting. Great course, overall. Thanks, Marvin | Still on the first week. The | Content | is an easy follow, though it | Positive | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.42 | 1.13 |
| myQGkjlZEeWJaxK5AT4frw | Really good professors Good content, well structured and presented | Really good professors Good | Content | well structured and presented | Positive | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.53 | 1.08 |
| myQGkjlZEeWJaxK5AT4frw | The course is well presented and the content is packed with information and great techniques to use in your work world and in everyday life. I really enjoyed the lectures and Scott DeRue, besides being a world leader in his field, is an engaging and personable speaker who brings the course to life. Despite the course being very engaging and worthwhile, I am dismayed that you cannot take the tests if you do not buy the certificate of completion option. I understand purchasing the Course Certificate and understand that it costs time and resources to put this course together. However, since the tests are scored by a computer, the developers are not doing any work for free if they allow test access and scoring to those who choose not to buy the certificate option. By barring the those people from taking the tests, the MOOC suddenly becomes not so open anymore. People often wonder how a process or a product gets from A to B where it goes from open access to access for a limited few. This, the little step of denying access to test taking in courses that purport to be open, is that first step. Once this take further hold, more and more course will become less and less open and the MOOC system becomes the MOC system of just being Massive Online Courses. Please maintain the spirit of the MOOC by allowing testing access to all learners, not just to those who pay for the certificate. Thank you. | course is well presented and the | Content | is packed with information and great | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.53 | 1.08 |
| myQGkjlZEeWJaxK5AT4frw | I heard about this course in a article on business insider. The in depth explanation provided as well as the related practical experiences makes it more interesting. Congratulations for the team for putting together such a good content . | for putting together such a good | Content | . | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.53 | 1.08 |
| myQGkjlZEeWJaxK5AT4frw | Low on actionable content. Was looking for some specific tactics to use, but even though the course syllabus refers to tactical information on influencing people, it lacked any specificity to make it useful. | Low on actionable | Content | Was looking for some specific tactics | Negative | -0.7 | -1.0 | 0.53 | 1.08 |
| myQGkjlZEeWJaxK5AT4frw | Great course! The course structure is clear and straightforward. The content is rich and also inspires me to think a lot. | structure is clear and straightforward. The | Content | is rich and also inspires me | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.53 | 1.08 |
| myQGkjlZEeWJaxK5AT4frw | Amazing Course! Great influential instructors. Very good training content! | Great influential instructors. Very good training | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.53 | 1.08 |
| myQGkjlZEeWJaxK5AT4frw | Good concepts, very useful tips shared in this course. I reduced 1 star because, it has very less illustrations. Interactions, live examples could have been added in the content. Especially the video background is not good. It matters because, it's distracting while listening the class. | could have been added in the | Content | Especially the video background is not | Negative | -0.6 | 0.0 | 0.53 | 1.08 |
| myQGkjlZEeWJaxK5AT4frw | Instructor was great, course content lucid. All in all an excellent offering. | Instructor was great, course | Content | lucid. All in all an excellent | Positive | 0.9 | 1.0 | 0.53 | 1.08 |
| myQGkjlZEeWJaxK5AT4frw | Really good and useful content. Instructors offer a lot of real life examples. I probably will pursue the whole specialization! | Really good and useful | Content | Instructors offer a lot of real | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.53 | 1.08 |
| myQGkjlZEeWJaxK5AT4frw | I find the course content useful and well structured, but I'd wish to hear more example for the different tactics. A few things remained unclear to me. Still I am satisfied with the course and would totally recommend it! Thank you Maxim Sytch and Scott DeRue! | I find the course | Content | useful and well structured, but I'd | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.53 | 1.08 |
| myQGkjlZEeWJaxK5AT4frw | At the risk of sounding like a jerk and I am TRULY sorry for saying this but only gave this course 4 stars instead of 5 because of one of the professors, not the actual content. I actually feel like this course was GREAT, I just couldnt deal with one of the professors constant sucking of teeth or whatever in the videos and dragging out of everything. Information got repeated in different ways making everything longer and boring where I literally just kept forwarding the lessons. Besides my "ADD" with that one professor, I will have to admit, I loved this course. | of the professors, not the actual | Content | I actually feel like this course | Negative | -0.6 | 0.5 | 0.53 | 1.08 |
| myQGkjlZEeWJaxK5AT4frw | Very good, the spelling is clear and easy to understand, even for who doesn't speak and/or listen in English and the content is awesome. | and/or listen in English and the | Content | is awesome. | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.53 | 1.08 |
| myQGkjlZEeWJaxK5AT4frw | Great insights, very useful contents. The assignments are a good addition to the lectures & quizzes - it makes it more interactive and "forces" you to think about the content more deeply and in relation to your own experiences. Geoffrey (The Netherlands) | Great insights, very useful | Content | The assignments are a good addition | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.53 | 1.08 |
| myQGkjlZEeWJaxK5AT4frw | Great insights, very useful contents. The assignments are a good addition to the lectures & quizzes - it makes it more interactive and "forces" you to think about the content more deeply and in relation to your own experiences. Geoffrey (The Netherlands) | forces" you to think about the | Content | more deeply and in relation to | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.53 | 1.08 |
| myQGkjlZEeWJaxK5AT4frw | A very engaging and informative course. The content was well laid out and easy to follow. I enjoyed the assignments and would recommend the course as professional development for anyone in a leadership position in a large organisation. I have already recommended to 6 colleagues who have enrolled in the course (I must have influenced them!) :) | very engaging and informative course. The | Content | was well laid out and easy | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.53 | 1.08 |
| myQGkjlZEeWJaxK5AT4frw | The only reason I give 3 stars is because there were no pdf documents of the lectures. Being able to check back notes fast is important and very helpful and I can't see why they are not given. Other than that the course content was very interesting and fascinating. Well done on that!! | given. Other than that the course | Content | was very interesting and fascinating. Well | Positive | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.53 | 1.08 |
| myQGkjlZEeWJaxK5AT4frw | Excellent content with examples. | Excellent | Content | with examples. | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.53 | 1.08 |
| myQGkjlZEeWJaxK5AT4frw | First course I took with Coursera and University of Michigan. The content was well organized and easy to navigate, the presenters were exceptionally articulate, the resources were ideal for the assignments. | Coursera and University of Michigan. The | Content | was well organized and easy to | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.53 | 1.08 |
| myQGkjlZEeWJaxK5AT4frw | This course is quite elaborate and the course content and lectures are quite effective. | is quite elaborate and the course | Content | and lectures are quite effective. | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.53 | 1.08 |
| myQGkjlZEeWJaxK5AT4frw | Most useful content is the list of factors that influence us behind the scenes in our minds. Would prefer to have more content of that nature presented, since the concepts of power and how to use those behind the scenes influences seem fairly basic in comparison. I appreciated the succinct presentation of the material, as well. Please make your graphics/slides available. | Most useful | Content | is the list of factors that | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.53 | 1.08 |
| myQGkjlZEeWJaxK5AT4frw | Most useful content is the list of factors that influence us behind the scenes in our minds. Would prefer to have more content of that nature presented, since the concepts of power and how to use those behind the scenes influences seem fairly basic in comparison. I appreciated the succinct presentation of the material, as well. Please make your graphics/slides available. | minds. Would prefer to have more | Content | of that nature presented, since the | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.53 | 1.08 |
| nA4RUW01EeW8nRIpKnwp7Q | Very well structured, good choice of content. All video lectures are engaging and you can feel a lot of though was put into making algorithms explanations both clear and concise. Many thanks to the lecturers. | Very well structured, good choice of | Content | All video lectures are engaging and | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.74 | 0.98 |
| nA4RUW01EeW8nRIpKnwp7Q | Really Useful Content. | Really Useful | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.74 | 0.98 |
| nA4RUW01EeW8nRIpKnwp7Q | Strong Points: -Course content is well-organized -Good assignments that enhance the understanding of concepts Weak Points: -Some of the presenters need to strengthen their presentation skills -Lectures slides aren't good enough | Strong Points: -Course | Content | is well-organized -Good assignments that enhance | Positive | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.74 | 0.98 |
| nA4RUW01EeW8nRIpKnwp7Q | Near the end it becomes a slosh to get through all the information covered in the last two weeks. It feels like you are given some hints and pointers on what to do, but for the most part, the last two weeks are being tossed in the deep end and hoping you learn how to swim. I want to give a 3.5 but that's not allowed. With the amount of content covered this course is closer to a 4 than a 3. | not allowed. With the amount of | Content | covered this course is closer to | Negative | -0.6 | 0.5 | 0.74 | 0.98 |
| nA4RUW01EeW8nRIpKnwp7Q | The content covered in this course is great. However, I hope there was a more efficient way to communicate with student. I hope there is a way to bring student together like a group chat function in the coursera app. So, people who want to be more committed can communicate more often and effcient. | The | Content | covered in this course is great. | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.74 | 0.98 |
| nA4RUW01EeW8nRIpKnwp7Q | First four weeks of the course were awesome,some exciting problems,insightful teaching but fifth week's content I felt were not up to the standards of first four weeks.Nonetheless it was great experience.Thank you instructors and course forum. | problems, insightful teaching but fifth week's | Content | I felt were not up to | Negative | -0.7 | 0.5 | 0.74 | 0.98 |
| nA4RUW01EeW8nRIpKnwp7Q | Very good content and great professors, I like the short duration of lectures and more emphasis on assignments.. | Very good | Content | and great professors, I like the | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.74 | 0.98 |
| nA4RUW01EeW8nRIpKnwp7Q | The course starts very promising, but it gets worse week after week, culminating on a barely understandable week about dynamic programming. That’s when I gave up and decided to write this review instead, with just one assignment missing to complete the course. Some of the teachers aren’t native english speakers, which is fine, but their english is very hard to understand. I found myself having to watch some portions of the videos over and over again in order to understand what was being said. I tried reading the transcripts instead, but the they’re even worse! It seems that they were automatically generated from the videos, thus suffering with the poor pronunciation. The teachers use mathematical sophistication that feels unnecessary, but to be fair, they do mention it on the FAQ as part of the necessary background. However, even though it’s an online course, they barely use any teaching method besides very raw slides, some dry mathematical proofs and someone speaking about the content. The only resources offered to help learning are a few open source visualizations. I expected much more. The only good aspect from this course are the assignment checkers, which allow you to write your solutions in multiple languages. I deeply regret the money and time I spent on this course. | proofs and someone speaking about the | Content | The only resources offered to help | Negative | -0.8 | -0.5 | 0.74 | 0.98 |
| nA4RUW01EeW8nRIpKnwp7Q | the content if very good, but lecturers are terrible. you better read slides and read any book you like. watching their videos it wast of time. | the | Content | if very good, but lecturers are | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.74 | 0.98 |
| NCNTU5w4EeWNCwqI4rnUgw | superb course with interesting contents | superb course with interesting | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.73 | 0.79 |
| NCNTU5w4EeWNCwqI4rnUgw | Please put more content. The content is very less. | Please put more | Content | The content is very less. | Negative | -0.6 | 0.0 | 0.73 | 0.79 |
| NCNTU5w4EeWNCwqI4rnUgw | Please put more content. The content is very less. | Please put more content. The | Content | is very less. | Negative | -0.6 | 0.0 | 0.73 | 0.79 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Amazing course with very useful contents and hands on. | Amazing course with very useful | Content | and hands on. | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.38 | 1.04 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Impressive and wonderful content. | Impressive and wonderful | Content | | Positive | 0.9 | 1.0 | 0.38 | 1.04 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | This is a solid course. The videos are a bit low quality, and the API's used are sorta derpy, but the content is good. | used are sorta derpy, but the | Content | is good. | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.38 | 1.04 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Good beginner content, touches on some good foundations for java | Good beginner | Content | touches on some good foundations for | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.38 | 1.04 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Considering the contents of the second and third course, this was too basic. | Considering the | Content | of the second and third course, | Negative | -0.6 | 0.0 | 0.38 | 1.04 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | really explicit and easy to follow up, nice preparation and nice content. | follow up, nice preparation and nice | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.38 | 1.04 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Excellent contents! | Excellent | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.38 | 1.04 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | A good practical overview of Java language with good exercises that emphasize the course contents. | good exercises that emphasize the course | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.38 | 1.04 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Just Completed 1 week , awesome content and lectures , best | Just Completed 1 week , awesome | Content | and lectures , best | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.38 | 1.04 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Well structured content and great explanation on concepts. I really like the concept challenge portion as it helps dig into the application of the concepts explained in the lecture. It would have been better if the lecture slides were available in pdfs. | Well structured | Content | and great explanation on concepts. I | Positive | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.38 | 1.04 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Excellent course with great content. The only problem is that there's a bit less administrative assistance in the discussion forums than perhaps preferable. Aside from that, this course was fun, and while some parts were strenuous, I enjoyed taking it! | Excellent course with great | Content | The only problem is that there's | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.38 | 1.04 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | I really liked the structure of the course, and also the course contents. | the course, and also the course | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.38 | 1.04 |
| ngZrURn5EeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | The direction of the content is correct. First node and then his wrapper Express. | The direction of the | Content | is correct. First node and then | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.78 | 0.83 |
| ngZrURn5EeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Great content and teaching! Thanks Professor Muppala! | Great | Content | and teaching! Thanks Professor Muppala! | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.78 | 0.83 |
| ngZrURn5EeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Great contents as the rest of the courses in the specialization. I'm afraid I need to be a little bit critical with this one though: 1) The contents are really jammed into 4 weeks - The last week's contents are actually some kind of miscellany between mongoose, https, authentication and BaaS 2) Not a single quiz or self-evaluation of sorts along the course - To be completely fair, the exercises shown along the way might make up for it. Still, I think it's important to spread some quizes around so as to make absorb the concepts more effectively 3) The quality of the presentations is somewhat lower than other courses. There's even a video towards the end of the course where a Linkedin notification springs up on top, which even makes the presenter pause for a few seconds. Don't get me wrong, I really enjoyed this course and definitely appreciate the effort put into it - Given the newly introduced Coursera fees, I'd expect much more quality in place to make it 70 buck-worth, though | Great | Content | as the rest of the courses | Positive | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.78 | 0.83 |
| ngZrURn5EeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Great contents as the rest of the courses in the specialization. I'm afraid I need to be a little bit critical with this one though: 1) The contents are really jammed into 4 weeks - The last week's contents are actually some kind of miscellany between mongoose, https, authentication and BaaS 2) Not a single quiz or self-evaluation of sorts along the course - To be completely fair, the exercises shown along the way might make up for it. Still, I think it's important to spread some quizes around so as to make absorb the concepts more effectively 3) The quality of the presentations is somewhat lower than other courses. There's even a video towards the end of the course where a Linkedin notification springs up on top, which even makes the presenter pause for a few seconds. Don't get me wrong, I really enjoyed this course and definitely appreciate the effort put into it - Given the newly introduced Coursera fees, I'd expect much more quality in place to make it 70 buck-worth, though | with this one though: 1) The | Content | are really jammed into 4 weeks | Negative | -0.7 | 0.0 | 0.78 | 0.83 |
| ngZrURn5EeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Great contents as the rest of the courses in the specialization. I'm afraid I need to be a little bit critical with this one though: 1) The contents are really jammed into 4 weeks - The last week's contents are actually some kind of miscellany between mongoose, https, authentication and BaaS 2) Not a single quiz or self-evaluation of sorts along the course - To be completely fair, the exercises shown along the way might make up for it. Still, I think it's important to spread some quizes around so as to make absorb the concepts more effectively 3) The quality of the presentations is somewhat lower than other courses. There's even a video towards the end of the course where a Linkedin notification springs up on top, which even makes the presenter pause for a few seconds. Don't get me wrong, I really enjoyed this course and definitely appreciate the effort put into it - Given the newly introduced Coursera fees, I'd expect much more quality in place to make it 70 buck-worth, though | 4 weeks - The last week's | Content | are actually some kind of miscellany | Negative | -0.7 | 0.0 | 0.78 | 0.83 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Nice introductory course. The speaker explains very well the content and is funny enough in order to catch our attention for the subject. | The speaker explains very well the | Content | and is funny enough in order | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.35 | 1.09 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | I like the way instructor teaches and content is also helpful. | like the way instructor teaches and | Content | is also helpful. | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.35 | 1.09 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | great content | great | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.35 | 1.09 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | I loved this course! Colleen made HTML accessible and enjoyable to learn - something I've been struggling to understand for a while. I highly recommend this course to anyone who has had either no exposure, or some exposure to HTML. It serves as a very solid foundation on which to build futher knowledge of the content. | to build futher knowledge of the | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.35 | 1.09 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | I would have given this course 5 stars if not for the final exam, which is to look at a jpeg and then write code to make a web page look exactly like the jpeg. The issue is that there are many ways to get a page to look like the image and you will still fail the exam. The course creators have realized this and you now have supporting questions that you can pass the course on even if your page code is not validated as correct. In my opinion there are so many better ways this final exam could have been handled, for instance i would have like to have seen a few more questions in the exam, and once passed you could see a forum area open up for us all to paste our code in or link to a page where we could discuss with teachers and moderators etc. personally I believe that sort of approach would add more value. The above being said the content of the course is excellent for beginners with an eye opening focus on accessibility and good content on the DOM structure. The course will provide you with a good set of tools to get a basic page up on the internet. | value. The above being said the | Content | of the course is excellent for | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.35 | 1.09 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | I would have given this course 5 stars if not for the final exam, which is to look at a jpeg and then write code to make a web page look exactly like the jpeg. The issue is that there are many ways to get a page to look like the image and you will still fail the exam. The course creators have realized this and you now have supporting questions that you can pass the course on even if your page code is not validated as correct. In my opinion there are so many better ways this final exam could have been handled, for instance i would have like to have seen a few more questions in the exam, and once passed you could see a forum area open up for us all to paste our code in or link to a page where we could discuss with teachers and moderators etc. personally I believe that sort of approach would add more value. The above being said the content of the course is excellent for beginners with an eye opening focus on accessibility and good content on the DOM structure. The course will provide you with a good set of tools to get a basic page up on the internet. | opening focus on accessibility and good | Content | on the DOM structure. The course | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.35 | 1.09 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Excellent course for beginners, with a very well structured content and an awesome instructor. | beginners, with a very well structured | Content | and an awesome instructor. | Positive | 0.9 | 1.0 | 0.35 | 1.09 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Really basic course, great for everyone who haven't seen or written any code in their whole life. Teacher is surely likeable and content is easy to follow even during busy, full of work week. It teaches mostly about tags and how to put them together in proper way. I really liked constant reminders about accessibility, that definitely helps with making good habits. | life. Teacher is surely likeable and | Content | is easy to follow even during | Positive | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.35 | 1.09 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Very helpful for absolutely beginners. The content is well-organized and materials are carefully picked to provide concise, easy-to-read information for learners. Lectures are clear, well presented, just-right informative; accompanied by the great public speaking skill of the instructor, they are hence not intimidating or boring at all. Another plus point is the instructor constantly urging learners to go beyond "the passing point" and learn more on their own, which is a very key mindset to keep up with the fast, ever-changing landscape of Information Technologies. Don't feel lost or scared, since she'll provide you with great resources for further learning and references! | Very helpful for absolutely beginners. The | Content | is well-organized and materials are carefully | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.35 | 1.09 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | This is an excellent course. This is worth your time and money. I highly recommend it to anyone who is interested in learning to make websites. The instructor is great and the content is of high quality. | The instructor is great and the | Content | is of high quality. | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.35 | 1.09 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | I'd give it a 3.5, but it's not possible so I'm leaning more towards a 4 than a 3. The most positive thing about the course was Prof. van Lent who really knows her stuff. She also has a calm, soothing manner of explaining things and moves with it at the right pace. The content was easy to follow and quizzes were useful. Final assignment was messed up and they really should fix that, but the additional eight questions were basically a transcript of the code itself, and if you did your own code, you shouldn't have had any problem distinguishing the bad code from the good one. Extra stuff for those who successfully finished the course was a nice touch. The real downside of it all was the 'staff'. I got my question answered nine days after I posted it, when I had already finished. I've also seen some rude and condescending yet sparse answers to other students. Similar (but worse) things happen in CSS3 course as well. I don't know who those people are and how they got their jobs, but they should be replaced. Or sent to professional conduct and time management class. | it at the right pace. The | Content | was easy to follow and quizzes | Positive | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.35 | 1.09 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Excellent intro to HTML. Colleen van Lent is awesome. I really enjoy her teaching style. The content is clear and interesting. | really enjoy her teaching style. The | Content | is clear and interesting. | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.35 | 1.09 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Excellent course content and pace of the lectures. | Excellent course | Content | and pace of the lectures. | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.35 | 1.09 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Good lecturer and presentation. Some additional contents and details would be good, but this was a good start into HTML5 | Good lecturer and presentation. Some additional | Content | and details would be good, but | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.35 | 1.09 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Five stars for emphasis on accessibility, explanation and detail of semantic elements. Three stars for course content testing prior to publication and for omission of Linux. I use sftp on a command-line interface and did not learn in this course how to use mput for putting multiple HTML files and web assets onto my live site. There is no hyphen in "meta-data", nor are there two hyphens in "local area network. | semantic elements. Three stars for course | Content | testing prior to publication and for | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.35 | 1.09 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Great intro to the content! | Great intro to the | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.35 | 1.09 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Colleen is a great instructor and her slides work with well the content. Very helpful way to get a beginning | her slides work with well the | Content | Very helpful way to get a | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.35 | 1.09 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | I have finished this course and it has great content. Almost all HTML5 Elements are explained well. It is great for beginners. | this course and it has great | Content | Almost all HTML5 Elements are explained | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.35 | 1.09 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Very Good Course and contents. Colleen has explained every concept very deeply and descriptively. I have enjoyed the learning. | Very Good Course and | Content | Colleen has explained every concept very | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.35 | 1.09 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | It is a great course and the instructor has such a great way to teach that it's very easy to understand the content. Theres is only one thing left... more excercises. | it's very easy to understand the | Content | Theres is only one thing left. | Negative | -0.6 | 0.5 | 0.35 | 1.09 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | great professor and content is easy. | great professor and | Content | is easy. | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.35 | 1.09 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | The class was good. The instructor is great and she is very knowledgeable. I just wish there were more content in the class. | I just wish there were more | Content | in the class. | Negative | -0.6 | 0.0 | 0.35 | 1.09 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | The course content was presented at steady pace and the videos were clear and direct. However, the auto-grader was really confusing for the final project. | The course | Content | was presented at steady pace and | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.35 | 1.09 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Amazing course! The instructor presents the contents in a very easy to follow way. | Amazing course! The instructor presents the | Content | in a very easy to follow | Positive | 0.9 | 1.0 | 0.35 | 1.09 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | This is a very "pediatric" way to learn HTML basics and how to get started on your developer career. Both content and examples are pretty straight forward. Evaluation system should be reviewed and interaction with teacher, other than blog, should be open when there's an issue/question with specific questions. | started on your developer career. Both | Content | and examples are pretty straight forward. | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.35 | 1.09 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Excellent class. Video lectures are very accessible and good content. The automatic parser is a pain, and can be improved. I spent a lot of time to get code that was working and giving the correct output to pass the tests. | lectures are very accessible and good | Content | The automatic parser is a pain, | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.35 | 1.09 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Easy to follow, well explained content with a very nice lecturer. | Easy to follow, well explained | Content | with a very nice lecturer. | Positive | 0.9 | 1.0 | 0.35 | 1.09 |
| OmgIw0C2EeWZtA4u62x6lQ | content is not good, too scattered content, cannot find focus. assignments are meaningless. | | Content | is not good, too scattered content, | Negative | -0.6 | -1.0 | 1.09 | 1.13 |
| OmgIw0C2EeWZtA4u62x6lQ | content is not good, too scattered content, cannot find focus. assignments are meaningless. | content is not good, too scattered | Content | cannot find focus. assignments are meaningless. | Negative | -0.7 | -1.0 | 1.09 | 1.13 |
| OmgIw0C2EeWZtA4u62x6lQ | I found this course to be excellent. I really enjoyed the content and learned so very much. My only criticism is not of the course content but simply the nature of the course. I am currently working full time and doing a Masters degree part time, and I did this on top of that, so I found the work load to be exceptionally heavy. Not a problem for someone who isn't working though. Superb course - thank you. | be excellent. I really enjoyed the | Content | and learned so very much. My | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 1.09 | 1.13 |
| OmgIw0C2EeWZtA4u62x6lQ | Very enthusiastic lecturer, which made learning that much more enjoyable! The course content is fantastic. My only comment is the grading system for the assignments / how the assignments are designed - in my opinion the grading system could be improved to reflect efforts and correct submission done by students. | that much more enjoyable! The course | Content | is fantastic. My only comment is | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 1.09 | 1.13 |
| OmgIw0C2EeWZtA4u62x6lQ | The content and material were really good, interesting and challenging. I wanted to thank you very much for this really great introductory course. | The | Content | and material were really good, interesting | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 1.09 | 1.13 |
| opCIcU3SEeWeiwqPB940Pw | Great content, very relevant to business problems | Great | Content | very relevant to business problems | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.46 | 1.0 |
| opCIcU3SEeWeiwqPB940Pw | Very helpful, very professional staff and content. | Very helpful, very professional staff and | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.46 | 1.0 |
| opCIcU3SEeWeiwqPB940Pw | A very well laid out structured learning program. Course pace & content is great & triggers enough thinking during the course assignment. I recommend the course to all those who want to bring in structure to thinking & innovation | structured learning program. Course pace & | Content | is great & triggers enough thinking | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.46 | 1.0 |
| opCIcU3SEeWeiwqPB940Pw | I can't say I really enjoyed this 5 week course. The flow itself was more like "food for thought" where a bunch of ideas are presented as sort of an intellectual gymnastics exercise with no point really. By week 5 you are just plain bored. The content wasn't concise enough. It could have easily been a 4 week course or even shorter had they not tried to belabor each topic. It all was too high level and never really got down enough to earth. I have done other courses on the same topic which were better put together. | you are just plain bored. The | Content | wasn't concise enough. It could have | Negative | -0.7 | -0.5 | 0.46 | 1.0 |
| opCIcU3SEeWeiwqPB940Pw | Interesting approach, content & delivery. Sound examples & study material. | Interesting approach, | Content | & delivery. Sound examples & study | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.46 | 1.0 |
| opCIcU3SEeWeiwqPB940Pw | Very good introduction to design thinking. Provides some useful tools that I have already used in my personal and professional projects and will continue to use in the future. Every video lesson was well done and tied the overall theme into the content well. Highly recommended! | tied the overall theme into the | Content | well. Highly recommended! | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.46 | 1.0 |
| opCIcU3SEeWeiwqPB940Pw | One of the best courses I have ever attended. I am really impressed with the presentation of the content and the creativity of delivering the ideas. I have purchased the book "GROWTH" from Amazon, to add on what I've already learned in a deeper manner. Thank you, Thuraya Al Souli | impressed with the presentation of the | Content | and the creativity of delivering the | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.46 | 1.0 |
| opCIcU3SEeWeiwqPB940Pw | I found the course useful as an overview into the process of design thinking. The content was delivered in an engaging manner and the examples and case studies were memorable. | the process of design thinking. The | Content | was delivered in an engaging manner | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.46 | 1.0 |
| opCIcU3SEeWeiwqPB940Pw | Content is fairly good with weak story line and connection across the various modules. Also the lack of in session quiz modules or weekly quiz module to re-inforce learning is disappointing. It's also possible that i was expecting a lot from a course on design thinking and what it turned out to be was just a scratching of the surface of what the definition of Design Thinking is all about. Having read numerous books on Lean Thinking, Agile development, Minimum Viable Propositions, etc. I was really expecting a solid rigorous approach to the world of design thinking. This course let me down and I just managed to scrape through at the end...almost gave up. | | Content | is fairly good with weak story | Positive | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.46 | 1.0 |
| opCIcU3SEeWeiwqPB940Pw | Great content! | Great | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.46 | 1.0 |
| opCIcU3SEeWeiwqPB940Pw | One of the best courses I have taken from Coursera. The professor and the team involved in this course are great. Highly value added content. | course are great. Highly value added | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.46 | 1.0 |
| opCIcU3SEeWeiwqPB940Pw | Great content and instructors! | Great | Content | and instructors! | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.46 | 1.0 |
| opCIcU3SEeWeiwqPB940Pw | A very interesting course, with lots of good content. I am excited to learn more now about design thinking. The video featuring Dr. Hess was hilarious! I would love to take a course with him! | interesting course, with lots of good | Content | I am excited to learn more | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.46 | 1.0 |
| opCIcU3SEeWeiwqPB940Pw | The course is pretty uneventful. I have done some courses from other universities, which are more interactive and fun. But the content is great! | more interactive and fun. But the | Content | is great! | Positive | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.46 | 1.0 |
| oZwETNccEeSV9iIAC0wBBw | The explanations and the topics covered are very much useful for the professionals to implement in the day to day work.Thanks for such a wonderful contents. | work. Thanks for such a wonderful | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.74 | 1.01 |
| oZwETNccEeSV9iIAC0wBBw | Good and practical course with very applicable content. | and practical course with very applicable | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.74 | 1.01 |
| oZwETNccEeSV9iIAC0wBBw | I learned a lot with this course, but there are not so many exercises for students to train the content learned. The lectures are very good. | exercises for students to train the | Content | learned. The lectures are very good. | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.74 | 1.01 |
| oZwETNccEeSV9iIAC0wBBw | Besides the course free fee, the content is meaningful and worth studying. Thanks. | Besides the course free fee, the | Content | is meaningful and worth studying. Thanks. | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.74 | 1.01 |
| oZwETNccEeSV9iIAC0wBBw | Excellent content, as it is concise and clear. | Excellent | Content | as it is concise and clear. | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.74 | 1.01 |
| oZwETNccEeSV9iIAC0wBBw | Poor content. Clearly filler material for the specialization. :) | Poor | Content | Clearly filler material for the specialization. | Negative | -0.8 | -1.0 | 0.74 | 1.01 |
| oZwETNccEeSV9iIAC0wBBw | The course was very short and very basic. I do not think it is fair to call it "High-Impact Business Writing" when all you get is an introduction to business writing. It would be nice to have a more extensive course on this subject. I would retake it if it was improved. My rating reflects the lack of high-quality content with more examples. | rating reflects the lack of high-quality | Content | with more examples. | Negative | -0.6 | 0.0 | 0.74 | 1.01 |
| oZwETNccEeSV9iIAC0wBBw | Some lessons were a bit obvious, but lots of good content overall. | bit obvious, but lots of good | Content | overall. | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.74 | 1.01 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | After also learning R from a non-Coursera MOOC, I find this Coursera course clunky and distractingly esoteric. Coursera occasionally crashes when attempting to parse or record the Python code that I've written, when that code runs fine on a regular IDE. This course in particular also includes lots of optional content that is either unnecessary (The Best Taco in the World video, for example) or for which it is unclear how to apply to Python (An interview with the inventor of JQuery, for example). Additionally, the instructor often assigns variable names that don't explain what the variable represents, which makes the videos a bit harder to follow than necessary. Despite all of this, I have learned a lot from this course. | particular also includes lots of optional | Content | that is either unnecessary (The Best | Positive | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | The course is an introduction to the absolute basics of python. Programming assignments are not very challenging and the course could benefit by adding more content and challenging tasks for those who wish to challenge themselves. | course could benefit by adding more | Content | and challenging tasks for those who | Positive | 0.7 | -0.5 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | This second Python course included more complex assignments and much more interesting content than the first part of it. I strongly recommend it for those, who interested in computer programming! | complex assignments and much more interesting | Content | than the first part of it. | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | I rated this class 5/5 because the instruction, content, resources, and pacing are all excellent, and this course is true to its description. Highly recommended for anyone who has taken Python for Everybody (Getting Started in Python). These two courses are a best match for someone learning their first programming language. Learning with Professor Severance is fun, in bite-sized pieces, and with just enough challenge to keep you engaged and moving forward without getting discouraged. Professor Severance has mastered teaching programming at scale. Thank you! | this class 5/5 because the instruction, | Content | resources, and pacing are all excellent, | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Engaging, simplified content (easy to understand concepts and functions) | Engaging, simplified | Content | (easy to understand concepts and functions) | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Excellent pace and great course material. I like having both the videos and slides to refer to, as it allows me to continue studying in environments where I can't play a video. The content turned out to be unexpectedly useful in my work, too. | I can't play a video. The | Content | turned out to be unexpectedly useful | Negative | -0.7 | 1.0 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | still. easy assignment... gives five star because the instructor did a very clear explanation and course content is well organized | a very clear explanation and course | Content | is well organized | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Way too expensive for its contents | Way too expensive for its | Content | | Negative | -0.7 | 0.0 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | I really like the course content and the instructor is nice | I really like the course | Content | and the instructor is nice | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Excellent content and teacher. | Excellent | Content | and teacher. | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Thanks for your teaching!!! This content includes basic python concept, syntax and excises which are batter for beginner. | for your teaching! ! ! This | Content | includes basic python concept, syntax and | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | The professor is particularly good at explaining. He builds from previous lessons and it's easy to get an understanding of the topic. The pace and content are just right. | of the topic. The pace and | Content | are just right. | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Excellent lecturer! Excellent content! | Excellent lecturer! Excellent | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | The pace of this course & the course content, along with the Creative Commons material is fabulous for anyone who has no prior experience in programming. Prof. Severance is great at what he does, and the assignments are also brilliant. I wished there were more peer review assignments or more assignments so that we could practice more. | of this course & the course | Content | along with the Creative Commons material | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Excellent content and well paced | Excellent | Content | and well paced | Positive | 0.9 | 1.0 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | great content, but a little short... would love to meed Dr. Chuck in person ! =) | great | Content | but a little short. . . | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Phenomenal course! love the pace, the content, the structure and the delivery. Truly outstanding. | Phenomenal course! love the pace, the | Content | the structure and the delivery. Truly | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Great course, step-by-step learning. Content is easy to understand and well explained. Videos provide further explanation, if required. If you want to learn Python by yourself, get enrolled now! | Great course, step-by-step learning. | Content | is easy to understand and well | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | fun content and easy to learn. The difficulty of the assignment is in the right ratio, I like it a lot. | fun | Content | and easy to learn. The difficulty | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Very good, well structured and explained. I loved the course and its content. I recommend it for who wants to learn Python. | I loved the course and its | Content | I recommend it for who wants | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Good content with a nice bit of character and playfulness from the professor. Be prepared to find your own ways to practice and solidify the skill, though. | Good | Content | with a nice bit of character | Positive | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Awesome Professor and great content! | Awesome Professor and great | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Wonderful course. Interesting professor. Useful content. | Wonderful course. Interesting professor. Useful | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | The contents are easy to understand and learn, many thanks! | The | Content | are easy to understand and learn, | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Great course with well structured content and great delivery style | Great course with well structured | Content | and great delivery style | Positive | 0.9 | 1.0 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | This is one of the best online course I ever had.The course content is top notch .The assignments are at very good standards.I strongly recommend | course I ever had. The course | Content | is top notch . The assignments | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Great content for starters!! Slides are easy to follow. Lectures are never boring mainly due to the witty professor!! Love this course!! | Great | Content | for starters! ! Slides are easy | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | great content, thanks | great | Content | thanks | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | The class was great! The professor is excellent. He does a great job of explaining the material, and he's fun to listen to. He also sprinkles the course with interesting related content. It was a great experience. | sprinkles the course with interesting related | Content | It was a great experience. | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | The faculty is really cool and has an excellent way of explaining concepts. Content is also practical and useful. I am enjoying the course very much. | an excellent way of explaining concepts. | Content | is also practical and useful. I | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Continuing with part 2 of the specialization, this course was as good and interesting as the first one. Dr. Chuck knows how to lay the fundamentals of progamming in an understandable and easy way to digest the content. The best part is that you get time to practice and resolve by yourself each problem finding your own strengths and weakness and work into improve your skills. | and easy way to digest the | Content | The best part is that you | Positive | 0.9 | 1.0 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Prof. Chuck - Shout from India, you are super awesome. Course content and your teaching style...... and like you say...yati yata | India, you are super awesome. Course | Content | and your teaching style. . . | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | I think the lectures were excellent, containing plenty of content and a periodic sprinkling of humour. I have programmed in Python for a couple of years but this course taught me some neat techniques I hadn't previously encountered. I hope I can cope with the next part and am looking forward to the chapter on regular expressions. | lectures were excellent, containing plenty of | Content | and a periodic sprinkling of humour. | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Awesome class, really enjoyed the content! | Awesome class, really enjoyed the | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Great content and pacing, loves the P's and C's from the ceremony speech :) | Great | Content | and pacing, loves the P's and | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| PeZYFz-zEeWB_AoW1KYI4Q | I believe the quality of the course is above average. But I have to admit that it can hardly be called a great course, in that the content of the course seems to be loose, inconsistent and sorta unorganized. Martin is no wonder one of the greatest computer scientists in the world, but there is still a long way to go before his course can match his ability as computer scientist. Many thanks for Martin anyway for his great contribution to the world, hope your course will keep growing as Scala does! | a great course, in that the | Content | of the course seems to be | Positive | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 0.85 |
| PeZYFz-zEeWB_AoW1KYI4Q | The content is interesting, however, Reactive looks not maintained in Scala anymore, ScalaCheck assignment looks to have nothing to do with the course content of the week, Future part took large amount of a week but no relevant assignment. Because the "Functional Programming Principles in Scala" was such a great and well organized course, it can bring disappointment, because the expectation was set so high by the "principle" one. | nothing to do with the course | Content | of the week, Future part took | Negative | -0.6 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 0.85 |
| PeZYFz-zEeWB_AoW1KYI4Q | The course was still useful and with new information but I really found it lacking cohesion with the overall specialization and with its own content. | overall specialization and with its own | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | -0.5 | 0.8 | 0.85 |
| PeZYFz-zEeWB_AoW1KYI4Q | Several courses have been combined. Content is not updated. Now is 2016. | Several courses have been combined. | Content | is not updated. Now is 2016. | Negative | -0.7 | -0.5 | 0.8 | 0.85 |
| PeZYFz-zEeWB_AoW1KYI4Q | Really enjoyed this course. Having had experience in functional reactive programming, the content wasn't overly in depth but it helped cement understanding of how functional patterns can be used in place of OO ones, as well as further the knowledge of Scala gained in the first course. The content on streams and futures was particularly helpful for me. | experience in functional reactive programming, the | Content | wasn't overly in depth but it | Negative | -0.6 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 0.85 |
| PeZYFz-zEeWB_AoW1KYI4Q | Really enjoyed this course. Having had experience in functional reactive programming, the content wasn't overly in depth but it helped cement understanding of how functional patterns can be used in place of OO ones, as well as further the knowledge of Scala gained in the first course. The content on streams and futures was particularly helpful for me. | gained in the first course. The | Content | on streams and futures was particularly | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 0.85 |
| PeZYFz-zEeWB_AoW1KYI4Q | This course is a re-hash of both the excellent "Functional Programming Principles in Scala" and the mediocre "Principles of Reactive Programming in Scala". Unfortunately, in quality it's closer to the latter: mixed quality, lectures that seem unrelated to their corresponding assignments, many errors (both typos and, more seriously, examples that don't type-check!) and a general lack of an in-depth motivation for the principles. Staff participation in my run of the course (2016) was disappointingly low; in some cases there was no response at all to students pointing out glaring errors in the lectures. It's very noticeable that this course is a patchwork of previous courses. In same cases the video lectures even display the wrong title for the course, or mention lectures that no longer exist in this version of the course! The course has interesting parts (I was especially thrilled when I saw there were lectures about FRP), but its quality is way below "Functional Programming Principles in Scala". I'm disappointed. To make this review constructive, my recommendations: 1- Pay attention to quality. Make sure all examples compile and type-check. 2- Make sure you're not repeating content already in other courses, especially if they are part of the same specialization! 3- If you're going to re-use content from other contents, make sure it fits the current course. Do not mention lectures not in the course. | 2- Make sure you're not repeating | Content | already in other courses, especially if | Positive | 0.6 | -0.5 | 0.8 | 0.85 |
| PeZYFz-zEeWB_AoW1KYI4Q | This course is a re-hash of both the excellent "Functional Programming Principles in Scala" and the mediocre "Principles of Reactive Programming in Scala". Unfortunately, in quality it's closer to the latter: mixed quality, lectures that seem unrelated to their corresponding assignments, many errors (both typos and, more seriously, examples that don't type-check!) and a general lack of an in-depth motivation for the principles. Staff participation in my run of the course (2016) was disappointingly low; in some cases there was no response at all to students pointing out glaring errors in the lectures. It's very noticeable that this course is a patchwork of previous courses. In same cases the video lectures even display the wrong title for the course, or mention lectures that no longer exist in this version of the course! The course has interesting parts (I was especially thrilled when I saw there were lectures about FRP), but its quality is way below "Functional Programming Principles in Scala". I'm disappointed. To make this review constructive, my recommendations: 1- Pay attention to quality. Make sure all examples compile and type-check. 2- Make sure you're not repeating content already in other courses, especially if they are part of the same specialization! 3- If you're going to re-use content from other contents, make sure it fits the current course. Do not mention lectures not in the course. | 3- If you're going to re-use | Content | from other contents, make sure it | Positive | 0.6 | -0.5 | 0.8 | 0.85 |
| PeZYFz-zEeWB_AoW1KYI4Q | This course is a re-hash of both the excellent "Functional Programming Principles in Scala" and the mediocre "Principles of Reactive Programming in Scala". Unfortunately, in quality it's closer to the latter: mixed quality, lectures that seem unrelated to their corresponding assignments, many errors (both typos and, more seriously, examples that don't type-check!) and a general lack of an in-depth motivation for the principles. Staff participation in my run of the course (2016) was disappointingly low; in some cases there was no response at all to students pointing out glaring errors in the lectures. It's very noticeable that this course is a patchwork of previous courses. In same cases the video lectures even display the wrong title for the course, or mention lectures that no longer exist in this version of the course! The course has interesting parts (I was especially thrilled when I saw there were lectures about FRP), but its quality is way below "Functional Programming Principles in Scala". I'm disappointed. To make this review constructive, my recommendations: 1- Pay attention to quality. Make sure all examples compile and type-check. 2- Make sure you're not repeating content already in other courses, especially if they are part of the same specialization! 3- If you're going to re-use content from other contents, make sure it fits the current course. Do not mention lectures not in the course. | going to re-use content from other | Content | make sure it fits the current | Positive | 0.6 | -0.5 | 0.8 | 0.85 |
| PeZYFz-zEeWB_AoW1KYI4Q | The content is excellent (as always), however the form leaves a bit to be desired. The video quality kept reverting to "low", and even on "high", the resolution was nothing to be proud of in 2016 (or at any time during this century). Also, the instructors appeared to make references to lectures that are not a part of this edition of the course. But these are small issues – the course is definitely worth taking, small imperfections or not. | The | Content | is excellent (as always), however the | Positive | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 0.85 |
| PeZYFz-zEeWB_AoW1KYI4Q | A bit lost sometimes. The course was remodeled after previous ones obviously and it seems a little chaotic sometimes. Not sure to get all the message that was intended to be passed. Sometimes the exercice are way simpler than the session contents. Still I've enjoyed (almost) every moment of the course and I am eager to go on! Thanks! | are way simpler than the session | Content | Still I've enjoyed (almost) every moment | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 0.85 |
| PeZYFz-zEeWB_AoW1KYI4Q | Maybe an unfair comparison but I am comparing this with the principles of reactive programming. That had much more contents such as actors, etc. Having said that this is a good course by itself. | reactive programming. That had much more | Content | such as actors, etc. Having said | Negative | -0.6 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 0.85 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | Great content | Great | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.44 | 0.96 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | great course content | great course | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.44 | 0.96 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | I think should be more lessons with less time, like the first modules. But the content is great! | like the first modules. But the | Content | is great! | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.44 | 0.96 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | Nice Instructor and course content... Loved doing this course. | Nice Instructor and course | Content | . . Loved doing this course. | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.44 | 0.96 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | No enthusiasm to hold attention but good content | enthusiasm to hold attention but good | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.44 | 0.96 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | Course with good content and overview of project management, albeit being a bit too simplistic. | Course with good | Content | and overview of project management, albeit | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.44 | 0.96 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | It`s great course , content many information and great Doctor | It`s great course , | Content | many information and great Doctor | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.44 | 0.96 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | Great course. I would have distributed more consistently the content through the weeks, as week four had significantly more than the other three. | would have distributed more consistently the | Content | through the weeks, as week four | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.44 | 0.96 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | It has very good content, specially if you are looking for basic concepts, you can find those here, although it doesn't go deeply on them, gives you what you need to get started, it's a fast pace so you have to keep up, and use of side materials/web to complement the course. | It has very good | Content | specially if you are looking for | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.44 | 0.96 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | Good content | Good | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.44 | 0.96 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | Nice approach, needed more organized content! | Nice approach, needed more organized | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.44 | 0.96 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | This is a great introduction to Project Management, clear language and examples with PMI concepts and definitions. I would just improve the slides PDF files, there is no need to put one slide for each action, if there is a list, each element of the list generates a new slide. Anyway content is great. Thanks a lot! | list generates a new slide. Anyway | Content | is great. Thanks a lot! | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.44 | 0.96 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | An amazing introductory course that clearly teaches you the project management principles. I came out feeling that it gave me great building blocks to put on practice at work straight away. On top of the contents, the concrete and amusing ways of the instructor make this course a must for anyone. | straight away. On top of the | Content | the concrete and amusing ways of | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.44 | 0.96 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | Good and very practical content ready to be applied. | Good and very practical | Content | ready to be applied. | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.44 | 0.96 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | Instructor seems uninterested or bored. Sometimes he only reads the slides without adding anything else to the content. Others, he goes quickly through a slide without any time to digest the information. Overall, intro level concepts are ok, but specifics about creation or handling of tools is left without deeper explanation | without adding anything else to the | Content | Others, he goes quickly through a | Negative | -0.6 | -1.0 | 0.44 | 0.96 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | Prof Rob Stone is a very good speaker and has made the videos very informative. The content is very small, which is good because it makes the course very lean, but bad because it merely scratches the surface of project management world. | made the videos very informative. The | Content | is very small, which is good | Positive | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.44 | 0.96 |
| q6P-8ed8EeSglCIACzUL2A | Excellent course! Dr. Shelton is an excellent instructor and the content is very insightful. | is an excellent instructor and the | Content | is very insightful. | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.85 | 1.09 |
| q6P-8ed8EeSglCIACzUL2A | Good if you want to fall asleep. The content is probably interesting, but they would have some use of advice from the entertaining industry. | you want to fall asleep. The | Content | is probably interesting, but they would | Negative | -0.6 | -1.0 | 0.85 | 1.09 |
| q6P-8ed8EeSglCIACzUL2A | The course content is very well organized. Every aspect of the topic has been covered with emphasis on the important factors. | The course | Content | is very well organized. Every aspect | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.85 | 1.09 |
| q6P-8ed8EeSglCIACzUL2A | Got good understanding about energy demand, supply and its independence. Good content and lecture. | demand, supply and its independence. Good | Content | and lecture. | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.85 | 1.09 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | I absolutely loved the course and the content! | absolutely loved the course and the | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.38 | 1.11 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | I'm absolutely loving this course! Prof Raj's presence just cheers me up..he's so bubbly and positive! The content is really excellent. Great to have all of this information in one place. I'm really enjoying the exercises too, thank you so much! | he's so bubbly and positive! The | Content | is really excellent. Great to have | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.38 | 1.11 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | I have enjoyed this class so much - it has given me skills to be a happier person! can a person ask for anything more than that? the professor and course content was awesome! well done! | than that? the professor and course | Content | was awesome! well done! | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.38 | 1.11 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | Rich, great and intense course. Be aware of the implication of the students before enrolling in order to be stressed about the exercice that need you to work / think of it every week. Thank you for the content which is really rich. | every week. Thank you for the | Content | which is really rich. | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.38 | 1.11 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | Good contents. Interactive. Useful for life. | Good | Content | Interactive. Useful for life. | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.38 | 1.11 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | Thank you so much for offering this class on Coursera. I like the professor's teaching style and the class content very much. | professor's teaching style and the class | Content | very much. | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.38 | 1.11 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | Great course, really tied in nicely with all the stuff I have been learning about mindfulness. Loved the presentation style and content. | mindfulness. Loved the presentation style and | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.38 | 1.11 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | Excellent course content, a little longwinded on the videos, and therefore more diffuse than it needs to be, however a hugely important topic, and presented multidimensionally in a way that draws in the latest research as well as ancient wisdom . The happiness framework gives a clearcut way of action-ing Happiness hacks into ones life. Even the apparently simple task of Defining Happiness makes it clear how we are unclear & confused about happiness, to the extent that we keep measuring the wrong metrics. Ones that could never result in happiness! | Excellent course | Content | a little longwinded on the videos, | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.38 | 1.11 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | This is a wonderful course that teaches us much needed strategies to mitigate our problems(or view of) and learn tactics and habits that will help us lead a happier life. Some of the content feels like its basic, but its a much needed reminder. I appreciated the expertise interviews that are incorporated into this course. There is important science behind the concept of being happy and you learn it here. Professor Raj has an optimistic style of teaching and it brightens the course work and mood within the course. I would take it again. | a happier life. Some of the | Content | feels like its basic, but its | Negative | -0.6 | 1.0 | 0.38 | 1.11 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | The content of the course was actually very helpful, but the way the assignments are made took all my motivation away. They use an external tool where one has to enter the information for the assigments, at the end you get a PDF and then you have to copy paste that again into Coursera. The emails are often confusing and some assignements require you to do something each day for seven days in a row, but don't really warn you about that anywhere. So when you think that you have 3 days left to meet the deadline ... wrong, you should've started 4 days ago. This in combination with the ridiculously detailed instruction videos, which consist to 95% of a tutor reading aloud what is written on the assignment webpage. Chances are you get bored quickly and miss the one information that was NOT given on the assignment webpage. In total, it is very sad that this course started so great, but the technical and organizational problems reduced the motivation so much. | The | Content | of the course was actually very | Positive | 0.6 | -0.5 | 0.38 | 1.11 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | In addition of the very relevant content, all the materials and videos are of very high quality. Além do tema ser muito relevante, todo o material e os vídeos são de alta qualidade. | In addition of the very relevant | Content | all the materials and videos are | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.38 | 1.11 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | Thank you! I enjoyed the content and learning more about happiness. I found the music a wee bit corny, though. | Thank you! I enjoyed the | Content | and learning more about happiness. I | Positive | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.38 | 1.11 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | A must! I'm sure EVERYBODY can benefit inmensly from taking this course! Excellent content, excellent quality, excellent proffesor! | inmensly from taking this course! Excellent | Content | excellent quality, excellent proffesor! | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.38 | 1.11 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | What a wonderful experience taking this class has been...I have really enjoyed Prof. Raj's videos and learning about human nature in regards to our happiness levels...I believe this to be a beneficial class for anyone and everyone to take and have expressed my excitement for it on many occasions with those I come in contact with...THANK YOU for the amazing work on putting this beneficiary course together...I hope to have the opportunity to continually review the content and continue to learn and grow in a positive way... | the opportunity to continually review the | Content | and continue to learn and grow | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.38 | 1.11 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | Fantastic approach to the topic. Excellent content and delivery. | Fantastic approach to the topic. Excellent | Content | and delivery. | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.38 | 1.11 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | The Course seems to be a great one and the way it has been delivered is fantastic... Although, I know there is a lot of content to be covered to make it really impactful but I felt the duration is just a bit longer than expected. | know there is a lot of | Content | to be covered to make it | Negative | -0.7 | 0.5 | 0.38 | 1.11 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | Great content and delivered well. Kudos Prof Raj and team | Great | Content | and delivered well. Kudos Prof Raj | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.38 | 1.11 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | the contents of the course were very good. It is essential material that everyone should learn about as early as possible in their life. It should be essential learning in each school. All the material is based on scientific facts. there are, however, reasons why I did not rate this course with 5 points. The amount of material takes a lifetime to digest and adopt. To cram this into a few weeks was not the appropriate way to teach it. there were way too many videos one was supposed to watch within a single week. Sometimes even the summary videos for a single week took 20 minutes. That is just not right. I was so busy memorizing the material that I did not find the time to adopt it in my daily life. what a pity. it will take me many months to really digest the material | the | Content | of the course were very good. | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.38 | 1.11 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | I've taken about 70 MOOCs across multiple platforms. Of those 70, I've completed about 12. Of those 12, about 4 were good. This is one of those four. Sometimes the videos were a little long, but the work was inspired and the science behind the content was great. I did every assignment (rare for a MOOCer, as you probably know). This was totally worth my time. I hope you find it to be worth yours. Enjoy! | inspired and the science behind the | Content | was great. I did every assignment | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.38 | 1.11 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | Thank you so much! It's a great and fantastic course, extremely well organized and presented. The professors could not be better, the materials as well, and well.. the contents... perfect. Thank you so much to all the team! | as well, and well. . the | Content | . . perfect. Thank you so | Positive | 0.9 | 1.0 | 0.38 | 1.11 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | excellent course with great content | excellent course with great | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.38 | 1.11 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | This course has been really eye opener. The research on happiness done by Prof. Mr Raj is amazing. The way the course is designed is very nice. There are systematic contents in every week. I must the exercises also are very good and I did not feel that I am doing this course on virtual platform. Kudos to all the team who have really put an effort to make this course available on Coursera! I would highly recommend this course to all my friends, colleagues and relatives. Cheers and Thank you. | is very nice. There are systematic | Content | in every week. I must the | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.38 | 1.11 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | Very good content, oo long, too many words to get to the point, and too many instructions on assignments. | Very good | Content | oo long, too many words to | Positive | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.38 | 1.11 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | Exceptionally well taught and amazing content! I can only recommend everyone takes this course :-) | Exceptionally well taught and amazing | Content | I can only recommend everyone takes | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.38 | 1.11 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | Excellent course. Engaging, fun, thought-provoking, meaningful, blended learning experience the content of which is life changing. Highly recommend this course to all that will listen! Bravo Dr. Happy Smart & Indian School of Business! Bravo! | thought-provoking, meaningful, blended learning experience the | Content | of which is life changing. Highly | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.38 | 1.11 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | I love this course. Very interesting, full of practical and useful content. 5* | interesting, full of practical and useful | Content | 5* | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.38 | 1.11 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | super course - both the content and organizational aspect of it thank you that I could participate! best | super course - both the | Content | and organizational aspect of it thank | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.38 | 1.11 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | The most happy class ever. Great teachers, great content! | happy class ever. Great teachers, great | Content | | Positive | 0.9 | 1.0 | 0.38 | 1.11 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | This course is one of the best offerings I've taken from Coursera. Due to Raj, Catherine and the team, the content, research, production with graphics, and readings ----- the weeks' lessons far exceeded my expectations. The trick with learning is applying what I have learned, so that is my intent. Hats off to enhancing sometimes hard-to-grasp concepts through video, interviews and quizzes. The online format and technical process worked 100% fine for me without any problems or glitches. I have been happy with everything! Thank you! Learner ID | Raj, Catherine and the team, the | Content | research, production with graphics, and readings | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.38 | 1.11 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | wonderful course one of its kind, very beautiful and effective presentation, smooth flow , life changing content | presentation, smooth flow , life changing | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.38 | 1.11 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | Title is a bit sappy, but content is excellent with a very engaging instructor. Would highly recommend to anyone in management or professional field, as this course will not only offer introspection into your own psyche, but offer insight into how and why others think the way they do. | Title is a bit sappy, but | Content | is excellent with a very engaging | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.38 | 1.11 |
| QgmoVdT2EeSlhSIACx2EBw | Great course, contents are very accurate and comprehensive, explained in a simple manner. | Great course, | Content | are very accurate and comprehensive, explained | Positive | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.84 |
| QgmoVdT2EeSlhSIACx2EBw | Pros: Content Professor Depth of material Cons: Exams are shit, full of mistakes, stuid questions asking 2 values but you have one field to fill in the data. Totally unacceptable quality issues with exams. READ THE FORUM!!!! | Pros: | Content | Professor Depth of material Cons: Exams | Negative | -0.6 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.84 |
| QgmoVdT2EeSlhSIACx2EBw | Great Content! Very recommendable. | Great | Content | Very recommendable. | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.84 |
| QKGzLQoYEeWKzSIAC7Uk8A | I didn't learn a whole lot -perhaps it is because I'm not coming into a professional setting as a newbie anymore? I found a lot of the examples juvenile - 'wearing a robe to the office' or 'stealing things'. I was looking for more substantial examples of idealogical conflict I guess -stuff that is harder to resolve than being a person of integrity and making good decisions. I know this is just module 1, but the content didn't feel valuable for the most part. The assignments were alright. | is just module 1, but the | Content | didn't feel valuable for the most | Negative | -0.7 | -0.5 | 0.85 | 0.97 |
| QKGzLQoYEeWKzSIAC7Uk8A | Great course and content | Great course and | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.85 | 0.97 |
| QKGzLQoYEeWKzSIAC7Uk8A | Excellent course content. | Excellent course | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.85 | 0.97 |
| qLFYrxnoEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Great content, horrible technical support from Coursera and the team that runs this program (since it is clearly obvious that Michael Mannino just recorded the videos and is not part of the class anymore). | Great | Content | horrible technical support from Coursera and | Negative | -0.6 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 0.93 |
| qLFYrxnoEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | The content was very well structured, the practices were very appropiate to the concepts that the course is teaching. And the professor is very clear explaining each of the modules, one of the best courses I that have participated . Thanks ! | The | Content | was very well structured, the practices | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.7 | 0.93 |
| qLFYrxnoEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | very informative and rich content | very informative and rich | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.7 | 0.93 |
| qLFYrxnoEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Pros: The course content covers a lot of relevant topics on Database Management. Things like Basic SQL queries, Database Normalization, Conceptual and Logical databases, and making ER diagrams are covered in the course. Cons: Prof Mannino is a bit robotic in his reading out of long sentences and the constant pace of talking. There is tons of repetition of sentences and words mere seconds after they were just spoken. The lectures seem to be a collection of bullet points. The assignments and the peer review structure is really a low point. There's no specific grading rubric - so points allocation is random and based on your peer's assessment. I had many instances where my right answers were marked as wrong. There is nothing you can do to correct it. Moreover, the questions are iterative and thus the same apparent error carries on and you get multiple wrong scores. Assignments need to be submitted in documents. Separate documents for each question !! At times, even a one-line answer needs to be in a separate document. Pictures of database diagrams need to be pasted in said documents. It was a bit frustrating to take screenshots all the time. Especially when you make a small correction, and have to take screenshots AGAIN, then paste it AGAIN, and upload AGAIN !! Summary: Take the course for it's content, and use the assignments as good practice. Don't take the grading seriously. Also, focus on the content rather than the delivery by the professor, and you will still be able to get some value out of the course (and the specialization by extension) | Pros: The course | Content | covers a lot of relevant topics | Positive | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 0.93 |
| qLFYrxnoEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Pros: The course content covers a lot of relevant topics on Database Management. Things like Basic SQL queries, Database Normalization, Conceptual and Logical databases, and making ER diagrams are covered in the course. Cons: Prof Mannino is a bit robotic in his reading out of long sentences and the constant pace of talking. There is tons of repetition of sentences and words mere seconds after they were just spoken. The lectures seem to be a collection of bullet points. The assignments and the peer review structure is really a low point. There's no specific grading rubric - so points allocation is random and based on your peer's assessment. I had many instances where my right answers were marked as wrong. There is nothing you can do to correct it. Moreover, the questions are iterative and thus the same apparent error carries on and you get multiple wrong scores. Assignments need to be submitted in documents. Separate documents for each question !! At times, even a one-line answer needs to be in a separate document. Pictures of database diagrams need to be pasted in said documents. It was a bit frustrating to take screenshots all the time. Especially when you make a small correction, and have to take screenshots AGAIN, then paste it AGAIN, and upload AGAIN !! Summary: Take the course for it's content, and use the assignments as good practice. Don't take the grading seriously. Also, focus on the content rather than the delivery by the professor, and you will still be able to get some value out of the course (and the specialization by extension) | Summary: Take the course for it's | Content | and use the assignments as good | Positive | 0.8 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 0.93 |
| qLFYrxnoEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Pros: The course content covers a lot of relevant topics on Database Management. Things like Basic SQL queries, Database Normalization, Conceptual and Logical databases, and making ER diagrams are covered in the course. Cons: Prof Mannino is a bit robotic in his reading out of long sentences and the constant pace of talking. There is tons of repetition of sentences and words mere seconds after they were just spoken. The lectures seem to be a collection of bullet points. The assignments and the peer review structure is really a low point. There's no specific grading rubric - so points allocation is random and based on your peer's assessment. I had many instances where my right answers were marked as wrong. There is nothing you can do to correct it. Moreover, the questions are iterative and thus the same apparent error carries on and you get multiple wrong scores. Assignments need to be submitted in documents. Separate documents for each question !! At times, even a one-line answer needs to be in a separate document. Pictures of database diagrams need to be pasted in said documents. It was a bit frustrating to take screenshots all the time. Especially when you make a small correction, and have to take screenshots AGAIN, then paste it AGAIN, and upload AGAIN !! Summary: Take the course for it's content, and use the assignments as good practice. Don't take the grading seriously. Also, focus on the content rather than the delivery by the professor, and you will still be able to get some value out of the course (and the specialization by extension) | grading seriously. Also, focus on the | Content | rather than the delivery by the | Negative | -0.6 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 0.93 |
| qLFYrxnoEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Great Course. Awesome Content. The sessions can be a little more interactive. | Great Course. Awesome | Content | The sessions can be a little | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 0.93 |
| qLFYrxnoEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | I found the content was great but the style of lectures were a bit too robotic and not conversational. This didn't help the learning process. Also, the course admin might consider explaining 'On' 'And' 'Where' 'TIMESTAMP', 'DateDiff' more than what was provided. | I found the | Content | was great but the style of | Positive | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 0.93 |
| qLFYrxnoEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Awesome course content and teaching techniques used by Michael Mannino.Kudos! | Awesome course | Content | and teaching techniques used by Michael | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.7 | 0.93 |
| qLFYrxnoEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Great teacher and awesome content!!! | Great teacher and awesome | Content | ! ! | Positive | 0.9 | 1.0 | 0.7 | 0.93 |
| qLFYrxnoEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Although not have any business intelligence content, I recommend it to people who need to strengthen their knowledge in databases. On the other hand, it should be an optional course for those who were interested in obtaining certification. | Although not have any business intelligence | Content | I recommend it to people who | Negative | -0.6 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 0.93 |
| qLFYrxnoEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | very good teacher and very helpful and learning style and really appropriate course content. thumbs up | learning style and really appropriate course | Content | thumbs up | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.7 | 0.93 |
| QoJxNRnoEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Very comprehensive and clear content delivery. Usable and helpful learning tools | Very comprehensive and clear | Content | delivery. Usable and helpful learning tools | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.67 | 1.08 |
| QoJxNRnoEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Thanks very much for great content and especially, Ms. Jana Schaich Borg for brilliant presentation skills, lovely voice and good looking as well. Please participate. This is highly recommend course. | Thanks very much for great | Content | and especially, Ms. Jana Schaich Borg | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.67 | 1.08 |
| QoJxNRnoEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Very helpful content with easy-to-understand explanations that I can follow along. Jana is also engaging instructor. Tableau Desktop key provided is huge help as well. | Very helpful | Content | with easy-to-understand explanations that I can | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.67 | 1.08 |
| QoJxNRnoEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | One of the best courses on Coursera: the content covers not just the usage of Tableau but also the objectives heading into using Tableau as well as the presentation of the results one gets from Tableau. Most of all, it is evident that the trainers know their stuff and had a lot of fun putting this together! | the best courses on Coursera: the | Content | covers not just the usage of | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.67 | 1.08 |
| QoJxNRnoEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Its a good course, but I feel too much details in week 3 course content. | much details in week 3 course | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.67 | 1.08 |
| QoJxNRnoEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Excellent course. Love the content and the delivery. Also, the project is super cute! | Excellent course. Love the | Content | and the delivery. Also, the project | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.67 | 1.08 |
| QoJxNRnoEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | The material is very interesting with well-made videos. Great course to get an introduction to Tableau. The downside for me was that some videos were rushed with as they had too much content, and quizzes could be much better, I found the questions not really up-to-par with the course content. | with as they had too much | Content | and quizzes could be much better, | Negative | -0.6 | 0.5 | 0.67 | 1.08 |
| QoJxNRnoEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | The material is very interesting with well-made videos. Great course to get an introduction to Tableau. The downside for me was that some videos were rushed with as they had too much content, and quizzes could be much better, I found the questions not really up-to-par with the course content. | not really up-to-par with the course | Content | | Negative | -0.6 | 0.5 | 0.67 | 1.08 |
| QoJxNRnoEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | The course content is itself interesting but the lack of active mentors to provide guidance makes the course really difficult to learn. So many unanswered questions on the discussion board and many confused students. I am so glad I am not paying for this course. | The course | Content | is itself interesting but the lack | Negative | -0.6 | -1.0 | 0.67 | 1.08 |
| QoJxNRnoEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Incredibly content packed course. The best one of this series. | Incredibly | Content | packed course. The best one of | Positive | 0.9 | 1.0 | 0.67 | 1.08 |
| QoJxNRnoEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Good content! Thoughtful insight on approaching problem solving in data analysis world. | Good | Content | Thoughtful insight on approaching problem solving | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.67 | 1.08 |
| QoJxNRnoEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | wonderful design of content, good business examples. | wonderful design of | Content | good business examples. | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.67 | 1.08 |
| QRDjcWLVEeWFkQ7sUCFGVQ | I enjoyed this course immensely! I was a bit hesitant due to its length, however, the content was usually manageable and mostly interesting. A couple of the weeks, the lectures are quite lengthy and dense while others were a bit dry. Also, I think the week about bacteria could use a little more explanation. I feel as though I didn't really understand those concepts until watching that week's as well as the next week's lectures. Finally, the quiz questions for the third to last week were a bit confusing and didn't match well to what the instructors actually said. | due to its length, however, the | Content | was usually manageable and mostly interesting. | Negative | -0.6 | 0.5 | 0.65 | 0.8 |
| QRDjcWLVEeWFkQ7sUCFGVQ | Thank you so much for this course, I really enjoyed it! I only gave 4 stars because sometimes it is really hard to understand, especially key words (I am not talking about the accent but the group and family latin names, etc); I constantly had to check the subtitles for these. To be honest I wasn't expecting this content after reading the course title, but it was nice to see evolution from this point of view, great job! | be honest I wasn't expecting this | Content | after reading the course title, but | Negative | -0.7 | 0.5 | 0.65 | 0.8 |
| QRDjcWLVEeWFkQ7sUCFGVQ | This was an interesting and enjoyable course. The content was wide and varied. On the whole the lectures were well supported by videos and associated charts and tables.. However, I found that one or two of the lecturers', though they tried gamely, were a little unfamiliar with English. I fully understand that almost all of these people do not have English as a first (or second) language and admire their competence. If the transcripts had been corrected so that they more accurately reflected what the speaker was trying to say rather than what was actually said, I feel that would be a help. In spite of this, I would recommend this course to my friends and family. | an interesting and enjoyable course. The | Content | was wide and varied. On the | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.65 | 0.8 |
| QRDjcWLVEeWFkQ7sUCFGVQ | The course content is very very good and not superficial as some courses we see around here. I liked very much how the order of subjects where build. However, if you allow me to give a *constructive* criticism, please let me say that the strategy chosen to ask lectures to read from previous written scripts, instead of letting them present more naturally, was a bad one. I understand that in order to make the legends/captions available, the lecturers kinda read from scripts their talks and this was very bad. It would be much better next time if you allow each speaker give the talk naturally as they want, with no reading, and then latter produce the subtitles. The lecturers are reseachers and not ACTORS so the final result of reading word by word what they were saying compromised a lot the final quality of their talks. Please don't get me wrong, I just trying to be constructive giving back somehow the time and effort spent by you guys to prepare such nice course. | The course | Content | is very very good and not | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.65 | 0.8 |
| Qx-vkAocEeWAYyIACmGIdw | There is lack of understanding how you actually build shown systems and software was presented in lectures if we deal with actual code.. but I gave 5 stars for creative and useful content provide the direction to go father in computer graphics field. I strongly recommend this course to students who starts developing digital content or/and programmers who want inspiration for their own projects. If there is a specialization on the topic, but with deep view on actual code samples, I would have bought one. | 5 stars for creative and useful | Content | provide the direction to go father | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.96 | 0.97 |
| Qx-vkAocEeWAYyIACmGIdw | The algorithms presented in this course are interesting. However, the quizzes contain some questions that have no apparent relation to the content of the lectures, and some questions about details of the presented algorithms which are explained in neither the lectures, nor in the papers from which the lectures are derived. Also, most of the sample implementations will not run on a modern computer. They only work on Windows with Java 6 installed. | have no apparent relation to the | Content | of the lectures, and some questions | Negative | -0.6 | -0.5 | 0.96 | 0.97 |
| r0e9gyUAEeWxbhIkPfddLQ | The speaking style and body language of the instructor was quite monotonous when teaching the content. For the most part of the course, it felt like the instructor was just "reading" the teleprompter without blinking for several seconds! He did not attempt to teach the students in these videos. It could have been MUCH better if he had used better presentation tools and shorter sentences. | was quite monotonous when teaching the | Content | For the most part of the | Positive | 0.6 | -0.5 | 0.98 | 1.04 |
| r0e9gyUAEeWxbhIkPfddLQ | I really liked the style of learning as well as the course content which gives me a broad overview of formulation of strategies. | learning as well as the course | Content | which gives me a broad overview | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.98 | 1.04 |
| r0e9gyUAEeWxbhIkPfddLQ | Nice form, shallow content. Simply too simple. Beware: upgrade / fee required for last two exams. | Nice form, shallow | Content | Simply too simple. Beware: upgrade / | Negative | -0.6 | -1.0 | 0.98 | 1.04 |
| r8zaNVu-EeW0ugrg2GGh4Q | The contents and quality of the video lectures are great. The quality of the supplementary materials (like the quizzes and the Matlab code) provided by TAs for the assignments are very poor. The assignment guides are written with very poor grammar. The Matlab code is written using the worst coding and documenting practices. The automatic evaluation system (the system for grade the submissions), doest't provide useful feedback. As people can read in the course discussion forums, students have been asking for months for improvements to the grading systems. | The | Content | and quality of the video lectures | Negative | -0.6 | -0.5 | 0.66 | 0.88 |
| r8zaNVu-EeW0ugrg2GGh4Q | Great course! but there was too little content!!!! Double it !! Or double the coursework! make us do more work! Also, tell people to use 'parfor' to speed up the computations. Otherwise, great course! | course! but there was too little | Content | ! ! ! Double it ! | Negative | -0.6 | 0.0 | 0.66 | 0.88 |
| r8zaNVu-EeW0ugrg2GGh4Q | It is only introductory course. not a lot of content. | introductory course. not a lot of | Content | | Negative | -0.6 | 0.5 | 0.66 | 0.88 |
| r8zaNVu-EeW0ugrg2GGh4Q | I think there is need to provide clearer instructions on how to get the programming assignments done. The course content is good, but doing the programming assignments needs to be more clarified. | the programming assignments done. The course | Content | is good, but doing the programming | Positive | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.66 | 0.88 |
| r8zaNVu-EeW0ugrg2GGh4Q | The Assignments are more of Trial and Error and not very helpful. The Course Material and Content is good. Teaching Staff is nowhere to be found. | very helpful. The Course Material and | Content | is good. Teaching Staff is nowhere | Positive | 0.6 | -0.5 | 0.66 | 0.88 |
| r8zaNVu-EeW0ugrg2GGh4Q | The course is so weak. No enough illustration for the content of the course. It's too short and not prepared very well. | weak. No enough illustration for the | Content | of the course. It's too short | Negative | -0.6 | -1.0 | 0.66 | 0.88 |
| r8zaNVu-EeW0ugrg2GGh4Q | The assignments were hard, not because of the contents of the courser, but for understanding the context of the method being implemented (what each variable meant and how it was expressed). Also, there should be a range of submissions that could be right but having higher or lower scores depending of how long it took to find the path, or how long the path was to reach the goal. | were hard, not because of the | Content | of the courser, but for understanding | Negative | -0.7 | -0.5 | 0.66 | 0.88 |
| r8zaNVu-EeW0ugrg2GGh4Q | This is part 2 in the robotics specialization. The course content is way too short and basic for the price. There are about 77 minutes of lecture in total, i.e. less than 20 minutes per week. The first week covers BFS, Dijkstra, and A*, something part of most undergrad programs. The rest of the material is ok but very basic. The programming assignments are "implement Dijkstra" in week 1, "implement Dijkstra on a Torus" (and "do triangles intersect?") in week 2, a very simple for loop in week 3, and "implement gradient descent" in week 4. I could complete the course by looking at it on-and-off over one weekend. The material that is presented is presented well, but there's not enough of it. For reference, part 1 of the robotics specialization had over twice as much lecture content (by time) and then lots of supplementary material in addition to that, quizzes that required some thinking, and more relevant and at least slightly harder programming assignments. | in the robotics specialization. The course | Content | is way too short and basic | Negative | -0.7 | -1.0 | 0.66 | 0.88 |
| r8zaNVu-EeW0ugrg2GGh4Q | This is part 2 in the robotics specialization. The course content is way too short and basic for the price. There are about 77 minutes of lecture in total, i.e. less than 20 minutes per week. The first week covers BFS, Dijkstra, and A*, something part of most undergrad programs. The rest of the material is ok but very basic. The programming assignments are "implement Dijkstra" in week 1, "implement Dijkstra on a Torus" (and "do triangles intersect?") in week 2, a very simple for loop in week 3, and "implement gradient descent" in week 4. I could complete the course by looking at it on-and-off over one weekend. The material that is presented is presented well, but there's not enough of it. For reference, part 1 of the robotics specialization had over twice as much lecture content (by time) and then lots of supplementary material in addition to that, quizzes that required some thinking, and more relevant and at least slightly harder programming assignments. | had over twice as much lecture | Content | (by time) and then lots of | Negative | -0.6 | -1.0 | 0.66 | 0.88 |
| rc5KG0aUEeWG1w6arGoEIQ | Great content but animations are annoying! | Great | Content | but animations are annoying! | Negative | -0.6 | 0.0 | 0.78 | 0.91 |
| rc5KG0aUEeWG1w6arGoEIQ | Very interesting course, well designed, using animated fun-makers to shoot out questions that you will probably do it yourself. Course content easy to understand. Very suited for non-accounting major analyst who wants to get some background in accounting analysis.. | will probably do it yourself. Course | Content | easy to understand. Very suited for | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.78 | 0.91 |
| rc5KG0aUEeWG1w6arGoEIQ | Content very clear and explained by the professors. | | Content | very clear and explained by the | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.78 | 0.91 |
| rc5KG0aUEeWG1w6arGoEIQ | I loved the Accounting part of the course. It was quite hard for me (non-accounting person), however I really enjoyed the form of the lectures and the content itself (the earnings management + its revealing). Great materials Professor Bushee! | form of the lectures and the | Content | itself (the earnings management + its | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.78 | 0.91 |
| rc5KG0aUEeWG1w6arGoEIQ | While I enjoyed this course and the topics covered, I don't feel like the course content matched what the course description stated it was supposed to. I enrolled in the Business Analytics Specialization course with a focus on analyzing a business from the inside, not outside. Of the 4 weeks of the course, I'd say that only week 4 was valid from an internal perspective but it was kept very high level. I'd say this course could be good for a specialization in business market analysis, but not as advertised. I also found the cartoon classroom questions to be very annoying, almost as bad as fingernails on a blackboard. | I don't feel like the course | Content | matched what the course description stated | Negative | -0.7 | -0.5 | 0.78 | 0.91 |
| rc5KG0aUEeWG1w6arGoEIQ | Very well done! Contents, delivery, clarity, everything was top notch. Thank you! | Very well done! | Content | delivery, clarity, everything was top notch. | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.78 | 0.91 |
| rc5KG0aUEeWG1w6arGoEIQ | i love this course very much! very practical and systematical content. and very useful for accounting profession but its a little bit challenging to follow. I have watched whole the videos for more than 2 times in order to pass the assignment. | very much! very practical and systematical | Content | and very useful for accounting profession | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.78 | 0.91 |
| rc5KG0aUEeWG1w6arGoEIQ | It's ok. Bushee is very knowledgeable and a very enthusiastic teacher, but his lessons are too dense compared to the content in the rest of the Wharton BA programs. I actually like all the detail, but I think it's covered too quickly and the course should probably be made longer to deal with it all. There are ratios and balance sheet jargon just flying at you at a breathless pace. It would be better to focus on a few key ones and then walk through the examples a little more slowly. The quizzes were extremely tricky with too many choose more than one answers. It was difficult to find the parts of the video to review missed questions because 1) the transcripts are machine generated and make it difficult to search specific words and 2) it's difficult to remember where the concept was covered because there was so much in each video. The last week felt very disconnected from the first week and like it belonged in a different course almost. It was pretty good, though. I liked how it contained specific examples and charts. | are too dense compared to the | Content | in the rest of the Wharton | Negative | -0.6 | 0.0 | 0.78 | 0.91 |
| RFyNbG0iEeW9CAqYJHF3zQ | good instructors and content , i enjoyed it | good instructors and | Content | , i enjoyed it | Positive | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.47 | 1.01 |
| RFyNbG0iEeW9CAqYJHF3zQ | This is an amazing course. The teachers, the content, the duration, all of those features work great together. I learned a lot. | an amazing course. The teachers, the | Content | the duration, all of those features | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.47 | 1.01 |
| RFyNbG0iEeW9CAqYJHF3zQ | I am very impressed with presentation and content. This course approaches the skills in a systematic way. It will be beneficial to all levels of users. I strongly recommend for nonnative English speakers. | am very impressed with presentation and | Content | This course approaches the skills in | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.47 | 1.01 |
| RFyNbG0iEeW9CAqYJHF3zQ | The teacher is very nice. The content of the class is clear to understand. I think it fits people who have little English language using experience but want to improve. I would hope to learn more specific things during the course. | The teacher is very nice. The | Content | of the class is clear to | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.47 | 1.01 |
| RFyNbG0iEeW9CAqYJHF3zQ | It is very useful for both unviersity students and employers and employees at work. The content is a bit short and it will be great if there are more contents on pronunciation and grammar. Thanks! | be great if there are more | Content | on pronunciation and grammar. Thanks! | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.47 | 1.01 |
| RFyNbG0iEeW9CAqYJHF3zQ | I have almost completed week one. I learned about what words to stress in a sentence and how to use the innotation at the end of the sentence. It is fun to go through the course contents. I would have given it five stars when it actually have helped us by giving analogies on more conversations formally and informally. Well, thank you. | fun to go through the course | Content | I would have given it five | Negative | -0.6 | 0.5 | 0.47 | 1.01 |
| rKbbMST9EeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Nice abstraction about all kinds of games not about a specific game genre. But I'm not into it because I like developing games more than thinking about design. This course's homework is somewhat irrelevant of the course content. | is somewhat irrelevant of the course | Content | | Negative | -0.6 | 0.0 | 0.82 | 0.82 |
| rKbbMST9EeWtRg6boA3D-Q | It appears the teacher doesn't take the necessary steps to polish content and tests, everything feels unstructured and ad-lib. Course videos don't seem to follow any kind of logic or purpose and tests are based on highly subjective content, but are not prepared to deal with the subjectivity of reviewers (i.e. forcing them to provide feedback instead of giving points arbitrarily). | take the necessary steps to polish | Content | and tests, everything feels unstructured and | Negative | -0.6 | -0.5 | 0.82 | 0.82 |
| rKbbMST9EeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Great content and great teacher. But I found the assignments and the quizzes not that great. I reckon the questions and corrections were a bit subjective and time consuming. | Great | Content | and great teacher. But I found | Positive | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.82 | 0.82 |
| rKbbMST9EeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Not very informative content, some parts are interesting but not worth the money. The worst thing is, all assignments are writting work that are evaluated by colleagues, meaning, it is purely objective, to the extent that one question asks if my uploaded file is in a readable format, example pdf, txt...etc and two out of three marking my pdf file as not!!! and not even leaving a comment why they are giving that bad score on obvious things! | Not very informative | Content | some parts are interesting but not | Negative | -0.6 | -1.0 | 0.82 | 0.82 |
| rKbbMST9EeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Content is interesting but the lectures and the content is far below the first course in the series in my opinion. | interesting but the lectures and the | Content | is far below the first course | Negative | -0.6 | 0.0 | 0.82 | 0.82 |
| rKbbMST9EeWtRg6boA3D-Q | This course has some great content and assignments that I'd never make myself do on my own, for that I rate the course highly. I did find myself often wondering exactly what was expected of me on the assignments, and during lecture I'd hear "this is something to think about...", but not what I'd like to hear which is "here's what to do". Overall a great fit into the game development specialization. | This course has some great | Content | and assignments that I'd never make | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.82 | 0.82 |
| rKbbMST9EeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Although the course content is highly informative and interesting, the way it's all presented it not the best, most of the time concepts are confusing because of this, quizzes become guessing games most of the time. Forums feel neglected by the course tutor, lot's of question that someone knowledgeable should answer become random rambling as nobody is sure as to what the tutor actually meant. As somebody said on the forums "I feel like I'm alpha testing your course". | Although the course | Content | is highly informative and interesting, the | Positive | 0.8 | 0.0 | 0.82 | 0.82 |
| RKMa0PTnEeSR9SIAC7LYOA | Very rich content, thank you! | Very rich | Content | thank you! | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.76 | 0.93 |
| RKMa0PTnEeSR9SIAC7LYOA | Good content and GREAT assignments. Main problem is that the lecture videos are unscripted and could easily be made more concise. The other thing that worried me was that most of the assignments that I peer reviewed had missed large parts of the question. I would rather have my work marked by people who have read the question properly. | Good | Content | and GREAT assignments. Main problem is | Positive | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.76 | 0.93 |
| RKMa0PTnEeSR9SIAC7LYOA | Pace was slow and I was disappointed by the content level. From the title I thought this would give information about the "global energy business" but the focus is generally on the US, except for portions that discussed location/ use of global resources and demand and supply levels globally. The class begins with analyzing Supply & Demand curves for energy use and production which was interesting to me and I thought meant we'd be taking an economic view throughout. Then the large middle section covers very basic info about the types of energy production (coal, oil, NG, renewables) in the world -- low in factual content considering the time spent on each topic. The final section about political considerations was very basic and only focused on the US. I am amazed that the 3 branches of US government were explained on the simplest level; this is a middle school & high school topic in the US. I expected a more in-depth class with details and analysis about the global energy business. I am glad I did not choose to pay for the certificate. | and I was disappointed by the | Content | level. From the title I thought | Negative | -0.8 | -0.5 | 0.76 | 0.93 |
| RKMa0PTnEeSR9SIAC7LYOA | Pace was slow and I was disappointed by the content level. From the title I thought this would give information about the "global energy business" but the focus is generally on the US, except for portions that discussed location/ use of global resources and demand and supply levels globally. The class begins with analyzing Supply & Demand curves for energy use and production which was interesting to me and I thought meant we'd be taking an economic view throughout. Then the large middle section covers very basic info about the types of energy production (coal, oil, NG, renewables) in the world -- low in factual content considering the time spent on each topic. The final section about political considerations was very basic and only focused on the US. I am amazed that the 3 branches of US government were explained on the simplest level; this is a middle school & high school topic in the US. I expected a more in-depth class with details and analysis about the global energy business. I am glad I did not choose to pay for the certificate. | the world -- low in factual | Content | considering the time spent on each | Positive | 0.6 | -0.5 | 0.76 | 0.93 |
| RKMa0PTnEeSR9SIAC7LYOA | generally satisfied with the course content and its execution. Gives a brief, but very qualitative, overview on the issue. Sadly as a citizen of EU, some of the course materials are focused more on the US economy/energy systems, which for me would be much more interesting to see these information about EU. But it is logical, as it is provided by an US institution. Overall I only can recommend to any newcomers to the global energy business or who want to get a little bit deeper knowledge about the issue. | generally satisfied with the course | Content | and its execution. Gives a brief, | Positive | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.76 | 0.93 |
| RKMa0PTnEeSR9SIAC7LYOA | The course content is carefully thought through. The participation contribution is rewarding and the instructor has managed to convey key concepts of the energy business in a few properly executed short videos. It will be great to develop a Specialization around the core areas addressed by this fundamentals course. I will recommend this for anyone interested in understanding keys aspects of the global energy business. | The course | Content | is carefully thought through. The participation | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.76 | 0.93 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | I learned a lot fast in the class - but the assignments seemed very difficult, and often didn't match the content of the lectures. I enjoyed the class, and definitely earned all I learned. | difficult, and often didn't match the | Content | of the lectures. I enjoyed the | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.88 | 1.05 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | I will break down the review into the contents and comment on them. Before doing that and saving the trouble for people who do not like to read a lot - This course is an awesome kick-starter for R-programming. Video Lectures : The speed and content are just perfect. The concepts covered in each lecture and the manner in which it was taught just made them stick well in my mind. 2. Quiz - They were simple so I infer that they are meant to test how well we have learnt the concepts. 3. Swirl Practice Programming Assignments - A very innovative way to teach us in the R console itself. I really enjoyed playing with it. 4. Programming Assignment - It was a sheer pleasure to do the last assignment. The level was really good. I found it a bit daunting at first but then caught up by reviewing some concepts. 5. Discussion Forums - I couldn't be very active in terms of replying but I never missed to hear what mentors had to say. I owe thanks to mentors for their awesome posts that gave deeper insights especially Al Warren. I highly recommend this course. Prof. Peng - your videos are really good and far from boring. And yes, Thank you Coursera. | break down the review into the | Content | and comment on them. Before doing | Negative | -0.6 | 1.0 | 0.88 | 1.05 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | I will break down the review into the contents and comment on them. Before doing that and saving the trouble for people who do not like to read a lot - This course is an awesome kick-starter for R-programming. Video Lectures : The speed and content are just perfect. The concepts covered in each lecture and the manner in which it was taught just made them stick well in my mind. 2. Quiz - They were simple so I infer that they are meant to test how well we have learnt the concepts. 3. Swirl Practice Programming Assignments - A very innovative way to teach us in the R console itself. I really enjoyed playing with it. 4. Programming Assignment - It was a sheer pleasure to do the last assignment. The level was really good. I found it a bit daunting at first but then caught up by reviewing some concepts. 5. Discussion Forums - I couldn't be very active in terms of replying but I never missed to hear what mentors had to say. I owe thanks to mentors for their awesome posts that gave deeper insights especially Al Warren. I highly recommend this course. Prof. Peng - your videos are really good and far from boring. And yes, Thank you Coursera. | Video Lectures : The speed and | Content | are just perfect. The concepts covered | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.88 | 1.05 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | The course content and the assignments are too far apart. I would have learned more if it was better aligned and there were some exercise in between. | The course | Content | and the assignments are too far | Negative | -0.6 | -0.5 | 0.88 | 1.05 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | This course is not set up right, the assignments ask you to do things that aren't explained until the next weeks content, its kind of discouraging. In the end, it does teach you the basics of R, its just too bad that the way to get there is aggravating. The reason I still only give it 2 stars is because of the quality of the courses itself. There are many, many 1 and 2 minute videos, these could've easily been combined. The teacher seems unprepared in his lectures, he stutters and repeats a lot and makes a weird noise between slides. This shouldn't be necessary with pre-recorded lectures. The assignments and quizzes are also poorly written and contain spelling and sloppy mistakes, which doesn't make sense because the material isn't new. It all just makes it seem like the teacher doesn't really care and just wants to sell the course to a lot of people without putting in much effort. If you are not following the specialization I would not advise this course for beginners. I'm quite surprised to see the course get such high ratings. | aren't explained until the next weeks | Content | its kind of discouraging. In the | Negative | -0.7 | -0.5 | 0.88 | 1.05 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Need way more content, and accesibility to begginers, gap between theory and practical exercises is too big! | Need way more | Content | and accesibility to begginers, gap between | Positive | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.88 | 1.05 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | I think there is something not so important but occupys a large part of this class. Maybe you can rebalance the priority of this the contents in this class and replenish some introductions of more useful functions. | rebalance the priority of this the | Content | in this class and replenish some | Negative | -0.6 | 0.5 | 0.88 | 1.05 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Good content , nice flow of information . | Good | Content | , nice flow of information . | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.88 | 1.05 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | tutorial contents suit the first timer very well, ofcourse i used the R-programming book for further reading but the contents in this course suited my speed and awareness.. was able to learn R very effectively, specially the swirl was very good experience. | book for further reading but the | Content | in this course suited my speed | Negative | -0.7 | 1.0 | 0.88 | 1.05 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Excellent course, but the difficulty of the content can be increased | course, but the difficulty of the | Content | can be increased | Negative | -0.6 | 1.0 | 0.88 | 1.05 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | This is way too esoteric. The content was delivered way too fast for me to keep up and process it. This needs to be taught with more frequent hands on examples. I'm also not sure why, if auditing, we can't submit and see how we're doing on the learning. I have no way to evaluate if I'm picking up the concepts or not, which is a struggle. Overall, I would not recommend this course for R beginners. I would look elsewhere. | This is way too esoteric. The | Content | was delivered way too fast for | Negative | -0.8 | -1.0 | 0.88 | 1.05 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | nice content..understandable. | nice | Content | . understandable. | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.88 | 1.05 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | This course is the worst course that I have taken so far. I am not happy with the course content and the way that the lecturer uses to teach this course. I really want to refund my money! | am not happy with the course | Content | and the way that the lecturer | Positive | 0.8 | -1.0 | 0.88 | 1.05 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Great content delivered at a solid pace. | Great | Content | delivered at a solid pace. | Positive | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.88 | 1.05 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | not the model of learning that is encouraging or sticks. hard for a student (even one who has a programming background) to sit through hours of slides explaining what the functions and definitions in the language do without a layer of use context upfront. The content jumps from specific examples to unrelated specific definitions without carrying a sense of integrating the new knowledge with any past knowledge in the course. the whole course seems disjointed. would have been much more effective as learning through examples and to be taught functions and definitions as they come up in problem solving. | layer of use context upfront. The | Content | jumps from specific examples to unrelated | Positive | 0.6 | -1.0 | 0.88 | 1.05 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Good Content to learn programming language. | Good | Content | to learn programming language. | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.88 | 1.05 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Thought this course could've been much more effective. The content felt very random and esoteric at times. Especially the programming assignment on cached results. I get it. I'm a programmer at heart. But this is at the margin of usefulness. How about a segment on running regressions? Or doing some real data analysis? | could've been much more effective. The | Content | felt very random and esoteric at | Negative | -0.6 | 0.0 | 0.88 | 1.05 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | This is probably the most pedagogically inept course I have ever enrolled on. Although the content is what you would hope to find in such a course, the delivery of it is outrageously bad. When to complete your assignment, Google becomes your best friend rather than your lecture notes, you know that something is wrong. The idea that a baby thrown in the water may just learn to swim rather than drown is pedagogically retarded. Unfortunately, this seems to be the approach here... | have ever enrolled on. Although the | Content | is what you would hope to | Positive | 0.7 | -1.0 | 0.88 | 1.05 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | The difficulty of the assignments increases fairly dramatically week over week. It might be more productive to scale this content more gently by dividing it into a two-part course? | be more productive to scale this | Content | more gently by dividing it into | Positive | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.88 | 1.05 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Some disconnects between assignments and lectures but you'll find that in a lot of classroom settings. Otherwise fantastic content about the basics of R Programming and the environment thereof. | lot of classroom settings. Otherwise fantastic | Content | about the basics of R Programming | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.88 | 1.05 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Assignment is a bit too hard for entry level students, especially if we have to complete it in a week considering some students might be full time employees or students. However, assignment is very good for practice. Might consider adding more contents to let students learn more about build their own functions. | for practice. Might consider adding more | Content | to let students learn more about | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.88 | 1.05 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | The content was great, especially the swirl() library. The instructions were a little confusing at times, but the online advisors helped to sort it out. | The | Content | was great, especially the swirl() library. | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.88 | 1.05 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Very essential topics, but the instructor's delivery of content is inconsistent, glosses over explanations at time, "umms and arrrs" a lot, talks extremely fast at times. Making this course quite hard to follow. Disclosure: English if my first language. Not new to programming. Not new to MOOC courses. | topics, but the instructor's delivery of | Content | is inconsistent, glosses over explanations at | Negative | -0.6 | -0.5 | 0.88 | 1.05 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Swirl is an amazing addition to the course! Easy to learn, great content | the course! Easy to learn, great | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.88 | 1.05 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Really enjoy this course even i have done lot of programming and expert in other language but content is good and very easy to understand | and expert in other language but | Content | is good and very easy to | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.88 | 1.05 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Excellent course content and delivery. It has kick started me to move on my own pace and dive down into data sciences. | Excellent course | Content | and delivery. It has kick started | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.88 | 1.05 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | The video lectures were engaging with interesting tidbits thrown in to make the potentially dull topic not dull. I personally liked the rhythm and pace with which Dr Peng delivered the content. Also, the swirl exercises are a critical element of this course and I often found it effective to sandwich the swirl exercises between the video and the quiz. Doing this provided an incentive to complete the swirl practice and also made the quiz/assignment less of an exercise in 'dart-throwing' and more of validating what you've learned. Overall, great course to get started with R! | with which Dr Peng delivered the | Content | Also, the swirl exercises are a | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.88 | 1.05 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Very useful and practical content. | Very useful and practical | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.88 | 1.05 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | The lectures are clear and exhaustive. Assignments and quizzes perfectly compliment the content and aptly test the learning. Definitely recommended to anyone who wants to learn. | Assignments and quizzes perfectly compliment the | Content | and aptly test the learning. Definitely | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.88 | 1.05 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | The content is superbly designer for a beginner. The Swirl assignments need to make compulsory. Infact they contributed more to the learning process. More Swirl contents will make the course richer. | The | Content | is superbly designer for a beginner. | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.88 | 1.05 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | The content is superbly designer for a beginner. The Swirl assignments need to make compulsory. Infact they contributed more to the learning process. More Swirl contents will make the course richer. | to the learning process. More Swirl | Content | will make the course richer. | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.88 | 1.05 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | This is a challenging course because there is a marked gap between the video lectures and the weekly assignments. This course will be far more demanding of your time and willingness to fail that the Data Scientist's Toolbox. If you have the time and resilience to search out support materials and frequently peruse the Discussion threads, you will be able to find what you need. My peers with programming experience confirmed that there is too wide a gap between the content delivered in the video lectures and the demands of the coding assignments. If you decide to take this course, be sure to do the swirl exercises so you get a feel of how the R functions work. When you grade your peers' work, you might notice that more than a few decided to plagiarize code from others. The videos need to be redone. Effective instructors know that students learn by seeing examples, not by listening to broad descriptions of what a function can do. | too wide a gap between the | Content | delivered in the video lectures and | Negative | -0.6 | -0.5 | 0.88 | 1.05 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Very good introduction to programming with R. Surprisingly large amount of content for short period of time | with R. Surprisingly large amount of | Content | for short period of time | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.88 | 1.05 |
| rNpCSyQbEeWXzxJxfIL00w | Very interesting course content. also the way of presenting/discussing it is great! | Very interesting course | Content | also the way of presenting/discussing it | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.62 | 1.1 |
| rNpCSyQbEeWXzxJxfIL00w | Excellent course, great professor and very good quality content. Thank you | great professor and very good quality | Content | Thank you | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.62 | 1.1 |
| rNpCSyQbEeWXzxJxfIL00w | I just finished this course. I want to give a frank feedback since I see a lot of untapped possibilities in this course. On the strengths, it began with a high note and got me glued with expectations and promises. The instructor sounded extremely comfortable and confident with her subject, and had a very calming and pleasant presence which helped establish a kind of "remote" trust. On the improvement areas, I however have a few to list. For one, the intensity, rigour and to-the-pointedness of the content sharply fell after the first week. Having known about mindfulness, Metta meditations, gratitude, it became personally disappointing to me how this course conveyed so little about them and impacted so less than can be possible with the time and space alloted. The framework which initially looked hopeful is perhaps not the best framework, as much as is said about this not being "spectator course". Because this format diluted the intensity and possibility of the course, making it drag and bore towards the end. I wish there were guest interviews of more experienced academicians than what happened here as interviews from which there was little to learn. Honestly, this is my 4th of 5th course on positive psychology and this one will have to make many a fixes to any other that I've taken on coursera. The course ended and I find myself not a tad upbeater or nourished, or knowing something useful that I did not know already other than about vegas nerves which really did not make sense to end user who are here to know what and how to do things and feel better. | intensity, rigour and to-the-pointedness of the | Content | sharply fell after the first week. | Positive | 0.6 | -0.5 | 0.62 | 1.1 |
| rNpCSyQbEeWXzxJxfIL00w | Thank you so much Barbara. So much of your course content resonated with how I try to live my life and connect with people I encounter. The science behind it is very encouraging and validates that approach and to keep moving and growing in that direction. | Barbara. So much of your course | Content | resonated with how I try to | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.62 | 1.1 |
| rNpCSyQbEeWXzxJxfIL00w | It could have been more dynamic . The interviews were boring and there wasn't enough content. | were boring and there wasn't enough | Content | | Negative | -0.8 | -0.5 | 0.62 | 1.1 |
| rNpCSyQbEeWXzxJxfIL00w | Great content and well presented, learned a lot and enjoyed the lessons. Thanks for making this available. | Great | Content | and well presented, learned a lot | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.62 | 1.1 |
| rNpCSyQbEeWXzxJxfIL00w | I loved it - great content, a a gentle and easy to understand way of teaching. Prof. Freadricson did a great job making it actionable a came with lots of great ideas for practising positive psych. everyday. Lots of great stuff for my work shops and courses in stress manegement and happiness. Thank you! Stine Schmidt | I loved it - great | Content | a a gentle and easy to | Positive | 0.9 | 1.0 | 0.62 | 1.1 |
| rNpCSyQbEeWXzxJxfIL00w | Great class, interesting content. Thank you!! | Great class, interesting | Content | Thank you! ! | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.62 | 1.1 |
| rNpCSyQbEeWXzxJxfIL00w | I have truly enjoyed the format and content of this course! Excellent! | have truly enjoyed the format and | Content | of this course! Excellent! | Positive | 0.9 | 1.0 | 0.62 | 1.1 |
| rNpCSyQbEeWXzxJxfIL00w | It's a good course and the contents are very helpful. There are important components like negativity bias and loving-kindness meditation. However I somehow feel it lacks a more systematic or scientific approach since lots of the materials goes on with a free and open discussion that very much depends on subjective views or feelings of selected individuals who joined the discussion. Take another example, "What is Love" session clearly depends an individual's own view. It contradicts "triangular theory of love" and the lecturer doesn't even explain why. | It's a good course and the | Content | are very helpful. There are important | Positive | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.62 | 1.1 |
| rNpCSyQbEeWXzxJxfIL00w | Very well presented and excellent content. | Very well presented and excellent | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.62 | 1.1 |
| RO728xoIEeWg_RJGAuFGjw | The content includes interesting and useful Java programming examples. The lecturers are generally on top of their subject matter and can speak confidently without visible notes. The tests are thorough and you won't get away with only half-knowledge. If you take all the lectures and study the slides, you will generally get to the necessary level of understanding. | The | Content | includes interesting and useful Java programming | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.55 | 0.98 |
| RO728xoIEeWg_RJGAuFGjw | Awesome! Excellent methodology and contents! It goes to the point. Assignments are cool and help to understand the concepts. Perhaps, I found it a little bit easy, but this is also good because I can adapt my tight schedule to follow the deadlines while also remain motivated. ;-) | Awesome! Excellent methodology and | Content | It goes to the point. Assignments | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.55 | 0.98 |
| RO728xoIEeWg_RJGAuFGjw | The content that has been showed through this course is enough balanced and sufficient to help learners around the world like me to understand clearly Data Structures with java and also for with the other programming languages. | The | Content | that has been showed through this | Negative | -0.6 | 0.5 | 0.55 | 0.98 |
| RO728xoIEeWg_RJGAuFGjw | Interesting approach of core and support tracks! Great content. | of core and support tracks! Great | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.55 | 0.98 |
| rTTFFgb8EeWJMSIAC7Jl0w | interesting and useful content. very vivid videos | interesting and useful | Content | very vivid videos | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.45 | 1.15 |
| rTTFFgb8EeWJMSIAC7Jl0w | Great course with great content!! I learnt a lot! But it takes much more time than 4-5h a week as is stated at course info. | Great course with great | Content | ! I learnt a lot! But | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.45 | 1.15 |
| rTTFFgb8EeWJMSIAC7Jl0w | It was a really good course, very easy to understand and was good in keeping the interest up. I would only recommend they offered some, at least optional, exercises to help grasp the content. | optional, exercises to help grasp the | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.45 | 1.15 |
| rTTFFgb8EeWJMSIAC7Jl0w | Great course! I felt like of the basic nuts and bolts. A lot of the assignments called for evaluating actual social science studies which I found very helpful as it gave me an opportunity to apply the content I learned in the video modules. | me an opportunity to apply the | Content | I learned in the video modules. | Negative | -0.6 | 1.0 | 0.45 | 1.15 |
| rTTFFgb8EeWJMSIAC7Jl0w | I have to say thanks to Dr Annemarie Zand Scholten. I can feel how much efforts she had put into the lectures. Complex contents are simplified and easy to learn even for a non-native English speaker like me. I'm happy because I joint this course, very useful, an enjoyable experience. | had put into the lectures. Complex | Content | are simplified and easy to learn | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.45 | 1.15 |
| rTTFFgb8EeWJMSIAC7Jl0w | Excellent organisation of the course! The content is also well thought and presented. i personally clarified many vague questions related to variables, measurements and research ethics. I did have the quantitative methods course at the university, in any case some blank spots were left, so this course was helpful. It is a useful course for revising, but I do not know how total beginners feel about it. If I were a beginner I would have some difficulties probably. It could relate to my personal "slowness" to grasp material like this. Thank you Annemarie! I really like your lecturing/teaching style. | Excellent organisation of the course! The | Content | is also well thought and presented. | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.45 | 1.15 |
| rTTFFgb8EeWJMSIAC7Jl0w | This course provided a great experiece of online study. The high quality content of the videos and adequate rithym of assignments and quizzes are features that make it an admirable course. I strongly reccomend doing this course if you are still in doubt. | of online study. The high quality | Content | of the videos and adequate rithym | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.45 | 1.15 |
| rTTFFgb8EeWJMSIAC7Jl0w | Good Course. It should be complemented with reading of Neuman, Quantitative and Qualitative Methods in Social Science, which gives a far better overview of the contents of week 1 and 2 (insights into the scientific method). Nevertheless the rest of the weeks are very good and should provide a great framework of Quantitative methods for a undergraduate student, who can then complement this framework with some detailed additional readings, if it is of his liking. All in all, I really ended my fisrt college semester with an excellent knowledge in quantitative methods, for which I have to thank, in part to Miss Scholten for this wonderful course. | a far better overview of the | Content | of week 1 and 2 (insights | Negative | -0.6 | 0.5 | 0.45 | 1.15 |
| rTTFFgb8EeWJMSIAC7Jl0w | This course is excellent! I found the content of very high quality, the lecture videos are very clear and easy to understand. What I find remarkable however, is the quality of the exams and assignments! The staff have put in a lot of effort in creating questions and assignments which really test your understanding and knowledge with a clever marking system which always works out to give you a fair mark even when the assignments are peer reviewed. Well done to Anne-Marie and the other staff who put together this course :) | course is excellent! I found the | Content | of very high quality, the lecture | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.45 | 1.15 |
| rTTFFgb8EeWJMSIAC7Jl0w | Funny, useful, clear and serious too. I loved it. Many methodology courses before, but this one addresses also ethics on research practices and History of philosophy of science. simply I adored it and learned a lot. I strongly recommend it. It is so useful for my work and my everyday life. Interviews with real researchers and revising real publications helped me to conect contents with my inmediate reality.. Thanks to all team and congratulations for such a great course. | real publications helped me to conect | Content | with my inmediate reality. . Thanks | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.45 | 1.15 |
| rTTFFgb8EeWJMSIAC7Jl0w | Really enriching course material and the method of explaining by Annemarie Zand Scholten. It gave me a good overview of the quantitative approach to contrast it with the qualitative approach i have been following at my workplace. The course material is very comprehensive and also the transcripts provided for each module. The detailed word to word transcripts really help to revise material while doing assignments and preparing for exams. The assignments really makes one think and helps to digest the course material in the process. The concepts and style of illustrations used in the video are also extremely helpful to understand the content heavy topic. The bonus video material provide the completeness due to the applied examples discussed in them. Overall a very satisfying learning experience! Great! | also extremely helpful to understand the | Content | heavy topic. The bonus video material | Negative | -0.6 | 1.0 | 0.45 | 1.15 |
| rTTFFgb8EeWJMSIAC7Jl0w | Great content and delivered in a clear way. | Great | Content | and delivered in a clear way. | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.45 | 1.15 |
| rTTFFgb8EeWJMSIAC7Jl0w | Excellent course!!! Very well explained, clear examples, good and rich content This is a MUST DO one!!! | explained, clear examples, good and rich | Content | This is a MUST DO one! | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.45 | 1.15 |
| rTTFFgb8EeWJMSIAC7Jl0w | Excellent content, delivery and assessment | Excellent | Content | delivery and assessment | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.45 | 1.15 |
| rTTFFgb8EeWJMSIAC7Jl0w | Excellent! The course is extremely well thought over and executed, even in minor aspects of the course, like scripts, additional pieces of information, exams, created just for practice with feedback, great exercises. The content is highly relevant, well structured and illustrated, clearly laid out. The course is very challenging, thought provoking and stimulating, though it is not an easy course. | practice with feedback, great exercises. The | Content | is highly relevant, well structured and | Positive | 0.9 | 1.0 | 0.45 | 1.15 |
| sCE0nT-OEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Content is good, but exercises could be improved, should also add a few interactive quizzes (e.g. a quiz before the segment to ask what they think are the 3 - 4 factors of X,Y,Z; then a quiz at end to summarize). Also add sources. | | Content | is good, but exercises could be | Positive | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.68 | 0.94 |
| sCE0nT-OEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | The content is laid out very well and I found a ton of useful take-away points. Thank you to all the faculty members. I particularly enjoyed the assignments - they really make you think. But I found the branding you - audit and insights the best exercise in this program. I would definitely recommend this to friends and colleagues. | The | Content | is laid out very well and | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.68 | 0.94 |
| sCE0nT-OEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | The course content was very good. However, I would have liked to see assignments for each | The course | Content | was very good. However, I would | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.68 | 0.94 |
| sCE0nT-OEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Excellent content! | Excellent | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.68 | 0.94 |
| sCE0nT-OEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Excellent course. Concise and to the point. Maximum learning with differentiated, relevant, and authentic content. | learning with differentiated, relevant, and authentic | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.68 | 0.94 |
| sCE0nT-OEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | The topic was so intersting but the content was not enought practical! | topic was so intersting but the | Content | was not enought practical! | Negative | -0.7 | 0.0 | 0.68 | 0.94 |
| sCE0nT-OEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Content is grade, however I am still waiting for the grading of my last assignment in this course. :( | | Content | is grade, however I am still | Negative | -0.6 | 1.0 | 0.68 | 0.94 |
| SG_K6nEmEeWxvQr3acyajw | Great content for beginners. Especially appreciated given that the topic is not yet well covered by MOOCs. | Great | Content | for beginners. Especially appreciated given that | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.93 | 1.18 |
| SG_K6nEmEeWxvQr3acyajw | Instructor was passionate and clear to understand. She made the course enjoyable and the course content easy to digest | the course enjoyable and the course | Content | easy to digest | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.93 | 1.18 |
| SG_K6nEmEeWxvQr3acyajw | It is very easy to realize the course content and also provides practical tools to go. | very easy to realize the course | Content | and also provides practical tools to | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.93 | 1.18 |
| SG_K6nEmEeWxvQr3acyajw | Challenging, thorough and engaging. Repetitive in a good way, by gently going back over content you almost learn by default. The quizzes are professionally prepared and sometimes tough to pass! This is good as you are obliged to think hard, even go back through materials or ask others for advice until the knowledge sticks. Highly recommended and of great practical value. | way, by gently going back over | Content | you almost learn by default. The | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.93 | 1.18 |
| SG_K6nEmEeWxvQr3acyajw | The content is great, and the lectures are clear, but this course was made in a rush: there are many bugs throughout the quizzes and there is no contact at all with the lecturer in the forums, and there is no teaching stuff present in the forums. | The | Content | is great, and the lectures are | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.93 | 1.18 |
| SG_K6nEmEeWxvQr3acyajw | Good content, but blocked quizes in free version is bad idea. | Good | Content | but blocked quizes in free version | Positive | 0.6 | -0.5 | 0.93 | 1.18 |
| SG_K6nEmEeWxvQr3acyajw | Excellent content, but I would prefer the assignments be evaluated and rated by experts, not the colleagues. | Excellent | Content | but I would prefer the assignments | Positive | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.93 | 1.18 |
| SG_K6nEmEeWxvQr3acyajw | Very good course. Awesome content. | Very good course. Awesome | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.93 | 1.18 |
| SG_K6nEmEeWxvQr3acyajw | Very good content but it only gives a general view on each topic not going too deep on technical SEO and keyword research. | Very good | Content | but it only gives a general | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.93 | 1.18 |
| SG_K6nEmEeWxvQr3acyajw | Excellent course contents and a logical structured organization of the topics. | Excellent course | Content | and a logical structured organization of | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.93 | 1.18 |
| SG_K6nEmEeWxvQr3acyajw | Very poor. Full of errors in videos and quizzes (which affect final grade), no response from course organizers in the forum to multiple complaints from learners, and extremely thin on content. Could have been merged into the first course of the specialization (Introduction to SEO). I've taken $49 one-off certificate classes that provided 4-10 hours of content for 6-8 weeks; for this course I was charged $119 for 1-3 hours of content for what was supposed to be 4 weeks. I completed the course in a couple of days and felt like I learned more from free resources like Moz. Complete rip-off and easily the worse course of the half dozen I've taken on Coursera on various topics. It seems like you're paying for the UC Davis name on the certificates rather than the content. In addition to all that they dropped the price from $119 to $79 per course for the specialization after I paid for it, and refuse to refund the price difference. Fine - but if I'm paying a premium price I expect much better content and service than was received. | from learners, and extremely thin on | Content | Could have been merged into the | Negative | -0.6 | -1.0 | 0.93 | 1.18 |
| SG_K6nEmEeWxvQr3acyajw | Very poor. Full of errors in videos and quizzes (which affect final grade), no response from course organizers in the forum to multiple complaints from learners, and extremely thin on content. Could have been merged into the first course of the specialization (Introduction to SEO). I've taken $49 one-off certificate classes that provided 4-10 hours of content for 6-8 weeks; for this course I was charged $119 for 1-3 hours of content for what was supposed to be 4 weeks. I completed the course in a couple of days and felt like I learned more from free resources like Moz. Complete rip-off and easily the worse course of the half dozen I've taken on Coursera on various topics. It seems like you're paying for the UC Davis name on the certificates rather than the content. In addition to all that they dropped the price from $119 to $79 per course for the specialization after I paid for it, and refuse to refund the price difference. Fine - but if I'm paying a premium price I expect much better content and service than was received. | classes that provided 4-10 hours of | Content | for 6-8 weeks; for this course | Negative | -0.6 | -1.0 | 0.93 | 1.18 |
| SG_K6nEmEeWxvQr3acyajw | Very poor. Full of errors in videos and quizzes (which affect final grade), no response from course organizers in the forum to multiple complaints from learners, and extremely thin on content. Could have been merged into the first course of the specialization (Introduction to SEO). I've taken $49 one-off certificate classes that provided 4-10 hours of content for 6-8 weeks; for this course I was charged $119 for 1-3 hours of content for what was supposed to be 4 weeks. I completed the course in a couple of days and felt like I learned more from free resources like Moz. Complete rip-off and easily the worse course of the half dozen I've taken on Coursera on various topics. It seems like you're paying for the UC Davis name on the certificates rather than the content. In addition to all that they dropped the price from $119 to $79 per course for the specialization after I paid for it, and refuse to refund the price difference. Fine - but if I'm paying a premium price I expect much better content and service than was received. | charged $119 for 1-3 hours of | Content | for what was supposed to be | Negative | -0.7 | -1.0 | 0.93 | 1.18 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | The explainations are a bit hard to follow if you are in a hurry, some times the course concepts just jump onto you. The techniques and content are really really great and very relavent, but the instructional value can be further ehnanced. | jump onto you. The techniques and | Content | are really really great and very | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.94 | 0.98 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Quiz does not require hands-on experience of creating templates but rather simply plugging in numbers. Students may forget most of the content after finishing the quiz. | Students may forget most of the | Content | after finishing the quiz. | Positive | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.94 | 0.98 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Great contents and teachers! | Great | Content | and teachers! | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.94 | 0.98 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | The title is very misleading. Excel is an afterthought for this course; instead there is a heavy focus on statistics. The class claims to be for beginners, but that is clearly not the case, as it requires previous knowledge in inferential statistics and calculus. Excel is hardly used and is certainly not the focus; there are weeks where Excel is not used at all. There are no practice assignments, only quizzes. It's clear that this course is outdated and poorly maintained, as the videos refer to examples that are not included or content that was not presented. Needless to say, I will not be taking any other courses in this specialization. | examples that are not included or | Content | that was not presented. Needless to | Negative | -0.6 | -1.0 | 0.94 | 0.98 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Excellent content, learned many new things. Mainly new tools in Excel with the Solver. | Excellent | Content | learned many new things. Mainly new | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.94 | 0.98 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | The course structure is not thoughtfully prepared. There is a lot of confusion around what the instructor wants to say. The practice quizzes and course content have no match whatsoever | say. The practice quizzes and course | Content | have no match whatsoever | Negative | -0.6 | -1.0 | 0.94 | 0.98 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Good content but badly structured | Good | Content | but badly structured | Negative | -0.6 | 1.0 | 0.94 | 0.98 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Dr Eggers is a tremendous professor. The course has wit and application along with assignments that are well scaffolded to the learning content. Highly recommend this class. | are well scaffolded to the learning | Content | Highly recommend this class. | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.94 | 0.98 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | I am sorry to say this, but the tutorial could have been organzied in a much more serious way. I do not know how much time the Professors have put on preparation. But it gives me a "sloppy" impression!!! The class carries the name of University of Duke and 70 euros are charged, so I think the learners would reasonably expect to see that the teacher puts lots of time to organize the course structure, in order to efficiently give as much as information to the learners within limited time! For example, I believe nobody would not say that the Week 2 content on confusion matrix is very consistently explained. And this is just one example. | not say that the Week 2 | Content | on confusion matrix is very consistently | Positive | 0.6 | -0.5 | 0.94 | 0.98 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Content is not well organized, videos are disconnected from one another, explanations are not clear, spreadsheets contain vast information that is not explained anywhere. It is been quite difficult to follow through the course and I bet many students are giving up. | | Content | is not well organized, videos are | Negative | -0.6 | -1.0 | 0.94 | 0.98 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | The content of the course was good. However, I did not like the presentation of the material, moreover such a topic would need to be covered by a longer duration course. | The | Content | of the course was good. However, | Positive | 0.6 | -0.5 | 0.94 | 0.98 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | I missed some more content in certain areas of the course (i.e. histograms). Apart from that, great course and great explanations by Daniel Egger! | I missed some more | Content | in certain areas of the course | Negative | -0.6 | 0.5 | 0.94 | 0.98 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Unfortunately, the material and lectures of this course fell short of my expectations. Lectures don't follow a logical path and are all over the place, and some concepts are not expanded as required. Overall, I believe they need to improve how the content is presented, and how it's applied in a real world context. | they need to improve how the | Content | is presented, and how it's applied | Positive | 0.6 | -1.0 | 0.94 | 0.98 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Good content and practical examples. | Good | Content | and practical examples. | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.94 | 0.98 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Good content, some materials were difficult but the video lecture were rushed. | Good | Content | some materials were difficult but the | Negative | -0.6 | 0.5 | 0.94 | 0.98 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Content not discussed in proper detail. Instructor skims over the concepts. Its difficult to follow. | | Content | not discussed in proper detail. Instructor | Positive | 0.6 | -0.5 | 0.94 | 0.98 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Course contents are rather deep which is good and makes it challenging. Explanations could be better and there should be more content on some topics for better understanding. Someone with background in statistics would find this course more useful than on who only has basic knowledge of statistics. Nevertheless, it inspired me to learn from other sources to fill the gaps in my understanding. | Course | Content | are rather deep which is good | Positive | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.94 | 0.98 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Course contents are rather deep which is good and makes it challenging. Explanations could be better and there should be more content on some topics for better understanding. Someone with background in statistics would find this course more useful than on who only has basic knowledge of statistics. Nevertheless, it inspired me to learn from other sources to fill the gaps in my understanding. | better and there should be more | Content | on some topics for better understanding. | Positive | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.94 | 0.98 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Much work needs to be done on this course to make it friendly to learners. The quizzes and assignments do not align with what is taught in the lessons. Further, the content in the lessons does not even show or explain what is expected from the learning. I spent the majority of my time exploring the discussions to discover what I was supposed to be doing and the rest of it on Google teaching myself the concepts that were not taught in the course. | taught in the lessons. Further, the | Content | in the lessons does not even | Negative | -0.6 | -0.5 | 0.94 | 0.98 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | No need to learn Excel so I'm to focus on the content. The professor examples are clear and like that he provides different perspectives to looking at a problem and makes it visual as well in order to conceptualized the idea first so I can commit it to my mind. | so I'm to focus on the | Content | The professor examples are clear and | Negative | -0.6 | 1.0 | 0.94 | 0.98 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | The course deserves a 5-star rating because: (1) content is relevant, (2) the professor is concise and possesses great teaching skills, and (3) the learning modules are applicable to daily problems. | deserves a 5-star rating because: (1) | Content | is relevant, (2) the professor is | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.94 | 0.98 |
| SrM6V-3pEeSJZSIAC0gHUg | Practical and immediately applicable - language and activities to start your positive classroom. Participants are dedicated and the assignments offer insightful opportunities to explore concepts and create content for your classroom. | opportunities to explore concepts and create | Content | for your classroom. | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.91 | 1.13 |
| SrM6V-3pEeSJZSIAC0gHUg | Usable information, well presented, very accessible. Videos of teachers in class add a great deal to the content. | add a great deal to the | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.91 | 1.13 |
| SrM6V-3pEeSJZSIAC0gHUg | I've done a few online courses on various, and for me, this is poor. The content is gratingly simplified, the delivery worse. The instructions for the assignments are impenetrable at best. Unfortunately, I can't gain those moments that I've spent on this course back. | for me, this is poor. The | Content | is gratingly simplified, the delivery worse. | Negative | -0.8 | -1.0 | 0.91 | 1.13 |
| SrM6V-3pEeSJZSIAC0gHUg | I am really enjoying the course, I like the content, the instructor and the interviews! | enjoying the course, I like the | Content | the instructor and the interviews! | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.91 | 1.13 |
| sxQd3zI6EeWtEArDRuZAUQ | This course is really bad. The instruction is not enough to solve the programming assignment. The almost contents aren't related to communicating data science result. | solve the programming assignment. The almost | Content | aren't related to communicating data science | Negative | -0.7 | -1.0 | 0.76 | 1.08 |
| sxQd3zI6EeWtEArDRuZAUQ | Much of the assignment was out of date. The content was not related to big portion of the assignment. There was no way of getting clarification over the outdated assignment content. | assignment was out of date. The | Content | was not related to big portion | Negative | -0.6 | -1.0 | 0.76 | 1.08 |
| sxQd3zI6EeWtEArDRuZAUQ | Much of the assignment was out of date. The content was not related to big portion of the assignment. There was no way of getting clarification over the outdated assignment content. | getting clarification over the outdated assignment | Content | | Negative | -0.6 | -1.0 | 0.76 | 1.08 |
| sxQd3zI6EeWtEArDRuZAUQ | Excellent content. Detractors were some of the lectures had a continual popping in the audio and the instructions for the final assignment seemed a little dated and required a bit more work to figure out the correct steps. | Excellent | Content | Detractors were some of the lectures | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.76 | 1.08 |
| tCC8OzJzEeWLGgqjU3pHlw | It was a fun course, not sure about the educational content, but it was fun. | course, not sure about the educational | Content | but it was fun. | Positive | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| tCC8OzJzEeWLGgqjU3pHlw | The interviews were great, and useful to see a real experienced designer, however the contents in the course were almost nonexistent. The homework was well planed but it depends much more in the student to learn something that the contents exposed in the videos. Tips aren't the same as methodologies and content in character design. | student to learn something that the | Content | exposed in the videos. Tips aren't | Negative | -0.6 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| TcSA6RwWEeWBKhJRV_B8Gw | This course was very real, current and useful in my life. The content was well structured & delivered exceptionally well. I liked the fact that it was both theoretically robust and practically inclined, the examples utilised where relatable and easy to follow. I also appreciated the passion is the delivery of the course by the lecturer, her enthusiasm made watching all the videos worthwhile. Thank you for this introduction- it made a significant difference in my life | and useful in my life. The | Content | was well structured & delivered exceptionally | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.99 | 1.0 |
| TcSA6RwWEeWBKhJRV_B8Gw | Very repetitive content, provide only some abstract presentation of the technics used. | Very repetitive | Content | provide only some abstract presentation of | Negative | -0.6 | -0.5 | 0.99 | 1.0 |
| tGbJuel4EeSnMSIACzuFJw | I strongly recommend this course to those who want to learn some useful tools and techniques to become a better negotiator. Content is great, the course is nice to follow and it's not just watching some videos, you must really understand the concepts to pass the tests and it really forces you to think. | techniques to become a better negotiator. | Content | is great, the course is nice | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 1.21 |
| tGbJuel4EeSnMSIACzuFJw | I'm not done with this course, and I can already review it as EXCELLENT. The Professor is very entertaining, and the content is superb. | Professor is very entertaining, and the | Content | is superb. | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 1.21 |
| tGbJuel4EeSnMSIACzuFJw | This course in really insightful and with amazing content, but the structuring of the course is a bit confusing: too many divisions, and no clear learning path | in really insightful and with amazing | Content | but the structuring of the course | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 1.21 |
| tGbJuel4EeSnMSIACzuFJw | Outstanding teaching style and animations. Loved the content, format and examples. One of the most interesting and fun online classes I have taken. | teaching style and animations. Loved the | Content | format and examples. One of the | Positive | 0.9 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 1.21 |
| tGbJuel4EeSnMSIACzuFJw | Insightful content, great animated lectures, very valuable group work and very interesting guest lecturers. I enjoyed the course very much. | Insightful | Content | great animated lectures, very valuable group | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 1.21 |
| tGbJuel4EeSnMSIACzuFJw | Great professor, very well explained step-by-step content and practical exercises | Great professor, very well explained step-by-step | Content | and practical exercises | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 1.21 |
| tGbJuel4EeSnMSIACzuFJw | Great course! one of the best that I have ever seen in Coursera, very well driven and great content, Barry is an amazing bright teacher....would be great to get some more courses from him | Coursera, very well driven and great | Content | Barry is an amazing bright teacher. | Positive | 0.9 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 1.21 |
| tGbJuel4EeSnMSIACzuFJw | The good: introduction of some deep concepts that I haven't seen yet, in a clear format. What could be better: I would have preferred the course to focus more on the technical aspects, and there were quite large sections that I thought didn't add much to the information content. Thankfully there was enough good for it to get a high rating overall. | didn't add much to the information | Content | Thankfully there was enough good for | Negative | -0.6 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 1.21 |
| tGbJuel4EeSnMSIACzuFJw | Excellent content with a brilliant professor | Excellent | Content | with a brilliant professor | Positive | 0.9 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 1.21 |
| tGbJuel4EeSnMSIACzuFJw | Great, very usefull, so many examples, very interactive, easy to work with, great content, excelent!! get into it!! | interactive, easy to work with, great | Content | excelent! ! get into it! ! | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 1.21 |
| TIDJWBwuEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | Just the beginning now but a really great one ! Love the content, the teachers videos are really well made and explanatory. I found the Coursera platform really well fabricated and intuitive. Everything is set to give us the best chances to thoroughly learn and earn that awesome life changing license ! | really great one ! Love the | Content | the teachers videos are really well | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.54 | 1.09 |
| TIDJWBwuEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | very interesting & engaging & enriching course content . Dr.shane is wonderful in his presentation. | interesting & engaging & enriching course | Content | . Dr. shane is wonderful in | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.54 | 1.09 |
| TIDJWBwuEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | In a word: Great! Great content, organization, great teachers! | In a word: Great! Great | Content | organization, great teachers! | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.54 | 1.09 |
| TIDJWBwuEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | I love this program. The content is amaizing, weel done, well prepared, concise, well explained... I love all the courses of this University!! | I love this program. The | Content | is amaizing, weel done, well prepared, | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.54 | 1.09 |
| TIDJWBwuEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | amazing teachers, content, smooth learning curve. Very practical and useful knowledge for the classroom teacher. | amazing teachers, | Content | smooth learning curve. Very practical and | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.54 | 1.09 |
| TIDJWBwuEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | This class is very easy. It is a decent introduction, but has very little content. It is clearly made to be accessible to people from all around the world, and takes the content very slowly. The test questions ask you to recite information from the video lectures and reading, rather than thinking critically. It seems like they are just trying to make sure you watched/read the content and understood it, rather than making sure you acquired the knowledge. I guess it would be hard to grade essay questions in a class this big, but the content could go a little faster. | decent introduction, but has very little | Content | It is clearly made to be | Negative | -0.6 | 0.0 | 0.54 | 1.09 |
| TIDJWBwuEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | This class is very easy. It is a decent introduction, but has very little content. It is clearly made to be accessible to people from all around the world, and takes the content very slowly. The test questions ask you to recite information from the video lectures and reading, rather than thinking critically. It seems like they are just trying to make sure you watched/read the content and understood it, rather than making sure you acquired the knowledge. I guess it would be hard to grade essay questions in a class this big, but the content could go a little faster. | around the world, and takes the | Content | very slowly. The test questions ask | Positive | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.54 | 1.09 |
| TIDJWBwuEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | This class is very easy. It is a decent introduction, but has very little content. It is clearly made to be accessible to people from all around the world, and takes the content very slowly. The test questions ask you to recite information from the video lectures and reading, rather than thinking critically. It seems like they are just trying to make sure you watched/read the content and understood it, rather than making sure you acquired the knowledge. I guess it would be hard to grade essay questions in a class this big, but the content could go a little faster. | to make sure you watched/read the | Content | and understood it, rather than making | Positive | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.54 | 1.09 |
| TIDJWBwuEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | Wonderful course!! The content, the explanation etc...Thank you a lot!! | Wonderful course! ! The | Content | the explanation etc. . . Thank | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.54 | 1.09 |
| TIDJWBwuEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | Excellent course. Content, teachers, structure, everything is excellent. Highly recomend this course for expertes and new teachers. | Excellent course. | Content | teachers, structure, everything is excellent. Highly | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.54 | 1.09 |
| TIDJWBwuEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | Content is too basic, seems unresearched. Instructor is distracting in manner in which he presents information - overemphasizes acting over content. | | Content | is too basic, seems unresearched. Instructor | Negative | -0.6 | -1.0 | 0.54 | 1.09 |
| TIDJWBwuEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | The course was very interactive and the teachers made it fun, interesting and very easy to follow. The content was also all new to me. Very helpful! | and very easy to follow. The | Content | was also all new to me. | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.54 | 1.09 |
| TIDJWBwuEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | Really Really it's an awesome course! High content, High technique . Thank you Dr: Shane It's really nice to see ya ;) | Really it's an awesome course! High | Content | High technique . Thank you Dr: | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.54 | 1.09 |
| TIDJWBwuEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | Exceptional professors and content. Thanks a million for this initiative! | Exceptional professors and | Content | Thanks a million for this initiative! | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.54 | 1.09 |
| TIDJWBwuEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | Very helpful contents with videos of the length long enough to learn and short enough to keep learning interesting. | Very helpful | Content | with videos of the length long | Negative | -0.6 | 0.5 | 0.54 | 1.09 |
| TIDJWBwuEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | This course gave a great baseline for getting started in TESOL. I learned as much from watching the professor model good teaching as I did from the content of the videos. I highly recommend this course if you are considering teaching English to speakers of other languages. | teaching as I did from the | Content | of the videos. I highly recommend | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.54 | 1.09 |
| TIDJWBwuEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | Excellent teachers. Content and techniques were so easy to learn. | Excellent teachers. | Content | and techniques were so easy to | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.54 | 1.09 |
| TIDJWBwuEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | It was really interesting and simple to follow, and full of a rich content. It is highly recommended. | follow, and full of a rich | Content | It is highly recommended. | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.54 | 1.09 |
| TIDJWBwuEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | Fantastic course with GREAT content! | Fantastic course with GREAT | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.54 | 1.09 |
| TIDJWBwuEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | This course was beautifully made, the content was rich and meaty and yet not overwhelming. The modules were compact and yet well paced, presented using the very same principles being taught. My children (ages 8,10, 12) would even sit down and watch Dr. Shane's lessons with me, every week! Thank you very much to the team behind the Teach English Now specialization. | This course was beautifully made, the | Content | was rich and meaty and yet | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.54 | 1.09 |
| TIDJWBwuEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | I am so impressed with the quality of style and content that this course was presented. I could see careful forethought, planning and execution of an online course that was a joy for me to be a part of. I totally recommend this course! | with the quality of style and | Content | that this course was presented. I | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.54 | 1.09 |
| TIDJWBwuEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | The course is excellent! In fact, the professor, Dr. Shane Dixon is an expert able to capture and keep our attention. More yet, the content and the approach used are really good! The way Dr. Shane conduct the course and explain how to become a better teacher make this course a must for future teachers. I highly recommend, not just for english teachers, but those who wants to improve their abilities as professors at colleges and universities. | keep our attention. More yet, the | Content | and the approach used are really | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.54 | 1.09 |
| TIDJWBwuEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | Course is fun, easy, enjoyable and beneficial. Prof. Shane is a very talented presenter and managed to pull me into the lectures. My only concerns are: The length of the course was too short and it was not very deep. In other words In my opinion they could have easily added another course worth of material to this course without it becoming overbearing. It made me feel that their stretching the number of courses you have to take to finish the specialization. Other wise its a good course. Great instructor and good content! | good course. Great instructor and good | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.54 | 1.09 |
| TIDJWBwuEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | This course is taught in a easy way approachable for everybody. The images, graphics, metaphors are really good to make you understand the content. | good to make you understand the | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.54 | 1.09 |
| TIDJWBwuEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | The content is great, but the course lacks support from the staff. It is also too easy to pass. I hope the reason for this is because the course was introductory. | The | Content | is great, but the course lacks | Positive | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.54 | 1.09 |
| TIDJWBwuEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | Great! If this was the first I'm excited to start the others. The content is very instructive, a lot of concepts and useful tools. They should add more content per week, because is too little material to study per week. Thus, sometimes it seens to be boring. But it's ok. | excited to start the others. The | Content | is very instructive, a lot of | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.54 | 1.09 |
| TIDJWBwuEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | Great! If this was the first I'm excited to start the others. The content is very instructive, a lot of concepts and useful tools. They should add more content per week, because is too little material to study per week. Thus, sometimes it seens to be boring. But it's ok. | useful tools. They should add more | Content | per week, because is too little | Negative | -0.6 | 0.5 | 0.54 | 1.09 |
| TIDJWBwuEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | Excellent content. Thank you. | Excellent | Content | Thank you. | Positive | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.54 | 1.09 |
| TIDJWBwuEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | Great instructors, great teaching style, and a great content for foundational principles in language teaching! I recommend this to every language teacher who wants to hear something new! | great teaching style, and a great | Content | for foundational principles in language teaching! | Positive | 0.9 | 1.0 | 0.54 | 1.09 |
| tjqUXz-5EeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | Very interesting course that provides a comprehensive, yet accessible, account of the global financial crisis as well as of its causes and consequences. Both Prof. Metrick and Mr. Geithner do a great job in explaining the materials using clear slides and easily understandable graphics and figures. The course setup is also clear and can easily be completed. The quizzes offer a good opportunity to keep track of the course contents (maybe extend them to 3-4 questions instead of just 2?). Perhaps a comprehensive final exam reviewing the materials of all prior weeks would be sensible, as one might have forgotten what topics were discussed in week 1 or 2 while learning the contents of week 11. | to keep track of the course | Content | (maybe extend them to 3-4 questions | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.54 | 1.08 |
| tjqUXz-5EeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | Very interesting course that provides a comprehensive, yet accessible, account of the global financial crisis as well as of its causes and consequences. Both Prof. Metrick and Mr. Geithner do a great job in explaining the materials using clear slides and easily understandable graphics and figures. The course setup is also clear and can easily be completed. The quizzes offer a good opportunity to keep track of the course contents (maybe extend them to 3-4 questions instead of just 2?). Perhaps a comprehensive final exam reviewing the materials of all prior weeks would be sensible, as one might have forgotten what topics were discussed in week 1 or 2 while learning the contents of week 11. | 1 or 2 while learning the | Content | of week 11. | Negative | -0.6 | 0.5 | 0.54 | 1.08 |
| tjqUXz-5EeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | The scope, content and presentation were all very well done. | The scope, | Content | and presentation were all very well | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.54 | 1.08 |
| tjqUXz-5EeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | Sets a high bar for online educational content. The instructors clearly know their subject matter, and are serving a public duty by offering this course online. | a high bar for online educational | Content | The instructors clearly know their subject | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.54 | 1.08 |
| tjqUXz-5EeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | Interesting and topical, from people who were in the thick of things and don't pull punches. The camerawork leaves a bit to be desired, but not the content. | to be desired, but not the | Content | | Negative | -0.7 | 1.0 | 0.54 | 1.08 |
| tjqUXz-5EeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | Excellent speakers with excellent organizations on course content. Could not wait for more courses from Prof Andrew. However, is there any one who could help clear the questions raised in the forum? Thank you. | speakers with excellent organizations on course | Content | Could not wait for more courses | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.54 | 1.08 |
| tjqUXz-5EeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | Short and concise videos, well-explained and easy-to-understand content. I highly recommend it! | and concise videos, well-explained and easy-to-understand | Content | I highly recommend it! | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.54 | 1.08 |
| tjqUXz-5EeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | This course is very interesting and the content is pretty clear-cut and easy to understand. | course is very interesting and the | Content | is pretty clear-cut and easy to | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.54 | 1.08 |
| trDN9vgGEeSW1SIAC3oCCQ | I did all four courses - the whole specialization. Each course in itself was aright and I learned new things. However, the course certificate is meaningless. It neither states the content nor the effort (for example the hours). Instead, it even says "non-credit course". This is despite the fact that the course equates "35 PDU's" and "counts towards the UCI Project Management Certificate Programm"; as it was described in the FAQ. I feel betrayed. How can I apply with such a meaningless peace of paper anywhere? | is meaningless. It neither states the | Content | nor the effort (for example the | Negative | -0.7 | -1.0 | 1.22 | 1.22 |
| trDN9vgGEeSW1SIAC3oCCQ | An excellent finale for the program, giving us the oportunity to apply most of the knowledge received through the different courses. The capstone project is clear, easy to understand in terms of structure and requirements. It lacks some of the contents of the course but most of the content is included. Once again thanks to Ms Meloni, all the team from UCI and Coursera, keep the good work! | the course but most of the | Content | is included. Once again thanks to | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 1.22 | 1.22 |
| tWgmnb03EeS5IyIACyCAHg | Great course, a lot of content to be explored | Great course, a lot of | Content | to be explored | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.93 | 1.03 |
| tWgmnb03EeS5IyIACyCAHg | the only reason to take this course is because the certification will look good on your resume. don't expect to learn anything new if you are already in IT or related field. i passed the tests without going over the material. there is a shortage of original content, although their graphics and effects department did a good job, and mostly they expect you to read outside resources. audit the course for free to get familiar with the content but only pay if you need the certification for professional reasons. | there is a shortage of original | Content | although their graphics and effects department | Positive | 0.7 | -1.0 | 0.93 | 1.03 |
| tWgmnb03EeS5IyIACyCAHg | The high video production values of this course fail to hide the abysmal lack of content. With approximately 4 mins per week of video charging $49 for this course is a disgrace. Potential students should save their money and read the relevant Wikipedia pages. | to hide the abysmal lack of | Content | With approximately 4 mins per week | Negative | -0.8 | -1.0 | 0.93 | 1.03 |
| tWgmnb03EeS5IyIACyCAHg | I wish they spent more time on the content of videos and less on the silly effects and 30-second intro and outro sequences. Practically every question of the final comes word-for-word from a book not assigned in the module readings and not available for free to students for them to study. I won't be taking any other courses from this school if this course was an indication of quality. | they spent more time on the | Content | of videos and less on the | Negative | -0.6 | -1.0 | 0.93 | 1.03 |
| tWgmnb03EeS5IyIACyCAHg | The best part about this course was that it made sure you are interested in learning the subject. If not, it is really really difficult to get on with it. It makes sure you understand the subject really well and you have to give back to the community. I liked the fact that you have to read the "Readings for this module" part, otherwise you won't be able to pass the Quizzes at the end of each module. You have to write a short paragraph which it will be reviewed by peers, who will in turn give you ratings. You have to do the same for other peers. This was probably the best aspect of this course. The music was extremely annoying and the quality of the content in the videos was okay, but the most important part is that it guided me in the right direction every time. Sometimes, by the end of the video, the music started in between the lecture itself and played itself for 3-4 seconds. | annoying and the quality of the | Content | in the videos was okay, but | Negative | -0.7 | 0.5 | 0.93 | 1.03 |
| tWgmnb03EeS5IyIACyCAHg | Pretty average and way too short/fast paced videos. Felt like it was put together on the fly. I don't usually review but this was not great, the reading material they linked to was the best content overall. | they linked to was the best | Content | overall. | Positive | 0.7 | -0.5 | 0.93 | 1.03 |
| tWgmnb03EeS5IyIACyCAHg | The videos and documents are not balanced with the quizzes. The quiz questions are sometimes verbatim sentences from one book with a missing word - which I find hardly a test of acquired knowledge. The course must rise above only a few definitions and rough concepts. Most of the video's hardly offer insights - they last only 2 minutes and cover a few of those definitions. This course has a lot of potential, but in its current format and content it was a disappointment. | but in its current format and | Content | it was a disappointment. | Negative | -0.6 | -0.5 | 0.93 | 1.03 |
| tWgmnb03EeS5IyIACyCAHg | I'm going to try to continue to the end but the first three weeks is probably 15 minutes of videos with the most annoying music available playing for way too much of the content. I also didn't need to watch 10 seconds of an animated caveman grunting and smashing things on the screen. I would probably enjoy that part more if I felt that the information that is supposed to be learned over three weeks was more information than 5 pages in a book. | for way too much of the | Content | I also didn't need to watch | Negative | -0.8 | -0.5 | 0.93 | 1.03 |
| tWgmnb03EeS5IyIACyCAHg | The lectures were too heavy on Industry experts who quickly covered the important topics. I have taken many technology and business courses on Coursera with one or two professors covering the important content accented with industry and subject matter expert interviews. This format works best for consistency and learning, IMHO.. A student who is not in the Cybersecurity field will not gain insight into the meat of the material from the lectures. The final exam question material is almost exclusively absent in the lectures. One is required to read the cited material to gain the required information | or two professors covering the important | Content | accented with industry and subject matter | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.93 | 1.03 |
| tWgmnb03EeS5IyIACyCAHg | Minimal video efforts, not enough content, and long readings. Definetly not a good course to get a verified certificate | Minimal video efforts, not enough | Content | and long readings. Definetly not a | Negative | -0.6 | -1.0 | 0.93 | 1.03 |
| T_hpstgKEeSA2iIAC22KLw | This is an excellent overview of the issues surrounding sustainable development. Some of the content needs updating, in particular with relation to the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Furthermore, some of the quiz answers are incorrect based on the data referred to and the resources appear to have been updated since the course was written. There is nobody monitoring the forum and addressing issues raised. | surrounding sustainable development. Some of the | Content | needs updating, in particular with relation | Negative | -0.6 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 1.08 |
| T_hpstgKEeSA2iIAC22KLw | Exceptional content. High level text, graphs and references. Prof. Sachs is a great lecturer! So much we can learn from him and be better human beings. | Exceptional | Content | High level text, graphs and references. | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 1.08 |
| T_hpstgKEeSA2iIAC22KLw | I learnt so much from this course, and really appreciated the manner in which Professor Sachs logically and systematically presented the content | Sachs logically and systematically presented the | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 1.08 |
| T_hpstgKEeSA2iIAC22KLw | Excelent Professor, with great contents! A course that should be attended by everybody. | Excelent Professor, with great | Content | A course that should be attended | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 1.08 |
| T_hpstgKEeSA2iIAC22KLw | Excellent course content but very poorly designed quizzes. More clarity is needed in formulating questions, since different pages have different values for the same data sets (even on the same website such as the World Bank indicator datasets) and it will be difficult for students to get the right answers. | Excellent course | Content | but very poorly designed quizzes. More | Positive | 0.6 | -1.0 | 0.6 | 1.08 |
| T_hpstgKEeSA2iIAC22KLw | The course provides basics of Sustainable Development in a comprehensive way. Easy to understand and follow, rich with examples, and interesting content. | follow, rich with examples, and interesting | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 1.08 |
| T_hpstgKEeSA2iIAC22KLw | A course that every citizen of the world will find absolutely amazing! Excellent and well-structured content easy to understand and comprehend. | find absolutely amazing! Excellent and well-structured | Content | easy to understand and comprehend. | Positive | 0.9 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 1.08 |
| T_hpstgKEeSA2iIAC22KLw | This course has been wonderfully informative. I have enjoyed the structure, content and pace of this course and always look forward to the next video. This course is essential for understanding the complex issues facing our World today. | informative. I have enjoyed the structure, | Content | and pace of this course and | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 1.08 |
| T_hpstgKEeSA2iIAC22KLw | The content is good. The delivery of lectures can be more engaging, with aid of visuals to illustrate and emphasize important concepts. | The | Content | is good. The delivery of lectures | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 1.08 |
| T_hpstgKEeSA2iIAC22KLw | Very interesting and well delivered content. Occasional links expired | Very interesting and well delivered | Content | Occasional links expired | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 1.08 |
| T_hpstgKEeSA2iIAC22KLw | This course is pretty much what i expected from an online course. I just rate it with four stars because: 1. Quiz questions are often just about interpreting world bank data and not about the contents of the course. 2. Having read Prof. Sachs book the course does not offer additional insights. | bank data and not about the | Content | of the course. 2. Having read | Negative | -0.6 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 1.08 |
| T_hpstgKEeSA2iIAC22KLw | Great structure and content. Very knowledgeable lecturer as well. | Great structure and | Content | Very knowledgeable lecturer as well. | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 1.08 |
| UA9HkQ8QEeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Amazing Content for newbies , I do recommend these for business leaders as well. | Amazing | Content | for newbies , I do recommend | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 1.07 | 1.09 |
| UA9HkQ8QEeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Very good and to the point content. Very informative | Very good and to the point | Content | Very informative | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 1.07 | 1.09 |
| UA9HkQ8QEeWuEBJhzy2uFw | I feel that I wasted my time and money on this course to be very honest. Should have requested a refund when I could. The professor really doesn't put in the effort like other professors on Coursera. He is literally reading out the content on each slide. The content isn't very enlightening either, it's just facts about mobile technology and their release dates. One can read that up on wikipedia I honestly think this course should be taken off this platform so no one else falls for it as I did. If you're reading this before you enroll, don't do it, don't waste your time and money on this. | He is literally reading out the | Content | on each slide. The content isn't | Negative | -0.7 | -1.0 | 1.07 | 1.09 |
| UA9HkQ8QEeWuEBJhzy2uFw | I feel that I wasted my time and money on this course to be very honest. Should have requested a refund when I could. The professor really doesn't put in the effort like other professors on Coursera. He is literally reading out the content on each slide. The content isn't very enlightening either, it's just facts about mobile technology and their release dates. One can read that up on wikipedia I honestly think this course should be taken off this platform so no one else falls for it as I did. If you're reading this before you enroll, don't do it, don't waste your time and money on this. | the content on each slide. The | Content | isn't very enlightening either, it's just | Negative | -0.6 | -1.0 | 1.07 | 1.09 |
| UA9HkQ8QEeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Very good content and presentation, Thank you | Very good | Content | and presentation, Thank you | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 1.07 | 1.09 |
| UA9HkQ8QEeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Information in this course is thorough and comprehensive. The material is entirely composed of the specifications, release and feature development, and comparison of Android OS and iOS. The instructor shows slides and reads the slides in their entirety. There is no additional information the instructor provides that is not already included in the slide content. The teaching is not very stimulating. But the instructor does cover the material completely. | not already included in the slide | Content | The teaching is not very stimulating. | Negative | -0.7 | 0.5 | 1.07 | 1.09 |
| ujxZm0T9EeWhnQozdayc-w | I slogged through it and got an 89, but the videos were boring and the quizzes were poorly worded and should have had greater correlation with the course content. | had greater correlation with the course | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | -1.0 | 0.9 | 0.9 |
| ujxZm0T9EeWhnQozdayc-w | The content was interesting, but the quizzes didn't relate to the lectures very often. It was as if there was a major piece missing in this course. One of the questions even referenced a book that was never mentioned or made available. Also, several of the musical sections seemed to be in the wrong place. I think maybe this is one of the classes that doesn't work well in this format. | The | Content | was interesting, but the quizzes didn't | Negative | -0.7 | -0.5 | 0.9 | 0.9 |
| ujxZm0T9EeWhnQozdayc-w | The content is great. But there's not a lot of activity on the discussion boards, and there are some technical issues with the quizzes (using future lesson material on current quizzes). But the content is really fascinating. | The | Content | is great. But there's not a | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.9 | 0.9 |
| ujxZm0T9EeWhnQozdayc-w | The content is great. But there's not a lot of activity on the discussion boards, and there are some technical issues with the quizzes (using future lesson material on current quizzes). But the content is really fascinating. | material on current quizzes). But the | Content | is really fascinating. | Negative | -0.6 | 0.5 | 0.9 | 0.9 |
| urbm-CT-EeWCGRL6mLoB5w | The course content is good, although it is very "USA centered". It is very good for people with small experience in the professional market, no just the games area, but all areas. Casey is a great teacher, he makes boring stuff be less boring. The only negative point of the course are the assignments. Again, like in the previous course, the assignments are too subjective, too personal, hard to do and evaluate. Unlike last course (Game Design), I really recommend this one, useful stuff. | The course | Content | is good, although it is very | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 0.88 |
| urbm-CT-EeWCGRL6mLoB5w | Awesome course! But I think It was a very short course. I wish it had more content. Very expensive course for this amount of content...still I really like it =). | course. I wish it had more | Content | Very expensive course for this amount | Negative | -0.8 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 0.88 |
| urbm-CT-EeWCGRL6mLoB5w | Awesome course! But I think It was a very short course. I wish it had more content. Very expensive course for this amount of content...still I really like it =). | expensive course for this amount of | Content | . . still I really like | Negative | -0.7 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 0.88 |
| urbm-CT-EeWCGRL6mLoB5w | Great content and great teacher. But I found the assignments and the quizzes not that great. I reckon the questions and corrections were a bit subjective and time consuming. | Great | Content | and great teacher. But I found | Positive | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 0.88 |
| urbm-CT-EeWCGRL6mLoB5w | The Good > A lot of content > Provided a lot of outside reading material > Passionate professor > A lot of good refreshers (about CVs, teamwork, business practices) Suggestions > I hope in the future more time could be spent on monetization theories and practices > More emphasis on mobile games (as much as I dislike them) > Maybe some type of "case study" examples about games from conceptualization to publishing | The Good > A lot of | Content | > Provided a lot of outside | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 0.88 |
| urbm-CT-EeWCGRL6mLoB5w | During the first week the assignments for the week was not even remotely associated with the content we learn throughout the week. For individuals who wish to learn about the video game industry but are not avid video game players or well read in its trade magazines, this is a bit frustrating. This slightly improved in following weeks. Besides that, the course is stellar. | not even remotely associated with the | Content | we learn throughout the week. For | Negative | -0.6 | 1.0 | 0.7 | 0.88 |
| urbm-CT-EeWCGRL6mLoB5w | This course is good for someone that's interested in starting up a company - for video game development or really any kind of self-employed, consulting, freelance or even small business company. I've been self-employed for 15+ years and can honestly say I didn't learn anything that I hadn't already known. But my experiences in entrepreneurship and this course both are similar in content, meaning the class is a good resource for those who don't know where to start. | this course both are similar in | Content | meaning the class is a good | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 0.88 |
| urbm-CT-EeWCGRL6mLoB5w | Many of the issues from the previous course have been fixed in this course. Not bad, but there were still issues with the video content not matching up well with the assignments. Especially in that the assignments are never talked about in the videos, especially how to create the papers that are asked of the student. | were still issues with the video | Content | not matching up well with the | Negative | -0.6 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 0.88 |
| urbm-CT-EeWCGRL6mLoB5w | Better than the second one. It should focus more on the specifics of the game industry. It provides much generalist advice that can be gotten in much better depth in other entrepreneurship content on Coursera I missed a section on what are the main players on the gaming industry and a brief discussion of each | much better depth in other entrepreneurship | Content | on Coursera I missed a section | Negative | -0.6 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 0.88 |
| UwQkL5z8EeWJORITtzkPnQ | An excellent course with very informative content! | An excellent course with very informative | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.7 | 1.05 |
| UwQkL5z8EeWJORITtzkPnQ | Excellent course. Larry is a great teacher and the quizzes and assignments give a great opportunity to consolidate our learning. One recommendation I would give is to try to make the forum more useful maybe by including TAs o including mentors that response on the course contents and not only on technical issu | mentors that response on the course | Content | and not only on technical issu | Negative | -0.6 | 1.0 | 0.7 | 1.05 |
| UYzGkJfFEeWqkw5zNB248Q | Great course that explains a lot of core concepts and techniques (like controlling depth of field). Also gives a great introduction to the different types of lenses available. My only criticism would be that the last two weeks are lighter on content (however the assignments are challenging and a lot of fun!) | last two weeks are lighter on | Content | (however the assignments are challenging and | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.79 | 0.87 |
| UYzGkJfFEeWqkw5zNB248Q | The content is helpful in learning to use the camera and understand terminology, but it is somewhat, if not totally, a false representation of interaction with the experts. There is absolutely none. Some seems repetitive from course one. | The | Content | is helpful in learning to use | Positive | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.79 | 0.87 |
| UYzGkJfFEeWqkw5zNB248Q | Peter & Mark hit a home run with this course, very thorough , great advice,this was a course full of knowledge and at the same time I truly enjoyed their way of delivering the content. | enjoyed their way of delivering the | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.79 | 0.87 |
| UYzGkJfFEeWqkw5zNB248Q | Sorry but yet again a potentially great course spoiled by the implementation, way too many mistakes in the quizzes, peer review grading systems which in places are nonsense . I hope things get better and I give the the course the 5 stars the content would merit if it had been properly QCed and delivered to best Coursera standards | the course the 5 stars the | Content | would merit if it had been | Negative | -0.6 | 0.0 | 0.79 | 0.87 |
| UYzGkJfFEeWqkw5zNB248Q | The course started really well and followed on nicely from the first course in the series but I'm really disappointed and frustrated with the video editing issues. Many were fixed but there are still some errors/omissions and the second half of the course was very short of content compared to the rest. Such a shame as I'm sure the writers really know their material and conveyed so well when the content was there. I'm looking forward to the next course and hope the material is all ready to go! | the course was very short of | Content | compared to the rest. Such a | Positive | 0.6 | -0.5 | 0.79 | 0.87 |
| UYzGkJfFEeWqkw5zNB248Q | The only content I had access to were lectures, but I still want to say that I really liked this course. And I'm looking forward to another courses of this specialization. I'm a music student with bachelor's degree in Computer Science and dozens of coursera certificates (from the times they were free), I'm curious about everything. I used to say that I'll learn to paint when I retire :) But it turned out that I can do pretty good photos without having to wait until retirement. It's not the same thing, of course, but it's a visual art. This course and "Cameras, Exposure, and Photography" teached me a lot and brought so much joy into my life. I'm not planning to make money as a photographer, but I'm happy to have an opportunity to create better and better photographs. Thank you, Prof. Glendinning and Prof. Sullivan. And thanks to everyone who helped to create this course. My photos can be found here, in case you're curious: https://www.flickr.com/photos/140271759@N03/ Most of them are made with my old cheap digital camera, only a few with a new DSLR. I would never have the courage and motivation to buy it without your courses. Thanks again for all the happiness photography brings into my life :) | The only | Content | I had access to were lectures, | Negative | -0.7 | 1.0 | 0.79 | 0.87 |
| u_Rrw_tfEeSuiSIACwuNww | The content could have digged deeper a bit more and the assignments could have been harder. | The | Content | could have digged deeper a bit | Positive | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.81 | 0.93 |
| u_Rrw_tfEeSuiSIACwuNww | Really great content and learnings. | Really great | Content | and learnings. | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.81 | 0.93 |
| u_Rrw_tfEeSuiSIACwuNww | Great content, nice presentation but Coursera website is slow, especially the submission step is unstable. | Great | Content | nice presentation but Coursera website is | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.81 | 0.93 |
| u_Rrw_tfEeSuiSIACwuNww | This is a very basic course. The contents do not cover a whole lot of ground. I personally did feel that there is a lot of repetition and this course did not help much . I somehow feel this course and the next ( the practical one ) could have been combined into one. Otherwise, not worth 2 courses of money. | is a very basic course. The | Content | do not cover a whole lot | Negative | -0.6 | 0.0 | 0.81 | 0.93 |
| u_Rrw_tfEeSuiSIACwuNww | This stage of the course i feel could be summed up to just one week worth of work. It mainly revolves around ZMOT and best marketing analytics and data collection techniques and rawly around 30 minutes of content, and the last week was more of a "let's sum up". Compared to the first stage where every single week had a new subject, with lots of content this one i feel, just didn't cut it. I do feel I learned a lot from it...and i plan to finish the specialization, but this one should be aided as part of another another module. | and rawly around 30 minutes of | Content | and the last week was more | Negative | -0.6 | 0.0 | 0.81 | 0.93 |
| u_Rrw_tfEeSuiSIACwuNww | This stage of the course i feel could be summed up to just one week worth of work. It mainly revolves around ZMOT and best marketing analytics and data collection techniques and rawly around 30 minutes of content, and the last week was more of a "let's sum up". Compared to the first stage where every single week had a new subject, with lots of content this one i feel, just didn't cut it. I do feel I learned a lot from it...and i plan to finish the specialization, but this one should be aided as part of another another module. | a new subject, with lots of | Content | this one i feel, just didn't | Negative | -0.7 | 0.0 | 0.81 | 0.93 |
| u_Rrw_tfEeSuiSIACwuNww | Some contents are overlapped, especially Lesson 7 feels like a recap of all previous lessons. Tool list is really helpful. Other examples could be written in more details. The narrative is easy to follow, reasonable pace of speech | Some | Content | are overlapped, especially Lesson 7 feels | Negative | -0.6 | 0.5 | 0.81 | 0.93 |
| u_Rrw_tfEeSuiSIACwuNww | very cool stuff, although the content could be a bit more compressed for this course and the next, I have the feeling that there are many redundancies and stuff that comes more than once | very cool stuff, although the | Content | could be a bit more compressed | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.81 | 0.93 |
| u_Rrw_tfEeSuiSIACwuNww | Excellent course with concise and well articulated content. | course with concise and well articulated | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.81 | 0.93 |
| u_Rrw_tfEeSuiSIACwuNww | thank you for the great structured content only recommendation is to increase the audio volume of the lecturer | thank you for the great structured | Content | only recommendation is to increase the | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.81 | 0.93 |
| u_Rrw_tfEeSuiSIACwuNww | Excellent content, narration could have been clearer and felt there was a bit of an overload of information in the lectures - could have been broken down into chunks. | Excellent | Content | narration could have been clearer and | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.81 | 0.93 |
| u_Rrw_tfEeSuiSIACwuNww | Hated the course and the content. I truly regret investing my money on this course. | Hated the course and the | Content | I truly regret investing my money | Negative | -0.8 | -1.0 | 0.81 | 0.93 |
| u_Rrw_tfEeSuiSIACwuNww | The lecture presents Google's ZMOT marketing model, how it benefited (and shaped) marketing research and strategies to increase conversion and loyalty. It is a good contextual introduction if you never heard of "search engine marketing", "cost per acquisition" or "click through rate". If you know the basics, it is probably not a good use of your time. I didn't like that the content feels like evangelism for (paid) google services, and most sources of the course are either random blogs or related to interested parties (google, twitter). I still learnt a couple of cool metrics I didn't know about, but the course didn't bring any added value to the blog links provided. | time. I didn't like that the | Content | feels like evangelism for (paid) google | Negative | -0.8 | -0.5 | 0.81 | 0.93 |
| u_Rrw_tfEeSuiSIACwuNww | Excellent crafted content for Marketing Analytics | Excellent crafted | Content | for Marketing Analytics | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.81 | 0.93 |
| u_Rrw_tfEeSuiSIACwuNww | The content is very similar to the Marketing analytics in practice one | The | Content | is very similar to the Marketing | Positive | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.81 | 0.93 |
| u_Rrw_tfEeSuiSIACwuNww | Interesting content and very well designed course. Instructor is good at explaining concepts. | Interesting | Content | and very well designed course. Instructor | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.81 | 0.93 |
| u_Rrw_tfEeSuiSIACwuNww | Great content! | Great | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.81 | 0.93 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | we are expecting some more similar good content mooc courses from michigan state university, regarding digital marketing , inbound marketing, internet of things,etc | are expecting some more similar good | Content | mooc courses from michigan state university, | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.37 | 1.13 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | Simple but not easy. This is well presented course with very practical content. I was able to put it to work straight away. I now approach negotiations with much more structure (and confidence). Looking forward to making the larger for everyone! | well presented course with very practical | Content | I was able to put it | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.37 | 1.13 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | The lectures were amazing, with lots of content but easy to follow. The examples were great to make everything clear. | lectures were amazing, with lots of | Content | but easy to follow. The examples | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.37 | 1.13 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | love the professor and content | love the professor and | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.37 | 1.13 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | Excellent teacher and great content, perfectly fit for a self-study course, it would be even better if there were more exercises to practice. | Excellent teacher and great | Content | perfectly fit for a self-study course, | Positive | 0.9 | 1.0 | 0.37 | 1.13 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | Excellent approach and content. | Excellent approach and | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.37 | 1.13 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | Excellent content, structure and delivery. Thank you for this course!! Very useful. | Excellent | Content | structure and delivery. Thank you for | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.37 | 1.13 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | Great book and great content on the course. | Great book and great | Content | on the course. | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.37 | 1.13 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | Poor content, only a book accompanies the videos and we should not be forced to buy anything! | Poor | Content | only a book accompanies the videos | Negative | -0.6 | -1.0 | 0.37 | 1.13 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | Great content, Professor's really good. Thanks! | Great | Content | Professor's really good. Thanks! | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.37 | 1.13 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | This course is challenging, but if you stick with the deadlines and take the exam within the timeline you will learn the content deeply. There is a lot of usable information in this course whether it is for personal or professional use. | the timeline you will learn the | Content | deeply. There is a lot of | Positive | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.37 | 1.13 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | Great content! | Great | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.37 | 1.13 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | This course was really useful and Prof. Siedel is such a great person. It is a pleasure listen to his lectures that were more like stories. I however would have liked to have little quizzes in between the weeks to review the content. It adds up quite a lot and even taking notes, at the end some info gets missing. I definitely recommend this course though. I am sure I will do much better in my next negotiation. | between the weeks to review the | Content | It adds up quite a lot | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.37 | 1.13 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | Some great content in this course - very comprehensive and great for anyone new to negotiation or just wanting a refresher. | Some great | Content | in this course - very comprehensive | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.37 | 1.13 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | excellent course. very experienced and knowledgeable professor. content of practical use and relevant almost every interaction where influencing is required. | course. very experienced and knowledgeable professor. | Content | of practical use and relevant almost | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.37 | 1.13 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | Outstanding content for any profession or walk of life. I wish I would have had this course about 10 years ago! | Outstanding | Content | for any profession or walk of | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.37 | 1.13 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | Very good course, structure, content, and engaging fellow students -- big Thanks UofM! :)) | Very good course, structure, | Content | and engaging fellow students -- big | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.37 | 1.13 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | Thank you so much for provding quality content. This is the best thing in coursera. Keep it up. | you so much for provding quality | Content | This is the best thing in | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.37 | 1.13 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | The course content was good. | The course | Content | was good. | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.37 | 1.13 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | Great teacher, wonderfull content and examples. Thank you very much professor Siedel Only one improving point: the videos were often working badly (no audio or breaking the upload) | Great teacher, wonderfull | Content | and examples. Thank you very much | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.37 | 1.13 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | I love the program content as well as lecturer's knowledge about this topic. So many interesting examples he provided during the course make it really practical and attracting to learners. Many thanks! | I love the program | Content | as well as lecturer's knowledge about | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.37 | 1.13 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | Excellent content. I felt elevated in this area and can enter any negotiation with confidence. I loved the Professor, he kept it interesting an I always had to keep my paper an pen close to answer his quick questions. EXCELLENT!!!!! | Excellent | Content | I felt elevated in this area | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.37 | 1.13 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | He is certainly a very good teacher, but he is boring. He uses this same monotonous tone,but seeing the content it does help us understand. | same monotonous tone, but seeing the | Content | it does help us understand. | Negative | -0.6 | 0.5 | 0.37 | 1.13 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | Great contents, fantastic teacher. I advise you to buy the book, I really enjoyed reading it. This is my first course on Coursera platform, I prefer EdX but that's an opinion. I would like an additional course taught by the same teacher, with more advanced contents. | Great | Content | fantastic teacher. I advise you to | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.37 | 1.13 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | Great contents, fantastic teacher. I advise you to buy the book, I really enjoyed reading it. This is my first course on Coursera platform, I prefer EdX but that's an opinion. I would like an additional course taught by the same teacher, with more advanced contents. | the same teacher, with more advanced | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.37 | 1.13 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | Excellent content | Excellent | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.37 | 1.13 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | World class teacher. Fine contents with a very useful legal approach that is often missed in introductory negotiation courses. Compared to other Coursera MOOCs I missed support materials or further readings. Additional assignments and cases could be included. | World class teacher. Fine | Content | with a very useful legal approach | Positive | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.37 | 1.13 |
| v8BCQVu-EeWzUQ41NnCQkQ | This is the worst course online I've done so far. I would not recommend it to anyone as it stands, regardless of the student's background, this course is just poor and lacking. The premise of this course is a promising one, the topic is still in its infancy and seems very interesting. Having said that, this is about everything positive that I can say about this course. For starters, the videos seem good at first, but later it becomes very superficial and monotone. The content is many times just rushed through and it's visible that the lecturers at several occasions have difficulty even to read their own slides! However, the worst part of the course are the quizzes. There are 24 graded quizzes in total, to pass the course you need to pass all 24 of them! To make matters worse, the minimum passing marks for each quiz is 80%, that wouldn't have been such an issue if most quizzes had 5 or more questions, which is not the case, most of the quizzes have 4 or less questions. This is such an unreasonable requirement, if you miss only one question in a quiz with 3 questions there's already no chance to pass the course! The content of each quiz is also very troublesome, we are essentially being graded for trivia, a considerable number of the questions are very superficially related to not related at all to the subject of each lecture. Instead of using the questions to delve deeper into the topic at hand, they only create confusion with futilities. A little example, the topic of a subject was about the mechanical properties of using multiple templates and a question in its quiz was about an electric circuit that is never shown in the question itself, only briefly shown in the lecture video for about 10s, minimal information is given without any explanation of what they mean and we are asked to enter a formula as the answer for which also almost no information is given about which notation we should use for the formula itself. There are other cases where there are multiple choice questions which have incorrect answers accepted by the grader. In one instance, two of the options available are contradictory to each other, however the accepted answer was the one involving both. In another instance, there was more than one solution available to an answer, however the grader accepted only one and there was no information in the question itself to narrow down the possible answers to the desired one. Finally, there is no active community by the TA and professors, I have never had a single answer form a TA or professor, only sporadical replies from a mentor, who has no authority to fix any issue by him or herself. All these issues just point to how poorly this course was designed. It had such high hopes, but they fell short flat. In doing this course, I found myself reverse engineering most of the questions just to try to find an accepted answer and try to understand what it meant. The imposed 8-hour period between attempts at the quizzes only hindered my progress. I was focused and engaged in studying for each quiz, however, after 3 failed attempts I had an imposed break period that makes little sense. In the end, this course only made me feel like the very object of my learning: a robot. I am really disappointed with this course. | chance to pass the course! The | Content | of each quiz is also very | Positive | 0.6 | -1.0 | 0.82 | 0.92 |
| v8BCQVu-EeWzUQ41NnCQkQ | There must be something wrong to spend time on google&wiki much more than the course content. | google&wiki much more than the course | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.82 | 0.92 |
| v8BCQVu-EeWzUQ41NnCQkQ | I will never walk the same. This course has some of the coolest content in robotics and the instructor is great! | course has some of the coolest | Content | in robotics and the instructor is | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.82 | 0.92 |
| v8BCQVu-EeWzUQ41NnCQkQ | Despite the arguments of this module are extremely interesting and very useful for Robotics, I think the way they are treated is very poor. In my opinion lectures are so superficial that it is almost a waste of time to follow them. Lectures are completely useless and most of the time quizzes are note related with them. In order to solve quizzes you have not only to recover prior knowledge, that it is obvious, but also to search for new arguments somwhere in the web, in some other courses where contents are better treated and explained. In that contest what are the quizzes, what should quizzes have to test if no content is given? Moreover it often happen that without a clear support from the lectures, questions are confused and ambiguous. It is quite difficult to follow the teaching path and to enrich my knowledge. I think it is a very bad way to make a course and often the pleasure to follow disappears leaving a sense of frustration and futility. I arrived at the end of the course just because I'm doing the specialization otherwise I would have left in the middle of the first week. I'm very disappointed. | web, in some other courses where | Content | are better treated and explained. In | Positive | 0.6 | -1.0 | 0.82 | 0.92 |
| v8BCQVu-EeWzUQ41NnCQkQ | Despite the arguments of this module are extremely interesting and very useful for Robotics, I think the way they are treated is very poor. In my opinion lectures are so superficial that it is almost a waste of time to follow them. Lectures are completely useless and most of the time quizzes are note related with them. In order to solve quizzes you have not only to recover prior knowledge, that it is obvious, but also to search for new arguments somwhere in the web, in some other courses where contents are better treated and explained. In that contest what are the quizzes, what should quizzes have to test if no content is given? Moreover it often happen that without a clear support from the lectures, questions are confused and ambiguous. It is quite difficult to follow the teaching path and to enrich my knowledge. I think it is a very bad way to make a course and often the pleasure to follow disappears leaving a sense of frustration and futility. I arrived at the end of the course just because I'm doing the specialization otherwise I would have left in the middle of the first week. I'm very disappointed. | quizzes have to test if no | Content | is given? Moreover it often happen | Negative | -0.6 | -1.0 | 0.82 | 0.92 |
| v8BCQVu-EeWzUQ41NnCQkQ | Poorly structured. Bloated. Discontinuous content. | Poorly structured. Bloated. Discontinuous | Content | | Negative | -0.6 | -0.5 | 0.82 | 0.92 |
| v8BCQVu-EeWzUQ41NnCQkQ | Interesting to learn about how and why robots differ from animals. The material was relatively easy to digest because the lectures were well paced and at the end there was a summary of the content. The quizzes are intelligent, so the course is not a give away. | there was a summary of the | Content | The quizzes are intelligent, so the | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.82 | 0.92 |
| v8BCQVu-EeWzUQ41NnCQkQ | Nice high level overview of the motion of robots. I would have liked to do more programming (modeling of robots, controllers, etc.) in the course and have the lectures tie in closer with the content of the quizzes. The TAs were very active in the forums and helped clarify/fix any problems that came up. | lectures tie in closer with the | Content | of the quizzes. The TAs were | Positive | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.82 | 0.92 |
| v9CQdBkhEeWjrA6seF25aw | This course gave me a new understanding of modern art, and also about the artists and the works selected for the course. The content has been carefully selected and the reading material is very interesting. | works selected for the course. The | Content | has been carefully selected and the | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.76 | 0.97 |
| v9CQdBkhEeWjrA6seF25aw | I have no complaints over the content. I would however, change the final quizzes, which rely too much on one essay rather than on the videos or on other reading material. | I have no complaints over the | Content | I would however, change the final | Negative | -0.7 | 0.0 | 0.76 | 0.97 |
| v9CQdBkhEeWjrA6seF25aw | This course is solely for teachers, on how to tech art to elementary school pupils. Very basic. Most of the content is available on the MoMA's website. Disappointing. | pupils. Very basic. Most of the | Content | is available on the MoMA's website. | Positive | 0.6 | -0.5 | 0.76 | 0.97 |
| v9CQdBkhEeWjrA6seF25aw | Good video production, successful combination of video content and reading resources as well as very interesting weekly topics. | video production, successful combination of video | Content | and reading resources as well as | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.76 | 0.97 |
| v9CQdBkhEeWjrA6seF25aw | Excellent concepts and content. Poor quiz composition and monitoring by MOMA staff of discussion. Logistical hassles tainted joy from the delivery. | Excellent concepts and | Content | Poor quiz composition and monitoring by | Positive | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.76 | 0.97 |
| v9CQdBkhEeWjrA6seF25aw | Excellent content, but absent support platform. | Excellent | Content | but absent support platform. | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.76 | 0.97 |
| vGGtBxVGEeW_mxLPrCkAqw | Quite disappointed, I thought we'd have something more structured or at least different from the previous courses. The content is here and good, but I was expecting reviews from pro U.X and not student like the previous courses. The good upgrade though is that we have clear examples of submission before we send ours. | different from the previous courses. The | Content | is here and good, but I | Positive | 0.8 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 1.06 |
| vGGtBxVGEeW_mxLPrCkAqw | This course was delivered 6-months behind schedule and the assignments half-way through the course can't even be completed due to technical problems and sloppy content. When students try to seek support to fix the issues, nothing is done and they receive no response. The specialization started so well, but the care that was taken to craft the specialization course content in the beginning has been lost in the later courses. | due to technical problems and sloppy | Content | When students try to seek support | Negative | -0.7 | -1.0 | 0.8 | 1.06 |
| vGGtBxVGEeW_mxLPrCkAqw | This course was delivered 6-months behind schedule and the assignments half-way through the course can't even be completed due to technical problems and sloppy content. When students try to seek support to fix the issues, nothing is done and they receive no response. The specialization started so well, but the care that was taken to craft the specialization course content in the beginning has been lost in the later courses. | taken to craft the specialization course | Content | in the beginning has been lost | Negative | -0.7 | -1.0 | 0.8 | 1.06 |
| Vh4RJTk8EeWJaxK5AT4frw | great content | great | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.39 | 1.14 |
| Vh4RJTk8EeWJaxK5AT4frw | Excellent intro to CSS. Colleen van Lent is awesome. I really enjoy her teaching style. The content is clear and interesting. | really enjoy her teaching style. The | Content | is clear and interesting. | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.39 | 1.14 |
| Vh4RJTk8EeWJaxK5AT4frw | The material and resources are excellent. This was the first course I took without any mentors or tutors, so my participation in the discussions was very high. The following could be improved: inclusion of 'type="text/css"' in the <LINK> element; perils of alternating between background and background-color, especially in complicated, long style sheets; links to Coursera lecture videos and materials from the students' side rather than teacher's; explanation for Assignment One if the text-align:center style should be applied to the <a> or the <nav> element (I used the nav because I wanted the menu styled below the H1 heading, which is where the menu is positioned in later assignments). I'm deducting a star for Coursera's unwillingness to respond in its Community Help Forums to its method of assigning peer review assignments and for introducing new 'features' without notice to its educational content partners. I shouldn't have to engage a very busy professional to intercede on the students' behalf. Despite the large population of people taking the class (or is that cumulative? Coursera doesn't specify), about twenty students were active on the Discussion Forums. I felt we students were left on our own which is fine as long as we all are aware that the more peer reviews we do, the more we can learn from each other. I also did not like the error message in red 'There was an upload error. Please try again' coexisting with the 'Your assignment was submitted successfully!' in green on the same page. This confused lots of us and those of us who'd never used the transloadit.com script for uploading our assignments for peer-review would only know of transmission error if classmates flagged our submissions. I identified this as an issue and Coursera didn't respond because I'm only a lowlife deadbeat student. Never mind that there are people who've paid for the courses who encounter the same issues on this platform. | 'features' without notice to its educational | Content | partners. I shouldn't have to engage | Negative | -0.6 | 0.5 | 0.39 | 1.14 |
| Vh4RJTk8EeWJaxK5AT4frw | As a beginner, this is a must take course! Dr. Colleen van Lent is excellent at hitting the right points, delivering the right content at the right time. Easy for anyone to learn. | the right points, delivering the right | Content | at the right time. Easy for | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.39 | 1.14 |
| Vh4RJTk8EeWJaxK5AT4frw | More than a simple introduction to css. Great content, great delivery. | a simple introduction to css. Great | Content | great delivery. | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.39 | 1.14 |
| Vh4RJTk8EeWJaxK5AT4frw | The lectures were well-paced and thoughtfully curated. Just enough content and assignments to get you started; the prof says repeatedly she assumes you're going to treat this as a starting point and experiment on your own. | well-paced and thoughtfully curated. Just enough | Content | and assignments to get you started; | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.39 | 1.14 |
| VIUTXB0IEea20BJooCBlFw | This is one of the best courses I've taken to date through Coursera. The course content is useful in all walks of life and the instructor is thorough and engaging. I would highly recommend this course to everyone interested in looking for ways to structure better arguments. | to date through Coursera. The course | Content | is useful in all walks of | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 0.96 |
| VIUTXB0IEea20BJooCBlFw | I am 3 weeks into the course and can categorically say that it one of the best courses I have ever taken. Besides the professor's impeccable knowledge, his amazing command over fluid teaching is admirable. I really like the content where the learners are taught how to dissect (and construct) an argument for a broad range of areas where they might find its use. People who are thinking of taking it, make sure you commit at least 5 hours every week. Absorb and enjoy! | is admirable. I really like the | Content | where the learners are taught how | Negative | -0.6 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 0.96 |
| vU4CeqTaEeW2ORLv1OUyFQ | Pros: Really motivating! Cons: Not much real content even for a beginner, too short. | Really motivating! Cons: Not much real | Content | even for a beginner, too short. | Negative | -0.6 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 0.72 |
| vU4CeqTaEeW2ORLv1OUyFQ | Practical and easy to understand course! I'm a practitioner of Sports/Exercise Science, but I believe this is 'digestible' for non-practitioners, as the content and delivery allows for easy understanding. Thank you! | is 'digestible' for non-practitioners, as the | Content | and delivery allows for easy understanding. | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 0.72 |
| VuRXs3EiEeWrAxJQXw-8PQ | The course is very preliminary. Its content can be covered in one session and does not need 4 weeks. The assignments were not clear enough. The course material can not be downloaded and can not be retrieved or used as reference after finishing the course, unlike other courses I have taken with Coursera, but in other University. | The course is very preliminary. Its | Content | can be covered in one session | Negative | -0.6 | -0.5 | 0.99 | 1.0 |
| VuRXs3EiEeWrAxJQXw-8PQ | very good content and standard basics | very good | Content | and standard basics | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.99 | 1.0 |
| wD1C7I_eEeWZyg6bf_Oxkw | I found much of the content to be interesting and timely. However, I thought the quizzes were poorly written. There was no feedback, so as a learner it was hard to grow from errors. Also, there were many that required more than one answer, if you missed one, you missed entire question. Without feedback, it was difficult to know which one you missed. The week 4 lesson content was a bit dense for an introductory course. It was dry and could've been more global. Last, the large lesson assignment was only graded by peers with no feedback from the instructor. | I found much of the | Content | to be interesting and timely. However, | Positive | 0.6 | -0.5 | 0.67 | 0.93 |
| wD1C7I_eEeWZyg6bf_Oxkw | I found much of the content to be interesting and timely. However, I thought the quizzes were poorly written. There was no feedback, so as a learner it was hard to grow from errors. Also, there were many that required more than one answer, if you missed one, you missed entire question. Without feedback, it was difficult to know which one you missed. The week 4 lesson content was a bit dense for an introductory course. It was dry and could've been more global. Last, the large lesson assignment was only graded by peers with no feedback from the instructor. | you missed. The week 4 lesson | Content | was a bit dense for an | Negative | -0.6 | -0.5 | 0.67 | 0.93 |
| wD1C7I_eEeWZyg6bf_Oxkw | Although the content is good, the course itself does not reflect in any way what a good asynchronous course should be. Where is the discussion board? How can one communicate with the instructor or with other classmates? Although peer review of an assignment is one aspect of asynchronous and synchronous education, said assignment should also be reviewed by an instructor, especially when said instruction carries so much weight. In addition, I think overall the tests are unfair. I was marked wrong twice for a question that asked my opinion! Also, in the "check all that apply" questions, if one misses one of the answers, the whole question is marked wrong. Finally, many of the test questions themselves are irrelevant to the content of the course. One last thing- the course says it's a five week program, but there are only 4 weeks. Something needs to be adjusted. | Although the | Content | is good, the course itself does | Positive | 0.7 | -1.0 | 0.67 | 0.93 |
| wD1C7I_eEeWZyg6bf_Oxkw | Although the content is good, the course itself does not reflect in any way what a good asynchronous course should be. Where is the discussion board? How can one communicate with the instructor or with other classmates? Although peer review of an assignment is one aspect of asynchronous and synchronous education, said assignment should also be reviewed by an instructor, especially when said instruction carries so much weight. In addition, I think overall the tests are unfair. I was marked wrong twice for a question that asked my opinion! Also, in the "check all that apply" questions, if one misses one of the answers, the whole question is marked wrong. Finally, many of the test questions themselves are irrelevant to the content of the course. One last thing- the course says it's a five week program, but there are only 4 weeks. Something needs to be adjusted. | questions themselves are irrelevant to the | Content | of the course. One last thing- | Negative | -0.6 | -1.0 | 0.67 | 0.93 |
| we5nljlYEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | One of the main presenters, who led about half of this course, would greatly benefit from an editor to help them organize their ideas. This, and a presentation style that made me feel "talked down to", similar to reading a story book to a small child, made comprehension of ideas frustratingly difficult. The content they were responsible for covering was why I signed up for a paid multi-course specialization. Though I learned lots of other things I'll no doubt find helpful, I did not walk away with the information I need the most. The other presenters were great, as usual, and presented their topics in a clear, concise manner. | comprehension of ideas frustratingly difficult. The | Content | they were responsible for covering was | Negative | -0.6 | -0.5 | 0.75 | 0.89 |
| we5nljlYEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | I enjoyed the course materials immensely, the content is well selected and adapted, the sequencing fosters understanding, and the presentors seem to have been born to teach. Looking forward to more courses like this one. | enjoyed the course materials immensely, the | Content | is well selected and adapted, the | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.75 | 0.89 |
| we5nljlYEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | Started a bit slow but built through an incredibly rich and valuable amount of content and assignments. | incredibly rich and valuable amount of | Content | and assignments. | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.75 | 0.89 |
| we5nljlYEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | Two of the weeks' content was not based on specific, cited research, which was disappointing. Inspiring and Motivating Individuals did an excellent job of that, as did two of the four weeks of this course. | Two of the weeks' | Content | was not based on specific, cited | Positive | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.75 | 0.89 |
| we5nljlYEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | I found the content of the course very interesting, I really enjoyed the interventions of Jeff Brodsky and Rich Sheridan. What I would have liked, is to make the content more landed to reality. I didn't understand some examples from Cheri Alexander (for example the video of the skaters getting the gold medal) | I found the | Content | of the course very interesting, I | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.75 | 0.89 |
| we5nljlYEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | I found the content of the course very interesting, I really enjoyed the interventions of Jeff Brodsky and Rich Sheridan. What I would have liked, is to make the content more landed to reality. I didn't understand some examples from Cheri Alexander (for example the video of the skaters getting the gold medal) | have liked, is to make the | Content | more landed to reality. I didn't | Negative | -0.6 | 0.5 | 0.75 | 0.89 |
| wEl1EleDEeWTbwotamPtlQ | Excellent content and delivery. Gave me a good perspective of history around Israel and Palestine. | Excellent | Content | and delivery. Gave me a good | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.98 | 1.03 |
| wEl1EleDEeWTbwotamPtlQ | Very bogus and boring content. The monotonous voice gets me! | Very bogus and boring | Content | The monotonous voice gets me! | Negative | -0.8 | -1.0 | 0.98 | 1.03 |
| wEl1EleDEeWTbwotamPtlQ | content is good but its not made interesting. | | Content | is good but its not made | Positive | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.98 | 1.03 |
| wKPtohoHEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | While I was primarily taking this course as a prerequisite for the next course in the specialization (which covers MongoDB in a bit more depth), I found this to be a well-organized introduction to a compelling framework. The instructor did a good job of presenting the content in a way that should be accessible for new developers, while still being relevant to experienced developers looking to round out their skills by learning a new framework. Acknowledging that this is a review of the course and not the framework, it's worth noting that Meteor itself is promising in its ability to quickly deploy sophisticated client-server web applications. My firm has well-established boilerplate templates based on Node.js and Gulp.js and a few dozen dependency packages that satisfy many of the same capabilities, but which were developed over a period of months and come with a much steeper learning curve. The scope of modern capabilities that Meteor offers out-of-the-box for "free" is quite impressive, and allows developers to dive into the interesting parts without the overhead of configuring services and establishing a build process. My only criticism is the cost, if you're looking to attain a verified certificate. At least from the perspective of a professional developer, the course was a bit light on content by comparison to other Coursera classes with the same pricing structure. I was able to complete the initial coursework in less than a week, while still attending my day job (although it did take additional time to complete the course project). Ultimately, this would be more compelling at a $49 price point, at least relative to other Coursera offerings. | a good job of presenting the | Content | in a way that should be | Positive | 0.9 | 0.5 | 0.54 | 1.03 |
| wKPtohoHEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | While I was primarily taking this course as a prerequisite for the next course in the specialization (which covers MongoDB in a bit more depth), I found this to be a well-organized introduction to a compelling framework. The instructor did a good job of presenting the content in a way that should be accessible for new developers, while still being relevant to experienced developers looking to round out their skills by learning a new framework. Acknowledging that this is a review of the course and not the framework, it's worth noting that Meteor itself is promising in its ability to quickly deploy sophisticated client-server web applications. My firm has well-established boilerplate templates based on Node.js and Gulp.js and a few dozen dependency packages that satisfy many of the same capabilities, but which were developed over a period of months and come with a much steeper learning curve. The scope of modern capabilities that Meteor offers out-of-the-box for "free" is quite impressive, and allows developers to dive into the interesting parts without the overhead of configuring services and establishing a build process. My only criticism is the cost, if you're looking to attain a verified certificate. At least from the perspective of a professional developer, the course was a bit light on content by comparison to other Coursera classes with the same pricing structure. I was able to complete the initial coursework in less than a week, while still attending my day job (although it did take additional time to complete the course project). Ultimately, this would be more compelling at a $49 price point, at least relative to other Coursera offerings. | course was a bit light on | Content | by comparison to other Coursera classes | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.54 | 1.03 |
| wKPtohoHEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | The content from this course is already out of date for Meteor.js and links are broken. | The | Content | from this course is already out | Negative | -0.6 | -0.5 | 0.54 | 1.03 |
| wKPtohoHEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Mr. Yee-King is a gifted instructor. The course content is presented in an intelligible and clear manner. The only downside (as with many web development courses on Coursera) is that there is no section on how to deploy a Meteor project to the web. According to my own experience, this is not trivial as the long list of issues on the github pages of mup and mupx shows. Of course, there is a business logic behind this: simplicity and developer friendliness comes at a price - Meteor needs a return on investment, which is achieved through charging for deploying on Meteor's Galaxy web backend. Another proposal for improvement: the peer review form does not reflect the tasks of the final project well. Especially the section on the challenges should be more differentiated and should contain an item for each challenge. | is a gifted instructor. The course | Content | is presented in an intelligible and | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.54 | 1.03 |
| wKPtohoHEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Great course content and teacher. Looking forward to the next one. | Great course | Content | and teacher. Looking forward to the | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.54 | 1.03 |
| wKPtohoHEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Excellent course , with great content, and adequate depth. Changed my view on web development frameworks. Do take you from start to finish. | Excellent course , with great | Content | and adequate depth. Changed my view | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.54 | 1.03 |
| wKPtohoHEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Very good introduction. Very good presented. It just makes you want to learn more of Meteor. I can absolutely recommend this course to newbies to Meteor.js. Good methodology regarding speed, content and presentation of the course. | Meteor. js. Good methodology regarding speed, | Content | and presentation of the course. | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.54 | 1.03 |
| wKPtohoHEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Very concise contents, and a practical approach to Meteorjs | Very concise | Content | and a practical approach to Meteorjs | Positive | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.54 | 1.03 |
| wKPtohoHEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | This is a good course for introduction to Meteor.js. I think the content is very complete for the beginner level. And the Dr. Matthew explains each one the topics, even the details of the code, very well. It was a luck to have taken this course. I'm thinking strongly take the whole specialization. Thanks University of London & Goldsmith. | to Meteor. js. I think the | Content | is very complete for the beginner | Negative | -0.6 | 1.0 | 0.54 | 1.03 |
| wKPtohoHEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | The Course content is good. And the teacher is awesome...he explains everything quite well. | The Course | Content | is good. And the teacher is | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.54 | 1.03 |
| wKPtohoHEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Just write in terms of workload. Good mixture of projects and quizzes. Good teacher and content, explained in an easy to understand way. | projects and quizzes. Good teacher and | Content | explained in an easy to understand | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.54 | 1.03 |
| wKPtohoHEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Highly valuable content. The teacher is one the BEST | Highly valuable | Content | The teacher is one the BEST | Positive | 0.9 | 1.0 | 0.54 | 1.03 |
| wKPtohoHEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Great teacher, Content complete | Great teacher, | Content | complete | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.54 | 1.03 |
| Wl5ych5kEeWFIxLDnS6_kQ | great content ! | great | Content | ! | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.68 | 1.07 |
| Wl5ych5kEeWFIxLDnS6_kQ | Excellent course! Great content and activities that will make you learn a lot about yourself following a very innovative approach. | Excellent course! Great | Content | and activities that will make you | Positive | 0.9 | 1.0 | 0.68 | 1.07 |
| Wl5ych5kEeWFIxLDnS6_kQ | This was one of the best MOOC I completed recently. Good lecture content that explains various concepts to start building leadership skills and the ACE terminology helps in recollecting the concepts. The assignments in terms of self-portrait and conversation was awesome and was a totally new experience. Loved the course thoroughly and made a good friend as well ! | MOOC I completed recently. Good lecture | Content | that explains various concepts to start | Negative | -0.6 | 1.0 | 0.68 | 1.07 |
| X1RtV0EiEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Very good balance between content and presentation | Very good balance between | Content | and presentation | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.56 | 0.95 |
| X1RtV0EiEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | I think these courses need to be condensed into a single one as the contents are rather limited individually. | into a single one as the | Content | are rather limited individually. | Negative | -0.7 | 0.0 | 0.56 | 0.95 |
| X1RtV0EiEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | essential content! | essential | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.56 | 0.95 |
| X1RtV0EiEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Liked how a lot of content was covered in a small amount of time. Thought the instructor was effective in presenting the important elements of the lectures. Only issue is some typos in the quizzes that were a bit distracting. | Liked how a lot of | Content | was covered in a small amount | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.56 | 0.95 |
| X1RtV0EiEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | The content is covered in great depth in this course but pre-reads may help as the course moves up a few notches in technical content. | The | Content | is covered in great depth in | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.56 | 0.95 |
| XEjjlXEkEeWhZxJhllGpHQ | Content is good but there is no practice whatsoever. So much theory can become boring at times. | | Content | is good but there is no | Positive | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.79 | 0.97 |
| XEjjlXEkEeWhZxJhllGpHQ | This course made me realise how exciting SEO can be. I really like the fact that the course content is update with the latest technologies out there. I am also enjoying the SEO blog references and the reading material provided. Thank you for this enjoyable and fruitful experience! | like the fact that the course | Content | is update with the latest technologies | Negative | -0.6 | 1.0 | 0.79 | 0.97 |
| XEjjlXEkEeWhZxJhllGpHQ | Good information presented, but I can't get past the outdated teaching method of using the first 45 to 60 seconds of each video to talk about what the video is going to cover, then spending 30 seconds repeating those bullet points at the end of each video. Some videos are 4 minutes long, so more than half of the content is not actually content, it is essentially the instructor reading the outline for the upcoming content. It's a waste of both instructor and learner time. There are errors in the materials, and since there is no instructor feedback/interaction, there is no way to find out what was meant (including in reading assignments). All you can do is submit a ticket to get it fixed and hope that it gets corrected for the next people who take this course. | so more than half of the | Content | is not actually content, it is | Negative | -0.6 | 0.0 | 0.79 | 0.97 |
| XEjjlXEkEeWhZxJhllGpHQ | Good information presented, but I can't get past the outdated teaching method of using the first 45 to 60 seconds of each video to talk about what the video is going to cover, then spending 30 seconds repeating those bullet points at the end of each video. Some videos are 4 minutes long, so more than half of the content is not actually content, it is essentially the instructor reading the outline for the upcoming content. It's a waste of both instructor and learner time. There are errors in the materials, and since there is no instructor feedback/interaction, there is no way to find out what was meant (including in reading assignments). All you can do is submit a ticket to get it fixed and hope that it gets corrected for the next people who take this course. | of the content is not actually | Content | it is essentially the instructor reading | Negative | -0.6 | 0.0 | 0.79 | 0.97 |
| XEjjlXEkEeWhZxJhllGpHQ | Good information presented, but I can't get past the outdated teaching method of using the first 45 to 60 seconds of each video to talk about what the video is going to cover, then spending 30 seconds repeating those bullet points at the end of each video. Some videos are 4 minutes long, so more than half of the content is not actually content, it is essentially the instructor reading the outline for the upcoming content. It's a waste of both instructor and learner time. There are errors in the materials, and since there is no instructor feedback/interaction, there is no way to find out what was meant (including in reading assignments). All you can do is submit a ticket to get it fixed and hope that it gets corrected for the next people who take this course. | reading the outline for the upcoming | Content | It's a waste of both instructor | Negative | -0.6 | 0.0 | 0.79 | 0.97 |
| XEjjlXEkEeWhZxJhllGpHQ | Great content for someone who has no idea what SEO is and who is willing to dig deep after some basic info. | Great | Content | for someone who has no idea | Negative | -0.6 | 1.0 | 0.79 | 0.97 |
| XEjjlXEkEeWhZxJhllGpHQ | Course objectives are clear and concise. Course instructor's voice is upbeat and she articulates well. Visuals are simple and focus on key concepts. Course contents follows a logical progressive flow from easy to more complex concepts. Small chunks of information makes it easy to follow. This is an excellent course and definitely worth while the investment. For me, It has sparked a keen interest in the field of SEO and it has build my confidence to proceed to the next level. | and focus on key concepts. Course | Content | follows a logical progressive flow from | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.79 | 0.97 |
| XEjjlXEkEeWhZxJhllGpHQ | Good content, but blocked quizes in free version is bad idea. | Good | Content | but blocked quizes in free version | Positive | 0.6 | -0.5 | 0.79 | 0.97 |
| XEjjlXEkEeWhZxJhllGpHQ | This course is concise and provides a very good overview of the SEO industry. But I just wish there were more content. I finished all the four weeks' modules and tests within one day. | I just wish there were more | Content | I finished all the four weeks' | Negative | -0.6 | 1.0 | 0.79 | 0.97 |
| XEjjlXEkEeWhZxJhllGpHQ | Great introductory course to SEO. The content is brilliant and the lecturer is clear. It would be good if there would be a teaching stuff to assist the students in their threads in the forums. | Great introductory course to SEO. The | Content | is brilliant and the lecturer is | Positive | 0.9 | 1.0 | 0.79 | 0.97 |
| XEjjlXEkEeWhZxJhllGpHQ | Nice intro course. A little light on content but I still learned a lot | intro course. A little light on | Content | but I still learned a lot | Positive | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.79 | 0.97 |
| XEjjlXEkEeWhZxJhllGpHQ | Great!!! Powerful Content :) | Great! ! ! Powerful | Content | :) | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.79 | 0.97 |
| XEjjlXEkEeWhZxJhllGpHQ | An amazingly structured content, which help you to be from zero to hero!!! | An amazingly structured | Content | which help you to be from | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.79 | 0.97 |
| XEjjlXEkEeWhZxJhllGpHQ | An evaluation is always tied to the value it provides in relation to the paid price. On the plus side: 1) It provides an interesting historical perspective of Search Engines, their evolution and the evolution of the algorithms and their purposes. 2) Rebeka May talks slowly and clearly. The transcripts also help in reviewing the contents of each lesson. On the minus side: 1) It is very theoretical and with no practical application. 2) Lots of terminology pops out of the blue without any prior explanation, and would be difficult to understand for a total newbie. Just as a very simple example, backlinks are mentioned several times. What is a " backlink" ?? I know what they are, but not everybody does. 3) There should be real support material, not merely " transcripts" 4) The Peer review does not make any sense. There should be a real test. The peers do not have a "higher" knowledge level to make an evaluation of the alummni. 5) It is not possible to take the quizzes unless you " upgrade" . Presently this costs $ 80. Conclusion: it is an interesting course, but at $ 80 provides no value.Audit the course instead. UC Davies and Coursera should provide this course free of charge or with a voluntary "donation" | transcripts also help in reviewing the | Content | of each lesson. On the minus | Positive | 0.6 | -0.5 | 0.79 | 0.97 |
| XEjjlXEkEeWhZxJhllGpHQ | Excellent course materials. The course contents have been methodically planned and structured leading to a solid foundation for SEO learning. | Excellent course materials. The course | Content | have been methodically planned and structured | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.79 | 0.97 |
| XEjjlXEkEeWhZxJhllGpHQ | good content | good | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.79 | 0.97 |
| XEjjlXEkEeWhZxJhllGpHQ | The pace of the course was great, and the content really helpful and informative. The instructors were engaging and explained topics clearly, they also provided a wealth of additional resources. I highly recommend this course for anyone interested in digital marketing. | the course was great, and the | Content | really helpful and informative. The instructors | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.79 | 0.97 |
| XEjjlXEkEeWhZxJhllGpHQ | Its excellent. Topic & contents [Including suggested contents ] were too Good] I learnt a lot. Thank you! | Its excellent. Topic & | Content | [Including suggested contents ] were too | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.79 | 0.97 |
| XEjjlXEkEeWhZxJhllGpHQ | Its excellent. Topic & contents [Including suggested contents ] were too Good] I learnt a lot. Thank you! | excellent. Topic & contents [Including suggested | Content | ] were too Good] I learnt | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.79 | 0.97 |
| XEjjlXEkEeWhZxJhllGpHQ | I liked the course contents, especially the Google algorithm evolution and the assignment to do an SEO analysis. I felt the first week content related to the jobs in the field of SEO was a bit long and could have been shortened since many aspects were repeated in the "consulting/agency" and "in-house" roles. | I liked the course | Content | especially the Google algorithm evolution and | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.79 | 0.97 |
| XEjjlXEkEeWhZxJhllGpHQ | I liked the course contents, especially the Google algorithm evolution and the assignment to do an SEO analysis. I felt the first week content related to the jobs in the field of SEO was a bit long and could have been shortened since many aspects were repeated in the "consulting/agency" and "in-house" roles. | analysis. I felt the first week | Content | related to the jobs in the | Negative | -0.6 | 0.5 | 0.79 | 0.97 |
| XEjjlXEkEeWhZxJhllGpHQ | The presentation of this course is top-notched. I hope the content of this course can be longer. I hope the quizzes can be more rigorous and challenging | course is top-notched. I hope the | Content | of this course can be longer. | Negative | -0.6 | 1.0 | 0.79 | 0.97 |
| xg_cj6KwEeWiwAqQT7MHVQ | I would definitely recommend this course to anyone at all in the professional world. It is thought-provoking, varied, insightful and full of real-life examples. There was a decent amount of content to get through each week but this was broken up into manageable chunks. Interviews with a range of mature professionals were utilised, offering a range of perspectives and professional experiences. The use of peer group assessment was also very positive - firstly it meant that you actually had to complete the assignments set, unlike other courses on coursera, and it also gave you a sense of being part of a learning community, as well as gaining perspectives from other participants on the course. | There was a decent amount of | Content | to get through each week but | Negative | -0.6 | 0.5 | 0.53 | 0.76 |
| xg_cj6KwEeWiwAqQT7MHVQ | I think the Course has great content but there´s too many activities per week, most of the time if you don´t have time free you will loss the deadlines and after all loss the certificate. | I think the Course has great | Content | but there´s too many activities per | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.53 | 0.76 |
| xg_cj6KwEeWiwAqQT7MHVQ | Without question the content is great, but the written assignment instructions were somewhat vague and did not match the peer review rubric at times (although the mentor did pin a few posts to address the problem). | Without question the | Content | is great, but the written assignment | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.53 | 0.76 |
| XJUJYyzXEeWWqBIFfWmDPQ | It was very nice experience doing this course. Very nice contents and very good explanation. | experience doing this course. Very nice | Content | and very good explanation. | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.91 | 0.92 |
| XJUJYyzXEeWWqBIFfWmDPQ | Good content | Good | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | -0.5 | 0.91 | 0.92 |
| XJUJYyzXEeWWqBIFfWmDPQ | This could probably be better broken into two one week courses "History of Phone Technology" and "Intro to IoT". Many reviewers say they bail out in first few lectures because content seems too far removed from IoT. I enjoyed the last few lectures with examples of IoT, but could have skipped the rest. | out in first few lectures because | Content | seems too far removed from IoT. | Negative | -0.7 | 0.0 | 0.91 | 0.92 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | I found this a very good course, the reason I rate it so low is because the quizzes had a minimum of questions and these were very basic ones. The actual course content was interesting and informative and covered in depth . | very basic ones. The actual course | Content | was interesting and informative and covered | Positive | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.61 | 1.03 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | Very kind voice and great content! | Very kind voice and great | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.61 | 1.03 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | This has been an excellent Course. The content itself is very clear and gives you an enormous background about food and eating habits, although is focused mostly in the western diet in USA I think that at least in America continent an other parts of the globe eating habits are similar, Public health is a great concern and I think that in this way we should change completely our habits and stop eating processed food. Congrats Stanford University more courses like this one. | has been an excellent Course. The | Content | itself is very clear and gives | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.61 | 1.03 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | Interesting topic and very good information Not enough content (my opinion) Tests where way to easy, I could take them all without first watching the videos, and my grade ist above 90%. The questions are (espacially in Week 3 and 4) easy to solve with logic and a basic intelligence. Please work on making it harder! :) | and very good information Not enough | Content | (my opinion) Tests where way to | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.61 | 1.03 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | This is a very basic course on food and nutrition. I would consider the majority of the content to be common sense. I would not recommend it if you already have an interest or general knowledge of nu | would consider the majority of the | Content | to be common sense. I would | Negative | -0.6 | -0.5 | 0.61 | 1.03 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | Fantastic content!. Prof Maya condenses healthy eating into concrete and simple item sets - 1.What food items to eat and what to avoid 2. Where to find them in the Supermarket, how to read the nutrition labels on packaged food 3. Healthy cooking with minimal ingredients 4. Awesome recipes for healthy dishes | Fantastic | Content | . Prof Maya condenses healthy eating | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.61 | 1.03 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | Short, easy to watch videos fulled with high quality content and good ideias to incorporate healthy habbits in our daily life. | watch videos fulled with high quality | Content | and good ideias to incorporate healthy | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.61 | 1.03 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | This course is less demanding than I expected/hoped, but nevertheless the content and its delivery was top-notch. The lectures present material in a clear and natural way. Course content is immediately and easily applied to daily life. The video production is the among the best I've seen in online education. Not groundbreaking, but immensely helpful to those unfamiliar with this material. Definitely worth your time. | than I expected/hoped, but nevertheless the | Content | and its delivery was top-notch. The | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.61 | 1.03 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | This course is less demanding than I expected/hoped, but nevertheless the content and its delivery was top-notch. The lectures present material in a clear and natural way. Course content is immediately and easily applied to daily life. The video production is the among the best I've seen in online education. Not groundbreaking, but immensely helpful to those unfamiliar with this material. Definitely worth your time. | a clear and natural way. Course | Content | is immediately and easily applied to | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.61 | 1.03 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | Very good content! Easy to understand and very practical ! Loved it | Very good | Content | Easy to understand and very practical | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.61 | 1.03 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | Informative and practical. Mixes lectures with real life examples (from the professor's personal life) to validate content. | the professor's personal life) to validate | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.61 | 1.03 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | Great content! | Great | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.61 | 1.03 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | It's brief but quite informative. It organizes its content in a way that's both educative and entertaining at the same time. love Maya's style. | but quite informative. It organizes its | Content | in a way that's both educative | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.61 | 1.03 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | I really enjoyed this course - the recipes at the end are very nice, even though, gluten free is rather unnecessary, as only a very (very) small group of people actually need gluten free diets. But I liked the other content of the course very much. Thanks for explaining and sharing. | diets. But I liked the other | Content | of the course very much. Thanks | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.61 | 1.03 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | Very good as a introduction course! Its clear and easy! Congratulations for the contents! | clear and easy! Congratulations for the | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.61 | 1.03 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | Not much content | Not much | Content | | Negative | -0.6 | -0.5 | 0.61 | 1.03 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | Good course, easy to follow and informative. I regret that the content was so basic, I would have loved more depth particularly when the instructor is so knowledgeable and such a good speaker! | and informative. I regret that the | Content | was so basic, I would have | Negative | -0.6 | 0.5 | 0.61 | 1.03 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | Good content | Good | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.61 | 1.03 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | Amazing content for beginners | Amazing | Content | for beginners | Positive | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.61 | 1.03 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | To me , you were preaching to the choir. I have been trying to follow Pollan's ideas for years. I was hoping for new information, but for me it was a rehash of stuff I have heard ad infinite. this did not seem like a class. This seemed more like an advertisement for healthy eating with it constant music and sparse content. Certainly it did not have the rigorous content that would have been required in a college level credited class. It was certainly not as interesting nor as informative as the Berkeley class "edible education 101" Still as an advertisement for good eating it was well done. If you found an audience out there somewhere who had not heard these messages, then you have succeeded and I applaud you for that. | with it constant music and sparse | Content | Certainly it did not have the | Positive | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.61 | 1.03 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | To me , you were preaching to the choir. I have been trying to follow Pollan's ideas for years. I was hoping for new information, but for me it was a rehash of stuff I have heard ad infinite. this did not seem like a class. This seemed more like an advertisement for healthy eating with it constant music and sparse content. Certainly it did not have the rigorous content that would have been required in a college level credited class. It was certainly not as interesting nor as informative as the Berkeley class "edible education 101" Still as an advertisement for good eating it was well done. If you found an audience out there somewhere who had not heard these messages, then you have succeeded and I applaud you for that. | it did not have the rigorous | Content | that would have been required in | Negative | -0.6 | 0.0 | 0.61 | 1.03 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | This course has given me a completely new understanding of how my body functions and how I can "play around" with my meals to change my body and feel healthier! I thought (with this being an online course) that I would not gather much from the content that I didn't already know, but that definitely was NOT true! Thanks for a great experience! | would not gather much from the | Content | that I didn't already know, but | Negative | -0.7 | 1.0 | 0.61 | 1.03 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | Nice for a first approach, easy to follow. Good content. | first approach, easy to follow. Good | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.61 | 1.03 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | Michael Pollan is wonderful! Great fundamental tips. Music can be distracting. Maya's speech is a bit slow...Pollan's pace was stronger. Visuals were clean and easy to digest. Content was succinct and memorable. Appreciated the brevity of the videos. Thank you. | were clean and easy to digest. | Content | was succinct and memorable. Appreciated the | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.61 | 1.03 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | Quality course with valuable content. Good experience! | Quality course with valuable | Content | Good experience! | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.61 | 1.03 |
| XRy7uCAeEeWKeQ6ae81EbQ | Absolutely Amazing Content! I loved it! I learned so much my head is spinning! Thank you Professor John M. and Professor Suseela M. for a lovely course! | Absolutely Amazing | Content | I loved it! I learned so | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 1.06 | 1.07 |
| XRy7uCAeEeWKeQ6ae81EbQ | Proof reading needed, for the slides and for the quizzes. Overall, this is a low content course delivered in a rather boring and uninformative way. | quizzes. Overall, this is a low | Content | course delivered in a rather boring | Negative | -0.7 | -0.5 | 1.06 | 1.07 |
| xx-VwD-OEeWBrBIWi3mmCw | While this course has great content, it lacks interactivity, exercises, peer learning opportunities and leaves desiring more real-life use cases and examples. | While this course has great | Content | it lacks interactivity, exercises, peer learning | Positive | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 0.72 |
| xx-VwD-OEeWBrBIWi3mmCw | It's a very interesting course. The instructor is very good too. However I think there are not as much content as it could be. Each week has only 30 minutes top. | think there are not as much | Content | as it could be. Each week | Negative | -0.6 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 0.72 |
| XZomz77LEeWn1ApTWZT9Yw | Positives:- Good practice with the exciting world of script writing Learnt how to use the scriptwriting software Celtx.com Some aspects of the videos were helpful and instructive e.g. teaching us how to write a cold open Areas of improvement:- The beginner's course is entirely graded on peer reviews where one could get a range of divergent opinions on the same story, at times scathing and not constructive. Reviewers (who are purported to be beginners themselves) also at times give seemingly 'blind' grades without sharing constructive comments. The questions that you are graded on e.g. Do you feel immersed in the story? Is the story unique? are highly subjective and solely dependent on the reviewer's fleeting preferences. It would help if the questions were more nuanced and focused on the structure and technical aspects of script writing e.g. format, grammar, three part structure Lessons were too short and instructional (less than 10 mins of videos for each lesson) only for certain areas; it seemed like one of the major takeaways was to keep writing which is sensible but not helpful from a beginner's point of view. Suggestions:- To maintain some objectivity in grading: Mask the general comments section when a reviewer is giving his comments as negative comments from other peers could influence more negativity and vice versa. Give some guidelines on reviewing to prevent the grading process from turning into trolling. Would appreciate more helpful lessons with deeper content! | appreciate more helpful lessons with deeper | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.76 | 0.91 |
| XZomz77LEeWn1ApTWZT9Yw | This isn't a CLASS it's a workshop. Thank goodness for fee waivers; I would have been so upset if I had spent my money on this course. As someone who has taken Coursera offerings in the past, I cannot cosign the quality of this course. This class seems to suffer from both a lack of structure and time. I believe if the course was longer (allowing for more space between unguided assignments) the class would be a little better. I understand that the Instructor is barred by time constraints (this is only a five week course, and an opt-in one at that), so I do relate to not wanting to inundate the class with reading assignment and lengthy lectures. That said, the guidance and lessons are lacking-- even if the class was longer, I would still only give it 2.5/5 stars. It appeared that the onus was on the Mentors to provide answers; for example, the professor mentioned that our scripts are meant to feature half hour pilots. This left many students writing dramas rather than comedies at a loss, since they were planning for hour long pilots. (This, again, is partially an issue of the class being so short; more time to review = the option to have longer pilots, rather than only accepting half hour pilots in order to allow students to review five different submissions within three days.) Since half hour dramas are unconventional, I asked one of our mentors, JZ (who is great) for examples. The responsibility should not be on the Mentors to find out-- information like that should be included in the prompt; if not discussed in depth, then at least as a link or list of examples to research on your own if you have the time + desire to do so. Especially since the assignment boils down to "break convention with no examples of successful scripts in this fashion." In a class presumably allowing beginningeres/greenhorns to participate, this is irresponsible and flawed teaching. The same goes of the "hints" that are periodically posted (though again, appreciated!) by mentors in the forums-- those definitions and explanations should be included in the meat of the class, not as supplemental elements. In all honesty, if I didn't have prior experience with writing, I oftentimes wouldn't have any idea what was being discussed by the professor. (And one trip through the forums will illustrate that I am not the only one.) The assignments and due dates are oddly crunched together (another time constraint issue, I understand), but the Instructor's videos seem to imply that we should be receiving feedback before proceeding each time? Maybe in a longer course that would work, but here, I didn't even receive written feedback initially, so it would have been a mistake to wait for some to revise by before forging ahead. If this class isn't going to provide a solid foundation to build on, then it should be made clear, upfront. There is nothing wrong with an experience based / motivation-focused class, but that aspect needs to be transparent. "We will not provide 101 teachings/readings." This isn't a class; it's a workshop. It's a makerspace at best. I expected insight and some level of instruction. In one of the lectures, the Instructor literally says: "I'm not a big fan of some of the classic story structures, defining in what must happen in each act. Or the problem, the twist, the resolution, rising action, denouement, fine action, etc." He does not define these terms, nor allude to them ever again. These are key benchmarks in screenwriting. Definitions would be helpful for someone just starting out, even if the Instructor doesn't strictly want us to abide by them. His students should leave the class more informed than when they came. Unless you're lucky and receive a response from a mentor or someone with visible background in script writing, the reviews don't amount to much, because very few enrollees seem to know what is going on enough to provide a meaty assessment. That is the fault of the course, I think, rather than my peers. Likewise, The grading system here is atrocious because of it; few people understand the foundation, and thusly don't know how to format or structure. So to then be graded on a purely pass or fail basis (that, looking through the forums, many students weren't even AWARE of until the first review grades rolled in) is ridiculous. And I am saying that as someone that scored 100% on both assignments that I did stay to complete, so this is not a case of sour grapes, but an observation of inefficiency. I understand that the class is based around "Active Learning", but for active learning to work and bear fruit, students should be able to engage with/analyze/synthesize/evaluate/build upon class content. Which necessitates actual, meaningful content. Content beyond my fellow confused peers, and 2 minute videos illustrating various ways of saying "Write Something Interesting and if it isn't Interesting, people won't care." Not exactly an astute observation that we couldn't glean anywhere but this course. Honestly, my 4th Edition copy of "The Screenwriters Bible" is five times more helpful than this course, and it is about six years out of date. | able to engage with/analyze/synthesize/evaluate/build upon class | Content | Which necessitates actual, meaningful content. Content | Positive | 0.7 | -0.5 | 0.76 | 0.91 |
| XZomz77LEeWn1ApTWZT9Yw | I should suggest my fellow Coursera students not to waste their money and time for this course. You'll learn a lot more than this course has to offer if you consult some websites with screenwriting tutorial blogs, read books and write on your own. I am a PhD student of theoretical film studies and and a fan of Coursera courses. I was eager to learn screenwriting as an interesting hands-on course. Well, it's project-based alright, but where's the real guidance?? This is a lazily designed course with poor content and almost zero guidance. The videos are very short and feels like a layman is trying to motivate you to write something, that's all. No methods explained other than some terminologies like bible, acts, outline being thrown at you. No examples, no comparisons, no detailed approaches. Lastly, scriptwriting has a significant difference with other humanities course. Being peer-reviewed doesn't help here -- a total novice can not effectively judge another newbie's work nor give them quality feedback. | a lazily designed course with poor | Content | and almost zero guidance. The videos | Negative | -0.7 | -1.0 | 0.76 | 0.91 |
| XZomz77LEeWn1ApTWZT9Yw | I loved the course and content, but, found the process cumbersome. I think that some of these issues have now been addressed and should not present a problem in future programs. | I loved the course and | Content | but, found the process cumbersome. I | Positive | 0.8 | 0.0 | 0.76 | 0.91 |
| X_ZG4rVzEeWq2A7HIftJ6w | Really enjoyed this course and I learned a lot. The content is interesting, engaging and informative. I now feel confident to get started on the graphic novel I've had in mind for some time, as well as starting a webcomic archive. I would recommend this course to anyone remotely interested in making comics. It's a great kick starter! Only reason I haven't given 5 stars is I was expecting it to be more compatible with digital methods of creating art. The course is structured to use hard copy printing and actual pens/pencils/inks, whereas I use a Wacom tablet and pen with Sketchbook Pro. So I had some fiddling around to do to access the course materials in a format that was useful to me. Also, the final week instructions seemed to be directed at a class putting their comics together in a compendium for the final print. I found it a bit confusing. | and I learned a lot. The | Content | is interesting, engaging and informative. I | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.86 | 0.86 |
| X_ZG4rVzEeWq2A7HIftJ6w | I had high expectations of this course, but must admit I'm pretty disappointed. Navigating the course feels unintuitive and clunky. Not sure if that's just a Coursera thing though. The actual content (video) looks great, but is unfortunately exceedingly brief, so much so, that it feels like this entire course could have just been a single article. In fact, there's not much presented that really benefits from the video format. Most 'instruction' in the course is centered around brief talks, or artist interviews, and thus you're often just looking at two people talking, or an artist showing you their work while they talk. You never even see anyone draw to my recollection. The 'work' in the course feels rather 'phoned in' at times too. Questions such as "What did you find interesting about the video you just watched?" seem unnecessary, and too elementary to contain any real value, especially when the videos are so brief. Having said all that, I DO think the people who made it are genuine, and have passion for comics, and comics education, and I'll continue to follow their efforts on that front. | a Coursera thing though. The actual | Content | (video) looks great, but is unfortunately | Negative | -0.7 | -0.5 | 0.86 | 0.86 |
| Y1sD7WReEeSPwSIACy-XPg | Absolutely brilliant course, excellent content. Only problem is that it is impossible to get help if you need support. | Absolutely brilliant course, excellent | Content | Only problem is that it is | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.56 | 0.82 |
| Y1sD7WReEeSPwSIACy-XPg | I love the scale-up part of the course. It gives me a great insight of upscaling of solar cells. But in general, the course is lack of content in depth. I would prefer a more hard core course with detailed explanation of the working mechanism of solar cells. | general, the course is lack of | Content | in depth. I would prefer a | Negative | -0.7 | 0.0 | 0.56 | 0.82 |
| Y1sD7WReEeSPwSIACy-XPg | I would give this course a five based on the content it provides, but it lacks in three key areas. First, no forums, really? This is how we learn when we have NO instructor or TA support. They also lack workable calculations. Second, there was a GLARING error in a quiz that no one caught, showing a near complete lack of understanding of energy conversion. Third, the quiz engine has had a number of errors in the calculations. specifically in formula formatting. These are advanced systems that clearly need more testing. But all in all, this is GREAT content if you want to learn about organic (polymer OPV) solar cells. | course a five based on the | Content | it provides, but it lacks in | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.56 | 0.82 |
| Y1sD7WReEeSPwSIACy-XPg | I would give this course a five based on the content it provides, but it lacks in three key areas. First, no forums, really? This is how we learn when we have NO instructor or TA support. They also lack workable calculations. Second, there was a GLARING error in a quiz that no one caught, showing a near complete lack of understanding of energy conversion. Third, the quiz engine has had a number of errors in the calculations. specifically in formula formatting. These are advanced systems that clearly need more testing. But all in all, this is GREAT content if you want to learn about organic (polymer OPV) solar cells. | all in all, this is GREAT | Content | if you want to learn about | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.56 | 0.82 |
| YcfRNRoCEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | I didn't like the way contents were organized. It was too much information in a very short time. | I didn't like the way | Content | were organized. It was too much | Negative | -0.7 | 0.0 | 1.01 | 1.06 |
| YcfRNRoCEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Superb breadth of the content. | Superb breadth of the | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 1.01 | 1.06 |
| YcfRNRoCEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Interesting topic, however I quitted. Video lectures were recorded almost phrase by phrase, making it too hard to follow the contents properly | it too hard to follow the | Content | properly | Negative | -0.7 | -1.0 | 1.01 | 1.06 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Course content is good, however instructions for the assignments are not complete. Often, instructions for the assignments that are required in the grading criteria are buried in the discussion forums, sometimes in multiple threads. And the method of grading is also only explained in the discussion forum. This can lead to the peer review grades being difficult to assign. The assignment pages should be updated to properly include ALL requirements and an explanation of how to grade the assignment. | Course | Content | is good, however instructions for the | Positive | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.61 | 1.1 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | I don't recommend this class. Jogesh K. Muppala has very labored English and his pace and verbosity make the lectures hard to get through. I've turned in around 10 assignments and have yet to get a grade on anything. The course content is poorly organized and executed. Peer grading is just dumb (and clearly doesn't work, since I have yet to get a single assignment back). When you turn in assignment files, they cannot be opened (and we found out from an apparent student how to get past the technical issues). Questions about the class and submitting assignments went unanswered. My advice, save your money and don't take this class. | a grade on anything. The course | Content | is poorly organized and executed. Peer | Negative | -0.6 | -1.0 | 0.61 | 1.1 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Excellent for absolute beginners! But, if you have good experience in CSS & JavaScript you might play it at 1.5X, it is too informative to be attended by someone who knows even a little, it might be boring, then. Generally, the course is very informative, rich, instructions based and have very good exercises covering all the course content with a good-as-a-start hands on experience. | good exercises covering all the course | Content | with a good-as-a-start hands on experience. | Positive | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.61 | 1.1 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Great course , great teaching style and content :) Loved the course. | course , great teaching style and | Content | :) Loved the course. | Positive | 0.9 | 1.0 | 0.61 | 1.1 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Wonderful course, well designed content, exercise and assignment. Only that difficulties of the assignment could be improved so as to ensure bette learning. We want more challenge! lol | Wonderful course, well designed | Content | exercise and assignment. Only that difficulties | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.61 | 1.1 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Excellent course. Well taught by Prof. Muppala. Instructor has covered all key points of Bootstrap. Towards the end, he is appropriately introduced node.js and bower. His restaurant example is very appropriate for the course contents and builds continuity through out the course. | is very appropriate for the course | Content | and builds continuity through out the | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.61 | 1.1 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Excelent course. The teacher is amazing and the course content is great!!! | teacher is amazing and the course | Content | is great! ! ! | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.61 | 1.1 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Excellent instructor. Good content, and very good explanations. Very good additional resources. | Excellent instructor. Good | Content | and very good explanations. Very good | Positive | 0.9 | 1.0 | 0.61 | 1.1 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good Course ,Good content for Bootstrap. | Good Course , Good | Content | for Bootstrap. | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.61 | 1.1 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | A large portion of the course is just copy and pasting code that is provided to you. While the code that is pasted is explained, and a lot of content is covered as a result of not having to write it, I feel my overall retention is much lower than in other courses. | is explained, and a lot of | Content | is covered as a result of | Negative | -0.6 | -0.5 | 0.61 | 1.1 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Excellent contents!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! | Excellent | Content | ! ! ! ! ! ! | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.61 | 1.1 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | First, the assignments always had poor instructions. It wasn't until grading time you would find out what the criteria are. (After your assignment is submitted) Secondly, there was no documentation/help for the fact the Windows needs a webserver to run content in this section. (Many versions of Windows can't do this) Discovered/resolved over many hours, when course content would not work. The actual course content was sparse/not much to it other than "Bootstrap bootstrap bootstrap." After how good the first course was/how much ground it covered, this course was frustrating, poorly documented, and a disappointment. | would not work. The actual course | Content | was sparse/not much to it other | Negative | -0.7 | -1.0 | 0.61 | 1.1 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | This course content is very good! but i got stuck sometimes because some program installation is very annoying(ex... bower...). | This course | Content | is very good! but i got | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.61 | 1.1 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Really nice content. Great teacher | Really nice | Content | Great teacher | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.61 | 1.1 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good content, and covered a lot in a short span of time | Good | Content | and covered a lot in a | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.61 | 1.1 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | I concur with others of a similar opinion on this course: Assignment instructions/criteria differ from the grading rubric criteria. Assignments mostly copy and paste. Referring people to the Bootstrap docs as reference defeats the purpose of an instructor. Many of the assignments required you to do things against best practices, like inserting inline styles to make your element look like the instructor's screenshot of his page. The last week's content seemed to be a slapdash mix of bits and pieces, and trying to inform people about Node modules via solving a quadratic equation seemed really strange. How about an example from the real world, like even an e-commerce application? (In the comments on this, the instructor said there wasn't time in this course to explain Node modules, but that he provided a "clearer" example in the Node.js course. Hunh? Why wouldn't you do a simpler example in the drive-by assignment?) Instructor consistently mispronounced words that are CENTRAL to the field, which just seemed weird and made me question his credibility. This might sound petty, but kuh-rooze-zel for the word Carousel? It would be like a fashion designer mis pronouncing tulle as tull-ee or bias as bye-ez. Just not impressed. I am glad my employer paid the tuition and not me. The only positive was it enforced a schedule and structure for me to try my hand at Bootstrap. I had already worked with Foundation. | of his page. The last week's | Content | seemed to be a slapdash mix | Negative | -0.7 | -0.5 | 0.61 | 1.1 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Course content is good and it is well structured. Instructor is also quite knowledge and explains the concepts well. Definitely recommended. | Course | Content | is good and it is well | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.61 | 1.1 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | I'm feeling great doing this specialization. Thank you by the valuable content. | specialization. Thank you by the valuable | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.61 | 1.1 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Great way to get started with Bootstrap's functionality and gives you a way to go past the short but important course content and figuring things out by yourself. | past the short but important course | Content | and figuring things out by yourself. | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.61 | 1.1 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Excellent content describing bootstrap | Excellent | Content | describing bootstrap | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.61 | 1.1 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Awesome Course. One of the best courses , i have been part of on coursera. well paced, very rich in content, very good delivery of the ideas,. Assignments very good. A value for time i just wish practice quiz to have more number of question, and more challenging. A VERY SPECIAL THANKS TO JOGESH. THANKS A LOT | coursera. well paced, very rich in | Content | very good delivery of the ideas, | Positive | 0.9 | 0.5 | 0.61 | 1.1 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Great professor, content and learn experience! I recommend it to everyone who is interested in the topic! | Great professor, | Content | and learn experience! I recommend it | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.61 | 1.1 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Excellent tutor, excellent contents in notes. In one word "Outstanding" | Excellent tutor, excellent | Content | in notes. In one word " | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.61 | 1.1 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Easy to learn, great contents | Easy to learn, great | Content | | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.61 | 1.1 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | The explanation with examples is pretty clear to understand. Course contents are perfect. | is pretty clear to understand. Course | Content | are perfect. | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.61 | 1.1 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | An excellent course about bootstrap with excellent content videos and exercises | excellent course about bootstrap with excellent | Content | videos and exercises | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.61 | 1.1 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | A good course, content are a little bit too much in 4 weeks study. Exercises and assignment are easy. | A good course, | Content | are a little bit too much | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.61 | 1.1 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Course was amazing , Moreover the professor knows how to deliver the content and make it simple and easy. Good part it starts from scratch to build a web with bootstrap. | professor knows how to deliver the | Content | and make it simple and easy. | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.61 | 1.1 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very good content, lots of exercises to get familiar, very good professor. | Very good | Content | lots of exercises to get familiar, | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.61 | 1.1 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | This course is a requisite for anyone wanting to learn and apply frameworks for client side web development. What takes this course to 5-stars is the instructor, Jogesh Muppala. Aside from his humour, he prepares the content of this course in such an unambiguous and clear format that I think the material would be enjoyed by even the most diehard non-techy. There is a wide assortment of Coursera experiences but I would say that this should be the type other instructors aspire to duplicate. | from his humour, he prepares the | Content | of this course in such an | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.61 | 1.1 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | the course contents are great and understandable but I have a problem with the lake of details information the instructor sometimes forget to provide.. | the course | Content | are great and understandable but I | Positive | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.61 | 1.1 |
| YfjiOHROEeWLqw7zlLhRzQ | Content runs a bit fast but good course for stat inference with R focus. | | Content | runs a bit fast but good | Positive | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.76 | 0.8 |
| YfjiOHROEeWLqw7zlLhRzQ | An Excellently conceived course with good content and a competitively efficient evaluation components viz., assignments and quizzes. | An Excellently conceived course with good | Content | and a competitively efficient evaluation components | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.76 | 0.8 |
| YfjiOHROEeWLqw7zlLhRzQ | Content covered in this course was hard to learn, both because it was pitched at a level that realistically was more akin to a wrap up of content already covered (when in fact it was all new content) and because the instructor, Brian Caffo, has not a style that was conducive to teaching. The instructor often would launch into a topic, and then speed through a calculation with basically no explanation. In terms of time, this was one of the most intensive courses in the specialisation, and I'd recommend taking this course alone (not concurrently with other courses) for that very reason. | akin to a wrap up of | Content | already covered (when in fact it | Negative | -0.6 | -1.0 | 0.76 | 0.8 |
| YfjiOHROEeWLqw7zlLhRzQ | At times the content can be confusing. Some points are clearly explained. "Data Analysys Tools" course is a good complement in order to understand the subject. | At times the | Content | can be confusing. Some points are | Negative | -0.6 | 0.0 | 0.76 | 0.8 |
| YfjiOHROEeWLqw7zlLhRzQ | This course goes on a very fast pace and simply does not have the charm of all the other courses in the specialization. I understand that a lot of content is covered within a month, but there should be supplementary course material available. Moreover, TAs should be more active on the forums. I have seen most of the questions just being discussed among the students. A little disappointed. Will probably have to watch all the material again to have confidence with it. | I understand that a lot of | Content | is covered within a month, but | Negative | -0.7 | 0.0 | 0.76 | 0.8 |
| YfjiOHROEeWLqw7zlLhRzQ | This is a great course taught by a clever teacher but... The content is presented in a very dry, not easy to grasp, manner. In several cases, I had to use external sources to understand the content and/or derive it by myself. When I finally understood the content I couldn't understand why it is presented in such a cryptic manner when the concepts are rather simple to grasp and the math not so advanced. Professor Caffo is a good communicator in some occasion (the module on Power for example was incredibly well communicated). But most of the time he just throw us some result without properly setting the context and concepts, as if it was understood that we already know most of what he is talking about. (Not the case!) I plan to make a document that follows the course module and fill in the missing piece of contextual information, derivations and concepts. But this takes a lot of time. If/when it will be completed, I will try to find a way to share it with future generation of students. Because, honestly, the content of this course is not so hard and shouldn't be! | clever teacher but. . . The | Content | is presented in a very dry, | Positive | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.76 | 0.8 |
| YfjiOHROEeWLqw7zlLhRzQ | This is a great course taught by a clever teacher but... The content is presented in a very dry, not easy to grasp, manner. In several cases, I had to use external sources to understand the content and/or derive it by myself. When I finally understood the content I couldn't understand why it is presented in such a cryptic manner when the concepts are rather simple to grasp and the math not so advanced. Professor Caffo is a good communicator in some occasion (the module on Power for example was incredibly well communicated). But most of the time he just throw us some result without properly setting the context and concepts, as if it was understood that we already know most of what he is talking about. (Not the case!) I plan to make a document that follows the course module and fill in the missing piece of contextual information, derivations and concepts. But this takes a lot of time. If/when it will be completed, I will try to find a way to share it with future generation of students. Because, honestly, the content of this course is not so hard and shouldn't be! | myself. When I finally understood the | Content | I couldn't understand why it is | Negative | -0.8 | 0.0 | 0.76 | 0.8 |
| YfjiOHROEeWLqw7zlLhRzQ | This is a great course taught by a clever teacher but... The content is presented in a very dry, not easy to grasp, manner. In several cases, I had to use external sources to understand the content and/or derive it by myself. When I finally understood the content I couldn't understand why it is presented in such a cryptic manner when the concepts are rather simple to grasp and the math not so advanced. Professor Caffo is a good communicator in some occasion (the module on Power for example was incredibly well communicated). But most of the time he just throw us some result without properly setting the context and concepts, as if it was understood that we already know most of what he is talking about. (Not the case!) I plan to make a document that follows the course module and fill in the missing piece of contextual information, derivations and concepts. But this takes a lot of time. If/when it will be completed, I will try to find a way to share it with future generation of students. Because, honestly, the content of this course is not so hard and shouldn't be! | generation of students. Because, honestly, the | Content | of this course is not so | Negative | -0.7 | 0.0 | 0.76 | 0.8 |
| yFZxWd8aEeWDLBKS83bB7Q | The content of the course has been well-organized and could be easily understood by a non-English speaker. | The | Content | of the course has been well-organized | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.68 | 1.09 |
| yFZxWd8aEeWDLBKS83bB7Q | The course is great! I loved! The contents are in line with the current reality of Journalism. Congrats to the teachers and the Pennsylvania University. :) | course is great! I loved! The | Content | are in line with the current | Positive | 0.9 | 1.0 | 0.68 | 1.09 |
| yFZxWd8aEeWDLBKS83bB7Q | Well, I enjoyed very much taking part of this course. In my opinion the contents were just grate and according to my English level. Nevertheless, what I would like to have is the amount of hours dedicated to the course writen on the certificate. For this reazon, in my case, this will be my first but also my last of the on-line courses through coursera. Greetings, MSc. Petronio A. Piedra. | this course. In my opinion the | Content | were just grate and according to | Negative | -0.7 | 0.5 | 0.68 | 1.09 |
| yj814XQ_EeWIfhKr_WcYsQ | We've got some extreme quality content here, as always when Philip J Curry is involved. The new student that presents most of the videos has great educational skills. | We've got some extreme quality | Content | here, as always when Philip J | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.82 | 0.97 |
| yj814XQ_EeWIfhKr_WcYsQ | Great content, new cladistic information aviable, super staff! | Great | Content | new cladistic information aviable, super staff! | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.82 | 0.97 |
| yj814XQ_EeWIfhKr_WcYsQ | The course has incredible content, but you are required to read quite a bit of information via lengthy pdfs prior to the videos. This is not my learning style so I found it challenging. As a Naturalist and bird lover, I was eager to take the course and glad that I did. | The course has incredible | Content | but you are required to read | Positive | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.82 | 0.97 |
| yj814XQ_EeWIfhKr_WcYsQ | Interesting subject, but not much content and assessments are way too short. More variety in assignments would be nice too. | Interesting subject, but not much | Content | and assessments are way too short. | Negative | -0.7 | -0.5 | 0.82 | 0.97 |
| yO13mkySEeW_MgoxMAgbMQ | It is a good introductory course, but I think it should go deeper each week content. Being slightly more technical. I recommend this course. | it should go deeper each week | Content | Being slightly more technical. I recommend | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.83 | 1.02 |
| yO13mkySEeW_MgoxMAgbMQ | repeat of the same material and content in multiple videos, the videos were sourced from too many different places leading to 1) decrease of consistent quality and 2) non sequential / logical teaching (each video does not clearly lead to or build on the next one) | repeat of the same material and | Content | in multiple videos, the videos were | Negative | -0.6 | 0.0 | 0.83 | 1.02 |
| yO13mkySEeW_MgoxMAgbMQ | Excellent content and professors!! | Excellent | Content | and professors! ! | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.83 | 1.02 |
| yO13mkySEeW_MgoxMAgbMQ | Excellent content, explanatory talks and with many examples that made easier understanding. | Excellent | Content | explanatory talks and with many examples | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.83 | 1.02 |
| yO13mkySEeW_MgoxMAgbMQ | Could be even more details and demanding in terms of content, overall it is a good introduction to the topic | details and demanding in terms of | Content | overall it is a good introduction | Positive | 0.8 | 0.0 | 0.83 | 1.02 |
| yO13mkySEeW_MgoxMAgbMQ | This course is very easy, but the content is excellent and engaging. The assignment really makes you reflect about what is your city making for sustainability and also is inspiring to know what other cities around the world are doing for it. It should be part of our continuous education in sustainability. | course is very easy, but the | Content | is excellent and engaging. The assignment | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.83 | 1.02 |
| yO13mkySEeW_MgoxMAgbMQ | I was somewhat disappointed with the content of this course. It seems shallow and disintegrated to me. Its difficult to say that this course provides some practical knowledge. | I was somewhat disappointed with the | Content | of this course. It seems shallow | Negative | -0.6 | -1.0 | 0.83 | 1.02 |
| YOH__fNOEeSbSyIACxeWxg | Excellent content, well explained. The flash lessons could be slightly better structured. | Excellent | Content | well explained. The flash lessons could | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 1.02 |
| YOH__fNOEeSbSyIACxeWxg | I did all four courses - the whole specialization. Each course in itself was aright and I learned new things. However, the course certificate is meaningless. It neither states the content nor the effort (for example the hours). Instead, it even says "non-credit course". This is despite the fact that the course equates "35 PDU's" and "counts towards the UCI Project Management Certificate Programm"; as it was described in the FAQ. I feel betrayed. How can I apply with such a meaningless peace of paper anywhere? | is meaningless. It neither states the | Content | nor the effort (for example the | Negative | -0.7 | -1.0 | 0.8 | 1.02 |
| YOH__fNOEeSbSyIACxeWxg | Very good course contents, easy to follow | Very good course | Content | easy to follow | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 1.02 |
| YOH__fNOEeSbSyIACxeWxg | The course contents is delivered in a very easy to understand manner. | The course | Content | is delivered in a very easy | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 1.02 |
| YOH__fNOEeSbSyIACxeWxg | It has not enough content, you can just read the chapters 5 to 7 of PMBOK, and its the textbook that you'll use in this course. | It has not enough | Content | you can just read the chapters | Negative | -0.6 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 1.02 |
| YOH__fNOEeSbSyIACxeWxg | Excellent content of the course | Excellent | Content | of the course | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 1.02 |
| YOH__fNOEeSbSyIACxeWxg | Great Content. | Great | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 1.02 |
| YOH__fNOEeSbSyIACxeWxg | It is better to merge the content of all 3 courses in one... very less content | It is better to merge the | Content | of all 3 courses in one. | Positive | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 1.02 |
| yVldYUd5EeWb5ArkqfgJBw | Good course, but I expected something a little more detailed and to last a little longer. The videos were good, but w little long for the amount of content that they contained. For instance, a few videos could be compressed to the size of one video and still contain the relevant content. | little long for the amount of | Content | that they contained. For instance, a | Negative | -0.6 | 0.5 | 0.72 | 0.74 |
| yVldYUd5EeWb5ArkqfgJBw | Good course, but I expected something a little more detailed and to last a little longer. The videos were good, but w little long for the amount of content that they contained. For instance, a few videos could be compressed to the size of one video and still contain the relevant content. | video and still contain the relevant | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.72 | 0.74 |
| yVldYUd5EeWb5ArkqfgJBw | Great content, and I really like Prof. Harris' way of explaining things. | Great | Content | and I really like Prof. Harris' | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.72 | 0.74 |
| yVldYUd5EeWb5ArkqfgJBw | Good lecture and content. However, disappointing that even when I audit the course, I cannot take the exams. This is contrary to most of the other Coursera courses where you can. If you cannot afford to participate you have limited access to the testing material. I'm not impressed. | Good lecture and | Content | However, disappointing that even when I | Negative | -0.6 | -0.5 | 0.72 | 0.74 |
| yVldYUd5EeWb5ArkqfgJBw | A little light on content. Expected more interaction with features of the board. | A little light on | Content | Expected more interaction with features of | Positive | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.72 | 0.74 |
| yVldYUd5EeWb5ArkqfgJBw | Content was far too basic in my opinion. | | Content | was far too basic in my | Negative | -0.7 | 0.0 | 0.72 | 0.74 |
| yVldYUd5EeWb5ArkqfgJBw | Mr. Harris is great! A lot of course content could be as a prerequisite. For example, basic control structures of the python could been left out, just having a reference to material describing them. I hope following course will focus more on Raspberry Pi specifics. | is great! A lot of course | Content | could be as a prerequisite. For | Positive | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.72 | 0.74 |
| Z7-ViyT-EeW5pgpJEN0S6w | Great course but for the amount of content provided and how much was taught this course is certainly overpriced...still a good introductory course, teaching very basic stuff. | course but for the amount of | Content | provided and how much was taught | Positive | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.65 | 0.67 |
| Z7-ViyT-EeW5pgpJEN0S6w | I am in the middle of the course and will continue till the end. The course does show an easy way how to develop a platformer with Unity3D. It covers a lot of subjects, although I have a feeling that I will need to read about Unity again later. Anyhow, it is too fast and the instructor does not really emphasize on important points. Sometimes he also fails to provide proper explanation of some important parameters. Also, the course is tutorial-oriented but it goes so fast I could not really follow the instructions. So, I ended up watching the classes through and do the tutorial later. But as I said, because the instructions are super-quick, I had to watch them again many times while trying to do the workshop. Maybe this is how it should be but I still feel that it could be a little slower and let be breath a little while trying to digest the content so that I can redo the work by my own after finishing the class. | little while trying to digest the | Content | so that I can redo the | Negative | -0.6 | 0.5 | 0.65 | 0.67 |
| zKZY59dlEeSQOCIAC0ELFw | The first two sections, in particular, offer a lot of value and content for people thinking about starting a business. The latter lessons are a bit less "mind blowing" but they still offer value and can serve as good reminders to those who already know the basics of business. | offer a lot of value and | Content | for people thinking about starting a | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 1.03 | 1.05 |
| zKZY59dlEeSQOCIAC0ELFw | Disappointing, not different from a class presentation, poor in content, lousy instructor | from a class presentation, poor in | Content | lousy instructor | Negative | -0.8 | -0.5 | 1.03 | 1.05 |
| zn0YnhqsEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | GREAT COURSE! GREAT CONTENT AND EXCELLENT PROFESSOR. 100% RECOMMEND | GREAT COURSE! GREAT | Content | AND EXCELLENT PROFESSOR. 100% RECOMMEND | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.34 | 1.17 |
| zn0YnhqsEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | It's a fantastic lecture. The content is clear and succinct. The lecturer is good at teaching the complex in a simply way. | It's a fantastic lecture. The | Content | is clear and succinct. The lecturer | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.34 | 1.17 |
| zn0YnhqsEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | The content of this course is very good to cover some greatest thinkers in human history. It is important to know them and their thoughts to understand the society and oneself. One thing could be improved is the exercises. They're repeative and fail to inspire me. | The | Content | of this course is very good | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.34 | 1.17 |
| zn0YnhqsEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Great course taught by an even better teacher! The content is very rich and rewarding and it is explai | by an even better teacher! The | Content | is very rich and rewarding and | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.34 | 1.17 |
| zn0YnhqsEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Amazing teacher. He has the clarity and simplicity. Lectures are sufficient enough to grasp the essence of the content. People may feel that it is easy to pass this course. I must admit that I was pursuing this course not for a grade but for understanding. I got it. Thanks to the course teacher. I completed other mooc courses in edx and other platforms.I competed a few. I going through two other mooc from coursera. I had a mixed feeling after attending other two courses from university of Amsterdam. But this course is the best mooc I have so far completed. I was so immersed in the teaching. I completed the course in five days. I am eagerly waiting for the MOOC on Modern sociological theories. There is some element of Eurocentric Focus. But we cannot expect everything one Mooc course. | to grasp the essence of the | Content | People may feel that it is | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.34 | 1.17 |
| zn0YnhqsEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Excellent course. Very well and entertainingly presented. Very clear and informative content. Would love to it extended as a Part 2 to cover the more 'modern' Sociologists. | entertainingly presented. Very clear and informative | Content | Would love to it extended as | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.34 | 1.17 |
| zn0YnhqsEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Excelent contents, it is exactly the same that I learnt at University of El Salvador | Excelent | Content | it is exactly the same that | Negative | -0.6 | 1.0 | 0.34 | 1.17 |
| zn0YnhqsEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Great course. Fresh and competent view of classic sociology. Weekly content is well balanced and the readings are very insightful. This course offers valuable insights about the sociology foundations that are still important today for evaluating social interaction. Thumbs up for a quality MOOC! | competent view of classic sociology. Weekly | Content | is well balanced and the readings | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.34 | 1.17 |
| ZNeGqEC2EeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Great content, very useful and practical (applicable to nearly everything you ork with) and presented in a very interesting way. The Graphics are genious | Great | Content | very useful and practical (applicable to | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 1.17 |
| ZNeGqEC2EeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | The supervisor and the content is extremely good. | The supervisor and the | Content | is extremely good. | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 1.17 |
| ZNeGqEC2EeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | great intro class to statistics. Love the animation, teaching style and R lab exercises. The first class in coursera that video content and quiz are relevant. Highly recommended!!! | first class in coursera that video | Content | and quiz are relevant. Highly recommended! | Positive | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 1.17 |
| ZNeGqEC2EeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | It is really helpful to get an idea for statisctics. Examples, quizzes, assignments as well as R lab designed on according to content of class. There is no suprise. | R lab designed on according to | Content | of class. There is no suprise. | Negative | -0.7 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 1.17 |
| ZNeGqEC2EeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | It's an excellent course. All the content is simple and easy to follow. Congratulations for such a great didactic. | It's an excellent course. All the | Content | is simple and easy to follow. | Positive | 0.9 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 1.17 |
| ZNeGqEC2EeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | This is a nice course...thanks for providing such a great content from University of Amserdam. Please allow us to complete the course as I have to wait till the session starts for week 2 lessions. | thanks for providing such a great | Content | from University of Amserdam. Please allow | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 1.17 |
| ZNeGqEC2EeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Very helpful in understanding foundation of stats or Theory of Probability. All tutors were very effective in delivery of content even if you do not know stats. | were very effective in delivery of | Content | even if you do not know | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 1.17 |
| ZNeGqEC2EeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | In my opinion this course is a good way to learn basic statistics. I do think the R part and the statistics part could be more integrated in order to learn R better and to use it more efficiently. For me the studytime was double the time that was stated even though I was already familiar with some of the concepts and calculations. I feel like some weeks the subjects should have gotten a little more explanation with video's or other supportive material, maybe some assigments to make in order to check wether you know and understand the material. Maybe you could compare content and way of teaching to the Duke University statistics course, this is not a better course per se but does do some things differently whilst both teaching stats and R. | the material. Maybe you could compare | Content | and way of teaching to the | Negative | -0.6 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 1.17 |
| ZNeGqEC2EeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Great course, innovative design, great content and Organization. Great teachers and didactic. . | Great course, innovative design, great | Content | and Organization. Great teachers and didactic. | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 1.17 |
| zs3YSHQ6EeWrAxJQXw-8PQ | Awesome Instructor. Amazing content and materials. Needed support on the final project. | Awesome Instructor. Amazing | Content | and materials. Needed support on the | Positive | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.74 | 0.93 |
| zs3YSHQ6EeWrAxJQXw-8PQ | An excellent course. Well paced, comprehensive, delivers on many of the promises that the specialisation makes. My ranking above relates to course content and lecturer (who actively participates in the discussion forums). I do however have great disdain for Coursera's downright abysmal handling of course rescheduling that saw it magically reappear after being cancelled and announced to enrolled students only two days before assessed content was due. Numerous student concerns were subsequently brushed off by support staff. Highly unprofessional. | students only two days before assessed | Content | was due. Numerous student concerns were | Negative | -0.6 | 1.0 | 0.74 | 0.93 |
| zSmzLR5LEeS6wiIACzGPEQ | Elementary content, unfortunately. | Elementary | Content | unfortunately. | Negative | -0.6 | -1.0 | 1.0 | 1.09 |
| zSmzLR5LEeS6wiIACzGPEQ | The course is extremelly good!To point out,the information is necessary in real life,in real life content! | in real life, in real life | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.09 |
| zSmzLR5LEeS6wiIACzGPEQ | The content shown in the video lectures is a very nice overview of the subject but it feels somehow superficial, some more depth would be really appreciated. | The | Content | shown in the video lectures is | Negative | -0.6 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 1.09 |
| zSmzLR5LEeS6wiIACzGPEQ | Great contents | Great | Content | | Positive | 0.7 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.09 |
| _UsmIV-PEeSnpyIACzWBsQ | Very succinct and interesting content. Though provoking quiz | Very succinct and interesting | Content | Though provoking quiz | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.66 | 1.0 |
| _UsmIV-PEeSnpyIACzWBsQ | The course content is really good. However, in the last module, some sentence restructuring would be appreciated. | The course | Content | is really good. However, in the | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.66 | 1.0 |
| _UsmIV-PEeSnpyIACzWBsQ | I enjoyed a lot the course. Every Brazilian is a soccer coach and an economist, so I was very confortable with the topics and most of the content was more or less known, indeed. The best is that it does not seem to follow excessively on a ideological line. It seems to be open minded. I think it is great! Its excessive focus on industrialized countries is understandable. I think the last module about developing world seems too simplistic. I also think that opinions about american positions in the economic arena and happenings is somehow benevolent. I expected a more mathematical approach, but I see that it may not make sense since it is a introductiory course. I have not liked the exams, though, specially the final exam. They are much more about memorizing than deep understanding. | the topics and most of the | Content | was more or less known, indeed. | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.66 | 1.0 |
| _UsmIV-PEeSnpyIACzWBsQ | Good guide of Macroeconomics, but there are some sensitive contents for learners of China in the last few weeks. | Macroeconomics, but there are some sensitive | Content | for learners of China in the | Positive | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.66 | 1.0 |
| _UsmIV-PEeSnpyIACzWBsQ | Very fruitful contents, and Professor explains everything with the good examples, so it was really easy to understand. I am thinking to enroll the MicroEcon course of him, too! | Very fruitful | Content | and Professor explains everything with the | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.66 | 1.0 |
| _UsmIV-PEeSnpyIACzWBsQ | Too much contents in short lectures. Hard to catch up and to understand. The tests after each class are poorly designed. Most correct answers are the first choices. | Too much | Content | in short lectures. Hard to catch | Negative | -0.8 | -0.5 | 0.66 | 1.0 |
| _UsmIV-PEeSnpyIACzWBsQ | Before joining this course on Coursera, I had a little knowledge of economics. This course helped me to conceptualize the basics of macroeconomics. Now I am able to correlate the business environment or decisions to my job, salary hikes & other factors. Thanks to Faculty members from University of California, Irvine to provide such valuable & informative course content. | provide such valuable & informative course | Content | | Positive | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.66 | 1.0 |
| _UsmIV-PEeSnpyIACzWBsQ | The videos and content were engaging. | The videos and | Content | were engaging. | Positive | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.66 | 1.0 |
| _UsmIV-PEeSnpyIACzWBsQ | One of the best courses around in Coursera, with intensive contents and quizzes. At the end of these two courses (I took the Microeconomics as well), I totally grasped the fact that "economics is not something to memorize, but to conceptualize"!! | courses around in Coursera, with intensive | Content | and quizzes. At the end of | Negative | -0.6 | 1.0 | 0.66 | 1.0 |
| _UsmIV-PEeSnpyIACzWBsQ | I took a CLEP macroeconomics exam solely based on the contents of this course, and I scored 74/80. Because of it, I did not have to take a macroeconomics course in the college and also learned everything I would have learned in the college course. | macroeconomics exam solely based on the | Content | of this course, and I scored | Negative | -0.6 | 1.0 | 0.66 | 1.0 |